Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:39:31.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re St Andrew, Sedbergh

Bradford Consistory Court: Walford Ch, July 2010 Cross – aesthetics – doctrinal objections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2010

Ruth Arlow
Affiliation:
Barrister, Deputy Chancellor of the Dioceses of Chichester and Norwich
Will Adam
Affiliation:
Vicar of St Paul, Winchmore Hill
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Case Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2011

The petitioners sought a faculty to hang an ebony and ivory cross above the pulpit. Seventeen of the twenty-two PCC members present had voted in favour of the proposal and four against. The DAC supported the petition. One of the PCC members who had voted against the proposal objected to the grant of a faculty on doctrinal and aesthetic grounds. No other objections had been raised. The chancellor did not consider it appropriate for him to seek to resolve sensitive and difficult doctrinal issues, nor to apply his own subjective aesthetic judgment. Having regard to the support of the DAC and the majority of the PCC, the chancellor held that the will of the majority should prevail and granted the faculty. [RA]