Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:30:53.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Provisional bilateral symmetry in Xenopus eggs is estiblished during maturation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

E.E. Brown ,
K.M. Margelot  and
M.V. Danilchik
E.E. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Structure and Function SD, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
K.M. Margelot
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Structure and Function SD, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
M.V. Danilchik*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Structure and Function SD, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
*
Dr M.V. Danilchik, Department of Biological Structure and Function SD, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR 97201-3097, USA. Tel: (503)494-8568. Fax: (503)494-4666.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Dorsal–ventral patterning in the Xenopus egg becomes established midway through the first cell cycle during a 30° rotation of the subcortical yolk mass relative to the egg cortex. This rotation of symmetrisation is microtubule dependent, and its direction is thought to be cued by the usually eccentric sperm centrosome. The fact that parthenogenetically activated eggs also undergo a directed rotation, despite the absence of a sperm centrosome, suggests that an endogenous asymmetry in the unfertilised egg supports the directed polymerisation of microtubules in the vegetal cortex, in the way that an eccentric sperm centrosome would in fertilised eggs. Consistent with this idea, we noticed that the maturation spot is usually located an average of more than 15° from the geometric centre of the pigmented animal hemisphere. In parthenogenetically activated eggs, this eccentric maturation spot can be used to predict the direction of rotation. Although in most fertilised eggs the yolk mass rotates toward the sperm entry point (SEP) meridian, occasionally this relationship is perturbed significantly; in such eggs, the maturation spot is never on the same side of the egg as the SEP. In oocytes tilted 90° from upright during maturation in vitro, the maturation spot developed 15° or more from the centre of the pigmented hemisphere, always displaced towards the point on the equator that was up during maturation. This experimentally demonstrated lability is consistent with an off-axis oocyte orientation during oogenesis determining its eccentric maturation spot position, and, in turn, its endogenous rotational bias.

Keywords

Bilateral SymmetryCrotical-cytoplasmic roatationOocyte maturationOogenesisXenopus
Type
Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , August 1994 , pp. 213 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Refernces

Ancel, P.. & Vintemberger, P. (1948). Recherches sur le déterminisme de la symmétrie bilatérale dans l'oeuf des amphibiens. Bull. Biol. Fr. Belg. 31 (Suppl.), 1–182.Google Scholar
Black, S.D. & Gerhart, J.C.. 1985. Experimental control of the site of axis formation in Xenopus laevis eggs centrifuged before first clevage. Dev. Biol. 108, 310–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brachet, J. (1911). Etudes sur les localizations germinales et luer potentialité réelle l'oeuf parthenogenétique de Rana. Arch. Biol. Liege. 26, 337–63.Google Scholar
Brachet, J., Hanocq, F.. & VanGansen, P.. (1970). A cytochemical and ultrastructural analysis of in vitro maturation in amphibian oocytes. Dev. Biol. 21, 157–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, E.E., Denegre, J.M. & Danilchik, M.V.. (1993). Deep cytoplasmic rearrangements in ventralized Xenopus embryos. Dev. Biol. 160, 148–56.Google Scholar
Danilchik, M.V. & Black, S.D.. (1988). The first cleavage plane and the embryonic axis in Xenopus laevis are determined by separate mechanisms. I. The unperturbed embryo. Dev. Biol. 128, 58–64.Google Scholar
Danilchik, M.V. & Denegre, J.M.. (1991). Deep cytoplasmic rearrangements during early development in Xenopus laevis. Development 111, 845–56.Google Scholar
Denegre, J.M. & Danilchik, M.V.. (1993). Deep cytoplasmic rearrangements in axis-respecified Xenopus embryos. Dev. Biol. 160, 157–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dent, J.A. & Klymkowsky, M.W.. (1989). Whole-mount analyses of cytoskeletal reorganization and function during oogenesis and early embryogenesis in Xenopus. In The Cell Biology of Fertilization, ed. Schatten, H. & Schatten, G., pp. 63–103. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elinson, R.P. & Rowning, B. (1988). A transient array of parallel microtubules in frog eggs: potential tracks for a cytoplasmic rotation that specifies dorsal-ventral axis. Dev. Biol. 128, 185–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gard, D.L. (1992). Microtubule organization during maturation of Xenopus oocytes: assembly and rotation of the meiotic spindles. Dev. Biol. 151, 516–30.Google Scholar
Gard, D.L.. (1993). Ectopic spindle assembly during maturation of Xenopus oocytes: evidence for functional polarization of the oocyte cortex. Dev. Biol. 159, 298–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gard, D.L. (1994). γ-tubulin is asymmetrically distributed in the cortex of Xenopus oocytes. Dev. Biol. 161, 131–40.Google Scholar
Gerhart, J.C. (1980). Mechanisms regulating pattern formation in the amphibian egg and early embryo. In Biological Regulation and Development, ed. Goldberger, R.F.. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Gerhart, J., Danilchik, M., Roberts, J., Rowning, B. & Vincent, J.P. (1986). Primary and secondary polarity of the amphibian oocyte and egg. In Gametogenesis and the Early Embryo, pp305–19. New York: Alan R. Lisa.Google Scholar
Houliston, E. & Elinson, R.P. (1991 a). Patterns of microtubule polymerization relating to cortical rotation in Xenopus laevis eggs. Development 112, 107–17.Google Scholar
Houliston, E. & Elinson, R.P. (1991 b). Evidence for the involvement of microtubules, ER, and kinesin in the cortical rotation of fertilized frog eggs. J. Cell Biol. 114, 1017–28.Google Scholar
Klymkowsky, M.W., Maynell, L.A. & Polson, A.G.. (1987). Polar asymmetry in the organization of the cortical cytokeratin system of Xenopus laevis oocytes and embryos. Development 100, 543–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pasteels, J. (1937). Sur l'origine de la symétrie bilatérale des Amphibiens anoures. Arch. Anal. Microsc. 33, 279–300.Google Scholar
Peng, H.B. (1991). Appendix A: Solutions and protocols. In Methods in Cell Biology, vol. 36, ed. Kay, B.K. & Peng, H.B., San Diego: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Phillips, C.R. (1985). Spatial changes in poly(A) concentrations during early embryogenesis in Xenopus laevis: analysis by in situ hybridization. Dev. Biol. 109, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roux, W. (1988). Contributions to the developmental mechanics of the embryo. On the artificial production of half-embryos by destruction of one of the first two blastomeres and the later development (postgeneration) of the missing half of the body. In Foundations of Experimental Embryology. ed. Willier, B.H. & Oppenheimer, J.M., pp. 2–37. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Savage, R.M. & Danilchik, M.V. (1993). Dynamics of germplasm localization and its inhibition by ultraviolet irradiation in early cleavage Xenopus embryos. Dev. Biol. 157, 371–82.Google Scholar
Smith, L.D. (1972). Protein synthesis during oocyte maturation. In Oogenesis, ed. Biggers, J.D. & Schuetz, A.W.. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, J.-P. & Gerhart, J.C. (1987). Subcortical rotation in Xenopus eggs: an early step in embryonic axis specification. Dev. Biol. 123, 526–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, J.-P., Oster, G.F. & Cerhart, J.C. (1986). Kinematics of grey crescent formation in Xenopus eggs: the displacement of subcortical cytoplasm relative to the egg surface. Dev. Biol. 113, 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittek, M. (1952). La vitellogénèse chez les amphibiens. Arch. Biol. 63, 133–98.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1974). Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.Google Scholar