Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:51:10.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A role for polyglucans in a model sea urchin embryo cellular interaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2013

Suprita Singh ,
Eddie Karabidian ,
Alexander Kandel ,
Stan Metzenberg ,
Edward J. Carroll Jr  and
Steven B. Oppenheimer
Suprita Singh
Affiliation:
Center for Cancer and Developmental Biology, California State University, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, California 91330-8303, USA.
Eddie Karabidian
Affiliation:
Center for Cancer and Developmental Biology, California State University, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, California 91330-8303, USA.
Alexander Kandel
Affiliation:
Center for Cancer and Developmental Biology, California State University, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, California 91330-8303, USA.
Stan Metzenberg
Affiliation:
Center for Cancer and Developmental Biology, California State University, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, California 91330-8303, USA.
Edward J. Carroll Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, California 91330-8262, USA.
Steven B. Oppenheimer*
Affiliation:
Center for Cancer and Developmental Biology, California State University, Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, California 91330-8303, USA.
*
All correspondence to: Steven B. Oppenheimer. Center for Cancer and Developmental Biology, California State University, Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, California 91330-8303, USA. Tel: +1 818 677 3336. Fax: +1 818 677 2034. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The enzymatic activities of commercially prepared glycosidases were verified by direct chemical assays using defined substrates and fixed and live sea urchin (Lytechinus pictus) embryos to determine if a model cellular interaction of interest to developmental biologists for over a century (interaction of archenteron tip and roof of the blastocoel) was mediated by glycans. Glycosidases (active and denatured) were incubated with microdissected archenterons and blastocoel roofs in a direct assay to learn if their enzymatic activities could prevent the normal adhesive interaction. Of the five glycosidases tested only β-amylase (an exoglycosidase) immediately inhibited the interaction at relatively low unit activity. α-Amylase (an endoglycosidase) had no measurable effect, while other glycosidases (α-glucosidase, β-glucosidase, β-galactosidase) only substantially inhibited adhesion after a 12-h incubation. We demonstrated that the five glycosidases were active (not inhibited) in the presence of embryo materials, and that cleaved sugars could be detected directly after incubation of some enzymes with the embryos. The biochemical purity of the enzymes was examined using gel electrophoresis under denaturing conditions, and the absence of contaminating proteases was confirmed using Azocoll™ substrate. As we cannot entirely rule out the presence of minor contaminating enzymatic activities, only inhibitions of adhesion after very short incubations with enzyme were considered significant and biologically relevant. Although glycans in indirect experiments have been implicated in mediating the interaction of the tip of the archenteron and roof of the blastocoel, to our knowledge, this is the first study that directly implicates polyglucans with terminal 1,4-linked glucose residues in this adhesive event.

Keywords

Archenteron attachmentβ-AmylaseDirect adhesion assayPolyglucansSea urchin embryos
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , August 2014 , pp. 419 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergmeyer, H.U. (1984). Methods of Enzymatic Analysis 3rd edn vol. 4 p. 152.Google Scholar
Bernfeld, P. (1955). Amylase, α and β. Methods Enzymol. 1, 149–58.Google Scholar
Bidwell, J.P. & Spotte, S. (1985). Artificial Seawaters, Formulas and Methods. Boston: Jones & Barlett Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Callebout, I., Gilges, D., Vignon, I. & Mornon, J.P. (2000). HYR, an extracellular module involved in cellular adhesion and related to the immunoglobulin-like fold. Protein Sci. 9, 1382–90.Google Scholar
Carrea, G., Riva, S., Secundo, F. & Danielli, B. (1989). Enzyme synthesis of various 1′-O-sucrose and 1-O-fructose esters. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1057–61.Google Scholar
Carroll, E.J., Hutchins-Carroll, V. Jr, Coyle-Thompson, C. & Oppenheimer, S.B. (2008). Hyalin is a cell adhesion molecule involved in mediating archenteron-blastocoel roof attachment. Acta Histochem. 110, 265–75.Google Scholar
Chang, C.W. (1983). α-Amylase and R-enzyme contaminants in Q-enzyme preparation from cotton leaves. Microchemical Journal. 28, 363–73.Google Scholar
Chavira, R. Jr., Burnett, T.J. & Hageman, J.H. (1984). Assaying proteinases with Azocoll. Anal. Biochem. 136, 446–50.Google Scholar
Coyle-Thompson, C. & Oppenheimer, S.B. (2005). A novel approach to study adhesion mechanisms by isolation of the interacting system. Acta Histochem. 107, 243–51.Google Scholar
Craven, G.R., Steers, E., Jr., & Anfinsen, C.B. (1965). Purification, composition, and molecular weight of the β-galactosidase of Escherichia coli . J. Biol. Chem. 240, 2468–77.Google Scholar
Daily, M.F., Latham, V.H., Garcia, C.M., Hockman, C.L., Chun, H., Oppenheimer, M.L., West, S.P., Rostamiany, K., Chao, R.L.C., Pollock, E.G. & Oppenheimer, S.B. (1994). Producing exposed coat-free embryos. Zygote 2, 221–5.Google Scholar
Davidson, E.H. (2006). The sea urchin genome: where will it lead us? Science 314, 939–40.Google Scholar
Davidson, E.H. & Cameron, R.A. (2002). Arguments for sequencing the genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. www.genome.gov/pages/research/sequencing/SegProposals/SeaUrchin_Genome.prob.2002 Google Scholar
Elodi, P., Mora, S. & Krysteva, M. (1972). Investigation of the active center of porcine pancreatic amylase. Eur. J. Biochem. 24, 577–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ernst, S. G. (1997). A century of sea urchin development. Am. Zool. 37, 250–9.Google Scholar
Evans, Bosmann, H.B. (1977). Glycosyltransferase activity in developing sea urchin embryos. J. Cell Sci. 25, 355–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Manyes, S. (2006). Proteoglycan mechanics studied by single-molecule force spectroscopy of allotypic cell adhesion glycans. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 5992–9.Google Scholar
Genghof, D.S., Brewer, C.F. & Hehre, E.J. (1978). Preparation and use of α-maltosyl fluoride as a substrate by beta amylase. Carbohydr. Res. 61, 291–9.Google Scholar
Ghazarian, H., Coyle-Thompson, C., Dalrymple, W., Hutchins-Carroll, V., Metzenberg, S., Carroll, E.J. Jr. & Oppenheimer, S.B. (2009). Exogeneous hyalin and sea urchin gastrulation, Part IV: A direct adhesion assay-progress in identifying hyaline's active sites. Zygote 18, 17–26.Google Scholar
Handa, K. & Hakomori, S.I. (2012). Carbohydrate to carbohydrate interaction in development process and cancer progression. Glycoconj. J. 29, 627–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbst, C. (1900). Ueber das auseinanderegene im furchungs und gewebe-zellen in kalkfreiem medium. Arch. F. Entwick 9, 424–63.Google Scholar
Idoni, B., Ghazarian, H., Metzenberg, S., Hutchins-Carroll, V., Oppenheimer, S.B. & Carroll, E.J. Jr. (2010). Use of specific glycosidases to probe cellular interactions in the sea urchin embryo. Exp. Cell Res. 316, 2004–11.Google Scholar
Ilyas, R., Wallis, R., Soilleux, E.J., Townsend, P., Zehnder, D., Tan, B.K., Sim, R.B., Lehnert, H., Randeva, H.S. & Mitchell, D.A. (2011). High glucose disrupts oligosaccharide recognition function via competitive inhibition: a potential mechanism for immune dysregulation in diabetes mellitus. Immunobiology 216, 126–31.Google Scholar
Jiang, N., Tan, N.S., Ho, B. & Ding, J.L. (2007). Azocoll protease activity assay. Protocol Exchange Doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.484.Google Scholar
Khurrum, M., Hernandez, A., Eskalaei, M., Badali, O., Coyle-Thompson, C. & Oppenheimer, S.B. (2004). Carbohydrate involvement in cellular interactions in sea urchin gastrulation. Acta Histochem. 106, 97–106.Google Scholar
Kolatkar, A. R. & Weis, W.I. (1996). Structural basis of galactose recognition by C-type terminal lectins. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6679–85.Google Scholar
Latham, V.H., Tully, M.J. & Oppenheimer, S.B. (1999). A putative role for carbohydrates in sea urchin gastrulation. Acta Histochem. 101, 293–303.Google Scholar
Laemmli, U.K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–5.Google Scholar
Lee, R.T., Ichikawa, Y., Fay, M., Drickamer, K., Shao, M.C. & Lee, Y.C. (2011). Survey of immune-related, mannose/fucose binding C-type lectin receptors reveals widely divergent sugar-binding specificities. Glycobiology 21, 512–20.Google Scholar
McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. (1989). Generalized Linear Models 2nd edition. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Misevic, G.N., Burger, M.M. (1993). Carbohydrate-carbohydrate interactions of a novel acidic glycan can mediate sponge cell adhesion. J Biol. Chem. 268, 4922–9.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. (1944). A photometric adaptation of the somogyi method for the determination of glucose. J Biol. Chem. 153, 375–80.Google Scholar
Papakonstantinou, E. & Misevic, G.N. (1993). Isolation and characterization of a new class of acidic glycans implicated in sea urchin embryonal cell adhesion. J. Cell Biochem. 53, 98–113.Google Scholar
Pili, R., Chang, J., Partis, R.A., Mueller, R.A., Chrest, F.J. & Passaniti, A. (1995). The α glucosidase I inhibitor castanospermine alters endothelial cell glycosylation, prevents angiogenesis, and inhibits tumor growth. Cancer Res. 55, 2920–6.Google Scholar
Rachmaninov, O., Zinger-Yosovich, K.D. & Gilboa-Garber, N. (2012). Preventing Ralstonia solanacearum adhesion with glycans from cashew, cocoa, coffee, pumpkin, and tomato seed extract. Can J Microbiol. 58, 856–62.Google Scholar
Razinia, Z., Carroll, E.J., Jr & Oppenheimer, S.B. (2007). Microplate assay for quantifying developmental morphologies: effects of exogenous hyalin on sea urchin gastrulation. Zygote 15, 159–64.Google Scholar
Schultz, M.J., Swindall, A.F. & Bellis, S.L. (2012). Regulation of the metastatic cell phenotype by sialylated glycans. Cancer Metastasis Rev. doi 10.1007/s10555-012-9359-7.Google Scholar
Somogyi, M. (1945). A new reagent for the determination of sugars. J. Biol. Chem. 160, 160–1.Google Scholar
Somogyi, M. (1952). Notes on sugar determination. J. Biol. Chem. 195, 19–23.Google Scholar
Taniguchi, N. & Korekane, H. (2011). Branched N-glycans and their implications for cell adhesion, signaling and clinical applications for cancer biomarkers and in therapeutics. BMB Rep. 44, 772–81.Google Scholar
Vokhmyanina, O.A., Rapoport, E.M., Ryzhov, I.M., Korchagina, E.Y., Pazynina, G.V., Severov, V.V., Kaltner, H., Andre, S., Gabius, H.J. & Bovin, N.V. (2011). Carbohydrate specificity of chicken and human tandem-repeat-type galectins-8 in composition of cells. Biochemistry (Mosc). 76, 1185–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, H.M., Yu, C. & Yang, Z. (2012). N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase V negatively regulates integrin α5β1-mediated monocyte adhesion and transmigration through vascular endothelium. Int. J. Oncol. 41 589–98.Google Scholar
Zheng, S., Jia, Y., Zhao, J., Wei, Q. & Liu, Y. (2012). Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides eradicate the blocking effect of fibrinogen on NK cytotoxicity against melanoma cells. Oncol Lett. 3, 613–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed