Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:18:53.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a possible bioindicator of epigenetic factors present in drinking water that may affect reproductive function: is chorion an issue?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2014

M. Martinez-Sales ,
F. García-Ximénez  and
FJ. Espinós
M. Martinez-Sales*
Affiliation:
Aquaculture and Environmental Research Group (ACUMA), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera 14, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
F. García-Ximénez
Affiliation:
Aquaculture and Environmental Research Group (ACUMA), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera 14, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
FJ. Espinós
Affiliation:
Aquaculture and Environmental Research Group (ACUMA), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera 14, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
*
All correspondence to: M. Martinez-Sales. Aquaculture and Environmental Research Group (ACUMA), Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Camino de Vera 14, 46022, Valencia, Spain. Tel: +34 963879433. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Emerging organic contaminants have been monitored in stream waters, raw and finished waters and wastewater effluents. Most of these contaminants, such as epigenetic substances, have been detected at very low levels. Unfortunately, their complete monitoring and/or removal are very difficult, given the increasing presence of new contaminants and due to analytical and economic considerations. For this reason, bioindicators are used as an alternative to monitor their presence. To this end, zebrafish is being used to assess certain contaminants in water quality studies.

As our long-term aim is to determine if zebrafish (Danio rerio) can be used to detect environmental epigenetic factors in drinking waters with effects on human reproduction, an initial question is whether the chorion could interfere with the possible action of epigenetic factors in two reproductive events: genital ridge formation and migration of the primordial germ cells (PGCs) to these genital ridges.

In the first experiment, we attempted to partially degrade the chorion of mid blastula transition (MBT) embryos with pronase, with acceptable survival rates at 5 days post fertilisation (dpf), with the group exposed for 15 min giving the best survival results. As denuded early embryos require a specific culture medium, in the next experiment embryo survival was evaluated when they were cultured up to 5 dpf in drinking waters from six different sources. Results showed a negative effect on embryo survival at 5 dpf from several waters but not in others, thus distorting the survival outcomes. These results suggest using embryos with the chorion intact from the outset when drinking waters from different sources are to be tested.

Keywords

BioindicatorChorionDrinking waterPronaseZebrafish
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , June 2015 , pp. 447 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansari, B.A. & Sharma, D.K. (2009). Toxic effect of synthetic pyrethroid deltamethrin and neem based formulation achook on zebrafish, Danio rerio (Cyprinidae). Trends Biosci. 2, 18–20.Google Scholar
Baccarelli, A. & Bollati, V. (2009). Epigenetics and environmental chemicals. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 21, 243–51.Google Scholar
Bonsignorio, D., Perego, L., Del Giacco, L. & Cotelli, F. (1996). Structure and macromolecular composition of the zebrafish egg chorion. Zygote 4, 101–8.Google Scholar
Brand, M., Granato, M. & Nüsslein-Volhard, C. (2002). Keeping and raising zebrafish. In Zebrafish: A Practical Approach (eds Nüsslein-Volhard, C. & Dahm, R.), pp. 7–33. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardona-Costa, J. & García-Ximénez, F. (2007). Vitrification of zebrafish embryo blastomeres in microvolumes. CryoLett. 28, 303–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheng, J., Flahaut, E. & Cheng, S.H. (2007). Effect of carbon nanotubes on developing zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 26, 708–16.Google Scholar
Creton, R. (2004). The calcium pump of the endoplasmic reticulum plays a role in midline signaling during early zebrafish development. Dev. Brain Res. 151, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahm, R. (2002). Atlas of embryonic stages of development in the zebrafish. In Zebrafish: A Practical Approach (eds Nüsslein-Volhard, C. & Dahm, R.), pp. 219–236. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ericson, I., Nadal, M., Van Bavel, B., Lindström, G. & Domingo, J.L. (2008). Levels of perfluorochemicals in water samples from Catalonia, Spain: is drinking water a significant contribution to human exposure? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 15, 614–9.Google Scholar
Eschauzier, C., Beerendonk, E., Scholte-Veenendaal, P. & de Voogt, P. (2012). Impact of treatment processes on the removal of perfluoroalkyl acids from the drinking water production chain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 1708–15.Google Scholar
Gregoraszczuk, E. & Ptak, A. (2013). Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: some actions of POPs on female reproduction. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2013, ID 828532, 9 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagedorn, M., Kleinhans, F.W., Wildt, D.E. & Rall, W.F. (1997). Chill sensitivity and cryoprotectant permeability of dechorionated zebrafish embryos, Brachydanio rerio . Cryobiology 34, 251–63.Google Scholar
Hallare, A., Pagulayan, R., Lacdan, N., Köhler, H. & Triebskorn, R. (2005). Assessing water quality in a tropical lake using biomarkers in zebrafish embryos: developmental toxicity and stress protein responses. Environ. Monit. Assess. 104, 171–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, N.H. & Donovan, M. (1983). Fine structure of the chorion and site of sperm entry in the egg of Brachydanio . J. Exp. Zool. 227, 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, B., Kelly, R.N. & Ashwood-Smith, M.J. (1983). Permeability of intact and dechorionated zebra fish embryos to glycerol and dimethyl sulfoxide. Cryobiology 20, 432–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heberer, T. (2002). Occurrence, fate, and removal of pharmaceutical residues in the aquatic environment: a review of recent research data. Toxicol. Lett. 131, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henn, K. (2011). Limits of the embryo toxicity test with Danio rerio as an alternative to the acute fish toxicity test. PhD Thesis. University of Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Henn, K. & Braunbeck, T. (2011). Dechorionation as a tool to improve the fish embryo toxicity test (FET) with the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 153, 91–8.Google Scholar
Kallenborn, R., Fick, R., Lindberg, R., Moe, M., Nielsen, K.M., Tysklind, K. & Vasskoog, T. (2008). Pharmaceutical residues in Northern European environments: consequences and perspectives. In Pharmaceuticals in the Environment. Sources Fate Effects and Risks, 3rd edn (ed. Kümmerer, K.), pp. 61–74. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Kimmel, C., Ballard, W., Kimmel, S., Ullmann, B. & Schilling, T. (1995). Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dynam. 203, 253–310.Google Scholar
Kümmerer, K. (2009). The presence of pharmaceuticals in the environment due to human use – present knowledge and future challenges. J. Environ. Manage. 90, 2354–66.Google Scholar
Lo, K.H., Hui, M.N.Y., Yu, R.M.K., Wu, R.S.S. & Cheng, S.H. (2011). Hypoxia impairs primordial germ cell migration in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. PLoS One. 6, e24540.Google Scholar
Mandrall, D., Truong, L., Jephson, C., Sarker, M., Moore, A., Lang, C., Simonich, M. & Tanguay, R. (2012). Automated zebrafish chorion removal and single embryo placement: optimizing throughput of zebrafish development toxicity screens. J. Lab. Autom. 17, 66–74.Google Scholar
Matthews, M., Trevarrow, B. & Matthews, J. (2002). A virtual tour of the Guide for Zebrafish Users . Lab. Anim. 31, 34–40.Google Scholar
Molinari, A., Troisi, S., Fallico, C., Paparella, A. & Straface, S. (2009). Broom fibre PRB for heavy metals groundwater remediation. EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, http://meetings.copernicus.org/egu2009, p. 8075.Google Scholar
Rawson, D.W., Zhang, T., Kalicharan, D. & Jongebloed, W.L. (2000). Field emission scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy studies of the chorion, plasma membrane and syncytial layers of the gastrula-stage embryo of the zebrafish Brachydanio rerio: a consideration of the structural and functional relationships with respect to cryoprotectant penetration. Aquacult. Res. 31, 325–36.Google Scholar
Simão, M., Cardona-Costa, J., Pérez Camps, M. & García-Ximénez, F. (2010a). Ultraviolet radiation dose to be applied in recipient zebrafish embryos for germ-line chimaerism is strain dependent. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 45, 1098–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simão, M., Cardona-Costa, J., Pérez Camps, M. & García-Ximénez, F. (2010b). Ultraviolet radiation and handling medium osmolarity affect chimaerism success in zebrafish. Zygote 19, 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, S.K., Hsu, H.J. & Chung, B.C. (2010). Zebrafish monosex population reveals female dominance in sex determination and earliest events of gonad differentiation. Dev. Biol. 344, 849–56.Google Scholar
Truong, L., Harper, S. & Tanguay, R. (2011). Evaluation of embryotoxicity using the zebrafish model. Methods Mol. Biol. 691, 271–9.Google Scholar
Ullah, S., Alsberg, T. & Berger, U. (2011). Simultaneous determination of perfluoroalkyl phosphonates, carboxylates and sulfonates in drinking water. J Chromatogr. A 1218, 6388–95.Google Scholar
Weiting, C. & Wei, G. (2013). Gonad differentiation and puberty onset in the zebrafish: evidence for the dependence of puberty onset on body growth but not age in females. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 80, 384–92.Google Scholar
Westerfield, M. (2000). The Zebrafish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio), 4th edn. Eugene, OR, USA: University of Oregon Press.Google Scholar
Westerfield, M. (2007). The Zebrafish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio), 5th edn. Eugene, OR, USA: University of Oregon Press.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, M., Bergmann, S. & Dieter, H.H. (2010). Occurrence of perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) in drinking water of North-Rhine-Westphalia, Germany and new approach to assess drinking water contamination by shorter-chained C4–C7 PFCs. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 213, 224–32.Google Scholar
Wolffe, A.P. & Guschin, D. (2000). Review: chromatin structural features and targets that regulate transcription. J. Struct. Biol. 129 (2–3), 102–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, L., Jiang, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, L. & Zhang, H. (2013). Toxicity of urban highway runoff in Shanghai to zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos and luminous bacteria (Vibrio qinghaiensis.Q67). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, doi 10.1007/s11356–013–2193–9.Google Scholar
Yamaha, E., Saito, T., Goto–Kazeto, R. & Arai, K. (2007). Developmental biotechnology for aquaculture, with special reference to surrogate production in teleost fishes. J. Sea Res. 58, 8–22.Google Scholar
Yoon, C., Kawakami, K. & Hopkins, N. (1997). Zebrafish vasa homologue RNA is localized to the cleavage planes of 2- and 4-cell-stage embryos and is expressed in the primordial germ cells. Development 124, 3157–65.Google Scholar