Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T15:30:04.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Foreign vs. Local Ownership

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2018

Get access

Extract

The ownership of affiliates of international companies has become a critical issue in many host countries. Inevitably, the issue of ownership has become a serious matter for the parent companies. In the discussion that has developed, things are not always what they seem, or what is presumed to be the case. Reality diverges from several unexamined presumptions.

That host countries take the question of ownership very seriously is evident from the increasing requirements that foreign shareholdings be sold to locals or to the government itself, from the regulations preventing new acquisitions of existing companies (thereby reducing the shifts in ownership to foreigners), and from the moves toward bringing labor into ownership. This last item is represented by the comtnunidad industrial of Peru, which progressively hands over1 to labor larger percentages of the shares, and by those in Europe who advocate that labor take over ownership and control of some companies or industries.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 40 note * “Misuse occurred, of course, by not following market opportunity, which supposedly reflected what the society wanted. Early there was also a prohibition against abuse (or ab-use),which we have narrowed to the concept of harm, rejecting the concept of nonuse, which was a violation of stewardship. Recognition of the problem of nonuse was the basis for Henry George's proposal for a single tax on land—so high that it would haveto be used in order to pay the taxes. He accepted the Classical system but regarded nonuse of property as a violation of its precepts.

page 43 note * For distinctions among the different types of international companies see my monograph on “Decision Criteria of Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America” (Council of the Americas, 1974), chapter 1.