Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:53:06.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Moralities of Negotiation

They Determine Our Approach and Our Objectives in the Cold War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

Get access

Extract

Many well-intentioned people have long recognized the absence in our century of any effective international law, government and mores. They have also wasted a lot of time attempting to conjure up constitutional governments for the world, to codify, revise and extend international law, and to call forth a mostly non-existent world public opinion. In a world rent by such basic ideological and cultural splits as is ours, these efforts are foredoomed to failure.

The much more relevant question for one interested in peace in this nuclear-missile’ age is whether or not the United States and the Soviet Union can settle through negotiation some of the political problems of the Cold War. If they cannot agree to “live and let live” as sovereign states in a world of sovereign states, on what basis can we expect that they will engage in that much more intimate collaboration out of which mores, law and government can grow?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)