Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:01:25.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States – Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from Korea (US–OCTG (Korea)), DS488

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2018

Kholofelo Kugler
Kholofelo Kugler*
Affiliation:
Works in the Advisory Centre on WTO Law (ACWL), but writes in personal capacity
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The dispute relates to anti-dumping measures imposed by the United States (US) on oil country tubular goods (OCTG) imported from the Republic of Korea (Korea). Korea challenged the ‘laws, regulations, administrative procedures and other measures’ through which the US maintains a ‘viability test’ in anti-dumping investigations, administrative reviews, and other aspects of anti-dumping proceedings ‘as such’ and ‘as applied’ in the underlying investigation in this dispute. Korea also challenged certain aspects of the final anti-dumping measure that was applied by the US on imports of Korean OCTG subsequent to a final determination of dumping by the US Department of Commerce (USDOC) in the underlying investigation. Moreover, Korea challenged certain conduct of the USDOC during the course of the investigation at issue. Finally, Korea challenged the USDOC's remand determination of 22 February 2016 that was issued while the current dispute was pending before the panel. This determination was taken by the USDOC subsequent to a review conducted by the US Court of International Trade (USCIT) on the final determination challenged by Korea in this dispute. The USCIT found aspects of the final determination to be inconsistent with US law and remanded that final determination to the USDOC to cure the relevant inconsistencies.

Type
Case Summaries
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 353 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Kholofelo Kugler 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Case Summaries: WTO Disputes

The following summaries provide a brief factual background and describe the key findings of recent WTO panel and Appellate Body reports.

References

1 Panel Report, US–OCTG (Korea), para. 2.1.

2 Ibid., para. 2.2.

3 Ibid., para. 2.3.

4 Ibid., para. 7.7.

5 Ibid., para.7.8.

6 Ibid., paras. 7.15–7.16.

7 Ibid., paras. 7.19–7.20.

8 Ibid., paras. 7.23–7.24.

9 Ibid., para. 7.26.

10 Ibid., paras. 7.32, 7.58.

11 Ibid., para. 7.47.

12 Ibid., paras. 7.58, 7.59.

13 Ibid., para. 7.75.

14 Ibid., para. 7.95.

15 Ibid., paras. 7.107–7.109.

16 Ibid., paras. 7.116.

17 Ibid., paras. 7.133–7.134.

18 Ibid., para. 7.135.

19 Ibid., para. 7.136.

20 Ibid. 7.137.

21 Ibid., para. 7.149.

22 Ibid., para. 7.175.

23 Ibid., paras. 7.181–7.182.

24 Supplies NEXTEEL with steel coils used in the production of OCTG.

25 Panel Report, US–OCTG (Korea), para. 7.186.

26 Ibid., para. 7.196.

27 Ibid., paras. 7.199–7.200.

28 Ibid., paras. 7.201–7.202.

29 Ibid., para. 7.203.

30 Ibid., para. 7.223.

31 Ibid., para. 7.228.

32 Ibid., para. 7.243.

33 Ibid., para. 7.256.

34 Ibid., para. 7.257.

35 Ibid., paras. 7.273, 7.278.

36 Ibid., para. 7.289.

37 Ibid., para. 7.290.

38 Ibid., para. 7.291.

39 Ibid., para. 7.305.

40 Ibid., para. 7.307.

41 Ibid., para. 7.311.

42 Ibid., para. 7.315.

43 Ibid., paras. 7.324, 7.333.

44 Ibid., para. 7.340.

45 Ibid., paras. 7.346, 7.351.

46 Ibid., para. 7.353.

47 Ibid., para. 8.1