Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:14:02.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection, but for whom?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2019

Seda Karabulut Open the ORCID record for Seda Karabulut [Opens in a new window] ,
Ozlem Aksunger ,
Oya Korkmaz ,
Hilal Eren Gozel Open the ORCID record for Hilal Eren Gozel [Opens in a new window]  and
Ilknur Keskin
Seda Karabulut*
Affiliation:
Medipol University, School of Medicine, Kavacik, Istanbul, Turkey Medipol University, School of Medicine, REMER (Regenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Centre), Kavacik, Istanbul, Turkey
Ozlem Aksunger
Affiliation:
Memorial Antalya Hospital/IVF Centre, Antalya, Turkey
Oya Korkmaz
Affiliation:
Medipol University, School of Medicine, Kavacik, Istanbul, Turkey Medipol University, School of Medicine, REMER (Regenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Centre), Kavacik, Istanbul, Turkey
Hilal Eren Gozel
Affiliation:
Medipol University, School of Medicine, Kavacik, Istanbul, Turkey Medipol University, School of Medicine, REMER (Regenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Centre), Kavacik, Istanbul, Turkey
Ilknur Keskin
Affiliation:
Medipol University, School of Medicine, Kavacik, Istanbul, Turkey Medipol University, School of Medicine, REMER (Regenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Centre), Kavacik, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Seda Karabulut. Medipol University, School of Medicine, Department of Histology and Embryology, Kavacik mah, Ekinciler cd. No. 19 Beykoz, Istanbul, Turkey. Tel: +90 532 273 98 64. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is performed in cases of infertility by injecting a motile and morphologically normal sperm cell under a routine ×400 magnification at which is hard to distinguish morphologically healthy sperm. Recently, the use of high-powered differential interference contrast optics gave the opportunity to select a sperm under ultra-high magnification of ×10,160. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) technique in different infertility populations undergoing ICSI. Main outcome measures of routine ICSI were compared with IMSI in three different groups of patients (1, non-selected; 2, male infertility; and 3, repeated implantation failure group). Results were analysed to evaluate the effects of the IMSI procedure and to find the most suitable group of patients who may benefit from the procedure. IMSI caused a significant increase in the fertilization and top quality embryo rates in the male infertility group and a significant increase in fertilization and pregnancy rates in the repeated implantation failure group, whereas no effect was observed in the non-selected group with patients of various indications. A positive effect of IMSI on the outcome of male factor infertility and repeated implantation failure patients was observed. Data observed confirmed that the application of IMSI was beneficial for a selected group of patients with male factor infertility and repeated implantation failure.

Keywords

ICSIIMSISpermSperm morphologySperm selection
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 299 - 304
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antinori, M, Licata, E, Dani, G, Cerusico, F, Versaci, C, d’Angelo, D and Antinori, S (2008) Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective randomized trial. Reprod Biomed Online 16, 835–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balaban, B, Yakin, K, Alatas, C, Oktem, O, Isiklar, A and Urman, B (2011) Clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic injection of spermatozoa morphologically selected under high magnification: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online 22, 472–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartoov, B, Berkovitz, A and Eltes, F (2001) Selection of spermatozoa with normal nuclei to improve the pregnancy rate with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. New Engl J Med 345, 1067–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartoov, B, Berkovitz, A, Eltes, F, Kogosowski, A, Menezo, Y and Barak, Y (2002) Real‐time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF‐ICSI outcome. J Androl 23, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartoov, B, Berkovitz, A, Eltes, F, Kogosovsky, A, Yagoda, A, Lederman, H, and Barak, Y (2003) Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril 80, 1413–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkovitz, A, Eltes, F, Yaari, S, Katz, N, Barr, I, Fishman, A and Bartoov, B (2005) The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Hum Reprod 20, 185–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkovitz, A, Eltes, F, Lederman, H, Peer, S, Ellenbogen, A, Feldberg, B and Bartoov, B (2006) How to improve IVF–ICSI outcome by sperm selection. Reprod Biomed Online 12, 634–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boitrelle, F, Ferfouri, F, Petit, JM, Segretain, D, Tourain, C, Bergere, M, and Selva, J (2011) Large human sperm vacuoles observed in motile spermatozoa under high magnification: nuclear thumbprints linked to failure of chromatin condensation. Hum Reprod 26, 1650–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braga, DPDAF, Setti, AS, Figueira, RC, Nichi, M, Martinhago, CD, Iaconelli, A Jr and Borges, E Jr (2011) Sperm organelle morphologic abnormalities: contributing factors and effects on intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles outcomes. Urology 78, 786–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cayli, S, Jakab, A, Ovari, L, Delpiano, E, Celik-Ozenci, C, Sakkas, D, and Huszar, G (2003) Biochemical markers of sperm function: male fertility and sperm selection for ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 7, 462–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celik-Ozenci, C, Jakab, A, Kovacs, T, Catalanotti, J, Demir, R, Bray-Ward, P, and Huszar, G (2004) Sperm selection for ICSI: shape properties do not predict the absence or presence of numerical chromosomal aberrations. Hum Reprod 19, 2052–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Vos, A, Van De Velde, H, Joris, H, Verheyen, G, Devroey, P and Van Steirteghem, A (2003) Influence of individual sperm morphology on fertilization, embryo morphology, and pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 79, 42–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franco, JG Jr, Baruffi, RLR, Mauri, AL, Petersen, CG, Oliveira, JBA and Vagnini, L (2008) Significance of large nuclear vacuoles in human spermatozoa: implications for ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 17, 42–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garolla, A, Fortini, D, Menegazzo, M, De Toni, L, Nicoletti, V, Moretti, A and Foresta, C (2008) High-power microscopy for selecting spermatozoa for ICSI by physiological status. Reprod Biomed Online 17, 610–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greco, E, Scarselli, F, Iacobelli, M, Rienzi, L, Ubaldi, F, Ferrero, S and Tesarik, J (2005) Efficient treatment of infertility due to sperm DNA damage by ICSI with testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 20, 226–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazout, A, Dumont-Hassan, M, Junca, AM, Bacrie, PC and Tesarik, J (2006) High-magnification ICSI overcomes paternal effect resistant to conventional ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 12, 19–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knez, K, Zorn, B, Tomazevic, T, Vrtacnik-Bokal, E and Virant-Klun, I (2011) The IMSI procedure improves poor embryo development in the same infertile couples with poor semen quality: a comparative prospective randomized study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 9, 123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Küpker, W, Schulze, W and Diedrich, K (1998) Ultrastructure of gametes and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the significance of sperm morphology. Hum Reprod 13(Suppl 1), 99–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leandri, RD, Gachet, A, Pfeffer, J, Celebi, C, Rives, N, Carre‐Pigeon, F and Parinaud, J (2013) Is intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) beneficial in the first ART cycle? a multicentric randomized controlled trial. Andrology 1, 692–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mauri, AL, Petersen, CG, Oliveira, JBA, Massaro, FC, Baruffi, RL and Franco, JG Jr (2010) Comparison of day 2 embryo quality after conventional ICSI versus intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) using sibling oocytes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150, 42–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oehninger, S, Veeck, L, Lanzendorf, S, Maloney, M, Toner, J and Muasher, S (1995) Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: achievement of high pregnancy rates in couples with severe male factor infertility is dependent primarily upon female and not male factors. Fertil Steril 64, 977–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, JBA, Massaro, FC, Baruffi, RLR, Mauri, AL, Petersen, CG, Silva, LF and Franco, JG Jr (2010) Correlation between semen analysis by motile sperm organelle morphology examination and sperm DNA damage. Fertil Steril 94, 1937–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shalom-Paz, E, Anabusi, S, Michaeli, M, Karchovsky-Shoshan, E, Rothfarb, N, Shavit, T and Ellenbogen, A (2015) Can intracytoplasmatic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) technique improve outcome in patients with repeated IVF–ICSI failure? a comparative study. Gynecol Endocrinol 31, 247–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowronek, F, Casanova, G, Alciaturi, J, Capurro, A, Cantu, L, Montes, JM and Sapiro, R (2012) DNA sperm damage correlates with nuclear ultrastructural sperm defects in teratozoospermic men. Andrologia 44, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staessen, C, Camus, M, Khan, I, Smitz, J, Van Waesberghe, L, Wisanto, A, Devroey, P and Van Steirteghem, AC (1989) An 18-month survey of infertility treatment by in vitro fertilization, gamete and zygote intrafallopian transfer, and replacement of frozen–thawed embryos. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Transfer 6, 22–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tasaka, A, Doshida, M, Sato, Y, Kyoya, T, Nakajo, Y and Kyono, K (2009) Outcome of IMSI (intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection) in patients with repeated ICSI failures. Fertil Steril 92, S76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, DM, Barbosa, MA, Ferriani, RA, Navarro, PA, Raine‐Fenning, N, Nastri, CO and Martins, WP (2013) Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst 25, CD010167.Google Scholar
Tesarik, J (2005) Paternal effects on cell division in the preimplantation embryo. Reprod Biomed Online 10, 370–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Steirteghem, AC, Nagy, Z, Joris, H, Liu, J, Staessen, C, Smitz, J, Wisanto, A and Devroey, P (1993) High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 8, 1061–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderzwalmen, P, Hiemer, A, Rubner, P, Bach, M, Neyer, A, Stecher, A and Cassuto, G (2008) Blastocyst development after sperm selection at high magnification is associated with size and number of nuclear vacuoles. Reprod Biomed Online 17, 617–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilding, M, Coppola, G, Di Matteo, L, Palagiano, A, Fusco, E and Dale, B (2011) Intracytoplasmic injection of morphologically selected spermatozoa (IMSI) improves outcome after assisted reproduction by deselecting physiologically poor quality spermatozoa. J Assist Reprod Genet 28, 253–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yazbeck, C, Delaroche, L, Jacquesson, L, Ayel, JP, Selva, J and Rougier, N (2008) Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI): is it a good choice after two or more IVF or ICSI failures? Fertil Steril 90, S416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, S, Koyuturk, M, Kilic, G, Alpak, O and Aytoz, A (2005) Effects of leucocytospermia on semen parameters and outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Int J Androl 28, 337–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed