Introduction
Reference Martin and KauffmanMartin and Kauffman (1981) have discussed the interaction of deep water waves and newly forming ice suspensions in ocean leads and polynyas. In the early stages of the ice season in lakes, the interaction of wind-driven waves and ice suspensions is frequently relegated to the near-shore zone where accelerated cooling is possible due to the shallow depths. The formation and growth of grease ice, as described by Martin and Kauffman, will be altered in this zone by the interaction of the progressive waves and the nearshore bathymetry. This paper examines the special situation of the interaction of a standing Stakes’ edge wave with a newly forming near-shore ice field. Two aspects of this possible interaction are considered: the influence of a floating ice suspension on Stokes’ edge waves and the influence of Stokes’ edge waves on a floating ice suspension. The inquiry into this interaction was motivated by the possibility of the observed spatial regularity of ice-mound (volcano) features being related to the presence of standing edge waves. Reference Fahnestock, Fahnestock, Crowley, Wilson and SchneiderFahnestock and others (1973) have described the characteristics of these ice volcanoes as found in Lake Erie near Dunkirk, New York.
Effect of a Floating Ice Suspension on Stokes’ Edge Waves
The classical Stokes’ edge-wave solution has been known for many years (e.g. Reference StokesStokes, 1846). It represents a wave trapped on a linearly sloping shore bounded by an infinite straight coastline (see Fig. 1). It is of interest to note that the presence of a floating ice suspension produces only minor changes in the original Stokes’ solution. Only the inertial resistance of the floating ice suspension is considered here. Other mechanisms such as energy loss due to viscous effects, gelation due to sintering of ice particles, etc., would be expected to have a smaller influence on the dispersion equation than that due to inertial resistance and are not included.
The governing equation, expressed in terms of the velocity potential, ϕ (x,y,z,t), for a perfect fluid, is the Laplace equation
On the lower surface, z = −x tan α where α is the bottom slope angle, the requirement of zero normal velocity gives
while on the upper surface, linearized to z = 0,
Here, η is the vertical displacement of the upper surface, both for the ice and the water, ρi and ρf are the ice and water mass densities respectively, and h is the average thickness of the ice suspension with volume concentration c. The “mass loading” of the ice suspension is ρ ich, (Reference Weitz and KellerWeitz and Keller, 1950).
A solution for Φ is assumed in the form
where β is the off-shore wave decay parameter, K is an along-shore wave number, and ω is the frequency of this assumed time-harmonic problem. Equation (1) then provides
The lower boundary condition requires
for potential functions which decrease with depth (Reference LambLamb, 1932) leaving
The upper boundary conditions require
providing a dispersion equation
which reduces to the well-known Stokes’ solution if either h or c is zero. Introducing ω0 = (Kg sin α)½ as the original Stokes frequency, the frequency as modified by the ice suspension is
Reference Martin and KauffmanMartin and Kauffman (1981) have shown that the thickness of a grease-ice suspension being herded by progressive incident deep-water waves depends on the incident wave amplitude, the incident wave number, and the volume concentration of the ice suspension. Values of c = 18% to 22% were reported for the leading edge of grease-ice slicks. For incident wavelengths of approximately 280 ft (85.3 m) and wave amplitudes of 2 ft (0.61 m), the thickness of the ice suspension would be on the order of 1 ft (0.3 m). These incident wave characteristics are typical for Lake Erie during the early stages of the ice season (Reference Resio and VincentResio and Vincent, 1976). Under these circumstances, the Stokes’ wave frequency is only negligibly affected. In fact, the Stokes’ wave frequency is changed very little over the range of wavelengths and amplitudes typical of Lake Erie. It is concluded that a floating grease-ice suspension has a negligible effect on the Stokes’ edge-wave dispersion equation.
Ice-Cusp Formation by Standing Stokes' Edge Waves
The near-shore ice features called “ice volcanoes”, as described by Reference Fahnestock, Fahnestock, Crowley, Wilson and SchneiderFahnestock and others (1973), are shown in Figure 2. The observed mounds were periodic, spaced approximately 45 ft (15 m) apart and occurred in early January with winds from the west and north-west, producing lake waves essentially normal to the coastline at that location. The celerity of the incident lake waves was observed to be approximately 40 ft per second (14 m/s). After some time, usually overnight, the appearance of small ice volcanoes, regularly spaced, was noted. The volcanic features grow in size by expulsion of water upward through a central cavity. The expelled water freezes to the sloping sides of the mound. Cones have been observed to reach heights of 15 ft (5 m). As can be seen in Figure 2, the ice volcano features are accompanied by a cusp-like configuration of the leading edge of the shore-fast ice.
The question as to how these volcanoes and the cusp-like configuration of the ice edge may originate leads to speculation on the role of a standing edge wave in this region. The presence of a standing edge wave during the early stages of a newly forming ice field could provide the mechanism for initiation of cusping of a floating ice suspension. Although such an ice suspension may not appreciably affect edge- wave frequencies as suggested in the previous section, the converse may not be true.
A standing edge wave would cause alternating regions of small and of substantial wave action. A standing Stokes’ edge wave of wavelength 90 ft (30 m) would require wave periods of seconds. The local lake topography near Dunkirk has a relatively straight section of shoreline oriented in a north-east direction bounded to the north-east by a promontory, Point Gratiot, and to the south-west by an under-water ridge and another promontory, Van Buren Point. Thus, a standing edge wave does appear to be possible in this region. Bottom slopes of about 3 to 5 deg, which are typical for this region, would require edge-wave periods of 14 to 18 s. A standing Stokes’ edge wave can be generated as a subharmonic (of half frequency) of incoming lake waves normally incident upon a straight coastline (Reference Guza and DavisGuza and Davis, 1974; Reference Guza and BowenGuza and Bowen, 1976). In this case, this would require lake waves of period 7 to 9 s. Such wave periods are typical for early winter storms on Lake Erie (Reference Resio and VincentResio and Vincent, 1976).
Thus, a possible scenario for the development of a standing Stokes’ edge wave and the formation of cusps in a newly-forming floating ice suspension involves a normally incident lake wave field with significant energy in the wave period range of 7 to 9 s. The standing edge wave would move the floating ice suspension on- and off-shore at locations of maximum velocity u = ∂ϕ/∂x. These locations would also correspond to maximum vertical displacements. Such motion might inhibit the thickening of the grease ice into dead zones (Reference Martin and KauffmanMartin and Kauffman, 1981) which congeal into shore-fast ice. One half wavelength away these motions would be zero, although there would be maximum along-shore velocity there. This sorting of the floating ice suspension by the standing edge wave could be the mechanism that causes the initiation of a cusp-like configuration to the leading edge of the developing ice field.
Once cusps were established, the incident lake waves could act to maintain the development of cusping by a concentration of wave energy in the narrowing channels as discussed by Reference Fahnestock, Fahnestock, Crowley, Wilson and SchneiderFahnestock and others, (1973). The effects of the edge wave are felt only near to the shore due to their exponential decay lakeward. For the parameters given here, the e-folding length is about 15 ft (5 m). However, as the shore-fast ice develops, the effective shoreline location moves lakeward as well, allowing the region of influence of the edge waves to move lakeward. Edge waves can exist along a vertical wall or other topographies as well as a linearly sloping bottom, but require more complicated mathematical descriptions. The Stokes’ solution is used as a simple illustration, rather than a unique situation.
Conclusions
The above discussion establishes neither the existence of standing edge waves in Lake Erie nor any definite cause-and-effect relationship between edge waves and ice cusps. However, the plausibility of such a relationship has been shown. The analogy of ice cusp formation and that of beach cusps as discussed by Reference Guza and InmanGuza and Inman (1975) is apparent. This phenomenon may be the winter counterpart to beach cusps which, due to the nature of the bottom sediments in this region, cannot be developed as readily as for sandy beaches. The ice volcano features may be seen as a possible indicator of the presence of edge waves which are quite difficult to measure close to shore. The initiation of a cusp-like configuration to the ice edge may be caused by a standing edge wave, but the maintenance mechanism for growth of ice mounds or volcanoes may be unrelated to the edge wave. It seems more likely that the growth of the ice mounds is maintained by ordinary on-shore lake waves as has been suggested for beach cusps by Reference Dean and MaurmeyerDean and Maurmeyer (1980) and Reference Inman and GuzaInman and Guza (1982) as a “swash” mechanism.
The proposed mechanism for the formation of ice cusps, and eventually ice volcanoes, needs to be evaluated in the light of field data dealing with similar ice features along other shorelines. A field investigation is planned at the Dunkirk site during the 1983–84 ice season aimed at documenting more carefully the conditions that are present when these ice features are formed. It was decided to submit this preliminary theoretical development for publication in the hope that others may join in the study at different geographical locations to broaden the base of data, since this appears to be a wide-spread phenomenon.
Acknowledgement
This study has been supported as part of a project entitled “Nearshore ice dynamics” which is funded by the New York State Sea Grant Institute.