No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 March 2019
1. Engl. “We often speak of folksong and do not always know what it is meant by it,” Goethe, J.W., Weimarer Ausgabe, Vol. I., 1823, p. 69.Google Scholar
2. See, for instance: T.W. Adorno, H. Engel, M. Belvianes, K. Blaukopf, H. Boettcher, P. Honigsheim, T. Kneif, I. Supicic, V. Karbusicky, F. Lesure, H. Raynor, P. Rümmenholler, A. Silberman, H. Haselauer.Google Scholar
3. “Sociology of Music and Ethnomusicology: Two Disciplines in Competition,” The Journal of General Education, Vol. 38, No. 3 (1986), pp. 167–181 and in “Forty years of research concerned with the study of music in culture: Trends developed in musical folklore, sociology of music, and ethnomusicology” paper delivered at the 1987 Conference of the ICTM, Berlin, Aug. 4, 1987.Google Scholar
4. It is probably significant in this respect that another recent European book, Wolfgang Suppan's, Der musizierende Mensch (Mainz, B. Schott's Söne, 1984) also makes few references to recent ethnomusicological literature.Google Scholar
5. The English-language literature in the sociology of music, today, largely overlaps with popular music scholarship.Google Scholar
6. It is no coincidence that a journal bears the title of International Journal of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music.Google Scholar
7. See Merriam, “Aesthetics and the Interrelationship of the Arts,” Chapter XIII in The Anthropology of Music, Northwestern University Press, 1964.Google Scholar