Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:00:26.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embryonic development of the fire-eye-tetra Moenkhausia oligolepis (Characiformes: Characidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2021

Raquel Santos dos Santos ,
Jeane Rodrigues Rodrigues ,
Jhennifer Gomes Cordeiro ,
Hadda Tercya ,
Marissol Leite ,
Bruna Patrícia Dutra Costa ,
Raphael da Silva Costa ,
Caio Maximino  and
Diógenes Henrique de Siqueira-Silva Open the ORCID record for Diógenes Henrique de Siqueira-Silva [Opens in a new window]
Raquel Santos dos Santos
Affiliation:
Research Group of Studies on the Reproduction of Amazon fish (GERPA/LANEC), Faculdade de Biologia (FACBIO), University of South and Southern of Pará (Unifesspa), Marabá, Pará, Brazil Aquam Research Group, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Jeane Rodrigues Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Research Group of Studies on the Reproduction of Amazon fish (GERPA/LANEC), Faculdade de Biologia (FACBIO), University of South and Southern of Pará (Unifesspa), Marabá, Pará, Brazil
Jhennifer Gomes Cordeiro
Affiliation:
Research Group of Studies on the Reproduction of Amazon fish (GERPA/LANEC), Faculdade de Biologia (FACBIO), University of South and Southern of Pará (Unifesspa), Marabá, Pará, Brazil
Hadda Tercya
Affiliation:
Research Group of Studies on the Reproduction of Amazon fish (GERPA/LANEC), Faculdade de Biologia (FACBIO), University of South and Southern of Pará (Unifesspa), Marabá, Pará, Brazil
Marissol Leite
Affiliation:
Research Group of Studies on the Reproduction of Amazon fish (GERPA/LANEC), Faculdade de Biologia (FACBIO), University of South and Southern of Pará (Unifesspa), Marabá, Pará, Brazil
Bruna Patrícia Dutra Costa
Affiliation:
Research Group of Studies on the Reproduction of Amazon fish (GERPA/LANEC), Faculdade de Biologia (FACBIO), University of South and Southern of Pará (Unifesspa), Marabá, Pará, Brazil PPG in Biodiversity and Biotechnology (BIONORTE)
Raphael da Silva Costa
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Fish Biotechnology, National Center for Research and Conservation of Continental Fish, Chico Mendes Institute of Biodiversity Conservation, São Paulo, Brazil
Caio Maximino
Affiliation:
Research Group of Studies on the Reproduction of Amazon fish (GERPA/LANEC), Faculdade de Biologia (FACBIO), University of South and Southern of Pará (Unifesspa), Marabá, Pará, Brazil PPG in Biodiversity and Biotechnology (BIONORTE)
Diógenes Henrique de Siqueira-Silva*
Affiliation:
Research Group of Studies on the Reproduction of Amazon fish (GERPA/LANEC), Faculdade de Biologia (FACBIO), University of South and Southern of Pará (Unifesspa), Marabá, Pará, Brazil PPG in Biodiversity and Biotechnology (BIONORTE)
*
Author for correspondence: Diógenes Henrique de Siqueira-Silva. Research Group of Studies on the Reproduction of Amazon fish (GERPA/LANEC), Faculdade de Biologia (FACBIO), University of South and Southern of Pará (Unifesspa), Marabá, Pará, Brazil. Tel: +55 94981135614. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This study describes the embryonic development of Moenkhausia oligolepis in laboratory conditions. After fertilization, the embryos were collected every 10 min up to 2 h, then every 20 min up to 4 h, and afterwards every 30 min until hatching. The fertilized eggs of M. oligolepis measured approximately 0.85 ± 0.5 mm and had an adhesive surface. Embryonic development lasted 14 h at 25ºC through the zygote, cleavage, blastula, gastrula, neurula, and segmentation phases. Hatching occurred in embryos around the 30-somites stage. The present results contribute only the second description of embryonic development to a species from the Moenkhausia genus, being also the first for this species. Such data are of paramount importance considering the current conflicting state of this genus phylogenetic classification and may help taxonomic studies. Understanding the biology of a species that is easily managed in laboratory conditions and has an ornamental appeal may assist studies in its reproduction to both supply the aquarium market and help the species conservation in nature. Moreover, these data enable the use of M. oligolepis as a model species in biotechnological applications, such as the germ cell transplantation approach.

Keywords

EmbryogenesisIncubationMorphologyNeotropical fishTemperature
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , June 2021 , pp. 194 - 198
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arashiro, DR, Yasui, GS, Calado, LL, Nascimento, NFD, Santos, MPD, Alves do Santos, SC and Senhorini, JA (2018). Synchronizing developmental stages in neotropical catfishes for application in germ cell transplantation. Zygote 26, 135–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benine, RC, Castro, RMC and Santos, ACA (2007). A new Moenkhausia eigenmann, 1903 (Ostariophysi: Characiformes) from Chapada Diamantina, rio Paraguacu basin, Bahia, northeastern Brazil. Neotrop Ichthyol 5, 259–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benine, RC, Mariguela, TC and Oliveira, C (2009). New species of Moenkhausia Eigenmann, 1903 (Characiformes: Characidae) with comments on the Moenkhausia oligolepis species complex. Neotrop Ichthyol 7, 161–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, EL, Alves, MS, Ferreira, RM and Godinho, HP (1995). Embryogenesis of the neotropical freshwater Siluriforme Pseudoplatystoma coruscans . Aqua Living Resour 8, 343–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, FR, Sarmento-Soares, LM and Martins-Pinheiro, RF (2014). Redescription of Moenkhausia doceana (Steindachner, 1877) (Ostariophysi: Characiformes): a characid from the Northeastern Mata Atlântica ecoregion, Brazil. Neotrop Ichthyol 12, 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, WJEM. (1994). Description of two new species of the genus Moenkhausia (Characiformes: Characidae) from the central Brazil. Zoologischer Anzeiger 232, 21–9.Google Scholar
De Alexandre, JS, Ninhaus-Silveira, A, Veríssimo-Silveira, R, Buzollo, H, Senhorini, JA and Chaguri, MP (2009). Structural analysis of the embryonic development in Brycon cephalus (Gunther, 1869). Zygote 18, 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domingos, TJ, Moraes, LN, Moresco, RM, Margarido, VP and Venere, PC (2014). Genetic and morphological diversity of Moenkhausia oligolepis (Characiformes: Characidae) populations in the tributaries of the Araguaia River, Brazil: implications for taxonomy and conservation. Genet Mol Res 13, 7979–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dos Santos, MP, Yasui, GS, Xavier, PLP, de Macedo Adamov, NS, do Nascimento, NF, Fujimoto, T and Nakaghi, LSO (2016). Morphology of gametes, post-fertilization events and the effect of temperature on the embryonic development of Astyanax altiparanae (Teleostei, Characidae). Zygote 24, 795–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faustino, F, Nakaghi, LSO and Neumann, E (2011). Brycon gouldingi (Teleostei, Characidae): aspects of the embryonic development in a new fish species with aquaculture potential. Zygote 19, 351–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froese, R and Pauly, D (2018). Moenkausya oligolepis (Gunther, 1864) Glass tetra. World Wide Web electronic publication. FishBase. Disponivel em: <https://www.fishbase.se/Summary/SpeciesSummary.php?id=12391&lang=portuguese> Accessed 7 August 2020.+Accessed+7+August+2020.>Google Scholar
Godinho, AL, Lamas, IR and Godinho, HP (2009). Reproductive ecology of Brazilian freshwater fishes. Environ Biol Fishes 87, 143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, TK and Falk-Petersen, IB (2001). The influence of rearing temperature on early development and growth of spotted wolffish Anarhichas minor (Olafsen). Aquacult Res 32, 369–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hojo, RES, Santos, GB and Bazzoli, N (2004). Reproductive biology of Moenkhausia intermedia (Eigenmann) (Pisces, Characiformes) in Itumbiara Reservoir, Goiás, Brazil. Rev Brasil Zool 21, 519–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ICMBio (2018). Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Executive Summary. Brazil Red Book of Threatened Species of Fauna. http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/images/stories/comunicacao/publicacoes/publicacoes-diversas/dcom_sumario_executivo_livro_vermelho_ed_2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Isaú, ZA, Rizzo, E, Amaral, TB, Mourad, NM and Viveiros, AT (2011). Structural analysis of oocytes, post-fertilization events and embryonic development of the Brazilian endangered teleost Brycon insignis (Characiformes). Zygote 21, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keckeis, H, Bauer-Nemeschkal, E and Kamler, E (1996). Effects of reduced oxygen level on the mortality and hatching rate of Chondrostoma nasus embryos. J Fish Biol 49, 430–40.Google Scholar
Kolm, N and Ahnesjö, I (2005). Do egg size and parental care coevolve in fishes? J Fish Biol 66, 1499–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, LV, Melo, MAP, Oliveira, FCE, Pinheiro, JPS, Campello, CC, Nunes, JF and Salmito-Vanderley, CSB (2013). Determinação da dose inseminante e embriogênese na fertilização artificial de tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum). Arq Bras Med Vet Zoo 65, 421–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, FC and Toledo-Piza, M (2001). New species of Moenkhausia (Characiformes: Characidae) from the rio Negro of Brazil. Copeia 4, 1058–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luz, RK, Reynalte-tataje, DA, Ferreira, AA and Zaniboni-Filho, E (2001). Desenvolvimento embrionário e estágios larvais do mandi-amarelo Pimelodus maculatus. Bo Inst Pesca 27, 49–55.Google Scholar
Marques, C, Okada Nakaghi, LS, Faustino, F, Ganeco, LN and Senhorini, JA (2008). Observation of the embryonic development in Pseudoplatystoma coruscans (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) under light and scanning electron microscopy. Zygote 16, 333–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matos, E, Matos, P, Corral, L and Azevedo, C (2003). A morfologia ultra-estrutural de microrganismos parasitas que causam microsporidioses e mixosporidioses em peixes tropicais brasileiros. Boletim Técnico CEPTA 16, 27–40.Google Scholar
Ninhaus-Silveira, A, Foresti, F and De Azevedo, A (2006). Structural and ultrastructural analysis of embryonic development of Prochilodus lineatus (Valenciennes, 1836) (Characiforme; Prochilodontidae). Zygote 14, 217–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, CS and Guimarães, MR (2012). Fatores ambientais e reprodução dos peixes. Revista da Biologia 8, 58–61. doi.org/10.7594/revbio.08.10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, E, Sato, Y, Barreto, BP and Godinho, HP (2002). Adhesiveness and surface patterns of eggs in neotropical freshwater teleosts. J Fish Biol 61, 615–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues-Galdino, AM, Maiolino, CV, Forgati, M, Donatti, L, Mikos, JD, Carneiro, PCF and Rios, FSA (2010). Development of the neotropical catfish Rhamdia quelen (Siluriformes, Heptapteridae) incubated in different temperature regimes. Zygote 18, 131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romagosa, E, Narahara, MY and Fenerich-Verani, N (2001). Stages of embryonic development of the ‘matrinxã’, Brycon cephalus (Pisces, Characidae). Bol Inst Pesca 27, 29–32.Google Scholar
Santos, JE, Padilha, GEV, Bomcompagni-Júnior, O, Santos, GB, Rizzo, E and Bazzoli, N (2006). Ovarian follicle growth in the catfish Iheringichthys labrosus (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae). Tissue Cell 38, 303–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, Y, Sampaio, EV, Fenerich-Verani, N and Verani, JR (2006). Biologia reprodutiva e reprodução induzida de duas espécies de Characidae (Osteichthyes, Characiformes) da bacia do São Francisco, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Rev Brasil Zoo 23, 267–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddique, MAM, Psenicka, M, Cosson, J, Dzyuba, B, Rodina, M, Golpour, A and Linhart, O (2014). Egg stickiness in artificial reproduction of sturgeon: an overview. Rev Aquacult 8, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solnica-Krezel, L (2005). Conserved patterns of cell movements during vertebrate gastrulation. Curr Biol 15, R213–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villanueva, R, Quintana, D, Petroni, G and Bozzano, A (2011). Factors influencing the embryonic development and hatchling size of the oceanic squid Illex coindetii following in vitro fertilization. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 407, 54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, BE (2011). Early ontogeny of aquarium raised Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae (Characiformes: Characidae). Ichthyol Res 59, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, AA, Arantes, FP, Sato, Y, Rizzo, E and Bazzoli, N (2012). Oocyte adhesiveness and embryonic development of Astyanax bimaculatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Pisces: Characidae). Zygote 21, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamagami, K, Hamazaki, TS, Yasumasut, S and Masuda, K (1992). Molecular and cellular basis of formation, hardening, and breakdown of the egg envelope in fish. Int Rev Cytol 136, 51–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, S, Zhang, X, Liu, X, Hu, J, Wang, Y, Du, Z and Yan, T (2014). Chorion surface ultrastructure of loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus: adaptation to the environment and correlation with the reproductive strategy. J Nat Hist 48, 35–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar