Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:52:36.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Different in vitro culture systems affect the birth weight of lambs from vitrified ovine embryos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2013

L. Mara
Affiliation:
Agris-Sardegna, DIRPA (Agricultural Research Agency of Sardinia, Department of Animal Science) Reproduction Division, S.S. 291 Km 18.6, 07040 Olmedo (SS), Italy.
D. Sanna
Affiliation:
Agris-Sardegna, DIRPA (Agricultural Research Agency of Sardinia, Department of Animal Science) Reproduction Division, S.S. 291 Km 18.6, 07040 Olmedo (SS), Italy.
M. Dattena
Affiliation:
Agris-Sardegna, DIRPA (Agricultural Research Agency of Sardinia, Department of Animal Science) Reproduction Division, S.S. 291 Km 18.6, 07040 Olmedo (SS), Italy.
I.M. Mayorga Muñoz*
Affiliation:
AGRIS DIRPA (Agricultural Research Agency of Sardinia, Department of Animal Science) Reproduction Division, S.S. 291 Km 18.6, 07040 Olmedo (SS), Italy.
*
All correspondence to: Isabel Margarita Mayorga Muñoz. AGRIS DIRPA (Agricultural Research Agency of Sardinia, Department of Animal Science) Reproduction Division, S.S. 291 Km 18.6, 07040 Olmedo (SS), Italy. Tel: +39 0792842396. Fax: +39 079389450. e-mail address: [email protected]

Summary

It has been reported that different in vitro culture systems affect the birth weight of lambs. The aim of this study was to test body weight and lambing rate of lambs born from five different in vitro culture systems after vitrification. Oocytes of Sarda sheep were matured in TCM-199 plus 0.4% bovine serum albumin (BSA) using systems: (i) 4 mg/ml fatty acid-free BSA (BSA4); (ii) 8 mg/ml fatty acid-free BSA (BSA8); (iii) BSA8–hyaluronan (BSA8–HA); (iv) BSA8–charcoal-stripped FBS (BSA8–CH); or (v) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; serum) and fertilized with fresh semen. The presumptive zygotes were cultured up to the blastocyst stage with BSA8, BSA8-HA, BSA8-CH or serum or BSA4. In the third and fifth days of culture 5% charcoal-stripped FBS was added into BSA8-CH and serum, while 8 mg/ml or 4 mg/ml fatty acid-free BSA was added as BSA8, BSA8-HA and BSA4 respectively; 6 mg/ml HA was added to BSA8-HA. In total, 240 vitrified blastocysts were transferred into synchronized ewes. The lambing rate was not significant different between BSA groups or between serum groups (BSA8-CH and serum), while serum groups showed significant lower values when compared with BSA groups. Only BSA8 groups produced heavy lambs (≥4.5 kg) with a significant difference between BSA4 and BSA8 groups (P < 0.05).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Accardo, C., Dattena, M., Pilichi, S., Mara, L., Chessa, B. & Cappai, P. (2004). Effect of recombinant human FSH and LH on in vitro maturation of sheep oocytes; embryo development and viability. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 81, 7786.Google Scholar
Dattena, M., Accardo, C., Pilichi, S., Isachenko, V., Mara, L., Chessa, B. & Cappai, P. (2004). Comparison of different vitrification protocols on viability after transfer of ovine blastocysts in vitro produced and in vivo derived. Theriogenology 62, 481–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dattena, M., Mara, L., Bin, T A.A. & Cappai, P. (2007). Lambing rate using vitrified blastocysts is improved by culture with BSA and hyaluronan. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 74, 42–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnus, C.C., de Matos, D.G. & Martínez, A.G. (1998). Effect of hyaluronic acid on development of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 49, 1489–99.Google Scholar
Holm, P., Walker, S.K. & Seamark, R.F. (1996). Embryo viability, duration of gestation and birth weight in sheep after transfer of in vitro matured and in vitro fertilized zygotes cultured in vitro or in vivo. J. Reprod. Fertil. 107, 175–81.Google Scholar
Kano, K., Miyano, T. & Kato, S. (1998). Effects of glycosaminoglycans on the development of in vitro-matured and fertilized porcine oocytes to blastocysts stage in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 58, 1226–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazuhiro, K., Akira, O., Naomi, K., Masaki, I., Junko, N., Hiroyuki, K., Tomiji, A., & Takashi, Nagai. (2002). Successful piglet production after transfer of blastocysts produced by a modified in vitro system. Biol. Reprod. 66, 1033–41.Google Scholar
Kleeman, D.O., Walker, S.K. & Seamark, R.F. (1994). Enhanced foetal growth in sheep administered progesterone during the first three days of pregnancy. J. Reprod. Fertil. 102, 411–7.Google Scholar
Lane, M., Maybach, J.M., Hooper, K., Hasler, J.F. & Gardner, D.K. (2003). Cryo-survival and development of bovine blastocysts are enhanced by culture with recombinant albumin and hyaluronan. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 64, 70–8.Google Scholar
Lazzari, G., Wrenzycki, C., Herrmann, D., Duchi, R., Kruip, T., Niemann, H. & Galli, C. (2002). Cellular and molecular deviations in bovine in vitro-produced embryos are related to the large offspring syndrome. Biol. Reprod. 67, 767–75.Google Scholar
Mara, L., Mayorga, I.M., Sanna, D. & Dattena, M. (2009). In vitro culture system affects lambing and lamb birth weight of vitrified ovine embryos. 25th Annual Meeting A.E.T.E. – POZNAN, Poland, 11–12 September 2009, p. 222 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Niemann, H. & Wrenzycki, C. (2000). Alterations of expression of developmentally important genes in preimplantation bovine embryos by in vitro culture conditions: implications for subsequent development. Theriogenology 53, 2134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niemann, H., Wrenzycki, C., Lucas-Hahn, A., Brambrink, T., Kues, W.A. & Carnwath, J.W. (2002). Gene expression patterns in bovine in vitro-produced and nuclear transfer-derived embryos and their implications for early development. Cloning Stem Cells 4, 2938.Google Scholar
Ptak, G., Dattena, M., Loi, P., Tischner, M. & Cappai, P. (1999). Ovum pick-up in sheep: efficiency of in vitro embryo production, vitrification and birth of offspring. Theriogenology 52, 1105–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, K.D., McEvoy, T.G., Carolan, C., Maxfield, E.K., Maltin, C.A., Young, L.E., Wilmut, I., Robinson, J.J. & Broadbent, P.J. (1998). Conceptus growth and development following in vitro culture of ovine embryos in media supplemented with bovine sera. Theriogenology 49, 218 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Sinclair, K.D., McEvoy, T.G., Maxfield, E.K., Maltin, C.A., Young, L.E., Wilmut, I., Broadbent, P.J. & Robinson, J.J. (1999). Aberrant fetal growth and development after in vitro culture of sheep zygotes. J. Reprod. Fertil. 116, 177–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tervit, H.R., Whittingham, D.G. & Rowson, L.E.A. (1972). Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova. J. Reprod. Fertil. 30, 493–7.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.G., Gardner, D.K., Pugh, P.A., McMillan, W.H. & Tervit, H.R (1995). Lamb birth weight is affected by culture system utilized during in vitro pre-elongation development of ovine embryos. Biol. Reprod. 53, 1385–91.Google Scholar
van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw, A.M., Mullaart, E., de Roos, AP., Merton, J.S., den Daas, J.H., Kemp, B. & de Ruigh, L. (2000). Effects of different reproduction techniques: AI MOET or IVP, on health and welfare of bovine offspring. Theriogenology 53, 575–97.Google Scholar
Walker, S.K., Heard, T.M. & Seamark, R.E. (1992). In-vitro culture of sheep embryos without co-culture: successes and perspectives. Theriogenology 37, 111–26.Google Scholar
Walker, S.K., Hartwich, K.M. & Seamark, R.F. (1996). The production of unusually large offspring following embryo manipulation: concepts and challenges. Theriogenology 45, 111–20.Google Scholar
Willadsen, S.M., Janzen, R.E., McAlister, R.J., Shea, B.F., Hamilton, G. & McDermand, D. (1991). The viability of late morulae and blastocysts produced by nuclear transplantation in cattle. Theriogenology 35, 161–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, L.E., Sinclair, K.D. & Wilmut, I. (1998). Large offspring syndrome in cattle and sheep. Rev. Reprod. 3, 155–63.Google Scholar