Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-c4bhq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-12T05:07:20.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Embryonic development and larval growth of Brycon nattereri Günther, 1864 (Characidae) and its implications for captive rearing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2017

Alexandre N. Maria ,
Alexandre Ninhaus-Silveira ,
Laura H. Orfão  and
Ana T.M. Viveiros
Alexandre N. Maria*
Affiliation:
Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros, Av. Beira Mar 3250, Bairro Jardins, Zip Code: 49025–040, Aracaju, SE, Brazil.
Alexandre Ninhaus-Silveira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista ‘Júlio de Mesquita Filho’, Rua Monção, 226, Zona Norte, Ilha Solteira, SP, 15385-000, Brazil.
Laura H. Orfão
Affiliation:
Universidade José do Rosário Vellano, Rod. MG 179, km 0, Campus Universitário, Alfenas, MG, 37130-000, Brazil.
Ana T.M. Viveiros
Affiliation:
Departmento de Zootecnica, Universidade Federal de Lavras, P.O. Box 3037, Lavras, MG, 37200-000, Brazil.
*
All correspondence to: Alexandre Nizio Maria. Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros, Av. Beira Mar 3250, Bairro Jardins, Zip Code: 49025–040, Aracaju, SE, Brazil. Tel: +55 79 4009 1385. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The aim of this study was to describe, for the first time, the embryogenesis and larval growth of the Paraitinga Brycon nattereri Günther, 1864 reared in captivity. After artificial fertilization, eggs were incubated at constant temperature (~19°C) and collected every 15 min during the first 3 h and then every 3 h until hatching. Five larvae were collected daily over 15 days for evaluation of the length, yolk sac volume and specific growth rate. The following stages of embryonic development were identified: zygote, cleavage, gastrula, segmentation and larval. The hatching occurred after 50–54 h, with larvae poorly developed and fully depigmented, devoid of mouth and swimming capacity, presenting 6.32 mm total length and 3.64 mm3 yolk sac volume. The mouth opening was observed between days 3–4 after hatching. The yolk sac absorption was slow during the first 3 days, increasing sharply after this period, being completed on the day 11. During this period there was a decrease in the larval growth rate. After yolk sac absorption, an increase in the growth rate was observed that coincided with the start of exogenous feeding. Cannibalism was not observed during the 15 days of evaluation. The initial development of B. nattereri was slow and poorly developed larvae in relation to other Brycon species, certainly due to the lower temperature required for egg incubation and larval rearing. Other studies are needed in order to develop techniques to improve the methods of incubating eggs and feeding larvae.

Keywords

DevelopmentEmbryoLarvaeNeotropicalThreatened fish
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , December 2017 , pp. 711 - 718
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alexandre, J.S., Ninhaus-Silveira, A., Veríssimo-Silveira, R., Buzollo, H., Senhorini, J.A. & Chaguri, M.P. (2010). Structural analysis of the embryonic development in Brycon cephalus (Günther, 1869). Zygote 18, 173–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrade-Talmelli, E.F., Kavamoto, E.T., Romagosa, E. & Fenerich-Verani, N. (2001). Embryonic and larval development of the ‘piabanha’, Brycon insignis, Steindachner, 1876 (Pisces, Characidae). B. Inst. Pesca 27, 21–7.Google Scholar
Andrade-Talmelli, E.F., Kavamoto, E.T., Narahara, M.Y. & Fenerich-Verani, N. (2002). Reprodução induzida da piabanha, Brycon insignis (Steindachner, 1876), mantida em cativeiro. R. Bras. Zootec. 31, 803–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atencio-García, V., Zaniboni-Filho, E., Pardo-Carrasco, S. & Arias-Castellanos, A. (2003). Influência da primeira alimentação na larvicultura e alevinagem do yamú Brycon siebenthalae . Acta Scientarium 25, 61–72.Google Scholar
Baras, E., Ndao, M., Maxi, M.Y.J., Jeandrain, D., Thomé, J.P., Vandewalle, P. & Mélard, C. (2000). Sibling cannibalism in dorada under experimental conditions, I. Ontogeny, dynamics, bioenergetics of cannibalism and prey size selectivity. J. Fish Biol. 57, 1001–20.Google Scholar
Belmont, R.A.F. (1994). Considerações sobre a propagação artificial da piracanjuba, (Brycon orbignyanus). In Seminário sobre criação de espécies do gênero Brycon, 1994, pp. 17–18. Pirassununga, SP: Anais.Google Scholar
Blaxter, J.H.S. & Hempel, G. (1963). The influence of egg size on herring larvae (Cuplea harengus L). ICES J. Mar. Sci 28, 211–40Google Scholar
Clavijo-Ayala, J.A. & Arias-Castellanos, J.A. (2004). Avances en el estudio de la embriología del yamú, Brycon siebenthalae (Pisces: Characidae). Dahlia 7, 37–48.Google Scholar
Clavijo-Ayala, J.A., Vetorelli, M.P. & Portella, M.C. (2006). Desenvolvimento inicial e caracteres de identificação de larvas vitelinas de Pacu Piaractus mesopotamicus (Holmberg, 1887). In 4th Congresso iberoamericano virtual de acuicultura, 4, Zaragosa, CIVA 2006, pp. 819–828.Google Scholar
Eckmann, R. (1984). Induced reproduction in Brycon cf. erythropterus. Aquaculture 38, 379–82.Google Scholar
Faustino, F., Makino, L.C., Neumann, E. & Nakaghi, L.S.O. (2015). Morphological and morphometric aspects of early life stages of piabanha Brycon gouldingi (Characidae). J. Fish Biol., 86, 1491–506.Google Scholar
Gomes, R.Z., Sato, Y., Rizzo, E. & Bazzoli, N. (2013). Early development of Brycon orthotaenia (Pisces: Characidae). Zygote 21, 11–20.Google Scholar
Isaú, Z.A., Rizzo, E., Amaral, T.B., Mourad, N.M.N. & Viveiros, A.T.M. (2013). Structural analysis of oocytes, post-fertilization events and embryonic development of the Brazilian endangered teleost Brycon insignis (Characiformes). Zygote 21, 85–94.Google Scholar
Jaworski, A. & Kamler, E. (2002). Development of a bioenergetics model for fish embryos and larvae during the yolk feeding period. J. Fish Biol. 60, 785–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamler, E. (1992). Early Life History of Fish: An Energetic Approach. London: Chapman and Hall, London, 267 pp.Google Scholar
Kamler, E. (2002). Ontogeny of yolk-feeding fish: an ecological perspective. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher 12, 79–103 Google Scholar
Landinez, M.A., Senhorini, J.Á. & Sanabria, A.I. (2004). Desenvolvimento embrionário de piracanjuba (Brycon orbignyanus). B. Tec CEPTA, 17, 1–12.Google Scholar
Leonardo, A.F.G., Hoshiba, M.A., Senhorini, J.A. & Urbinati, E.C. (2008). Canibalismo em larvas de matrinxã, Brycon cephalus, após imersão dos ovos a diferentes concentrações de triiodotironina (T3). B. Inst. Pesca 34, 231–9.Google Scholar
Lima, F.C. (2017). A review of the Cis-Andean species of the genus Brycon Müller & Troschel (Characiformes: Characidae). Zootaxa 4222, 1–189.Google Scholar
Lima, F.C.T., Albrecht, M.P., Pavanelli, C.S. & Vono, V. (2008). Threatened fishes of the world: Brycon nattereri Günther, 1864 (Characidae). Environ. Biol. Fish 1, 1–2.Google Scholar
Maria, A.N., Orfão, L.H., Rizzo, E., Ninhaus-Silveira, A. & Viveiros, A.T.M. (2015). Histochemical and morphological features of the intraovarian and stripped oocytes of the Brazilian endangered teleost pirapitinga Brycon nattereri (Characiformes). Zygote 23, 360–6.Google Scholar
Mira-Lopez, T.M., Medina-Robles, V.M., Velasco-Santamaria, Y.M. & Cruz-Casallas, P.E. (2007). Valores morfométricos en larvas de yamú Brycon amazonicus (Pisces: Characidae) obtenidas con semen fresco y crioconservado. Actual Biol. 29, 203–13.Google Scholar
Morrison, C.M., Miyake, T. & Wright, J.R. (2001). Histological study of development of the embryo and early larva of Oreochromis niloticus (Pisces, Cichlidae). J. Morphol. 247, 172–96.Google Scholar
Nakaghi, L.S.O., Neumann, E., Faustino, F., Mendes, J.M.R. & Braga, F.M. (2014). Moments of induced spawning and embryonic development of Brycon amazonicus (Teleostei, Characidae). Zygote 22, 549–57.Google Scholar
Nakatani, K., Agostinho, A.A., Baumgartner, G., Bialetzki, A., Sanches, P.Y., Makrakis, M.C. & Pavanelli, C.S. (2001). Ovos e larvas de peixes de água doce. Maringá: EDUEM, 378 pp.Google Scholar
Narahara, M.Y., Andrade-Talmelli, E.F., Kavamoto, E.T. & Godinho, H.M. (2002). Reprodução induzida da pirapitinga-do-sul, Brycon opalinus (Curvier, 1819), mantida em condições de confinamento. R. Bras. Zootec. 31,1070–5.Google Scholar
Ninhaus-Silveira, A., Foresti, F. & Azevedo, A. (2006). Structural and ultrastructural analysis of embryonic development of Prochilodus lineatus (Valenciennes, 1836) (Characiforme; Prochilodontidae). Zygote 14, 217–29.Google Scholar
Ojanguren, A.F. & Braña, F. (2003). Thermal dependence of embryonic growth and development in brown trout. J. Fish Biol. 62, 580–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, A.V., Viveiros, A.T.M., Maria, A.N., Freitas, R.T.F. & Isau, Z.A. (2007). Sucesso do resfriamento e congelamento de sêmen de pirapitinga Brycon nattereri. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 26, 1509–1515.Google Scholar
Puvanendran, V. & Brown, J.A. (1999). Foraging, growth and survival of Atlantic cod larvae reared in different prey concentrations. Aquaculture 175, 77–92.Google Scholar
Reynalte-Tataje, D.A., Zaniboni-Filho, E. & Esquivel, J.R. (2004). Embryonic and larvae development of piracanjuba, Brycon orbignyanus, Valeciennes, 1849 (Pisces, Characidae). Acta Sci. Biol. Sci. 26, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romagosa, E., Narahara, M.Y. & Fenerich-Verani, N. (2001). Stages of embryonic development of the ‘matrinxã’, Brycon cephalus (Pisces, Characidae). B. Inst. Pesca, 27, 27–32.Google Scholar
Rosa, R.S. & Lima, F.C.T. (2008). Os peixes brasileiros ameaçados de extinção. In Livro vermelho da fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinção 1st edn (eds Machado, A.B.M., Drummond, G.M. & Paglia, A.P.), pp. 8–285. Brasília, DF: MMA; Belo Horizonte, MG: Fundação Biodiversitas.Google Scholar
Sato, Y., Fenerich-Verani, N., Nuñer, A.P.O., Godinho, H.P. & Verani, J.R. (2003a). Padrões reprodutivos de peixes da bacia do São Francisco. In Águas, peixes e pescadores do São Francisco das Minas Gerais (eds Godinho, H.P. & Godinho, A.L.), pp. 229–74. Belo Horizonte: PUC Minas.Google Scholar
Sato, Y., Fenerich-Verani, N. & Godinho, H.P. (2003b). Reprodução induzida de peixes da bacia do São Francisco. In Águas, peixes e pescadores do São Francisco das Minas Gerais (eds Godinho, H.P. & Godinho, A.L.), pp. 275–89. Belo Horizonte: PUC Minas.Google Scholar
Souza, G. (2004). Reprodução induzida, ontogenia inicial, etologia larval e alevinagem da piabanha (Brycon insignis, Steindachner, 1877). Dissertation, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense.Google Scholar
Teletchea, F. & Fontaine, P. (2010). Comparison of early life-stage strategies in temperate freshwater fish species: trade-offs are directed towards first feeding of larvae in spring and early summer. J. Fish Biol., 77, 257–78.Google Scholar
Van Zutphen, L.F., Baumans, V. & Beynen, A.C. (2001). Principles of Laboratory Animal Science: A Contribution to the Humane Use and Care of Animals and to the Quality of Experimental Results. Revised edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Viveiros, A.T.M., Maria, A.N., Amaral, T.B., Orfão, L.H., Isaú, Z.A. & Veríssimo-Silveira, R. (2012a). Spermatozoon ultrastructure and sperm cryopreservation of the Brazilian dry season spawner fish pirapitinga, Brycon nattereri. Aquacult. Res. 43, 546–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viveiros, A.T.M., Isaú, Z.A, Caneppele, D. & Leal, M.C. (2012b). Sperm cryopreservation affects postthaw motility, but not embryogenesis or larval growth in the Brazilian fish Brycon insignis (Characiformes). Theriogenology 78, 803–10.Google Scholar
Zaniboni-Filho, E. & Barbosa, N.D.C. (1996). Priming hormone administration to induce spawning of Brazilian migratory fish. Rev. Bras. Biol. 56, 655–9.Google Scholar
Zaniboni-Filho, E., Reynalte-Tataje, D. & Weingartner, M. (2006). Potencialidad del gênero Brycon en la piscicultura brasileña. Rev. Col. Cienc. Pec. 19, 233–40.Google Scholar