Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:02:10.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Centrifugation on Percoll density gradient enhances motility, membrane integrity and in vitro fertilizing ability of frozen–thawed boar sperm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2013

Michiko Noguchi ,
Koji Yoshioka ,
Hirokazu Hikono ,
Gentaro Iwagami ,
Chie Suzuki  and
Kazuhiro Kikuchi
Michiko Noguchi
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Health, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0856, Japan.
Koji Yoshioka*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Health, Kannondai 3–1-5, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0856, Japan.
Hirokazu Hikono
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Health, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0856, Japan.
Gentaro Iwagami
Affiliation:
Hokkaido Research Organization, Shintoku, Hokkaido 081–0038, Japan.
Chie Suzuki
Affiliation:
National Institute of Animal Health, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0856, Japan.
Kazuhiro Kikuchi
Affiliation:
National Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–8602, Japan.
*
All correspondence to: Koji Yoshioka. National Institute of Animal Health, Kannondai 3–1-5, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0856, Japan. Tel: +81 29 838 7784. Fax: +81 29 838 7880. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of Percoll density gradient centrifugation on sperm quality, in vitro fertilizability and developmental capacity of frozen–thawed boar sperm were evaluated. Two-step density gradient centrifugation by Percoll enhanced significantly the motility parameters of sperm compared with a simple centrifugation procedure. Percentages of motile sperm and sperm with intact plasma and acrosome membranes after Percoll separation were significantly greater than those after simple centrifugation. The rates of penetration, cleavage and blastocyst formation after in vitro fertilization were significantly improved by Percoll separation compared with simple centrifugation and were influenced positively by the intactness of sperm head membranes, but not any sperm motility parameters. However, insemination with increased concentrations of sperm prepared by Percoll gradient centrifugation did not improve the success of fertilization and embryo development in vitro. Our results indicate that the integrity of sperm head membranes after Percoll separation is important for successful embryo development in vitro, more so than sperm motility.

Keywords

Acrosomal membraneIn vitro fertilizationPlasma membraneSperm motility
Type
Research Article
Information
Zygote , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 2015 , pp. 68 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, J.L., Bilodeau, J-F. & Cormier, N. (2000). Semen cryopreservation in domestic animals: A damaging and capacitating phenomenon. J. Androl. 21, 1–7.Google Scholar
Brito, L.F.C., Barth, A.D., Bilodeau-Goeseels, S., Panich, P.L. & Kastelic, J.P. (2003). Comparison of methods to evaluate the plasmalemma of bovine sperm and their relationship with in vitro fertilization rate. Theriogenology 60, 1539–51.Google Scholar
Carvajal, G., Cuello, C., Ruiz, M., Vázquez, J.M., Martínez, E.A. & Roca, J. (2004). Effects of centrifugation before freezing on boar sperm cryosurvival. J. Androl. 25, 389–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cesari, A., Kaiser, G.G., Mucci, N., Mutto, A., Vincenti, A., Fornés, M.W. & Alberio, R.H. (2006). Integrated morphophysiological assessment of two methods for sperm selection in bovine embryo production in vitro. Theriogenology 66, 1185–93.Google Scholar
Curry, M.R. (2000). Cryopreservation of semen from domestic livestock. Reproduction 5, 46–52.Google Scholar
Donnelly, E.T., Lewis, S.E.M., McNally, J.A. & Thompson, T. (1998). In vitro fertilization and pregnancy rates: the influence of sperm motility and morphology on IVF outcome. Fertil. Steril. 70, 305–14.Google Scholar
Drobnis, E.Z., Zhong, C.Q. & Overstreet, J.W. (1991). Separation of cryopreserved human semen using Sephadex columns, washing, or Percoll gradients. J. Androl. 12, 201–8.Google Scholar
Flores, E., Taberner, E., Rivera, M.M., Peña, A., Rigau, T., Miró, J. & Rodríguez-Gil, J.E. (2008). Effects of freezing/thawing on motile sperm subpopulations of boar and donkey ejaculates. Theriogenology 70, 936–45.Google Scholar
Funahashi, H. (2003). Polyspermic penetration in porcine IVM-IVF systems. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 15, 167–77.Google Scholar
Gadea, J. (2005). Sperm factors related to in vitro and in vivo porcine fertility. Theriogenology 63, 431–44.Google Scholar
Gadella, B.M., Tsai, P-S., Boerke, A. & Brewis, I.A. (2008). Sperm head membrane reorganization during capacitation. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 52, 473–80.Google Scholar
Gil, M.A., Roca, J., Cremades, T., Hernández, M., Vázquez, J.M., Rodríguez-Martínez, H. & Martínez, E.A. (2005). Does multivariate analysis of post-thaw sperm characteristics accurately estimate in vitro fertility of boar individual ejaculates? Theriogenology 64, 305–16.Google Scholar
Gil, M.A., Almiñana, C., Cuello, C., Parrilla, I., Roca, J., Vazquez, J.M. & Martinez, E.A. (2007). Brief coincubation of gametes in porcine in vitro fertilization: Role of sperm:oocyte ratio and post-coincubation medium. Theriogenology 67, 620–6.Google Scholar
Gil, M.A., Almiñana, C., Roca, J., Vázquez, J.M. & Martínez, E.A. (2008). Boar semen variability and its effects on IVF efficiency. Theriogenology 70, 1260–8.Google Scholar
Grant, S.A., Long, S.E. & Parkinson, T.J. (1994). Fertilizability and structural properties of boar spermatozoa prepared by Percoll gradient centrifugation. J. Reprod. Fertil. 100, 477–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikeda, H., Kikuchi, K., Noguchi, J., Takeda, H., Shimada, A., Mizokami, T. & Kaneko, H. (2002). Effect of preincubation of cryopreserved porcine epididymal sperm. Theriogenology 57, 1309–18.Google Scholar
Jeong, B.S. & Yang, X. (2001). Cysteine, glutathione, and Percoll treatments improve porcine oocyte maturation and fertilization in vitro. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 59, 330–5.Google Scholar
Machado, G.M., Carvalho, J.O., Siqueira Filho, E., Caixeta, E.S., Franco, M.M., Rumpf, R. & Dode, M.A.N. (2009). Effect of Percoll volume, duration and force of centrifugation, on in vitro production and sex ratio of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 71, 1289–97.Google Scholar
Martecikova, S., Hulinska, P., Reckova, Z., Pavlik, A., Jeseta, M. & Machatkova, M. (2010). Effect of acrosome reaction progress in frozen–thawed boar spermatozoa on the efficiency of in vitro oocyte fertilization. Vet. Med. 55, 429–37.Google Scholar
Matás, C., Vieira, L., García-Vázquez, F.A., Avilés-López, K., López-Úbeda, R., Carvajal, J.A. & Gadea, J. (2011). Effects of centrifugation through three different discontinuous Percoll gradients on boar sperm function. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 127, 62–72.Google Scholar
Maxwell, W.M.C. & Johnson, L.A. (1997). Chlortetracycline analysis of boar spermatozoa after incubation, flow cytometric sorting, cooling, or cryopreservation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 146, 408–18.Google Scholar
Mercado, E., Hernandez, M., Sanz, E., Rodriguez, A., Gomez, E., Vazquez, J.M., Martinez, E.A. & Roca, J. (2009). Evaluation of L-glutamine for cryopreservation of boar spermatozoa. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 115, 149–57.Google Scholar
Mito, T., Yoshioka, K., Nagano, M., Suzuki, C., Yamashita, S. & Hoshi, H. (2009). Transforming growth factor-α in a defined medium during in vitro maturation of porcine oocytes improves their developmental competence and intracellular ultrastructure. Theriogenology 72, 841–50.Google Scholar
Oliveira, L.Z., Arruda, R.P., Celeghini, E.C.C., de Andrade, A.F.C., Perini, A.P., Resende, M.V., Miguel, M.C.V., Lucio, A.C. & Hossepian de Lima, V.F.M. (2011). Effects of discontinuous Percoll gradient centrifugation on the quality of bovine spermatozoa evaluated with computer-assisted semen analysis and fluorescent probes association. Andrologia 44, 9–15.Google Scholar
Peña, F.J., Johannisson, A., Wallgren, M. & Rodríguez-Martínez, H. (2003). Assessment of fresh and frozen–thawed boar semen using an annexin-V assay: a new method of evaluating sperm membrane integrity. Theriogenology 60, 677–89.Google Scholar
Popwell, J.M. & Flowers, W.L. (2004). Variability in relationships between semen quality and estimates of in vivo and in vitro fertility in boars. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 81, 97–113.Google Scholar
Rath, D. & Niemann, H. (1997). In vitro fertilization of porcine oocytes with fresh and frozen–thawed ejaculated or frozen–thawed epididymal semen obtained from identical boars. Theriogenology 47, 785–93.Google Scholar
Salumets, A., Suikkari, A-M., Möls, T., Söderström-Anttila, V. & Tuuri, T. (2002). Influence of oocytes and spermatozoa on early embryonic development. Fertil. Steril. 78, 1082–7.Google Scholar
Sone, M., Chikyu, M., Yoshida, M., Bamba, K. & Ogasa, A. (1992). Prolonged storage of boar semen in liquid form. Jpn J. Swine. Sci. 29, 41–50.Google Scholar
Suzuki, C., Yoshioka, K., Itoh, S., Kawarasaki, T. & Kikuchi, K. (2005). In vitro fertilization and subsequent development of porcine oocytes using cryopreserved and liquid-stored spermatozoa from various boars. Theriogenology 64, 1287–96.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K. & Nagai, T. (2003). In vitro fertility and motility characteristics of frozen–thawed boar epididymal spermatozoa separated by Percoll. Theriogenology 60, 1481–94.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K., Geshi, M., Yamauchi, N. & Nagai, T. (2003). Functional changes and motility characteristics of Japanese Black bull spermatozoa separated by Percoll. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 77, 157–72.Google Scholar
Tartaglione, C.M. & Ritta, M.N. (2004). Prognostic value of spermatological parameters as predictors of in vitro fertility of frozen–thawed bull semen. Theriogenology 62, 1245–52.Google Scholar
Valcárcel, A., de las Heras, M.A., Moses, D.F., Perez, L.J. & Baldassarre, H. (1996). Comparison between Sephadex G-10 and Percoll for preparation of normospermic, asthenospermic and frozen/thawed ram semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 41, 215–24.Google Scholar
Wang, W.H., Niwa, K. & Okuda, K. (1991). In-vitro penetration of pig oocytes matured in culture by frozen–thawed ejaculated spermatozoa. J. Reprod. Fertil. 93, 491–6.Google Scholar
Ward, F., Enright, B., Rizos, D., Boland, M. & Lonergan, P. (2002). Optimization of in vitro bovine embryo production: effect of duration of maturation, length of gamete co-incubation, sperm concentration and sire. Theriogenology 71, 2105–17.Google Scholar
Ward, F., Rizos, D., Boland, M. & Lonergan, P. (2003). Effect of reducing sperm concentration during IVF on the ability to distinguish between bulls of high and low field fertility: work in progress. Theriogenology 59, 1575–84.Google Scholar
Xu, X., Ding, J., Seth, P.C., Harbison, D.S. & Foxcroft, G.R. (1996a). In vitro fertilization of in vitro matured pig oocytes: effects of boar and ejaculate fraction. Theriogenology 45, 745–55.Google Scholar
Xu, X., Seth, P.C., Harbison, D.S., Cheung, A.P. & Foxcroft, G.R. (1996b). Semen dilution for assessment of boar ejaculate quality in pig IVM and IVF systems. Theriogenology 46, 1325–37.Google Scholar
Yoshioka, K., Suzuki, C., Itoh, S., Kikuchi, K., Iwamura, S. & Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (2003). Production of piglets derived from in vitro-produced blastocysts fertilized and cultured in chemically defined media: effects of theophylline, adenosine, and cysteine during in vitro fertilization. Biol. Reprod. 69, 2092–9.Google Scholar
Yoshioka, K., Suzuki, C. & Onishi, A. (2008). Defined system for in vitro production of porcine embryos using a single basic medium. J. Reprod. Dev. 54, 208–13.Google Scholar