Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:04:23.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reforming agricultural trade among developing countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2007

SUSHIL MOHAN
SUSHIL MOHAN*
Affiliation:
University of Dundee
*
*Economic Studies, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, United Kingdom. Tel: 00-44-1382-384381. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is commonly perceived that much of the initiative for removal of distortions in trade in agriculture has to come from the developed world. This generalization is not valid across all agricultural products, in particular for tropical products that are predominantly produced in developing countries and constitute a large share of their exports. It emerges that export of most of these products suffers not because of barriers in advanced countries, but from those in the developing world. This implies reciprocal benefits from growth in counter-trade if developing countries agree on more stringent trade liberalization measures for them. Cotton, sugar and bananas are important exceptions; they face trade barriers in some developed economies, so they deserve specific attention of trade negotiators.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , November 2007 , pp. 397 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Sushil Mohan 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aksoy, M. A. and Beghin, J. C. (eds) (2004), Global Agricultural Trade and Developing Countries, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. and Martin, W. (2005), ‘Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda’, The World Economy, 28(9): 1301–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, K., Martin, W., and van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2005), ‘Market and Welfare Implications of Doha Reform Scenarios’, Ch. 12 in Anderson, K. and Martin, W. (eds) Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Anderson, K., Martin, W., and Valenzula, E. (2006), ‘The Relative Importance of Global Agricultural Subsidies and Market Access’, Paper, World Bank Research Project on Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, World Bank, Washington, DC, March.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binswanger, H. and Lutz, E. (1999), Agricultural Trade Barriers, Trade Negotiations, and the Interest of Developing Countries, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Borrell, B. and Bauer, M. (2004), ‘EU Banana Drama: Not Over Yet’, Discussion Paper, Center for International Economics, Canberra, March.Google Scholar
Bouet, A., Decreux, Y., Fontagne, L., Jean, S., and Laborde, D. (2004), ‘Computing an Exhaustive and Consistent, Ad-valorem Equivalent Measure of Applied Protection Across the World: The MAcMap-HS6 Database’, Working Paper 21, Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouet, A., Bureau, J. C., Decreux, Y., and Jean, S. (2005), ‘Multilateral Agricultural Trade Liberalization: The Contrasting Fortunes of Developing Countries in the Doha Round’, The World Economy, 28(9): 1329–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bureau, J. C., Jean, S., and Matthews, A. (2006), ‘The Consequences of Agricultural Trade Liberalization for Developing Countries: Distinguishing between Genuine Benefits and False Hopes’, World Trade Review, 5(2): 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobban, M. A. (1988), ‘Tropical Products in the Uruguay Round Negotiations’, The World Economy, 2(2): 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimaranan, B., Hertel, T., and Keeney, R. (2003), ‘OECD Domestic Support and the DCs’, Paper, UNU/WIDER Project on the Impact of WTO on Low-income Countries, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Purdue University, West Lafayette, January.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elobeid, A. and J., Beghin (2005) ‘Multilateral Trade and Agricultural Policy Reforms In Sugar Markets’, Working Paper 356, Iowa State University, Iowa, September.Google Scholar
FAO (1995a), ‘A Quantitative Analysis of Demand for Tea in the United States of America’, Working Paper, Inter-governmental Group on Tea, Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
FAO (1995b), ‘Factors Affecting the Profitability of Tea Exports’, Working Paper, Inter-governmental Group on Tea, Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
FAO (1999), ‘Agriculture Commodity Projections to 2005’, Working Paper, Inter-governmental Group on Tea, Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Hertel, T. W. (ed.) (1997), Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hertel, T. W., Anderson, K., Francois, J., and Martin, W. (2000), ‘Agriculture and Non-agricultural Liberalization in the Millennium Round’, Discussion Paper No. 0016, University of Adelaide, Center for International Economic Studies, Adelaide.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel, T. W. and Keeney, R. (2005), ‘What's at Stake: The Relative Importance of Import Barriers, Export Subsidies and Domestic Support’, Ch. 2 in Anderson, K. and Martin, W. (eds) Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
ICO (2006), Coffee Statistics, London: International Coffee Organization.Google Scholar
Jean, S., Laborde, D., and Martin, W. (2005), ‘Consequences of Alternative Formulas for Agricultural Tariff Cuts’, Ch. 4 in Anderson, K. and Martin, W. (eds) Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keeney, R. and Hertel, T. (2005), ‘GTAP-AGR: A Framework of Assessing the Implications of Multilateral Changes in Agricultural Policies’, GTAP Technical Paper No. 24, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, West Lafayette.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMap (2006), ‘Making Tariffs and Market Access Barriers Transparent’, Market Access Map, International Trade Center, Geneva, June.Google Scholar
OECD (2005a), ‘Agricultural Policies in OECD Countries: Monitoring and Evaluation’, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.Google Scholar
OECD (2005b), ‘Preferential Trading Arrangements in the Agriculture and Food Markets: The Case of the European Union and the United States’, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.Google Scholar
OECD (2006), ‘Review of Agricultural Policies – China’, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.Google Scholar
Panagariya, A. (2005) ‘Agricultural Liberalizations and the Least Developed Countries: Six Fallacies’, The World Economy, 28(9): 1277–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. and Charlton, A. (2004), The Development Round of Trade Negotiations in the Aftermath of Cancun, London: Commonwealth Secretariat.Google Scholar
UNCTAD (2005), Handbook of Statistics, New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
Valdes, A. and McCalla, A. F. (2004), ‘Where the Interests of Developing Countries Converge and Diverge’, Ch. 7 in Ingco, M. and Winters, A. (eds) Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda: Creating a Global Trading Environment for Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vanzetti, D. and Sharma, R. (2003), ‘Projecting the Effects of Agricultural Trade Liberalization on Developing Countries Using the ATPSM Partial Equilibrium Model’, Ch. 5 in McCalla, A. F. and Nash, J. (eds) Reforming Agricultural Trade for Developing Countries: Quantifying the Impact of Multilateral Trade Reform, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
WITS (2006), ‘Trade Data Warehouse: Commodity Trade (COMTRADE) of the United Nations Statistical Division’, Trade Analysis Information System (TRAINS) of the UNCTAD, Integrated Data Base (IDB) and the Consolidated Tariff Schedule (CTS) of the WTO, World Integrated Trade Solution, World Bank, Washington, DC, June.Google Scholar