Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:09:45.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sperm-egg fusion in the sea urchin is blocked in Mg2+-free seawater

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Hideo Mohri ,
Yukihisa Hamaguchi ,
Miyako S. Hamaguchi ,
Kiyoshi Sano ,
Hideki Shirakawa ,
Ken Nakada  and
Shunichi Miyazaki
Hideo Mohri*
Affiliation:
University of the Air, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Hokkaido University and Tokyo Women's Medical College, Japan.
Yukihisa Hamaguchi
Affiliation:
University of the Air, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Hokkaido University and Tokyo Women's Medical College, Japan.
Miyako S. Hamaguchi
Affiliation:
University of the Air, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Hokkaido University and Tokyo Women's Medical College, Japan.
Kiyoshi Sano
Affiliation:
University of the Air, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Hokkaido University and Tokyo Women's Medical College, Japan.
Hideki Shirakawa
Affiliation:
University of the Air, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Hokkaido University and Tokyo Women's Medical College, Japan.
Ken Nakada
Affiliation:
University of the Air, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Hokkaido University and Tokyo Women's Medical College, Japan.
Shunichi Miyazaki
Affiliation:
University of the Air, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Hokkaido University and Tokyo Women's Medical College, Japan.
*
Professor Hideo Mohri, University of the Air, Wakaba 2-11, Mihama-ku, Chiba 261, Japan. Tel: 043-276-5111. Fax: 043-275-9726.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Magnesium ions as well as calcium ions are required for successful fertilisation in sea urchins. In the absence of Mg2+ spermatozoa attached to the egg plasma membrane, their acrosomal processes passing through the vitelline envelope, but could not enter the egg cytoplasm (Sano et al, Dev. Growth Differ. 22, 531–41,1980). Such an individual spermatozoon was observed microscopically to resume entry into the egg immediately after the addition of a sufficient amount of Mg2+ to the surrounding medium. Neither any change in membrane potential nor an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration of the egg was observed after insemination in the absence of Mg2+, although both could be observed after the addition of Mg2+. The sperm heads did not show fluorescence when attached to the surface of an egg previously microinjected with mithramycin A in Mg-free seawater, indicating that there was no connection between the sperm and the egg. Therefore, occurrence of fertilisation potential must be a post-fusional event. These results suggest that Mg2+ are indispensable for fusion between the sperm acrosomal membrane and the egg plasma membrane.

Keywords

FertilisationMembrane potentialMg2+ requirementSea urchin eggSperm entry
Type
Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , May 1994 , pp. 149 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R.D. & Griffin, J.L. (1958). The time sequence of early events in the fertilisation of sea urchin eggs. I. The latent period and the cortical reaction. Exp. Cell. Res. 15, 163–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chambers, E.L. (1989). Fertilization in voltage clamped sea urchin eggs. In Mechanisms of Egg Activation, ed. Nuccitelli, R., Cherr, G.N. & Clark, W.H. Jr, 1–18. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Dale, B. & De Santis, R. (1981). Maturation and fertilization of the sea urchin oocytes: an electrophysiological study. Dev. Biol. 85, 474–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dale, B. & Santella, L. (1985). Sperm-oocyte interaction in the sea-urchin. J. Cell Sci. 74, 153–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dale, B., De Felice, L.J. & Taglietti, V. (1978). Membrane noise and conductance increase during single spermatozoon–egg interactions. Nature 275, 217–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foltz, K.R., Partin, J.S. & Lennarz, W.J. (1993). sea urchin receptor for sperm: sequence similarity of binding domain and hsp70. Science 259, 1421–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankenhaeuser, B. & Hodgkin, A.L. (1957). The action of calcium on the electrical properties of squid axons. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 137, 218–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujiwara, A., Yasumasu, I. & Mohri, H. (1983). Change in the respiratory rate of sea urchin spermatozoa following sperm-egg interaction in the absence of Mg2+. Dev. Growth Differ. 25, 239–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glabe, C.G. (1985). Interaction of the sperm adhesive protein, bindin, with phospholipid vesicles. II. Bindin induces the fusion of mixed phase vesicles that contain phosphatidylcholine and phosphatydylserine in vitro. J. Cell. Biol. 100, 800–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glabe, C.G. (1993). Structure/function relationships of bindin: a multifunctional adhesive protein. J. Reprod. Dev. 39 (suppl.), 29–30.Google Scholar
Hamaguchi, Y. & Hamaguchi, M.S. (1990). Simultaneous investigation of intracellular Ca2+ increase and morphological events upon fertilization in the sand dollar egg. Cell Struct. Funct. 15, 159–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwasa, F., Shimizu, H. & Mohri, H. (1981). Effect of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on motility of sea urchin spermatozoa. Experientia 37, 861–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffe, L.A. (1976). Fast block to polyspermy in sea urchin eggs is electrically mediated. Nature 261, 68–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaffe, L.A. & Gould-Somero, M. (1985). Polyspermy preventing mechanism. In: Biology of Fertilization, ed. Metz, C.B. & Monroy, A., 223–43. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiehart, D.P. (1982). Microinjection of echinoderm eggs: apparatus and procedures. Methods Cell Biol. 25, 13–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liévano, A., Beltrán, C., Zapata, O., Reynaud, E., De La Torre, L., García-Soto, J., Labarca, P. & Darszon, A. (1993). Ion channels and sea urchin sperm physiology. J. Reprod. Dev. 39. (Suppl.), 51–2.Google Scholar
Longo, F.J., Lynn, J.W., McCulloh, D.H. & Chambers, E.L. (1986). Correlative ultrastructural and electrophysiological studies of sperm–egg interactions of the sea urchin, Lytechinus variegatus. Dev. Biol. 118, 155–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynn, J.W., McCulloh, D.H., & Chambers, E.L. (1988). Voltage clamp studies of fertilization in sea urchin eggs. II. Current patterns in relation to sperm entry, monospermy, and activation. Dev. Biol. 128, 305–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloh, D.H. & Chambers, E.L. (1992). Fusion of membrane during fertilization: increase of the sea urchin egg's membrane capacitance and membrane conductance at the site of contact with the sperm. J. Gen. Physiol. 99, 137–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohri, H., Usui, N. & Sano, K. (1982). Magnesium ions in fertilization of sea urchins. Cell Differ. 11, 259–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohmori, H. & Yoshii, M. (1977). Surface potential reflected in both gating and permiation mechanisms of sodium and calcium channels of the tunicate egg cell membrane. J. Physiol. 267, 429–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osanai, K., Kyozuka, K., Sato, H., Hirai, S., Igusa, Y. & Miyazaki, S. (1987). Bioelectric responses of sea urchin eggs inseminated with oyster spermatozoa: a sperm evoked potential without egg activation. Dev. Biol. 124, 309–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saiki, T. & Hamaguchi, Y. (1993). Difference between maturation division and cleavage in starfish oocytes: dependency of induced cytokinesis on the size of the aster as revealed by transplantation of the centrosome. Dev. Growth Differ. 35, 181–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sano, K. & Mohri, H. (1976). Fertilization of sea urchins needs magnesium ions in sea water. Science 192, 1339– 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sano, K. & Mohri, H. (1977). Magnesium requirement in fertilization process of sea urchins. Dev. Growth Differ. 19, 275–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sano, K., Usui, N., Ueki, K., Mohri, T. & Mohri, H. (1980). Magnesium ion-requiring step in ferilization of sea urchins. Dev. Growth Differ. 22, 531–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swann, K., McCulloh, D.H., McDougall, A., Chambers, E.L. & Whitaker, M. (1992). Sperm-induced currents at fertilization in sea urchin eggs injected with EGTA and neomycin. Dev. Biol. 151, 552–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vacquier, V.D. & Moy, G.W. (1977). Isolation of bindin: the protein responsible for adhesion of sperm to sea urchin eggs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 74, 2456–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitaker, M., Swann, K. & Crossley, I. (1989). What happens during the latent period at fertilization. In: Mechanisms of Egg Activation, Nuccitelli, R., Cherr, G.N. & Clark, W.H. Jr, pp. 157–71. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar