Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T12:45:12.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental hybridisation between two tropical species of sea urchins (genus Echinometra) in Okinawa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2018

M. Aminur Rahman
Affiliation:
Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan
Tsuyoshi Uehara
Affiliation:
Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan

Extract

Recent morphological, biochemical, ecological and reproductive studies have revealed that there are four sympatric biological species of sea urchins in Echinometra from Okinawa, which are currently referred to as Echinometra species A, B, C and D (e.g. Uehara et al., 1990,1991; Arakaki & Uehara, 1991; Matsuoka & Hatanaka, 1991; Palumbi & Metz, 1991; Nishihira et al., 1991). Of these four species, E. sp. A (Ea) and E. sp. C (Ec), while being most closely related to each other genetically (Matsuoka & Hatanaka, 1991), can also be distinguished from each other by differences in adult morphology and microhabitat preference. No studies have addressed the mechanisms that maintain the independence of these species despite their close affinity and sympatry.

Experimental hybridisation conducted between two genetically very divergent species of Okinawan Echinometra, E. sp. A (Ea) and E. sp. D (Ed), revealed the presence of prezygotic isolation (Asian & Uehara, 1997). To test whether the closely related Okinawan Echinometra spp. are isolated by pre- or postzygotic mechanisms, we carried out experimental hybridisation by using much closer species, Ea and Ec, through a series of cross-fertilisation experiments and rearing of the resulting hybrids. The percentage of successful heterogametic fertilisation was high when eggs of Ec and sperms of Ea were involved, whereas it was considerably lower with eggs of Ea and sperms of Ec. This reduction, at least among some heterogametic crosses, indicates the presence of a gamete recognition protein binding system, as reported by Metz et al. (1994) and Metz & Palumbi (1996), which might eventually lead to gametic incompatibility and reproductive isolation.

Type
Special Lecture for Citizens
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arakaki, Y. & Uehara, T. (1991). In Biology of Echinodermata (ed. Yanagisawa, T., Yasumasu, I., Oguro, C., Suzuki, N. & Motokawa, T.), pp. 105–11. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Asian, L.M. & Uehara, T. (1997). Invert. Reprod. Dev. 31, 319–24.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, N. & Hatanaka, T. (1991). Zool. Sci. 8, 121–33.Google Scholar
Metz, E.C., Kane, R.E., Yanagimachi, H. & Palumbi, S.R. (1994). Biol. Bull. 187, 2334.Google Scholar
Metz, E.C. & Palumbi, S.R. (1996). Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 397406.Google Scholar
Nishihira, M., Sato, Y., Arakaki, Y. & Tsuchiya, M. (1991). In Biology of Echinodermata (ed. Yanagisawa, T., Yasumasu, I., Oguro, C., Suzuki, N. & Motokawa, T.), pp. 91104. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Palumbi, S.R. & Metz, E.C. (1991). Mol. Biol. Evol. 8, 227–39.Google Scholar
Uehara, T., Asakura, H. & Arakaki, Y. (1990). In Advances in Invertebrate Reproduction (ed. Hoshi, M. & Yamashita, O.), pp. 305–10. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Uehara, T., Shingaki, M., Taira, K., Arakaki, Y. & Nakatomi, H. (1991). In Biology of Echinodermata (ed. Yanagisawa, T., Yasumasu, I., Oguro, C., Suzuki, N. & Motokawa, T.), pp. 119–29. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar