Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:10:44.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of oocyte plasma membrane to electric current changes after fertilisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Tan Jing-he ,
Liu Zhong-hua ,
Sun Xing-shen  and
He Gui-xin
Tan Jing-he*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal science, Northeat Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Liu Zhong-hua
Affiliation:
Department of Animal science, Northeat Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Sun Xing-shen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal science, Northeat Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
He Gui-xin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal science, Northeat Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
*
Dr Jing-he Tan, Department of Animal scince, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, china 150030.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The tolerance of the oocyte plasma membrane (oolemma) to electrical pulses (TEP) was investigated for oocytes, zygotes, and embryos at the early and late 2-cell stage. The oocyte survival rate after two electrical pulses (1.4KV/cm for 640μs each) was used as an indicator of the TEP of the oolemma. Survival rate of mid-pronuclear zygotes (94.3%±2.3%) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than that of recently ovulated (2.1%±1.9%) and in vivo aged (25.1%±2.6%) oocytes; survival rate of in vivo aged oocytes was also significantly higher than that of recently ovulated oocytes. Soon after fertilisation, the survival rate of the oocytes markedly increased, up to 94% at the mid-pronuclear stage. Survival ratedropped thereafter. These results suggest that the characteristics of the oocyte plasma membrane (oolemma) change after fertilisation.

Keywords

FertilisationMouseOocytesPlasma membranePules tolerance
Type
Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , November 1996 , pp. 275 - 278
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Edwards, R.G. & Gates, A.H.. (1959). Timing of the stages of the maturation division, Ovulation, fertilization and the first cleavage of eggs of adult mice treated with gonadotrophins. J. Endocrinol. 18, 292–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gwatkin, R.B.L. (1977). Fertilization Mechanisms in Man and Mammals. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, B., Costantini, F. & Lacy, E.. (1986). Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.Google Scholar
Marston, J.H. & Chang, M.C. (1964). The fertilizable life of ova and their morphology following delayed insemination in mature and immature mice. J.Exp. Zool. 155, 237–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szollosi, D. (1971). Morphological changes in mouse eggs due to aging in the Fallopian tube. Am.J.Anat. 130, 209–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wassarman, P.M.. (1987). The biology and chemistry of fertilization. Science. 235, 553–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, D.E., Edidin, M. & Handyside, A.H. (1981). Changes in the organization of mouse egg plasma membrane upon fertilization and first cleavage: indications from the lateral diffusion rates of fluorescent lipid analogs. Dev.Biol. 85, 195–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanagimachi, R. (1994). Mammalian fertilization. In the physiology of Reproduction. 2nd edn, ed. E, Knobil, et al. , pp. 189–317New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar