Introduction
Although reproductive biotechniques have been used largely in the livestock industry, limited advances have been achieved regarding the increase in blastocyst rates (∼30–40% over the last 30 years) in cattle (Seneda et al., Reference Seneda, Zangirolamo, Bergamo and Morotti2020). Studies have suggested that inappropriate in vitro maturation (IVM) conditions account for the low blastocyst rate compared with its in vivo counterpart (De Vos et al., Reference De Vos, Grynberg, Ho, Yuan, Albertini and Gilchrist2021). During in vitro embryo production (IVEP), excessive intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production leads to detrimental effects on mitochondrial activity, meiotic spindle formation, DNA integrity, and chromatin configuration (He et al., Reference He, Wang, Zhang, Yang, Li, Tian, Ma, Tao, Zhu, Song, Ji and Liu2016). Therefore, the use of antioxidants in in vitro culture systems has been shown to be an outstanding alternative to overcome or mitigate the detrimental effects of ROS (Liang et al., Reference Liang, Qi, Xian, Huang, Sun and Wang2017; Tamura et al., Reference Tamura, Jozaki, Tanabe, Shirafuta, Mihara, Shinagawa, Tamura, Maekawa, Sato, Taketani, Takasaki, Reiter and Sugino2020; Residiwati et al., Reference Residiwati, Azari-Dolatabad, Tuska, Sidi, Van Damme, Benedetti, Montoro, Luceno, Budiono, Pavani, Opsomer, Van Soom and Bogado Pascottini2021). Among ROS, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) stands out from the other types of ROS due to its high reactivity in removing electrons from other molecules (Sies, Reference Sies2017). Similar to ROS, reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are signalling molecules responsible for modulating the interactions between oocyte and sperm, as well as during early embryonic development (Pandey et al., Reference Pandey, Tripathi, Premkumar, Shrivastav and Chaube2010; Loren et al., Reference Loren, Sánchez, Arias, Felmer, Risopatrón and Cheuquemán2017).
Several studies have shown some beneficial effects of antioxidants such as resveratrol (Silva et al., Reference Silva, Marques, Santos, Diesel, Macedo, Teixeira, Martins, Alves and Gambarini2021), lycopene (Residiwati et al., Reference Residiwati, Azari-Dolatabad, Tuska, Sidi, Van Damme, Benedetti, Montoro, Luceno, Budiono, Pavani, Opsomer, Van Soom and Bogado Pascottini2021), and anethole (Anjos et al., Reference Anjos, Aguiar, Sá, Souza, Cibin, Alves, Santos and Figueiredo2019) on IVEP in cattle. A potential new antioxidant candidate is carvacrol (C10H14O), which has not been tested in female germ cells and embryo culture. Carvacrol administered orally in different doses (10 and 20 mg/kg) to rats reduced ROS and increased antioxidant enzymes, such as catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), in testicular tissue (Güvenç et al., Reference Güvenç, Cellat, Gökçek, Yavaş and Yurdagül Özsoy2018). In vitro, carvacrol has been successfully used as an antioxidant due to its relatively low toxicity demonstrated in in vitro culture of isolated cells (uterine carcinoma cells: Mastelić et al., Reference Mastelić, Jerković, Blažević, Poljak-Blaži, Borović, Ivančić-Baće, Smrečki, Žarković, Brčić-Kostic, Vikić-Topić and Müller2008; mesenchymal stem cells: Matluobi et al., Reference Matluobi, Araghi, Maragheh, Rezabakhsh, Soltani, Khaksar, Siavashi, Feyzi, Bagheri, Rahbarghazi and Montazersaheb2018; and smooth muscle cells: Lee et al., Reference Lee, Sudjarwo, Jung, Lee, Lee, Lee, Baek, Kim, Lee, Kim, Kwon and Won2015). In addition to its antioxidant properties, carvacrol has shown antibacterial, antifungal, anticancer, hepatoprotective, antispasmodic, vasorelaxant, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory effects (Suntres et al., Reference Suntres, Coccimiglio and Alipour2015; Sharifi-Rad et al., Reference Sharifi-Rad, Varoni, Iriti, Martorell, Setzer, Del Mar Contreras, Salehi, Soltani-Nejad, Rajabi, Tajbakhsh and Sharifi-Rad2018; Ezz-Eldin et al., Reference Ezz-Eldin, Aboseif and Khalaf2020). Despite the encouraging results produced by the addition of carvacrol to in vitro cell culture, as mentioned above, to the best of our knowledge, the effects of carvacrol on IVEP in any species have not been studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of carvacrol supplementation at different concentrations (0, 3, 12.5, and 25 µM) during bovine oocyte IVM and its further impact on IVEP. Also, we compared among the treatments the levels of ROS, and the antioxidant capacity [2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH) and 2,2′-azinobis-3-ethyl-benzothiozoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) measurements] in spent medium after oocyte maturation.
Materials and methods
All procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee in Animal Experimentation of State University of Ceará (CEUA, UECE; #05498222/2019). Unless indicated, the chemicals used in the present study were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Ovarian source and cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) collection
Ovaries (n = 300) were collected in a local slaughterhouse and transported to the laboratory, and cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) from antral follicles (4–8 mm in diameter) were aspirated and, after selection, destined for IVM. Harvesting of oocytes as well as IVM, fertilization, and embryo culture were performed as previously described (Rodrigues-Cunha et al., Reference Rodrigues-Cunha, Mesquita, Bressan, Collado, Balieiro, Schwarz, de Castro, Watanabe, Watanabe, de Alencar Coelho and Leal2016) with modifications.
Oocyte in vitro maturation and experimental design
TCM-199 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 25 mg/ml sodium bicarbonate, 22 mg/ml sodium pyruvate, 50 mg/ml amikacin, 5 µg/ml FSH, 50 µg/ml LH, and 0.1 µg/ml estradiol, here called TCM-199+, was used for the IVM procedure. In total, 1222 COCs were cultured in TCM-199+ alone (control treatment) or supplemented with carvacrol at 3 µM (Carv-3), 12.5 µM (Carv-12.5), or 25 µM (Carv-25). Pure carvacrol (≥98% of purity, Ref. W224502) was diluted in ethanol (100%) to obtain a stock solution (1:20; 5%) that was further diluted in culture medium to produce the three working concentrations (3, 12.5, or 25 µM). Carvacrol (3 μM) was able to inhibit the increase in H2O2 production in vascular smooth muscle cells (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Sudjarwo, Jung, Lee, Lee, Lee, Baek, Kim, Lee, Kim, Kwon and Won2015). It was also reported that carvacrol (12.5 and 25 μM) increased levels of SOD enzyme activity in human mesenchymal stem cells (Matluobi et al., Reference Matluobi, Araghi, Maragheh, Rezabakhsh, Soltani, Khaksar, Siavashi, Feyzi, Bagheri, Rahbarghazi and Montazersaheb2018). COCs (n = 20/well/treatment) were incubated in 500 μl of maturation medium in five-well dishes under mineral oil. COCs were matured for 22–24 h at 38.5ºC under pre-mixed gas (6% CO2 + 5% O2 + 89% N2). The experiment was repeated six times.
Assessment of cumulus cell expansion
At the end of the maturation period, the degree of cumulus cell expansion in COCs (n = 191; 47–48 per group) was evaluated under a stereomicroscope and classified into low, partial, or total expansion (Marei et al., Reference Marei, Wathes and Fouladi-Nashta2009).
Evaluation of nuclear maturation
Oocyte maturation (MII) was evaluated by the extrusion of the first polar body (n = 360; 87–93 oocytes per group). As expected, the detection of the first polar body in the perivitelline space was associated with the visualization of the metaphase II plate using fluorescence microscopy after exposure of the oocytes (n = 107; 17–35 oocytes per group) to Hoechst 33342 (10 µg/ml) for 15 min (Santos et al., Reference Santos, Nascimento, Praxedes, Borges, Silva, Bertini and Pereira2019).
Levels of ROS (H2O2) in the culture medium
Frozen–thawed cultured medium (10 µl) was incubated with 0.9% phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 100 U/ml superoxide dismutase (SOD), 0.5 U/ml horseradish peroxidase (HRP), and 50 µM Amplex Red as previously described (Paes et al., Reference Paes, Lima, Ferreira, Lobo, Alves, Rodrigues, Oliveira, Figueiredo and Feugang2020) with adaptations. For this analysis, the intensity of the fluorescence signal was measured using a microplate reader (Victor NIVO) under an excitation of 530 nm and emission of 595 nm, and the concentration of ROS was expressed considering the amount of H2O2 (µM).
Evaluation of antioxidant activity using the DPPH method
The antioxidant activity of the culture medium after IVM was assessed using a previously described method (Becker et al., Reference Becker, Nunes, Ribeiro, Silva, Catanante and Marty2019) with modifications. The stock solution was prepared by dissolving 13.8 mg DPPH in 100 ml methanol and then stored until needed. The culture medium (20 μl) was allowed to react with 200 μl of methanolic DPPH solution for 60 min in the dark at 25°C. Methanol (20 μl) was used for the blank control (100%), and the methanolic DPPH solution (220 μl) was added to the culture medium (20 μl) to avoid interference due to the sample’s colour. The absorbance decrease was recorded at 490 nm. For all evaluated assays, absorbance measurements were performed in triplicate in a microplate reader. The dilutions of samples and positive standards used in quantitative microplate evaluations started from a stock solution with a concentration of 2000 to 0.78 µg/ml. The free radical scavenging activity or antioxidant activity (AA) was expressed as the percentage of inhibition determined by the equation AA% = AC – AS/AC × 100, in which, AA (%) stands for the percentage of antioxidant activity, AC stands for the absorbance of the negative control, and AS stands for the absorbance of the sample. The mean inhibitory concentration (IC50; µg/ml) was obtained using calibration curves, collected by plotting the different concentrations in relation to AA%, and further analyzed by linear regression.
Antioxidant activity in the culture medium using the ABTS method
Antioxidant activity was assessed using the ABTS method as described by Re et al. (Reference Re, Pellegrini, Proteggente, Pannala, Yang and Rice-Evans1999) with modifications. The ABTS solution (7 mM, 5 ml) was mixed with 88 µl of potassium persulfate (140 mM), agitated, and kept in the dark at room temperature for 16 h. Then, 1 ml of this solution was added to 99 ml of ethanol, and the absorbance was measured at 630 nm. A series of dilutions of the culture medium with decreasing concentrations of the stock solution, as used for the DPPH method, was prepared, and 3 ml of the ABTS solution was added to 30 µl of each of these solutions after 6 min. The AA% and the mean inhibitory concentration (IC50; µg/ml) using ABTS were calculated as described above for DPPH.
In vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo culture
After IVM, the COCs were placed in drops of 90 µl of Tyrode’s albumin lactate pyruvate (TALP) fertilization medium supplemented with 10 µg/ml heparin, 22 mg/ml sodium pyruvate, 50 mg/ml amikacin, 6 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA; fatty acid free), 2 µM penicillamine, 1 µM hypotaurine, and 0.25 µM epinephrine, inseminated with Percoll-purified sperm (1 × 106 sperm cells), and incubated in Petri dishes under mineral oil for 18–22 h at 38.5°C in 5% CO2.
After IVF, the presumptive zygotes were cultured in 500-µl drops of CR2-modified medium supplemented with 50 mg/ml amikacin, 0.1 mM amino acids, 2.5% FBS, and 6 mg/ml BSA in 5-well dishes under mineral oil at 38.5ºC under 6% CO2 + 5% O2 + 89% N2.
Assessment of embryo development and blastocyst total cell number quantification
Embryo development was evaluated after 3, 7, and 10 days of culture, and the blastocysts were classified according to Stringfellow and Seidel (Reference Stringfellow and Seidel1998). The blastocyst (days 7 and 10) and hatching (day 10) rates were calculated. After 7 days of culture, only expanded blastocysts (n = 118; 26–33 expanded blastocysts per group) were fixed (0.5% glutaraldehyde) and stained with Hoechst 33342 (10 µg/ml) for 15 min. Embryos were visualized individually by fluorescence microscopy (emission of 370 nm, Olympus BX51TF, Tokyo, Japan), and the total cell number was quantified using ImageJ software (Oliveira et al., Reference Oliveira, Aquino, Santos, Freitas, Bertini and Pereira2021).
Statistical analyses
Statistical analysis was performed using Sigma Plot (version 11.0; Systat Software Inc., USA). The proportion variables were analyzed among treatments using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed using Tukey’s post-hoc test was used to analyze the mean ROS, DPPH, ABTS, and the total number of blastomeres in the blastocysts. The association between carvacrol concentration and cleavage rates was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation. Data were presented as percentage and mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05 (two-sided).
Results
In vitro maturation
The influence of carvacrol during IVM of bovine oocytes is shown (Table 1) considering the degree of COC expansion (Figure 1A) and the evaluation of nuclear maturation rate (metaphase II and first polar body; Figure 1B). Overall, 89% of COCs had complete cell expansion after IVM, with no significant difference (P > 0.05) observed between treatments. Similarly, the maturation rate (range, 76–79%) did not differ (P > 0.05) between treatments.
Table 1. Influence of carvacrol during bovine oocyte IVM on the degree of cumulus cells expansion and oocyte nuclear maturation (presence of the 1st polar body)
Within a column, no difference (P > 0.05) was observed among treatments.
Carv-3, 3 µM carvacrol; Carv-12.5, 12.5 µM carvacrol; Carv-25, 25 µM carvacrol.
Figure 1. (A) Representative image of bovine oocytes with cumulus expanded after 22–24 h of IVM in the Carv-12.5 treatment. (B) Metaphase II oocyte, with the extrusion of the first polar body. (C) Blastocysts on day 7. (D) Expanded blastocyst stained with Hoechst 33342. Bars, 100 µm (A, C) and 50 µm (B, D). (E) Percentage of blastocyst stages on day 7 post-IVF: initial blastocyst (iB), blastocyst (B), expanded blastocyst (eB), and hatching or hatched blastocyst (hB) within the control and carvacrol treatments. No difference (P > 0.05) was observed among treatments.
ROS (H2O2) production and antioxidant capacity (DPPH and ABTS) levels in the culture medium
The ROS production and the antioxidant capacity levels were assessed in the spent medium after oocyte IVM (Figure 2). The levels of ROS, regardless of treatment, were similar (P > 0.05) to those of the control group. When carvacrol-treated groups were compared, high (P < 0.05) levels of ROS were observed in the Carv-25 µM treatment compared with the other two treatments (Figure 2A). However, when the carvacrol antioxidant capacity in neutralizing free synthetic radicals (DPPH and ABTS) was evaluated, carvacrol-treated groups led to greater antioxidant potential against those radicals compared with the control group. Moreover, a progressive antioxidant capacity was observed in a dose-dependent manner as the carvacrol concentration increased (P < 0.05) in the treated groups (Figure 2B,C).
Figure 2. (A) Reactive oxygen species (ROS; quantification of H2O2) production and antioxidant capacity with (B) 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH) or (C) 2,2′-azinobis-3-ethyl-benzothiozoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) assays in the culture medium after bovine oocyte in vitro maturation (IVM) with different concentrations of carvacrol. Carv-3, 3 µM carvacrol; Carv-12.5, 12.5 µM carvacrol; Carv-25, 25 µM carvacrol. a,b,c,d Within columns, values with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
In vitro fertilization and embryo culture
The impacts of carvacrol addition to the IVM medium on cleavage rate, percentage of blastocysts, blastocysts classes, hatched blastocysts, and the numbers of cells/blastocyst are shown (Figure 1 and Table 2). The addition of carvacrol at 25 µM to the IVM medium reduced (P < 0.05) the cleavage rate when compared with the control and Carv-3 treatments (Table 2); however, no significant correlation was observed between the cleavage rate and carvacrol concentrations (r = –0.34, P > 0.05). The total blastocyst and blastocyst hatching rates (Table 2; Figure 1C,D) as well as the rates of different blastocyst stages were similar among treatments (Figure 1E; P > 0.05). However, carvacrol reduced (P < 0.05) the mean total cell number per expanded blastocyst compared with the control, except for the Carv-12.5 treatment (Table 2; Figure 1D).
Table 2. Embryo development and quality after IVM of bovine oocytes exposed to different concentrations of carvacrol
a ,b Within a column, values with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
Carv-3, 3 µM carvacrol; Carv-12.5, 12.5 µM carvacrol; Carv-25, 25 µM carvacrol.
† Total cell number (TCN) in each expanded blastocyst was quantified on day 7 of culture.
†† Number of hatched embryos divided by the number of resulting embryos on day 10 of culture.
Discussion
This study reports, for the first time, the effect of carvacrol addition during oocyte maturation on in vitro embryo development in cattle. In the present study, the addition of carvacrol to the medium did not affect oocyte IVM but improved the antioxidant capacity (DPPH and ABTS) of the medium. Moreover, although carvacrol did not affect the levels of ROS in the medium, carvacrol supplementation in a dose-dependent manner reduced the cleavage rate and the number of cells per blastocyst.
The results of antioxidant supplementation on IVM in cattle are controversial. For instance, some studies in cattle have shown a positive effect of resveratrol (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Tian, Zhang, He, Ji, Li, Tan and Liu2014), lycopene (Chowdhury et al., Reference Chowdhury, Choi, Khan, Lee, Mesalam, Song, Xu, Joo, Afrin and Kong2017), niacin (Kafi et al., Reference Kafi, Ashrafi, Azari, Jandarroodi, Abouhamzeh and Asl2019), or dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Ynsaurralde-Rivolta et al., Reference Ynsaurralde-Rivolta, Suvá, Luchetti, Bevacqua, Munilla, Rodriguez-Alvarez, Velasquez, Briski, Lombardo and Salamone2020), while others did not report any effect for the use of ascorbic acid, resveratrol, anethole (Sovernigo et al., Reference Sovernigo, Adona, Monzani, Guemra, Barros, Lopes and Leal2017; Sá et al., Reference Sá, Vieira, Ferreira, Cadenas, Bruno, Maside, Sousa, Cibin, Alves, Rodrigues, Leal-Cardoso, Gastal and Figueiredo2019), and carvacrol (present study) on IVM. These discrepant effects of antioxidants on oocyte maturation might have been due to different in vitro culture conditions among studies. It is worth mentioning that, in our study, the results of IVM were obtained using low oxygen atmosphere (i.e. 5% O2) conditions. Therefore, the use of carvacrol during IVM in other atmospheric conditions is warranted.
In the present study, carvacrol concentrations (3, 12.5, and 25 µM) increased the antioxidant capacity (DPPH and ABTS) when compared with the control group. Among the antioxidant capacity assays that capture free radicals, DPPH and ABTS have commonly been used. Therefore, these two types of assays are able to measure the degree of absorption of free radicals attenuated by the presence of antioxidants in the solution (Re et al., Reference Re, Pellegrini, Proteggente, Pannala, Yang and Rice-Evans1999; Morais et al., Reference Morais, Lopes, Fontenele, Silva, Fernandes and Alves2021). Similarly to the findings of the present study, carvacrol has been reported to have a high capacity to scavenge free radicals through the DPPH and ABTS assays (Shahat et al., Reference Shahat, Cos, De Bruyne, Apers, Hammouda, Ismail, Azzam, Claeys, Goovaerts, Pieters, Vanden Berghe and Vlietinck2002; Aristatile et al., Reference Aristatile, Al-Numair, Al-Assaf, Veeramani and Pugalendi2015), as well as some other types of ROS and RNS, due to the phenolic ring in its chemical structure (Jamali et al., Reference Jamali, Kavoosi, Jamali, Mortezazadeh and Ardestani2021). In this regard, an in vivo study has shown that carvacrol administered orally in rats using different doses (10 and 20 mg/kg) was able to reduce ROS and increase antioxidant enzymes in testicular tissue (Güvenç et al., Reference Güvenç, Cellat, Gökçek, Yavaş and Yurdagül Özsoy2018). Considering that in this study, ROS levels (i.e. quantification of H2O2 levels) were similar between carvacrol-treated groups and the control group, we believe that the greater antioxidant capacity of carvacrol detected through the ABTS and DPPH assays might have been due to its effect in reducing RNS (Jamali et al., Reference Jamali, Kavoosi, Jamali, Mortezazadeh and Ardestani2021), such as nitric oxide (NO; Aristatile et al., Reference Aristatile, Al-Numair, Al-Assaf, Veeramani and Pugalendi2015), and other types of ROS, for example, the hydroxyl radical (•OH; Gavaric et al., Reference Gavaric, Mozina, Kladar and Bozin2015) and the superoxide anion (O2 –; Aristatile et al., Reference Aristatile, Al-Numair, Al-Assaf, Veeramani and Pugalendi2015).
Although in the present study, blastocyst production was not affected by the addition of carvacrol during IVM, after carvacrol supplementation, the cleavage rate and the number of cells per blastocyst were reduced in a dose-dependent manner despite the increased antioxidant capacity. In this regard, a cytotoxic effect of carvacrol on cancer cell membrane permeability has been demonstrated in a dose-dependent manner by an increase in apoptosis and a reduction in cell proliferation (Elbe et al., Reference Elbe, Yigitturk, Cavusoglu, Baygar, Ozgul Onal and Ozturk2020). Moreover, carvacrol at higher concentrations reduced the expression of proteins related to cell–cell adhesion, such as β-catenin (Elbe et al., Reference Elbe, Yigitturk, Cavusoglu, Baygar, Ozgul Onal and Ozturk2020), which has an important role in the fertilization process (Takezawa et al., Reference Takezawa, Yoshida, Miyado, Sato, Nakamura, Kawano, Sakakibara, Kondo, Harada, Ohnami, Kanai, Miyado, Saito, Takahashi, Akutsu and Umezawa2011). Considering that the balance between antioxidant capacity and production of free radicals is crucial for cell viability maintenance (He et al., Reference He, Wang, Zhang, Yang, Li, Tian, Ma, Tao, Zhu, Song, Ji and Liu2016), high concentrations of free radicals induce oxidative stress and cell damage, leading to problems in DNA molecules, proteins, and lipid membranes (Phaniendra et al., Reference Phaniendra, Jestadi and Periyasamy2015; Loren et al., Reference Loren, Sánchez, Arias, Felmer, Risopatrón and Cheuquemán2017). Studies have shown that the production and maintenance of ROS and RNS in the cell have beneficial effects on oocyte mitochondrial activity (Cajas et al., Reference Cajas, Cañón-Beltrán, Ladrón de Guevara, Millán de la Blanca, Ramos-Ibeas, Gutiérrez-Adán, Rizos and González2020; McKeegan et al., Reference McKeegan, Boardman, Wanless, Boyd, Warwick, Lu, Gnanaprabha and Picton2021) and embryo development (Pandey et al., Reference Pandey, Tripathi, Premkumar, Shrivastav and Chaube2010; Loren et al., Reference Loren, Sánchez, Arias, Felmer, Risopatrón and Cheuquemán2017). In fact, after the use of high antioxidant concentrations in a preincubation period before IVM in mice, a reduction in free radicals reduced mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) regulated by the activation of epidermal growth factor receptors (Shkolnik et al., Reference Shkolnik, Tadmor, Ben-Dor, Nevo, Galiani and Dekel2011). Moreover, a reduction in ROS during IVM reduced the intracellular calcium release and, consequently, the oocyte activation rate after IVM (Chaube et al., Reference Chaube, Khatun, Misra and Shrivastav2008). In this regard, the MAPK pathway and the intracytoplasmic calcium release regulate in vitro fertilization and embryo development (Loren et al., Reference Loren, Sánchez, Arias, Felmer, Risopatrón and Cheuquemán2017). Therefore, we believe that the carvacrol concentrations of 3 and 25 µM used in the present study during the IVM process may have drastically reduced the levels of free radicals after fertilization. This result may have affected the signalling pathways mentioned above, therefore causing a reduction in the multiplication of trophoblast cells demonstrated by the lower number of blastocyst cells in the 3- and 25-µM carvacrol treatments. However, the numbers of cells per blastocyst in these treatments were compared with those reported for in vivo-produced embryos (Koo et al., Reference Koo, Kang, Choi, Park, Kim, Oh, Son, Park, Lee and Han2002).
In conclusion, a high antioxidant capacity of carvacrol was demonstrated in the spent medium after oocyte maturation. However, although the addition of carvacrol to the maturation medium did not affect blastocyst production, the total numbers of cells per blastocyst were reduced in two carvacrol-treated groups (Carv-3 and Carv-25). Considering the positive antioxidant capacity of carvacrol in the maturation medium, new experiments are warranted to investigate the effects of lower concentrations of carvacrol on embryo production in cattle as well as in other species.
Acknowledgements
To the CAPES for providing the scholarship for Ana Normélia Pereira de Morais.
Financial support
This research was supported by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES; grant no. 88882.344033/2019-01).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that would prejudice the impartiality of this scientific work.
Open access
