Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:06:47.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How the sperm triggers development of the egg: what have we learned and what can we expect in the next millennium?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2018

David Epel
David Epel*
Affiliation:
Hopkins Marine Station, Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The problem of how the sperm activates the egg has captivated the attention of cell and developmental biologists since the turn of the century. An early focus concerned species-specific fertilisation and the pioneering work of Lilly and Tyler (Tyler & Tyler, 1966) used immunological analogies to provide explanations of species-specific fertilisation. Contemporary work has focused on the identity of unique receptors on the sperm and the egg as exemplified in the work of Lennarz (Ohlendieck & Lennarz, 1996), Vacquier (Vacquier, et al., 1995) and Wasserman (1999). Lately, this approach has provided unexpected insights on how speciation might occur. Speciation requires reproductive isolation and creative research from the Vacquier laboratory has demonstrated how reproductive barriers might occur through rapid evolution of sperm/egg recognition systems (Lee et al., 1995).

Studies on the cell biology of activation received a major impetus in the 1930s with Mazia's observation of a calcium increase in eggs of the sea urchin following fertilisation (Mazia, 1937). His discovery, however, was a premature one in that there was no satisfactory model at that time for explaining how a calcium increase could affect cell activity. It took almost 40 years to develop a paradigm, and this came from studies on muscle and nerve which revealed how calcium increases could somehow control cell activity. Work in the 1970s rapidly established a similar role for calcium in activation of the egg at fertilisation. The first break-through was the direct demonstration by Steinhardt & Epel (1974) that calcium was involved in egg activation, through manipulation of calcium levels in sea urchin oocytes by use of calcium ionophores.

Type
Special Lecture for Citizens
Information
Zygote , Volume 8 , supplement S1: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fertilization and Development of Sea Urchin and Marine Invertebrates , December 1999 , pp. S7 - S8
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ciapa, B. & Epel, D. (1996). An early increase in cGMP follows fertilisation of sea urchin eggs. Biochem. Biophys. Res Commun. 223, 633–6.Google Scholar
Epel, D. (1997). Activation of sperm and egg during fertilisation. In Handbook of Physiology, sect. 14, Cell Physiology, (ed. Hoffman, J.F. & Jamieson, J.J.), pp. 859–84. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Epel, D., Patton, C., Wallace, R.W. & Cheung, W.Y. (1981). Calmodulin activates NAD kinase of sea urchin eggs: an early event of fertilisation. Cell 23, 543–9.Google Scholar
Galione, A., White, A.; Willmott, N., Turner, M.; Potter, B.V.L. & Watson, S.P. (1993) cGMP mobilizes intracellular calcium. Nature 365, 456–9.Google Scholar
Hamaguchi, Y. & Hiramoto, Y. (1981) Activation of sea urchin eggs by microinjection of calcium buffers. Exp. Ceil Res. 134, 171–9.Google Scholar
Kuo, R., Baxter, G., Thompson, S.H., Strieker, S.A., Patton, C., Bonaventura, J. & Epel, D.. (2000). Nitric oxide is both necessary and sufficient for activation of the egg at fertilisation. Nature 406, 633–6Google Scholar
Kuroda, R., Yamato, Y., Kuroda, H. & Katada, T. (1997). Cyclic GMP-mediated calcium release pathway functions in the early stage of fertilisation of sea urchin eggs. Zool. Sci. (Tokyo) 14, Suppl., 90.Google Scholar
Lee, H.C., Aarhus, R. & Walseth, T.F. (1993) Calcium mobilization by dual receptors during fertilisation of sea urchin eggs. Science. 261, 352–5.Google Scholar
Lee, Y-H Ota, T. & Vacquier, V.D. (1995). Positive selection is a general phenomenon in the evolution of abalone sperm lysin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 231–8.Google Scholar
Mazia, D. (1937). The release of calcium in Arbacia eggs upon fertilisation. J. Cell Comp. Physiol. 10, 291–304 Google Scholar
Ohlendieck, K. & Lennarz, W.J. 1996. Molecular mechanisms of gamete recognition in sea urchin fertilisation. Curr. Topics Dev. Biol. (ed. Pedersen, R.A. & Schatten, G.P.): 32, 39–58.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, R.A. & Epel, D. (1974). Activation of sea urchin eggs by a calcium ionophore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 71, 1915–19.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, R.A., Epel, D., Carroll, E.J. Jr. & Yanagimachi, R. (1974). Is calcium ionophore a universal activator for unfertilized eggs? Nature 252, 41–43.Google Scholar
Tyler, A. & Tyler, B.S. (1966) Physiology of fertilisation and early development. In Physiology of Echinodermata (Boolootian, R., editor), pp. 683–741. New York: Interscience.Google Scholar
Vacquier, V.D. (1981) Dynamic changes of the egg cortex. Dev. Biol. 84, 1–26.Google Scholar
Vacquier, V.D., Swanson, W.J.; & Hellberg, M.E. (1995). What have we learned about sea urchin sperm binding? Dev. Growth Differ. 37, 1–10.Google Scholar
Wassarman, P.M. (1999). Mammalian fertilisation: molecular aspects of gamete adhesion, exocytosis, and fusion. Cell 96, 175–83.Google Scholar
Whitaker, M. & Swann, K. (1993). Lighting the fuse at fertilisation. Development (Cambridge) 117, 1–12.Google Scholar