Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:59:05.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tricostatin A-treated round spermatid enhances preimplantation embryo developmental competency following round spermatid injection in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2021

Sara Hosseini  and
Mohammad Salehi Open the ORCID record for Mohammad Salehi [Opens in a new window]
Sara Hosseini
Affiliation:
Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran MOM Research Center, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Salehi*
Affiliation:
Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Department of Biotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: Mohammad Salehi. Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Department of Biotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tel: +98 9125118872. Fax: +98 22439956. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

It has been documented that the inefficacy of round spermatid injection (ROSI) might be caused by abnormal epigenetic modifications. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of trichostatin A (TSA) as an epigenetic modifier of preimplantation embryo development in activated ROSI oocytes. Matured oocytes were collected from superovulated female mice. Testes were placed in human tubal fluid medium and masses were then cut into small pieces to disperse spermatogenic cells. Round spermatids were treated with TSA and subsequently injected into oocytes. The expression level of the development-related genes including Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, Dnmt and Hdac transcripts were evaluated using qRT-PCR. Immunohistochemistry was performed to confirm the presence of Oct-4 protein at the blastocyst stage. There was no statistically significant difference in fertilization rate following ROSI/+TSA compared with the non-treated ROSI and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) groups. Importantly, TSA treatment increased blastocyst formation from 38% in non-treated ROSI to 68%. The relative expression level of developmentally related genes increased and Dnmt transcripts decreased in ROSI/+TSA-derived embryos, similar to the expression levels observed in the ICSI-derived embryos. In conclusion, our results indicate that spermatid treatment with TSA prior to ROSI would increase the success rate of development to the blastocyst stage and proportion of pluripotent cells.

Keywords

Developmental competencyROSIRound spermatidTrichostatin A
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 2022 , pp. 373 - 379
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartolomei, MS and Ferguson-Smith, AC (2011). Mammalian genomic imprinting. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 3, a002592 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benkhalifa, M, Kahraman, S, Biricik, A, Serteyl, S, Domez, E, Kumtepe, Y and Qumsiyeh, MB (2004). Cytogenetic abnormalities and the failure of development after round spermatid injections. Fertil Steril 81, 1283–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bui, HT, Wakayama, S, Kishigami, S, Kim, JH, Van Thuan, N and Wakayama, T (2008). The cytoplasm of mouse germinal vesicle stage oocytes can enhance somatic cell nuclear reprogramming. Development 135, 3935–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bui, HT, Wakayama, S, Kishigami, S, Park, KK, Kim, JH, Thuan, NV and Wakayama, T (2010). Effect of trichostatin A on chromatin remodeling, histone modifications, DNA replication, and transcriptional activity in cloned mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 83, 454–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cervoni, N and Szyf, M (2001). Demethylase activity is directed by histone acetylation. J Biol Chem 276, 40778–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cocuzza, M, Alvarenga, C and Pagani, R (2013). The epidemiology and etiology of azoospermia. Clinics (São Paulo), 68, Suppl. 1, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esteves, SC (2015). Male infertility due to spermatogenic failure: Current management and future perspectives. Anim Reprod 12, 62–80.Google Scholar
Haigo, K, Yamauchi, Y, Yazama, F, Yanagimachi, R and Horiuchi, T (2004). Full-term development of hamster embryos produced by injection of round spermatids into oocytes. Biol Reprod 71, 194–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirabayashi, M, Kato, M, Aoto, T, Ueda, M and Hochi, S (2002). Rescue of infertile transgenic rat lines by intracytoplasmic injection of cryopreserved round spermatids. Mol Reprod Dev 62, 295–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosseini, S, Dehghani-Mohammadabadi, M, Ghafarri Novin, M, Haji Molla Hoseini, M, Arefian, E, Mohammadi Yeganeh, S and Salehi, M (2017). Toll-like receptor4 as a modulator of fertilization and subsequent pre-implantation development following in vitro maturation in mice. Am J Reprod Immunol 78, e12720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarow, JP, Espeland, MA and Lipshultz, LI (1989). Evaluation of the azoospermic patient. J Urol 142, 62–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, Y and Yanagimachi, R (1995). Mouse oocytes injected with testicular spermatozoa or round spermatids can develop into normal offspring. Development 121, 2397–405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kishigami, S, Mizutani, E, Ohta, H, Hikichi, T, Thuan, NV, Wakayama, S, Bui, HT and Wakayama, T (2006a). Significant improvement of mouse cloning technique by treatment with trichostatin A after somatic nuclear transfer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 340, 183–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kishigami, S, Van Thuan, N, Hikichi, T, Ohta, H, Wakayama, S, Mizutani, E and Wakayama, T (2006b). Epigenetic abnormalities of the mouse paternal zygotic genome associated with microinsemination of round spermatids. Dev Biol 289, 195–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kong, P, Yin, M, Chen, D, Li, S, Li, Y, Xing, F, Jiang, M, Fang, Z, Lyu, Q and Chen, X (2017). Effects of the histone deacetylase inhibitor “scriptaid” on the developmental competence of mouse embryos generated through round spermatid injection. Hum Reprod 32, 76–87.Google ScholarPubMed
Levran, D, Nahum, H, Farhi, J and Weissman, A (2000). Poor outcome with round spermatid injection in azoospermic patients with maturation arrest. Fertil Steril 74, 443–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogura, A, Matsuda, J and Yanagimachi, R (1994). Birth of normal young after electrofusion of mouse oocytes with round spermatids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91, 7460–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogura, A, Ogonuki, N, Miki, H and Inoue, K (2005). Microinsemination and nuclear transfer using male germ cells. Int Rev Cytol 246, 189–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivera, RM and Ross, JW (2013). Epigenetics in fertilization and preimplantation embryo development. Progr Biophys Mol Biol 113, 423–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rybouchkin, A, Kato, Y and Tsunoda, Y (2006). Role of histone acetylation in reprogramming of somatic nuclei following nuclear transfer. Biol Reprod 74, 1083–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salehi, M, Kato, Y and Tsunoda, Y (2014). Effect of melatonin treatment on developmental potential of somatic cell nuclear-transferred mouse oocytes in vitro. Zygote, 22, 213–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, L and Wu, J (2009). Epigenetic regulation in mammalian preimplantation embryo development. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 7, 59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sousa, M, Cremades, N, Silva, J, Oliveira, C, Ferraz, L, Teixeira da Silva, JT, Viana, P and Barros, A (2002). Predictive value of testicular histology in secretory azoospermic subgroups and clinical outcome after microinjection of fresh and frozen–thawed sperm and spermatids. Hum Reprod 17, 1800–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szczepańska, K, Stańczuk, L and Maleszewski, M (2011). Oct4 protein remains in trophectoderm until late stages of mouse blastocyst development. Reprod Biol 11, 145–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, A, Nagayoshi, M, Takemoto, Y, Tanaka, I, Kusunoki, H, Watanabe, S, Kuroda, K, Takeda, S, Ito, M and Yanagimachi, R (2015). Fourteen babies born after round spermatid injection into human oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 14629–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tesarik, J, Mendoza, C and Testart, J (1995). Viable embryos from injection of round spermatids into oocytes. New Eng J Med 333, 525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urman, B, Alatas, C, Aksoy, S, Mercan, R, Nuhoglu, A, Mumcu, A, Isiklar, A and Balaban, B (2002). Transfer at the blastocyst stage of embryos derived from testicular round spermatid injection. Hum Reprod 17, 741–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vicdan, K, Isik, AZ and Delilbaşi, L (2001). Development of blastocyst-stage embryos after round spermatid injection in patients with complete spermiogenesis failure. J Assist Reprod Genet 18, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vloeberghs, V, Verheyen, G and Tournaye, H (2013). Intracytoplasmic spermatid injection and in vitro maturation: Fact or fiction? Clinics (São Paulo), 68, Suppl. 1, 151–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, G and Schöler, HR (2014). Role of Oct4 in the early embryo development. Cell Regen 3, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yazawa, H, Yanagida, K and Sato, A (2007). Human round spermatids from azoospermic men exhibit oocyte-activation and Ca2+ oscillation-inducing activities. Zygote 15, 337–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zlatanova, J, Caiafa, P and Van Holde, K (2000). Linker histone binding and displacement: Versatile mechanism for transcriptional regulation. FASEB J 14, 1697–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed