Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:25:43.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Embryo culture at a reduced oxygen concentration of 5%: a mini review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2019

R. Sciorio*
Affiliation:
Edinburgh Assisted Conception Programme, EFREC, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK
G.D. Smith
Affiliation:
Departments of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, Ob/Gyn, Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
*
Address for correspondence: R. Sciorio, Edinburgh Assisted Conception Programme, EFREC, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

The optimum oxygen tension for culturing mammalian embryos has been widely debated by the scientific community. While several laboratories have moved to using 5% as the value for oxygen tension, the majority of modern in vitro fertilization (IVF) laboratory programmes still use 20%. Several in vivo studies have shown the oxygen tension measured in the oviduct of mammals fluctuates between 2% and 8% and in cows and primates this values drops to <2% in the uterine milieu. In human IVF, a non-physiological level of 20% oxygen has been used in the past. However, several studies have shown that atmospheric oxygen introduces adverse effects to embryo development, not limited to numerous molecular and cellular physiology events. In addition, low oxygen tension plays a critical role in reducing the high level of detrimental reactive oxygen species within cells, influences embryonic gene expression, helps with embryo metabolism of glucose, and enhances embryo development to the blastocyst stage. Collectively, this improves embryo implantation potential. However, clinical studies have yielded contradictory results. In almost all reports, some level of improvement has been identified in embryo development or implantation, without any observed drawbacks. This review article will examine the recent literature and discusses ongoing efforts to understand the benefits that low oxygen tension can bring to mammal embryo development in vitro.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baltz, JM and Biggers, JD (1991) Oxygen transport to embryos in microdrop cultures. Mol Reprod Dev 28, 351–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barja, G (1999) Mitochondrial oxygen radical generation and leak: sites of production in states 4 and 3, organ specificity, and relation to aging and longevity. J Bioenerg Biomembr 31, 347–66.10.1023/A:1005427919188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batty, E, Jensen, K and Freemont, P (2009) PML nuclear bodies and their spatial relationships in the mammalian cell nucleus. Front Biosci 14, 1182–96.10.2741/3302CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedaiwy, MA, Falcone, T, Mohamed, MS, Aleem, AA, Sharma, RK, Worley, SE, Thornton, J and Agarwal, A (2004) Differential growth of human embryos in vitro: role of reactive oxygen species. Fertil Steril 82, 593600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blondin, P, Coenen, K and Sirard, MA (1997) The impact of reactive oxygen species on bovine sperm fertilizing ability and oocytes maturation. J Androl 18, 454–60.Google Scholar
Bontekoe, S, Mantikou, E, van Wely, M, Seshadri, S, Repping, S and Mastenbroek, S (2012) Low oxygen concentrations for embryo culture in assisted reproductive technologies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11, 7.Google Scholar
Booth, PJ, Holm, P and Callesen, H (2005) The effect of oxygen tension on porcine embryonic development is dependent on embryo type. Theriogenology 63, 2040–52.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.10.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catt, JW and Henman, M (2000) Toxic effects of oxygen on human embryo development. Hum Reprod 15(Suppl 2), 199206.10.1093/humrep/15.suppl_2.199CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christianson, MS, Zhao, Y, Shoham, G, Granot, I, Safran, A, Khafagy, A, Leong, M and Shoham, Z (2014) Embryo catheter loading and embryo culture techniques: results of a worldwide web-based survey. J Assist Reprod Genet 31, 1029–36.10.1007/s10815-014-0250-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciray, HN, Aksoy, T, Yaramanci, K, Karayaka, I and Bahceci, M (2009) In vitro culture under physiologic oxygen concentration improves blastocyst yield and quality: a prospective randomized survey on sibling oocytes. Fertil Steril 91(Suppl 4), 1459–61.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1707CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croxatto, HB (2002) Physiology of gamete and embryo transport through the fallopian tube. Reprod BioMed Online 4, 160–9.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61935-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de los Santos, MJ, Gámiz, P, Albert, C, Galán, A, Viloria, T, Pérez, S, Romero, JL and Remohï, J (2013) Reduced oxygen tension improves embryo quality but not clinical pregnancy rates: a randomized clinical study into ovum donation cycles. Fertil Steril 100, 402–7.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donjacour, A, Liu, X, Lin, W, Simbulan, R and Rinaudo, PF (2014) In vitro fertilization affects growth and glucose metabolism in a sex-specific manner in an outbred mouse model. Biol Reprod 90, 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumoulin, JC, Vanvuchelen, RC, Land, JA, Pieters, MH, Geraedts, JP and Evers, JL (1995) Effect of oxygen concentration on in vitro fertilization and embryo culture in the human and the mouse. Fertil Steril 63, 115–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumoulin, JC, Meijers, CJ, Bras, M, Coonen, E, Geraedts, JP and Evers, JL (1999) Effect of oxygen concentration on human in-vitro fertilization and embryo culture. Hum Reprod 14, 465–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edwards, RG, Purdy, JM, Steptoe, PC and Walters, DE (1981) Am J Obstet Gynecol 141, 408–16.10.1016/0002-9378(81)90603-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eppig, JJ and Wigglesworth, K (1995) Factors affecting the developmental competence of mouse oocytes grown in vitro: oxygen concentration. Mol Reprod Dev 42, 447–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Favetta, LA, St John, EJ, King, WA and Betts, DH (2007) High levels of p66shc and intracellular ROS in permanently arrested early embryos. Free Radic Biol Med 42, 1201–10.10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.01.018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feil, D, Lane, M, Roberts, CT, Kelley, RL, Edwards, LJ, Thompson, JG and Kind, KL (2006) Effect of culturing mouse embryos under different oxygen concentrations on subsequent fetal and placental development. J Physiol 572(Pt 1), 8796.10.1113/jphysiol.2005.102681CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrieres-Hoa, A, Roman, K, Mullet, T, Gala, A and Hamamah, S (2017) Ultra-low (2%) oxygen tension significantly improves human blastocyst development and quality. Hum Reprod 32(Supp 1), i26.Google Scholar
Fischer, B and Bavister, BD (1993) Oxygen tension in the oviduct and uterus of rhesus monkeys, hamsters and rabbits. J Reprod Fertil 99, 673–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, DK, Lane, M, Stevens, J and Schoolcraft, WB (2001) Noninvasive assessment of human embryo nutrient consumption as a measure of developmental potential. Fertil Steril 76, 1175–80.10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02888-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, DK and Lane, M, (2005) Ex vivo early embryo development and effects on gene expression and imprinting. Reprod Fertil Dev 17, 361–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guérin, P, El Mouatassim, S and Ménézo, Y (2001) Oxidative stress and protection against reactive oxygen species in the pre-implantation embryo and its surroundings. Hum Reprod Update 7, 175–89.10.1093/humupd/7.2.175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidri, AA, Miller, IM and Gwatkin, RB (1971) Culture of mouse oocytes in vitro, using a system without oil or protein. J Reprod Fertil 26, 409–11.10.1530/jrf.0.0260409CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, MB, Arcellana-Panlilio, MY, Zhang, X, Schultz, GA and Watson, AJ (1995) Expression of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes in preimplantation mouse and cow embryos and primary bovine oviduct cultures employed for embryo coculture. Biol Reprod 53, 532–40.10.1095/biolreprod53.3.532CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heo, YS, Cabrera, LM, Bormann, CL, Shah, CT, Takayama, S and Smith, GD (2010) Dynamic microfunnel culture enhances mouse embryo development and pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 25, 613–22.10.1093/humrep/dep449CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higdon, HL, Blackhurst, DW and Boone, WR (2008) Incubator management in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril 89, 703–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, FD (2006) Energy metabolism of the inner cell mass and trophectoderm of the mouse blastocyst. Differentiation 74, 11–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishii, N (2007) Role of oxidative stress from mitochondria on aging and cancer. Cornea 26, S39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, MH and Nasr-Esfahani, MH (1994) Radical solutions and cultural problems: could free oxygen radicals be responsible for the impaired development of preimplantation mammalian embryos in vitro? Bioessays 16, 31–8.10.1002/bies.950160105CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaser, DJ, Bogale, B, Sarda, V, Farland, LV and Racowsky, C (2016) Randomized controlled trial of low (5%) vs. ultra-low (2%) oxygen tension for in vitro development of human embryos. Fertil Steril 106, e4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaser, DJ, Bogale, B, Sarda, V, Farland, LV, Williams, PL and Racowsky, C (2018) Randomized controlled trial of low (5%) versus ultralow (2%) oxygen for extended culture using bipronucleate and tripronucleate human preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril 109, 1030–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz-Jaffe, MG, Linck, DW, Schoolcraft, WB and Gardner, DK (2005) A proteomic analysis of mammalian preimplantation embryonic development. Reproduction 130, 899905.10.1530/rep.1.00854CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kea, B, Gebhardt, J, Watt, J, Westphal, LM, Lathi, RB, Milki, AA and Behr, B (2007) Effect of reduced oxygen concentrations on the outcome of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 87, 213–6.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.066CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovačič, B and Vlaisavljević, V (2008) Influence of atmospheric versus reduced oxygen concentration on development of human blastocysts in vitro: a prospective study on sibling oocytes. Reprod BioMed Online 17, 229–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovačič, B, Sajko, MC and Vlaisavljević, V (2010) A prospective, randomized trial on the effect of atmospheric versus reduced oxygen concentration on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril 94, 511–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovačič, B (2012) Culture systems: low-oxygen culture. Methods Mol Biol 912, 249–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Krisher, RL and Prather, RS (2012) A role for the Warburg effect in preimplantation embryo development: metabolic modification to support rapid cell proliferation. Mol Reprod Dev 79, 311–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwon, HC, Yang, HW, Hwang, KJ, Yoo, JH, Kim, MS, Lee, CH, Ryu, HS and Oh, KS (1999) Effects of low oxygen condition on the generation of reactive oxygen species and the development in mouse embryos cultured in vitro . J Obstet Gynaecol Res 25, 359–66.10.1111/j.1447-0756.1999.tb01177.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, M and Gardner, DK (2007) Embryo culture medium: which is the best? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 21, 83100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leese, HJ (1995) Metabolic control during preimplantation mammalian development. Hum Reprod Update 1, 6372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lengner, CJ, Gimelbrant, AA, Erwin, JA, Cheng, AW, Guenther, MG, Welstead, GG, Alagappan, R, Frampton, GM, Xu, P, Muffat, J, Santagata, S, Powers, D, Barrett, CB, Young, RA, Lee, JT, Jaenisch, R and Mitalipova, M (2010) Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations. Cell 141, 872–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, W, Goossens, K, Van Poucke, M, Forier, K, Braeckmans, K, Van Soom, A and Peelman, LJ (2014a) High oxygen tension increases global methylation in bovine 4-cell embryos and blastocysts but does not affect general retrotransposon expression. Reprod Fertil Dev 28, 948–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonergan, P, Fair, T, Corcoran, D and Evans, AC (2006) Effect of culture environment on gene expression and developmental characteristics in IVF-derived embryos. Theriogenology 65, 137–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lustgarten, M.S., Bhattacharya, A., Muller, F.L., Jang, Y.C., Shimizu, T., Shirasawa, T., Richardson, A., Van Remmen, H. (2012) Complex I generated, mitochondrial matrix-directed superoxide is released from the mitochondria through voltage dependent anion channels. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 422, 515–21.10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.05.055CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ma, YY, Chen, HW and Tzeng, CR (2017) Low oxygen tension increases mitochondrial membrane potential and enhances expression of antioxidant genes and implantation protein of mouse blastocyst cultured in vitro . J Ovarian Res 10, 47.10.1186/s13048-017-0344-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, MR, Lee, SS, Doherty, AS, Verona, RI, Nolen, LD, Schultz, RM and Bartolomei, MS (2004) Selective loss of imprinting in the placenta following preimplantation development in culture. Development 131, 3727–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcho, C, Cui, W and Mager, J (2015) Epigenetic dynamics during preimplantation development. Reproduction 150, R109120.10.1530/REP-15-0180CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martín-Romero, FJ, Miguel-Lasobras, EM, Domínguez-Arroyo, JA, González-Carrera, E and Alvarez, IS (2008) Contribution of culture media to oxidative stress and its effect on human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 17, 652–61.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60312-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, KL (2000) Nutritional and metabolic requirements of early cleavage stage embryos and blastocysts. Hum Fertil (Camb) 3, 247–54.10.1080/1464727002000199071CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mastroianni, L Jr and Jones, R (1965) Oxygen tension within the rabbit fallopian tube. J Reprod Fertil 9, 99102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meintjes, M, Chantilis, SJ, Douglas, JD, Rodriguez, AJ, Guerami, AR, Bookout, DM, Barnett, BD and Madden, JD (2009) A controlled randomized trial evaluating the effect of lowered incubator oxygen tension on live births in a predominantly blastocyst transfer program. Hum Reprod 24, 300–7.10.1093/humrep/den368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuter, A, Rogmann, LM, Winterhoff, BJ, Tchkonia, T, Kirkland, JL and Morbeck, DE (2014) Markers of cellular senescence are elevated in murine blastocysts cultured in vitro: molecular consequences of culture in atmospheric oxygen. J Assist Reprod Genet 31, 1259–67.10.1007/s10815-014-0299-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Missirlis, F, Hu, J, Kirby, K, Hilliker, AJ, Rouault, TA and Phillips, JP (2003) Compartment-specific protection of iron-sulfur proteins by superoxide dismutase. J Biol Chem 278, 47365–9.10.1074/jbc.M307700200CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, HD, Santos, F, Green, K, Dean, W and Reik, W (2005) Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum Mol Genet 14, R4758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakada, T, Kubota, Y, Sasagawa, I, Yagisawa, T, Watanabe, M and Ishigooka, M (1995) Remarkably suppressed manganese superoxide dismutase activity in malignant pheochromocytoma. J Urol 153, 1787–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ng, KYB, Mingels, R, Morgan, H, Macklon, N and Cheong, Y (2018) In vivo oxygen, temperature and pH dynamics in the female reproductive tract and their importance in human conception: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 24, 1534.10.1093/humupd/dmx028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ottosen, LD, Hindkaer, J, Husth, M, Petersen, DE, Kirk, J and Ingerslev, HJ (2006) Observations on intrauterine oxygen tension measured by fibre-optic microsensors. Reprod Biomed Online 13, 380–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinaudo, PF, Giritharan, G, Talbi, S, Dobson, AT and Schultz, RM (2006) Effects of oxygen tension on gene expression in preimplantation mouse embryos. Fertil Steril 86(4 Suppl), 1252–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodesch, F, Simon, P, Donner, C and Jauniaux, E (1992) Oxygen measurements in endometrial and trophoblastic tissues during early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 80, 283–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, GD, Takayama, S and Swain, JE (2012) Rethinking in vitro embryo culture: new developments in culture platforms and potential to improve assisted reproductive technologies. Biol Reprod 86, 62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, GD and Takayama, S (2017) Application of microfluidic technologies to human assisted reproduction. Mol Hum Reprod 23, 257–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Steptoe, PC, Edwards, RG and Purdy, JM (1971) Human blastocysts grown in culture. Nature 29(5280), 132–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, JE, Cabrera, L, Xu, X and Smith, GD (2012) Microdrop preparation factors influence culture-media osmolality, which can impair mouse embryo preimplantation development. Reprod Biomed Online 24, 142–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, JE, Lai, D, Takayama, S and Smith, GD (2013) Thinking big by thinking small: application of microfluidic technology to improve ART. Lab Chip 13, 1213–24.10.1039/c3lc41290cCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talevi, R, Sudhakaran, S, Barbato, V, Merolla, A, Braun, S, Di Nardo, M, Costanzo, V, Ferraro, R, Iannantuoni, N, Catapano, G and Gualtieri, R, (2018) Is oxygen availability a limiting factor for in vitro folliculogenesis? PLoS One 13, e0192501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, MA and Asada, K (1983) Superoxide anion permeability of phospholipid membranes and chloroplast thylakoids. Arch Biochem Biophys 226, 558–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahashi, M, Keicho, K, Takahashi, H, Ogawa, H, Schultz, RM and Okano, A (2000) Effect of oxidative stress on development and DNA damage in in-vitro cultured bovine embryos by comet assay. Theriogenology 54, 137–45.10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00332-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, JG, Simpson, AC, Pugh, PA, Donnelly, PE and Tervit, HR (1990) Effect of oxygen concentration on in-vitro development of preimplantation sheep and cattle embryos. J Reprod Fertil 89, 573–8.10.1530/jrf.0.0890573CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, JG, Partridge, RJ, Houghton, FD, Cox, CI and Leese, HJ (1996) Oxygen uptake and carbohydrate metabolism by in vitro derived bovine embryos. J Reprod Fertil 106, 299306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, JG, Sherman, ANM, Allen, NW, McGowan, LT and Tervit, HR (1998) Total protein content and protein synthesis within pre-elongation stage bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 50, 139–45.3.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trimarchi, JR, Liu, L, Porterfield, DM, Smith, PJ and Keefe, DL (2000) Oxidative phosphorylation-dependent and -independent oxygen consumption by individual preimplantation mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 62, 1866–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Umaoka, Y, Noda, Y, Narimoto, K and Mori, T (1992) Effects of oxygen toxicity on early development of mouse embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 31, 2833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ventura-Juncá, P, Irarrázaval, I, Rolle, AJ, Gutiérrez, JI, Moreno, RD and Santos, MJ (2009) In vitro fertilization (IVF) in mammals: epigenetic and developmental alterations. Scientific and bioethical implications for IVF in humans. Biol Res 48, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldenström, U, Engström, AB, Hellberg, D and Nilsson, S (2009) Low oxygen compared with high-oxygen atmosphere in blastocyst culture, a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 91, 2461–5.10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.051CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wale, PL and Gardner, DK (2012) Oxygen regulates amino acid turnover and carbohydrate uptake during the preimplantation period of mouse embryo development. Biol Reprod 87, 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wale, PL and Gardner, DK (2013) Oxygen affects the ability of mouse blastocysts to regulate ammonium. Biol Reprod 89, 75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Y, Xu, Y, Ding, C, Khoudja, RY, Lin, M, Awonuga, AO, Dai, J, Puscheck, EE, Rappolee, DA and Zhou, C (2016) Comparison of 2, 5, and 20% O2 on the development of post-thaw human embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet 33, 919–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yedwab, GA, Paz, G, Homonnai, TZ, David, MP and Kraicer, PF (1976) The temperature, pH, and partial pressure of oxygen in the cervix and uterus of women and uterus of rats during the cycle. Fertil Steril 27, 304–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed