Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:37:09.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aspects of Bulgarian Musical Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2019

Timothy Rice
Timothy Rice*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto; Ethnomusicology
Get access

Extract

Folk musicians are generally assumed to make music but not to think very much about it. Yet recent studies by Zemp (1978, 1979) and others demonstrate the existence of elaborate conceptual systems related to music in cultures without a written tradition. If the comparison between Western and a particular non-Western music theory seems invidious, it is partly because the West has a tradition of discourse about music (musica theoretica) that has existed for over 2000 years quite apart from practical music making (musica practica).

Type
Articles
Information
Yearbook of the International Folk Music Council , Volume 12 , 1980 , pp. 43 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 By the International Folk Music Council 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Publications cited

Black, Mary B. 1969 “Eliciting Folk Taxonomies in Ojibwa”, in Tyler, Stephen A., ed., Cognitive Anthropology (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston), pp. 165–189.Google Scholar
Conklin, Harold C. 1969 “Ethnogenealogical Method,” in Tyler, Stephen A., ed., Cognitive Anthropology (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston), pp. 93–122. (Reprinted from W.H. Goodenough, ed., Explorations in Cultural Anthropology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.)Google Scholar
Frake, Charles O. 1969 “The Ethnographic Study of Cognitive Systems”, in Tyler, Stephen A., ed., Cognitive Anthropology (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston), pp. 28–41. (Reprinted from F.W. Householder and S. Saporta, eds., Problems in Lexicography. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics, 1962.)Google Scholar
Goodenough, Ward H. 1956 “Componential Analysis and the Study of Meaning”, Language, 32(1): 195–216.Google Scholar
Harwood, Dane 1976 “Universals in Music: a Perspective from Cognitive Psychology”, Ethnomusicology, 20: 521–540.Google Scholar
Katsarova, Raina 1952 “Tri Pokoleniya Narodni Pevitsi”, Izvestiya na Instituta za Muzika, 1: 43–91.Google Scholar
Katsarova, Raina 1954 “Folk Music: Bulgaria”, in Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musicians. 5th Edition. London: Macmillan. Vol. 3: 201–211.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Nikolaj 1968 Bŭlgarska Mnogoglasna Narodna Pesen. Sofia: Nauka i Izkustvo.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Nikolaj 1970 Bŭlgarska Narodna Muzika. Sofia: Nauka i Izkustvo.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul 1969 “Comments on Colby”, in Tyler, Stephen A., ed., Cognitive Anthropology (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston), pp. 78–90. (Reprinted from Current Anthropology (1966), 7 (1): 20–23.)Google Scholar
Kremenliev, Boris 1952 Bulgarian-Macedonian Folk Music. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Marshall, Christopher in press “Toward a Comparative Aesthetics of Music”, in Rice, Timothy and Falck, Robert, eds., Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Music. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Merriam, Alan P. 1964 The Anthropology of Music. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Messner, Gerald Florian 1976 “Die Schwebungsdiaphonie in Bistrica.” Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Sachs, Nahoma 1975 “Music and Meaning: Musical Meaning in a Macedonian Village.” Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Singer, Alice 1974 “The Metrical Structure of Macedonian Dance”, Ethnomusicology, 18: 379–404.Google Scholar
Stoin, Vasil 1925 “Hypothèse sur l'origine bulgare de la diaphonie”, La Bulgarie d'Aujourd'hui, 8: 3–44.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor 1969 The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Zemp, Hugo 1978 “‘Are'are Classification of Musical Types and Instruments”, Ethnomusicology, 22: 37–67.Google Scholar
Zemp, Hugo 1979 “Aspects of ‘Are'are Musical Theory”, Ethnomusicology, 23: 6–48.Google Scholar