There is an error in Table 2 of Hodder et al. (Reference Hodder, Gauthier, Ross and Lian2023), where the De (Gy) – C value for site 23 should read 292 ± 18 instead of 229 ± 18. To be clear, this is a typo and the correct value of 292 ± 18 was used to calculate the Age (ka) - C for this sample (191 ± 15 ka). Thus, this typo does not affect the results in any way, but should be corrected to properly represent the dataset. The correct Table 2 is below:

Table 2 (revised). Number of aliquots measured (N), overdispersion values (OD), equivalent dose values (D _e), optical ages, and dose recovery (DR) ratios

¹ N= numbers of aliquots accepted/number of aliquots measured

² C= Determined using the central age model (CAM)

³ M= Determined using the three-parameter minimum age model (MAM)

⁴ DR= dose recovery ratio (given dose/recovered dose)

Note: equivalent dose and OD values calculated using the software of Liang and Forman, 2019