Introduction
Archaeological records contained within riverscapes can be compromised by their environmentally dynamic settings (Martinez Reference Martinez2011). Elevated landforms within floodplains may provide temporary respite from episodic flooding, although over the long term, even these settings risk being impacted by the ongoing migration of rivers. This relentless process acts to recycle riverine landscapes and has the potential to introduce bias into archaeological records, or erase them entirely (e.g. Goethals et al. Reference Goethals, De Dapper, Vermeulen, De Dapper, Vermeulen, Deprez and Taelman2009; Hassan Reference Hassan1997).
Like riverscapes the world over, the preservation of archaeological records along the river systems of Australia’s Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) has been similarly impacted (see Westell Reference Westell2022), although across the lower end of the drainage system, in South Australia (SA), the deeply incised nature of the Murray River mitigates the issue to some degree (Figure 1). Here, archaeological deposits located along the high bounding cliff-lines and valley slopes of the river can be elevated as much as 30–50 m above the active floodplain and well above even the most extreme flood events. Whilst these settings are not immune to erosion, recently published radiocarbon ages for Aboriginal shell middens located on a cliff-line overlooking the Pike River anabranch floodplain near Renmark (Figure 1), revealed a Pleistocene record extending as far back as ca. 29 cal ka (Westell et al. Reference Westell, Roberts, Morrison and Jacobsen2020:11). This included the oldest published age for an Aboriginal site on the Murray River in SA, to date. The Pike River cliff-line ages were also older when compared with ages returned on archaeological materials in the lower lying floodplains in the area, suggesting a differential preservation of archaeological records between these two settings.
Figure 1. Location of the newly dated archaeological sites at Tanamee and Pooginook Flat in relation to the southwestern MDB and other places mentioned in the text. The MDB boundary is shown as the dotted line in the top left inset. Also shown are the geomorphological divisions along the Murray River in SA (Valley, Upper and Lower Gorge) and Aboriginal “tribal” boundaries identified by Tindale (Reference Tindale1974).
Given this potential, this research aimed to conduct 14C dating at two additional archaeological complexes situated on the Murray River cliff-lines in SA to ascertain whether the Pleistocene ages from the Pike River cliffs could be replicated and to consider the possibility of geographic trends in a regional chronology. Specifically, the research aimed to shed further light on a critical period around the terminal Pleistocene, when Aboriginal lifeways on this river system appear to have undergone significant change (Balme and Hope Reference Balme and Hope1990; Clark and Hope Reference Clark and Hope1985; Garvey Reference Garvey2013; Hope Reference Hope1998; Kefous Reference Kefous1983; Prendergast et al. Reference Prendergast, Bowler, Cupper, Fairbairn, O’Connor and Marwick2009; Westell Reference Westell2022; Williams Reference Williams2013). Two cliff-top locations downstream of the Pike River were chosen for dating, both located within the Upper Gorge section of the Murray River corridor near Pooginook Flat and Tanamee (Figure 1). Shell middens recently surveyed in these locations displayed similar characteristics to the Pike River middens (see Marquez Reference Marquez2023; Westell et al. Reference Westell, Roberts, Moffat, Fairhead and Murray Aboriginal Corporation2023), i.e. containing lenses of shell composed almost exclusively of Alathyria jacksoni (Iredale Reference Iredale1934), the channel species of freshwater mussel, and displaying a carbonate patina. This research represents the first attempt to date Aboriginal archaeology in the Upper Gorge section of the Murray River and aims to contribute to a greater understanding of how this region, and the MDB more broadly, was peopled. This work was undertaken as a collaborative research project between archaeologists at Flinders University and the River Murray and Mallee Aboriginal Corporation (RMMAC).Footnote 1
Background
Cultural significance
The antecedents of RMMAC members belonged to Aboriginal groups whose traditional lands extended along the Murray River and into the adjoining, semi-arid mallee plains. These groups included the Nganguruku, Ngaiawang, Ngawait, Erawirung and Ngarkat, among others (Figure 1).Footnote 2 Every part of the Murray riverscape was, and remains, profoundly significant to the RMMAC community (e.g. Roberts et al. Reference Roberts, Duivenvoorde, Morrison, Moffat, Burke, Kowlessar and Naumann2017, Reference Roberts, Westell, Fairhead, Marquez, Murray and Aboriginal Corporation2023, Reference Roberts, Fairhead, Westell, Moffat, Kowlessar, Murray and Aboriginal Corporation2024) and the deep time chronologies established for archaeological sites along the Murray River are a source of immeasurable pride and connection for RMMAC members (Ward and Stephens Reference Ward and Stephens2020; Way Reference Way2020).
RMMAC ancestors provided significant cultural information about the Murray riverscape and the contemporary community honor these forebears for their roles as “knowledge carriers” (after Atalay Reference Atalay2020; Roberts et al. Reference Roberts, Westell, Fairhead, Marquez, Murray and Aboriginal Corporation2023). Cliffs feature in this cultural information—for example, the female ancestral being Nooreela reshaped the Murray River on her journeys, leaving behind the remnants of her meals, as evidenced by fossils in the Miocene cliffs and possibly also by the archaeological middens found in camping areas along the cliff-tops (Bellchambers Reference Bellchambers1931, 105; Roberts et al. Reference Roberts, Westell, Fairhead, Marquez, Murray and Aboriginal Corporation2023).
The high vantage points provided by the cliffs were used for communication via smoke signaling (Manning Reference Manning1990, 226), a means of conveying messages such as travel movements, the death of kin, and more (see Tindale Reference Tindale1974, 134). RMMAC Elder Jennifer Giles recalled how her family would look for the smoke from the fires of other families so that they could visit them when they travelled up and down the river in their boats (Interview 12 April 2023). The cliff-lines were also used in hunting strategies. Animals, such as kangaroos and emus, using the “natural sandy ramps” along the cliffs to access water would be “turned aside” and ambushed by Aboriginal people in the cul-de-sacs at the base of the cliffs (Tindale Reference Tindale1974, 65).
During periods of drought Ngarkat people from the semi-arid mallee plains to the east of the river were permitted to obtain water via defined paths from cliff-top areas (Tindale 1924–1991; Reference Tindale1974, 65, 134). These paths negotiated the cliff-face so as not to interfere with the “special hunting and trapping areas” that were owned by river people—such as the “natural sandy ramps” mentioned above (Tindale Reference Tindale1974, 65). Other well-established trackways also followed the cliff-tops and facilitated the movement of people between major residential centers (Burke et al. Reference Burke, Roberts, Morrison, Sullivan, Murray and Aboriginal Corporation2016). These tracks or “footpaths” were described by the early European explorer Charles Sturt (Reference Sturt1833) and were on such a scale that they were exploited by European stockmen (overlanding teams) who moved large numbers of stock through the region from the late 1830s (see also Browne in Finniss Reference Finniss1966; Burke et al. Reference Burke, Roberts, Morrison, Sullivan, Murray and Aboriginal Corporation2016; Woolmer Reference Woolmer1986).
A regional chronology
The MDB represents one of the more intensively studied regions in Australia in relation to Aboriginal archaeology with over 1000 published 14C ages reported from various sites across the basin (see for example Munack et al. Reference Munack, Emma, Saktura and Codlilean2023; Williams et al. Reference Williams, Ulm, Smith and Reid2014). The chronological evidence, albeit patchy, suggests that the earliest Aboriginal peopling of the basin had occurred by ca. 50 ka (Bowler et al. Reference Bowler, Johnston, Olley, Prescott, Roberts, Shawcross and Spooner2003; Cupper and Duncan Reference Cupper and Duncan2006) and that the initial phase of occupation had centered almost exclusively around large capacity lake systems to the north and south of the Murray River corridor, including the Willandra Lakes (Allen and Holdaway Reference Allen and Holdaway2009; Bowler et al. Reference Bowler, Johnston, Olley, Prescott, Roberts, Shawcross and Spooner2003; Fitzsimmons et al. Reference Fitzsimmons, Stern and Murray-Wallace2014; O’Connell and Allen Reference O’Connell and Allen2004), Menindee Lakes (Cupper and Duncan Reference Cupper and Duncan2006; Hope et al. Reference Hope, Dare-Edwards and McIntyre1983) and Lake Tyrell (Richards et al. Reference Richards, Pavlides, Walshe, Webber and Johnston2007) (see Figure 1). Shell middens dated to ca. 29 ka on the Murray River corridor at Lake Victoria in New South Wales (Abdulla et al. Reference Abdulla and Dillon2019) and at the Pike River floodplain in SA (Westell et al. Reference Westell, Roberts, Morrison and Jacobsen2020), represent the earliest evidence of Aboriginal life in the MDB beyond these lake systems.
The Pike River floodplain also currently defines the downstream limit of indisputable (see below) Pleistocene archaeology within the greater MDB. This floodplain is typical of a series of anabranch floodplains developed along the Murray River corridor between the SA border and Overland Corner (Figure 1). A 14C dating program was conducted by Westell et al. (Reference Westell, Roberts, Morrison and Jacobsen2020) and Westell (Reference Westell2022) within four archaeological sites (PikeAWE15_10, PikeSP16_01, 05 and 07) situated on the cliff line overlooking the southeastern corner of the Pike River floodplain. The sampling targeted exposures of Aboriginal shell midden contained within the mid Pleistocene–Holocene Woorinen Formation (Brown and Stephenson Reference Brown and Stephenson1991; Firman Reference Firman1972), a complex sequence of aeolian sediments that occur as sand sheets and linear dunes in this location (Figure 2). The 29 samples included a variety of shell species (A. jacksoni, Velesunio ambiguus and Notopala sublineata) (Iredale Reference Iredale1934, Reference Iredale1943) recovered from eroding sections along the rim of the cliff and in dune deflations 80–150 m from the cliff’s edge. All samples were located within units of unconsolidated sand that occurred stratigraphically above a major carbonate palaeosol. On the basis of a dune chronology established by Lomax et al. (Reference Lomax, Hilgers and Radtke2011, 731–734; see also Fitzsimmons et al. Reference Fitzsimmons, Cohen, Hesse, Jansen, Nanson, Jan-Hendrik, Barrows, Haberlah, Hilgers and Kelly2013) in the southwestern MDB, together with OSL dating conducted by Westell (Reference Westell2022, 204) at the Pike River, the palaeosol is likely to have formed within the period ca. 63–38 ka with the overlying sand deposited over multiple phases of dune (re)activation extending through the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) and Holocene.
Figure 2. The context of the Pike River cliff-top sites and an example of an eroding midden lens contained within Woorinen Formation sediments above a carbonate palaeosol (MR = Murray River).
A combination of AMS and conventional radiometric methods were applied to the 29 samples of shell following standard pre-treatments that included testing for calcite recrystallisation by staining with Fiegel’s solution (Friedman Reference Friedman1959); the test was negative for all samples. The reported Conventional Radiocarbon Ages (CRAs) were recalibrated by Westell (Reference Westell2022) using the SHCal20 atmospheric curve (Hogg et al. Reference Hogg, Heaton, Hua, Palmer, Turney, Southon, Bayliss, Blackwell, Boswijk and Ramsey2020) and OxCal v4.3.2 (Bronk-Ramsey Reference Bronk-Ramsey2009). Calibrated age-ranges were reported at 95.4% probability. No allowance was made in the dating for any reservoir effect based on the findings of Gillespie et al. (Reference Gillespie, Fink, Petchey and Jacobsen2009).
Two specimens of A. jacksoni recovered from a midden lens in site PikeAWE15_10 returned 14C ages of OZX288: 29,465–28,719 cal BP (2σ) and Wk-49723: 27,655–27,175 cal BP (2σ), representing the oldest published ages in the Pike River sampling. A subsequent gap in the chronology extended across the full breadth of the LGM to ca. 15 ka cal BP, at which point, extensive middens of A. jacksoni and N. sublineata appear to have developed along the cliff-line (Westell Reference Westell2022, 367; Westell et al. Reference Westell, Roberts, Morrison and Jacobsen2020). The timing and sheer scale of these middens is a phenomenon observed upstream of the Pike River floodplain at locations on both the Murray and Darling Rivers and appears to reflect a transformative period in Aboriginal lifeways within the MDB, post-LGM (Allen Reference Allen1972, 235–244; Balme Reference Balme1990, 187, Reference Balme1995; Coutts and Victoria Archaeological Survey Reference Coutts and Archaeological Survey1977; Garvey Reference Garvey2017; Hope Reference Hope1998; Johnston Reference Johnston1990; Kefous Reference Kefous1983; Lance Reference Lance1993; Luebbers Reference Luebbers1995; Prendergast et al. Reference Prendergast, Bowler, Cupper, Fairbairn, O’Connor and Marwick2009; Westell et al. Reference Westell, Roberts, Morrison and Jacobsen2020).
All 14C ages reported on archaeological materials downstream of the Pike River floodplain on the Murray River relate to Holocene Aboriginal lifeways, with two exceptions reported from sites at Roonka Flat and Roonka East Bank (Figure 1). For reasons detailed below, we consider the Pleistocene ages reported at these sites as contentiousFootnote 3 .
At Roonka Flat, Pretty (Reference Pretty and Wright1977, 297) obtained a 14C age of ANU-406: 18,050±340 BP (22.6–20.9 ka cal BP [2σ]) from a piece of charcoal associated with a possible hearth feature, however subsequent dating programs have consistently identified a Holocene chronology for this site (Littleton et al. Reference Littleton, Petchey, Walshe and Pate2017; Pate et al. Reference Pate, Pretty, Hunter, Tuniz and Lawson1998; Paton Reference Paton1983). The nature and context of the ‘hearth’ has also been disputed (see Paton Reference Paton1983, 46), and without further confirmation, we consider the ca. 18 ka BP age as contentious.
The Roonka East Bank site was initially identified as a scatter of stone artefacts exposed along the crest of a Woorinen Formation dune east of the deeply incised Murray gorge. Two trenches (EB1 and EB2) were excavated in the site between 1977 and 1982, revealing a series of stratified hearths and human burials (Paton Reference Paton1983; Prescott et al. Reference Prescott, Polach, Pretty and Smith1983; Pretty Reference Pretty and Wright1977; Robertson and Prescott Reference Robertson and Prescott2006). The initial 14C age ANU-1758: 11,290±1570 BP returned on feature F11 (a hearth) in EB1 was problematic with the sample weight described as “6% of optimum.” A weighted mean TL-derived age of ca. 2.3 ka was returned on samples of burnt calcrete associated with the feature, and a significantly younger, inverted radiocarbon age ANU-1749:2210±130 BP occurring stratigraphically below in a grave feature (F13) (Prescott et al. Reference Prescott, Polach, Pretty and Smith1983: Tables 1 and 2; Robertson and Prescott Reference Robertson and Prescott2006, 2592). We also note the high error value in the reported 14C age. Robertson and Prescott (Reference Robertson and Prescott2006: Table 2) reported OSL ages of 4.3–50.6 ka on sediments initially recovered from the East Bank dune for TL dating and soil analyses in 1984. Feature F13 was not directly dated, though was bracketed by an OSL range of a 20–16 ka based on the context of the grave feature within the dune stratigraphy (Robertson and Prescott Reference Robertson and Prescott2006). Whilst Robertson and Prescott (Reference Robertson and Prescott2006) stated that the archaeological evidence for the feature F13 was “unambiguous,” Paton (Reference Paton1983, 73), who participated in the EB2 excavation, suggested that the two graves F13 and F14 “lie within Unit 4, but their true stratigraphic position is difficult to assess as no grave pits were evident.” Further, Paton insisted that “without concrete evidence for the location of the grave pit tops, or radiometric dates for the graves, these two skeletons should not be classified as to [Pleistocene] age.”
Table 1. Age determinations from the Poodginook Flat and Tanamee cliff-lines
The Pleistocene ages reported for both the Roonka Flat and Roonka East bank sites are included in the discussion presented below, however given the factors described here, we consider these ages as highly problematic. Indeed, all other undisputed 14C age estimates returned on archaeological materials along the Murray River downstream of the Pike River floodplain are exclusively Holocene (Bourman et al. Reference Bourman, Murray-Wallace, Wilson, Mosley, Tibby, Ryan, De Carli, Tulley, Belperio and Haynes2022; Littleton et al. Reference Littleton, Petchey, Walshe and Pate2017; Mulvaney Reference Mulvaney1960; Mulvaney et al. Reference Mulvaney, Lawton and Twidale1964; Pate et al. Reference Pate, Pretty, Hunter, Tuniz and Lawson1998; Prescott Reference Prescott1983; Pretty Reference Pretty and Wright1977; Robertson and Prescott Reference Robertson and Prescott2006; Smith Reference Smith1982; Tindale Reference Tindale1957; Wilson Reference Wilson2017; Wilson et al. Reference Wilson, Fallon and Trevorrow2012). These range between ANU-3119: 8390–8190 cal BP (2σ) ka at Glen Lossie in the Lower Murray Gorge (Wilson et al. Reference Wilson, Fallon and Trevorrow2012) to ANU-6899: 632–modern (2σ) at Katarapko Island situated in the Murray Valley within the Katarapko floodplain (Dowling Reference Dowling1990) (Figure 1).
In an analysis of the Pike River data, and additional dating of Aboriginal middens on the Calperum floodplain upstream of Renmark, Westell (Reference Westell2022) identified a marked increase in age estimates across the very late Holocene (from ca. 1.2 ka). This trend, he argued, suggested that the societal responses to improved riverine ecology at either end of the Holocene were “manifestly different” (Westell Reference Westell2022:354). The introduction of oven mounds and the proliferation of grinding technologies in regional subsistence strategies from the mid Holocene provided an important context. Both of these economic strategies are commonly associated with the intensive use of plant resources which were likely to have been critical in supporting larger Aboriginal populations (Jones et al. Reference Jones, Morrison and Roberts2017, Reference Jones, Roberts, Westell, Moffat, Jacobsen and Rudd2022; Westell and Wood Reference Westell and Wood2014).
Cultural and geological contexts for the cliff-top sites at Pooginook Flat and Tanamee
Pooginook (also Poodjenook and Pudjinuk) is an Aboriginal toponym (Roberts et al. Reference Roberts, Burke and Morton2019; Roberts et al. Reference Roberts, Burke, Pring, Zhao, Gibson, Popelka-Filcoff, Thredgold and Bland2018), and in addition to the flat described here, has also been ascribed to nearby rockshelters, a lagoon, a pastoral station, a “hundred” (an administrative land division) and a Conservation Park (see Cockburn Reference Cockburn1984, 252; Manning Reference Manning1990; Roberts et al. Reference Roberts, Burke and Morton2019, 238; Roberts et al. Reference Roberts, Burke, Pring, Zhao, Gibson, Popelka-Filcoff, Thredgold and Bland2018; Tindale Reference Tindale1924–1991:Ngawait Cards 18–19; Reference Tindale1961–1965, 807, Reference Tindale1986–1987). The place-name has been associated with an abundance of good food (see Cockburn Reference Cockburn1984, 180; Manning Reference Manning1990, 252). Dating was conducted within an archaeological complex comprising a patchy exposure of clumped and scattered shell midden (A. jacksoni and N. sublineata) extending along the rim of a sheer cliff over approximately 900 m. The midden is contained in a Woorinen Formation sand sheet and low dunes extending over a shallow limestone base (Marquez Reference Marquez2023) (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Location of the Pooginook Flat site complex (yellow outline) and view looking southwest (downstream) from 14C sample Wk-56559 (14/4/2023) (MR = Murray River).
As with Pooginook, Tanamee is also an Aboriginal toponym meaning “never die,” a term associated specifically with a rockshelter in which a fire was “said to have been kept burning constantly (? In winter)…” (Boehm Reference Boehm1939, 13; see also Westell et al. Reference Westell, Roberts, Moffat, Fairhead and Murray Aboriginal Corporation2023). In this paper we also use the toponym to denote a broader archaeological complex incorporating both the rockshelter and exposures of shell midden that extend in a narrow band along the rim of the cliff directly above and west of the shelter over approximately 800 m (Figure 4). Access to the river flats is provided by an easily traversable gully adjacent to the site. Unlike the additional cliff-line sites described in this paper, the Tanamee middens are contained within, and on top of, a thin gravel and skeletal soil developed directly over limestone rather than within Woorinen Formation sediments.
Figure 4. The context and locations of the main midden exposures along the cliff-line at Tanamee (yellow outlines) together with a view looking east (upstream) along the cliff (13/4/2023). RMMAC members pictured left to right: Denise Agius, Janine Cook, Jennifer Giles and Candice Giles (MR = Murray River).
Methods
Approximately 32 ha and 0.8 km of cliff line were initially surveyed at Tanamee with a further 5 ha and 0.9 km surveyed at Pooginook Flat. All survey coverage was contained to government land (e.g. Crown and council reserves) and conducted under relevant permits (see also Marquez Reference Marquez2023). The survey aimed to identify in situ archaeological material for radiocarbon sampling. Eleven locations were selected; five located at Pooginook Flat and six at Tanamee. These included lenses of shell midden (A. jacksoni and N. sublineata) at both locations and a charcoal-rich sediment at Pooginook Flat. The sampling was undertaken in April and October 2023.
Following the methods outlined in Westell et al. (Reference Westell, Roberts, Morrison and Jacobsen2020, 6), small amounts of shell and charcoal were recovered using either steel tweezers or a trowel and were first placed into aluminum foil packets and then into plastic zip-lock bags. Loose sediment was later removed using tweezers or a nylon brush and the cleaned sample was then weighed using digital scales. Spatial coordinates for all samples and their contexts were collected using a high precision Leica GS16/CS35 receiver/tablet combination in real-time kinematic (RTK) mode. A proforma sample collection sheet was used to record relevant details including potential contamination, stratigraphic and landscape contexts.
All samples were analyzed at the Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory at the University of Waikato using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) methods (Petchey et al. Reference Petchey, Dabell and Hogg2017). As summarised in Petchey et al. (Reference Petchey, Dabell and Hogg2017), samples were initially inspected under >10× magnification to identify and remove contaminants (these were removed by scalpel, drill or by hand) and select appropriate sub-samples prior to cleaning by scalpel, air abrasion and/or by ultrasonification in MilliQä™ water. Chemical pretreatment for charcoal followed a standard dilute acid/alkali/acid (ABA) method. The sub-samples were crushed or milled, sonicated then dried at 80°C. For shell, samples were also etched in 1M HCl to remove ∼45% of the surface, then dried and tested for calcite recrystallisation by staining with Fiegel’s solution (Friedman Reference Friedman1959); the test was negative for all samples. CRAs provided in the laboratory reports were calibrated using the OxCal 4.4 program (Bronk-Ramsey Reference Bronk-Ramsey2009) and applying the SHCal20 atmospheric curve (Hogg et al. Reference Hogg, Heaton, Hua, Palmer, Turney, Southon, Bayliss, Blackwell, Boswijk and Ramsey2020). All results are reported as 95.4% probability.
Westell et al. (Reference Westell, Roberts, Morrison and Jacobsen2020) assumed no reservoir effect for the samples of freshwater mussel analyzed from the Pike River given the geological setting and previous analyses undertaken in the upper tributaries of the MDB by Gillespie et al. (Reference Gillespie, Fink, Petchey and Jacobsen2009). However, we note that the Upper and Lower Gorge sections of the Murray River, i.e. downstream from near Overland Corner, incise Miocene limestone and it can be assumed that these carbonate sediments are being continually dissolved and incorporated into the river both directly and via groundwater aquifers that intersect and discharge into the gorge. This process may result in a cumulative ‘hard-water’ effect as the river progresses downstream through this limestone terrain, potentially introducing a reservoir effect to be considered in 14C dating of freshwater shell that filter feed from the water column. Wilson (Reference Wilson2017, 136–137) attempted to quantify a reservoir effect on V. ambiguus in this region via four samples of known age, ‘pre-bomb’ shell collected along the Murray River at Lake Bonney, Berri, Mannum and Lake Alexandrina between 1886–1930, together with four paired charcoal–shell archaeological samples from the Lower Murray. Wilson (Reference Wilson2017, 137) determined a weighted mean reservoir value of 229 ± 172 yr on these eight samples. This represents the only attempt to characterize a local reservoir effect. As Wilson (Reference Wilson2017, 136–137) noted, however, this effect can also be species-specific and, as such, we consider further work is required to provide confidence in applying a reservoir effect to radiocarbon ages both in terms of geographic location and shell species along the Murray River. As above, Gillespie et al. (Reference Gillespie, Fink, Petchey and Jacobsen2009) had determined a limited effect (–60 to +112 years) for pre-bomb samples of V. ambiguus in the upper tributaries of the MDB.
Other dating programs conducted in this region have tended to ignore or dismiss any reservoir effect (e.g. Wilson et al. Reference Wilson, Fallon and Trevorrow2012, 2022). Similarly, our research has not attempted to directly determine if any reservoir effect is present in the newly presented radiocarbon ages as there was no opportunity to recover paired charcoal and shell samples from the sampled contexts. Whilst we acknowledge this technical gap, we do not consider this to significantly affect our conclusions or interpretations given the relatively small reservoir effects determined by Wilson (Reference Wilson2017, 136–137) and Gillespie et al. (Reference Gillespie, Fink, Petchey and Jacobsen2009) and the timelines being considered in this paper. We also note that both V. ambiguus and A. jacksoni are filter feeders living on alluvial/fluvial sediment substrates in a water column that is seasonally flushed. The extent to which a hard-water effect is present or is perhaps mitigated by the free-flowing nature of the river is unknown at this time, though this would need to be considered in further studies to characterize variability in reservoir effect, if present, in the context of the Murray River.
Results
The five Pooginook Flat samples (Figure 5) were recovered from three locations; an intact lens of N. sublineata (Wk-56562), loose shell (unidentified species) (Wk-56563) and charcoal (Wk-56561) exposed in a low dune truncated by a vehicle track, an A. jacksoni valve recovered from a discrete feature of densely clumped shell on the northern slope of an adjacent dune (Wk-56560) and a complete N. sublineata specimen from a patchy lens of shell that included freshwater mussel on the rim of the cliff (Wk-56559). The ages ranged from Wk-56563: 280–30 cal BP (2σ) to Wk-56562: 11,760–11,320 cal BP (2σ). Whilst there is no overlap in the calibrated ranges, three of the ages, including both N. sublineata samples, occur in the vague grouping over the period 11.3–9.9 ka cal BP, with the remaining ages ca. 2.5 ka cal BP and modern.
Figure 5. Context images for the sampling locations at Pooginook Flat (14/4/2023).
A total of 6 samples of A. jacksoni (4) and an indeterminate species of freshwater mussel (2) were dated at Tanamee. These were recovered from four contexts (Figure 6); a thin gravel unit exposed in section along the rim of the cliff directly above the basal limestone, surface exposures located a short distance from the cliff (to the west of the rockshelter) and a surface scatter of shell from immediately above the rockshelter. The ages range from Wk-57410: 680–560 cal BP (2σ) to Wk-56554: 7150–6790 cal BP (2σ). Only two of the calibrated ranges overlap (between 1060–1050 cal BP), although the results might also suggest a grouping of the two oldest ages.
Figure 6. Examples of the dated shell midden at Tanamee, including A) sample Wk-56555 exposed as a thin lens on the rim of the cliff and B) Wk-56556 within a surface exposure a short distance from the cliff.
The newly reported age estimates from Pooginook Flat and Tanamee are summarised in Table 1. Figure 7 presents the stacked probability distribution functions (PDF) against other age estimates from cliff-line settings at the Pike River floodplain and Roonka East Bank. Very little dating has been undertaken along the Murray River cliffs-lines in SA. Also shown in Figure 7 are the previously reported ages on archaeological materials located below the cliff lines within the incised landscapes of the Valley and Lower Gorge sections of the river; on the active floodplains, relic terraces and bounding slopes. As noted above, no previous dating has been undertaken with the Upper Gorge. The published Pleistocene ages reported for both the Roonka Flat and Roonka East bank sites are included, though as above, we consider these to be problematic and are highlighted as such in Figure 7.
Figure 7. A comparison between calibrated 14C ages (stacked PDFs are shown as 2σ) for cliff-top (red) and floodplain (blue) settings in the three geomorphological divisions of the Murray River in SA (Valley, Upper & Lower Gorge) (see aforementioned references for floodplain dates). The asterisks denote the two sites dated for this research. The dot outline PDF for the Roonka East Bank site represents a contentious 14C age for feature F11 while the OSL range suggested by Robertson and Prescott (Reference Robertson and Prescott2006) for the grave feature F13 is shown as the dashed rectangle. The dot outline PDF in the Lower Gorge stack represents a contentious 14C age for a contentious “hearth” feature at Roonka Flat.
Discussion
In discussing the dating results, two considerations need to be first acknowledged. The ethno-historical information provides some insight into the recent functions of the Murray cliff-lines (e.g. as camping places, as zones for interacting with neighboring groups, as places of cultural significance and for high vantage point viewing/communication), however, we need to consider that the ways in which these areas were used may have differed in the deeper past. At the Pike River floodplain, for instance, the early establishment of characteristically extensive middens ca. 15 ka cal BP reflect a significant effort in relocating large quantities of food items from the floodplains onto these elevated settings for processing and consuming. The intent and motivation behind this remain pure conjecture on our part, although perhaps the nature of flows and flooding at the time were necessary considerations. The development of these cliff-line middens also appears to taper off through the mid Holocene, at the same time as the number of 14C ages reported across the floodplains increase (Westell Reference Westell2022; Westell et al. Reference Westell, Roberts, Morrison and Jacobsen2020). In this case, there was evidently a shift in the ways that people utilized various landscape settings that might introduce bias into the record, i.e. Pleistocene records are preserved along the cliff-lines as there was simply a preference to occupy these areas at the time and this preference did not continue into later occupation.
Second, the physical context of each of the newly dated samples at the time of their original deposition is difficult to know given the highly dynamic nature of the riverine landscape. At Pooginook Flat, for instance, the cliff-line is currently ∼50 m high and sheer, although this relates to the modern position of the river as it directly impacts the base of the cliff. When the middens were being deposited, the river may have traced a different route or the cliff may have been buttressed with a traversable scree slope—the configuration of the landscape at the time the middens were being deposited is simply unknown. The landscape context at Tanamee is further complicated by the presence of Burra Creek, the first major tributary to the Murray River downstream of the Darling River junction (Figure 1). Whilst Burra Creek is ephemeral and rarely flows under the modern climate, the scale of its palaeochannel and distributary network had clearly formed under a very different hydroclimate and any interpretation of the archaeological record in this location would need to consider the potential influence of the creek in the ways Aboriginal people utilized and interacted with this space. It is worth noting that the earliest dates returned at Tanamee ca. 7.5 ka cal BP coincide roughly with an early Holocene pluvial described by Westell (Reference Westell2022, 174–177). Again, bias may have been introduced as the geographic context at the sampling locations, and the ways in which people responded to these contexts, changed.
The patchwork nature of archaeological dating in the MDB limits our ability to fully contextualize disparate records, with the Upper Gorge of the Murray River representing a notable research “gap.” The current study provides the first set of radiocarbon ages within this section of the Murray River corridor and, as such, offers a valuable contribution in advancing pan-MDB discourse. The following discussion considers the new dates obtained from cliff-top sites at Pooginook Flat and Tanamee within a regional chronology.
As illustrated in Figure 7, the two Pleistocene ages ca. 29 and 27 ka cal BP returned on shell from a midden on the Pike River cliff-line (site PikeAWE15_10) remain distinct outliers in the regional dataset (Westell et al. Reference Westell, Roberts, Morrison and Jacobsen2020) and this research has been unable to provide new insights for this early period of Aboriginal life on the river. On this basis, we continue to infer that an apparent time lag occurred between the early peopling of MDB ca. 50 ka and settlement of the lower parts of the Murray River corridor, or a more likely scenario, that the nature of early Aboriginal occupation on the river was such that it simply did not translate in the extant archaeology, e.g. a pattern of ephemeral occupation. Given that the calibrated age Wk-56552: 11,760–11,320 (2σ) represents the oldest result in the new data, and that the reliability of the Pleistocene ages at Roonka remains questionable, we would further argue that the LGM was a significant inhibitive factor for intensive Aboriginal occupation of the Murray River in SA (cf. Westell Reference Westell2022).
The ca. 15 ka “event” registered at the Pike River (and elsewhere in the MDB) is not replicated in the new data, or in the previously published chronologies for the Upper or Lower Gorge sections of the river. As above, the newly reported age ca. 11.5 ka at Pooginook Flat now represents the oldest indisputable 14C result in the combined dating from these regions. As such, the results may offer support to the notion of a staggered or gradual (re)population of the Murray River corridor in SA post-LGM, potentially extending downstream from the anabranch floodplains of the Murray Valley from ca. 15 ka.
The oldest ages at Pooginoook Flat were recovered from Woorinen Formation sediments, though it is evident that deeply stratified deposits are not a requirement for deep time archaeology. Also, as was the case with the Pike River sampling, no major pedogenic zones were observed above any of the dated samples. Clearly, wherever archaeological material is observed under palaeosols within the Woorinen Formation, this should be investigated as a priority.
Whilst the Murray cliff-lines are not immune to erosion, e.g. through cliff-line retreat and the deflation of Woorinen Formation sediments, the ages reported along the Murray River cliffs in SA, highlight an apparent resilience in these settings capable of preserving deep time archaeology. Archaeological chronologies recorded along the Murray cliffs extend over significantly deeper timelines than equivalent floodplains settings, as illustrated in Figure 7. There is, however, a constant loss of this record, with most sampling having occurred on exposed and eroding lenses of shell midden. The conservation of sites remains precarious. There is an imperative, therefore, to continue to record and sample the extant sites, although current efforts are frustrated by issues around land access and conservation, with archaeological surveys largely restricted to government properties and road-side remnants. Efforts to inform the public and local land holders will be critical if we are to capitalize on the potential in the Murray River cliffs to expand an understanding of Aboriginal life on Australia’s largest river system.
Acknowledgments
This research has been funded by the Australian Research Council for the project entitled “Rockshelters and Rock Art in the River Murray Gorge: New Data and Syntheses” (LP200200803). Amy Roberts is also the recipient of an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT230100499). This is a collaborative project between Flinders University and the River Murray and Mallee Aboriginal Corporation (RMMAC) and was approved by Flinders University’s Human Research Ethics Committee (Project Number: 4852). We particularly thank the RMMAC members who participated in the field work. The authors also thank the staff at Aboriginal Affairs and Reconciliation, Department of State Development, Government of South Australia, for their assistance with permits. We also thank Dr Fiona Petchey from the Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory at the University of Waikato for processing all of the radiocarbon samples.
Declaration of interest
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Open access
