Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:26:41.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Viability, acrosome morphology and fertilizing capacity of boar spermatozoa treated with strontium chloride

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

Konosuke Okada ,
Chiara Palmieri ,
Leonardo Della Salda  and
Irena Vackova
Konosuke Okada*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University (NVLU), 1-7-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino, Tokyo 180-0023, Japan. Institute of Animal Production (VUZV), POB 1, CZ-104 01 Prague 10, Czech Republic.
Chiara Palmieri
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Comparate, Teramo University, Piazza Aldo Moro 45, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Leonardo Della Salda
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Comparate, Teramo University, Piazza Aldo Moro 45, 64100 Teramo, Italy.
Irena Vackova
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Production (VUZV), POB 1, CZ-104 01 Prague 10, Czech Republic.
*
1All correspondence to: Konosuke Okada. Department of Animal Science, Nippon Veterinary and Life Science University, 1-7-1 Kyonan-cho, Musashino, Tokyo 180-0023, Japan. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The positive effect of strontium ions (Sr2+) on sperm motility, capacitation and acrosome reaction has been demonstrated in the mouse, human, guinea pig and hamster. In the present study, we have evaluated the effect of Sr2+ on the viability and acrosome morphology of boar spermatozoa, and on the fertilization and development after the microinjection of Sr2+-treated spermatozoa into porcine oocytes. Before incubation, 79% of spermatozoa were classified as propidium iodide (PI)-negative (live) using the LIVE/DEAD Sperm Viability Kit. After incubation with strontium chloride (SrCl2), 39% (0 mM; no divalent cations), 25% (1.9 mM) and 24% (7.5 mM) of them were classified as PI-negative. The proportion of spermatozoa that had initiated the acrosome reaction was higher in Sr2+-containing medium than in Sr2+-free medium, when assessed by electron microscopy. There was no significant difference in percentage of spermatozoa initiating the acrosome reaction between Sr2+-treated groups (1.9 mM: 22%, 7.5 mM: 33%, p > 0.05). After the microinjection of spermatozoa incubated with SrCl2, 67% (1.9 mM) and 61% (7.5 mM) of injected oocytes were successfully fertilized, and then 43% (1.9 mM) and 41% (7.5 mM) contained a fully decondensed sperm head. Sham-injected oocytes were significantly activated at a lower rate than Sr2+-treated groups (27%, p < 0.05). Next, after microinjection of spermatozoa incubated with 1.9 mM SrCl2 (n = 51), 45% of injected oocytes cleaved on day 2, and 18% developed to blastocysts on day 7 (sham-injection, n = 48: 15% to cleavage and 0% to blastocyst). These results demonstrate that Sr2+ is likely to positively affect the fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa in the pig.

Keywords

Acrosome reactionICSIPigStrontiumViability
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 49 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dozortsev, D., Wakaiama, T., Ermilov, A. & Yanagimachi, R. (1998). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the rat. Zygote 6, 143–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, L.R. (1987). Strontium supports capacitation and the acrosome reaction in mouse sperm and rapidly activates mouse eggs. Gamete Res. 18, 363–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Rosello, E., Matas, C., Canovas, S., Moreira, P.N., Gadea, J. & Coy, P. (2006). Influence of sperm pretreatment on the efficiency of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in pigs. J. Androl. 27, 268–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, R.C. (1973). Preparation of spermatozoa for electron and light microscopy. J. Reprod. Fertil. 33, 145–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katayama, M., Miyano, T., Miyake, M. & Kato, S. (2002). Progesterone treatment of boar spermatozoa improves male pronuclear formation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection into porcine oocytes. Zygote 10, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katayama, M., Sutovsky, P., Yang, B.S., Cantley, T., Rieke, A., Farwell, R., Oko, R. & Day, B.N. (2005). Increased disruption of sperm plasma membrane at sperm immobilization promotes dissociation of perinuclear theca from sperm chromatin after intracytoplasmic sperm injection in pigs. Reproduction 130, 907–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katayose, H., Yanagida, K., Shinoki, T., Kawahara, T., Horiuchi, T. & Sato, A. (1999). Efficient injection of bull spermatozoa into oocytes using a Piezo-driven pipette. Theriogenology 52, 1215–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, N.H., Lee, J.W., Jun, S.H., Lee, H.T. & Chung, K.S. (1998). Fertilization of porcine oocytes following intracytoplasmic spermatozoon or isolated sperm head injection. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 51, 436–44.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, Y. & Yanagimachi, R. (1995). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol. Reprod. 52, 709–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolbe, T. & Holtz, W. (1999). Intracytoplasmic injection (ICSI) of in vivo or in vitro matured oocytes with fresh ejaculated or frozen–thawed epididymal spermatozoa and additional calcium-ionophore activation in the pig. Theriogenology 52, 671–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krylov, V., Kren, R., Okada, K., Vackova, I., Tlapakova, T. & Fulka, J. (2005). Effect of protein supplement source on porcine oocyte maturation and subsequent embryonic development after parthenogenetic activation. Folia Biol. (Praha) 51, 29–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Harayama, H. (2003). Viability and protein phosphorylation patterns of boar spermatozoa agglutinated by treatment with a cell-permeable cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate analog. J. Androl. 24, 831–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harayama, H., Murase, T. & Miyake, M. (2005). A cyclic adenosine 3′,5′-monophosphate stimulates phospholipase Cγ1-calcium signaling via the activation of tyrosine kinase in boar spermatozoa. J. Androl. 26, 732–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, L., Sun, Q., Wu, G., Murphy, C.N., Kuhholzer, B., Park, K.W., Bonk, A.J., Day, B.N. & Prather, R.S. (2001). Development of porcine embryos and offspring after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with liposome transfected or non-transfected sperm into in vitro matured oocytes. Zygote 9, 339–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J.W., Tian, X.C. & Yang, X. (2003). Failure of male pronucleus formation is the major cause of lack of fertilization and embryo development in pig oocytes subjected to intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Biol. Reprod. 68, 1341–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magnus, O., Brekke, I., Abyholm, T. & Purvis, K. (1990). Effects of manganese and other divalent cations on progressive motility of human sperm. Arch. Androl. 24, 159–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCauley, T.C., Mazza, M.R., Didion, B.A., Mao, J., Wu, G., Coppola, G., Coppola, G.F., Di Berardino, D. & Day, B.N. (2003). Chromosomal abnormalities in day-6, in vitro-produced pig embryos. Theriogenology 60, 1569–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moor, R.M. & Trounson, A.O. (1977). Hormonal and follicular factors affecting maturation of sheep oocytes in vitro and their subsequent developmental capacity. J. Reprod. Fertil. 49, 101–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortimer, D. (1986). Comparison of the fertilizing ability of human spermatozoa preincubated in calcium- and strontium-containing media. J. Exp. Zool. 237, 21–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortimer, D., Chorney, M.J., Curtis, E.F. & Trounson, A.O. (1988). Calcium dependence of human sperm fertilizing ability. J. Exp. Zool. 246, 194–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okada, K., Krylov, V., Kren, R. & Fulka, J.J. (2006). Development of pig embryos after electro-activation and in vitro fertilization in PZM-3 or PZM supplemented with fetal bovine serum. J. Reprod. Dev. 52, 91–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prather, R.S., Hawley, R.J., Carter, D.B., Lai, L. & Greenstein, J.L. (2003). Transgenic swine for biomedicine and agriculture. Theriogenology 59, 115–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stock, C.E. & Fraser, L.R. (1989). Divalent cations, capacitation and the acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fertil. 87, 463–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szollosi, D. & Hunter, R.H. (1978). The nature and occurrence of the acrosome reaction in spermatozoa of the domestic pig. Sus scrofa. J. Anat. 127, 33–41.Google ScholarPubMed
Yanagida, K., Katayose, H., Yazawa, H., Kimura, Y., Konnai, K. & Sato, A. (1999). The usefulness of a piezo-micromanipulator in intracytoplasmic sperm injection in humans. Hum. Reprod. 14, 448–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanagimachi, R. & Usui, N. (1974). Calcium dependence of the acrosome reaction and activation of guinea pig spermatozoa. Exp. Cell Res. 89, 161–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yanagimachi, R. (1978). Calcium requirement for sperm–egg fusion in mammals. Biol. Reprod. 19, 949–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yong, H.Y., Pyo, B.S., Hong, J.Y., Kang, S.K., Lee, B.C., Lee, E.S. & Hwang, W.S. (2003). A modified method for ICSI in the pig: injection of head membrane-damaged sperm using a 3–4 μm diameter injection pipette. Hum. Reprod. 18, 2390–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshioka, K., Suzuki, C., Tanaka, A., Anas, I.M. & Iwamura, S. (2002). Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol. Reprod. 66, 112–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, D., Pan, L., Yang, L.H., He, X.K., Huang, X.Y. & Sun, F.Z. (2005). Strontium promotes calcium oscillations in mouse meiotic oocytes and early embryos through InsP3 receptors, and requires activation of phospholipase and the synergistic action of InsP3. Hum. Reprod. 20, 3053–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed