Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T23:41:48.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analysis of sea urchin metamorphosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2018

Ikuko Yazaki
Ikuko Yazaki*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Metamorphosis of sea urchin larvae is initiated by one or more cues from the environment. The cues can be from bacterial films (Cameron & Hinegardner, 1974), algae (Kitamura et al., 1993) or sand and seawater from adult habitats (Highsmith, 1982). The substances from sand are peptides (Burke, 1984), and those from red algae are free fatty acids (Kitamura et al., 1993) and dibromomethane (Taniguchi et al., 1994). Burke (1983a) suggested that chemical and physical stimuli were received by sensory receptors, probably podia of the adult rudiment, and transmitted to effectors of metamorphosis such as larval and adult tissues. Morpho-genetic, histolytic and histogenic processes progress during metamorphosis to create a juvenile, though direct evidence for the mechanism of induction has not been shown.

Glutamine (Gin) induces metamorphosis in larvae of many sea urchin species (Strongylocentrotus intermedius: Naidenko, 1991; Pseudocentrotus depressus: Yazaki & Harashima, 1994; Hemicentrotus pulcherrimus: Yazaki, 1995). We have analysed the metamorphosis of sea urchin larvae using Gln, neurotransmitters and a natural cue (green algae).

Type
Special Lecture for Citizens
Information
Zygote , Volume 8 , supplement S1: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fertilization and Development of Sea Urchin and Marine Invertebrates , December 1999 , pp. S46 - S47
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bisgrove, B.W. & Burke, R.D. (1987). Cell Tissue Res. 248, 335–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, R.D. (1983 a). Can.J.Zool. 61, 1701–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, R.D. (1983 b). Biol. Bull. 164, 176–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, R.D. (1984). Science 225, 442–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, R.A & Hinegardner, R.T. (1974). Biol. Bull. 146, 335–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Highsmith, R.C. (1982). Ecology 63, 329–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitamura, H., et al (1993). Mar. Biol. 115, 387–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, D.E., et al (1979). Science 204, 407–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naidenko, T.K (1991). In Biology of Echinodermata (ed. Yanagisawa, et al.), p. 271. Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
Sato, Y. & Yazaki, I. (1998). In Echinoderm Research 1998 (ed. Carnevali, & Bonasoro, ), pp. 221–6. Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
Taniguchi, K., et al. (1994). Fisheries Sci. 60, 795–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazaki, I. (1995). Zool. Sci. 12, 105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yazaki, I. & Harashima, H. (1994). Zool. Sci. 11, 253–60.Google Scholar