Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:38:54.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International regulation of free zones: an analysis of multilateral customs and trade rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2011

SHERZOD SHADIKHODJAEV
SHERZOD SHADIKHODJAEV*
Affiliation:
Associate Research Fellow (Ph.D.) WTO Research Team, Department of Trade and Investment PolicyKorea Institute for International Economic Policy (KIEP)
*
*Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Multilateral regulation of free zones is largely based on the International Convention on the Simplification and Harmonization of Customs Procedures as amended (Revised Kyoto Convention) and WTO disciplines. The Revised Kyoto Convention treats free zones as an area with some ‘exterritorial’ elements, while WTO law does not accord such treatment to free zones. The regulatory framework under the former is more flexible than that under the latter. As of 1 June 2010, 63 out of the 69 contracting parties to the Revised Kyoto Convention are members of the WTO, so they must live up to their commitments under both legal systems. This article provides an analysis of relevant provisions of the Revised Kyoto Convention and WTO rules and jurisprudence that can be taken into account by national authorities in the conduct of their free-zone policies.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 189 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © Sherzod Shadikhodjaev 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boyenge, Jean-Pierre Singa (2007), ‘ILO Database on Export Processing Zones (Revised)’, ILO Working Paper WP.251 (April 2007).Google Scholar
Clingand, J. P. and Letilly, G. (2001), ‘Export Processing Zones: A Threatened Instrument for Global Economy Insertion?’, Working Paper DT/2001/17, DIAL, France.Google Scholar
Daly, Michael (2006), ‘WTO Rules on Direct Taxation’, The World Economy, 29(5): 527–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engman, Michael, Onodera, Osamu, and Pinali, Enrico (2007), ‘Export Processing Zones: Past and Future Role in Trade and Development’, OECD Trade Policy Working Paper No. 53, TD/TC/WP(2006)39/FINAL (23 May 2007).Google Scholar
FIAS (Multi-donor Investment Climate Advisory Service of the World Bank Group) (2008), ‘Special Economic Zones: Performance, Lessons Learned, and Implications for Zone Development’, April 2008.Google Scholar
GATT (1970), Report of the Working Party on Border Tax Adjustments, adopted 2 December 1970, L/3464.Google Scholar
GATT (1979), ‘Understanding Regarding Notification, Consultation, Dispute Settlement and Surveillance’, BISD 26S/210, adopted 28 November 1979.Google Scholar
GATT (1994), ‘Accession of Panama: Questions and Replies to the Memorandum on Foreign Trade Regime’ (L/7228), L/7426 (30 March 1994).Google Scholar
GATT Analytical Index (1995), Guide to GATT Law and Practice, 6th edn, 2, Geneva.Google Scholar
GATT Secretariat (1994a), ‘Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM Agreement)’, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, Geneva, pp. 264–314.Google Scholar
GATT Secretariat (1994b), ‘Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement)’, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, Geneva, pp. 365–403.Google Scholar
GATT Secretariat (1994c), ‘Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs Agreement)’, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, Geneva, pp. 163–167.Google Scholar
GATT Secretariat (1994d), ‘Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations’, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, Geneva, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
GATT Secretariat (1994e), ‘General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)’, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, Geneva, pp. 485–558.Google Scholar
GATT Secretariat (1994f), ‘General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)’, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, Geneva, pp. 325–364.Google Scholar
GATT Secretariat (1994g), ‘Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO Agreement)’, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, Geneva, pp. 6–18.Google Scholar
GATT Secretariat (1994h), ‘Ministerial Decision on Notification Procedures’, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, Geneva, pp. 444–446.Google Scholar
GATT Secretariat (1994i), ‘Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU)’, The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, Geneva, pp. 404–433.Google Scholar
Granados, Jaime (2003), ‘Export Processing Zones and Other Special Regimes in the Context of Multilateral and Regional Trade Negotiations’, Occasional Paper 20, Inter-American Development Bank, available at http://www.iadb.org/intal.Google Scholar
Hamada, K. (1974), ‘An Economic Analysis of the Duty-Free Zone’, Journal of International Economics, 4: 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILO (1998), ‘Labour and Social Issues relating to Export Processing Zones’, TMEPZ/1998, Geneva.Google Scholar
Jayanthakumaran, K. (2003), ‘Benefit–Cost Appraisals of Export Processing Zones: A survey of the Literature’, Development Policy Review, 21(1): 51–65.Google Scholar
Korea Ministry of Government Legislation (n.d.), ‘Act on Designation and Management of Free Trade Zones’, wholly amended by Act No. 7210 (22 March 2004), available at http://www.law.go.kr; non-authentic English translation is available at Korea Legislation Research Institute, http://elaw.klri.re.kr.Google Scholar
Madani, D. (1999), ‘A Review of the Role and Impact of Export Processing Zones’, Policy Research Working Paper No. 2238, World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Notifications to the WCO (n.d.), Korea (PG0035E1, 31 March 2003), Uganda (PG0029E1, 24 September 2002), and US (PG0117E, 19 January 2006).Google Scholar
Rondinelli, D. A. (1987), ‘Export Processing Zones and Economic Development in Asia’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 46(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrank, A. (2001), ‘Export Processing Zones: Free Market Islands or Bridges to Structural Transformation?’, Development Policy Review, 19(2): 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Gazette of India (2005), ‘Special Economic Zones Act’, New Delhi, No. 31 (23 June 2005).Google Scholar
Torres, Raúl A. (2007), ‘Free Zones and the World Trade Organization Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures’, Global and Customs Journal, 2(5): 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WCO (1999), ‘International Convention on the Simplification and Harmonization of Customs Procedures (Revised Kyoto Convention)’, http://www.wcoomd.org/Kyoto_New/Content/content.html (visited 1 June 2010).Google Scholar
WCO (n.d.), ‘The Revised Kyoto Convention’, available at http://www.wcoomd.org/home_wco_topics_pfoverviewboxes_tools_and_instruments_pfrevisedkyotoconv.htm (visited 1 June 2010).Google Scholar
Wikipedia (n.d.), ‘Colón Free Trade Zone’, available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Col%C3%B3n_Free_Trade_Zone (visited 29 June 2010).Google Scholar
Williams, Peter John (2008), A Handbook on Accession to the WTO, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfrum, Rüdiger (2008), in Peter-Tobias, Stoll and Michael, Koebele (eds.), WTO – Trade Remedies, Leiden–Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
World Economic Processing Zones Association (n.d.), available at http://www.wepza.org.Google Scholar
WTO (1995a), ‘Notification under Article 5.1 of the Agreement on Trade-related Investment Measures – Dominican Republic’, G/TRIMS/N/1/DOM/1, Committee on Trade-related Investment Measures (10 May 1995).Google Scholar
WTO (1995b), ‘Notification under Article 5.1 of the Agreement on Trade-related Investment Measures – Thailand’, G/TRIMS/N/1/THA/1, Committee on Trade-related Investment Measures (28 April 1995).Google Scholar
WTO (1998), Indonesia – Certain Measures Affecting the Automobile Industry (Indonesia–Autos), WT/DS54/R, WT/DS55/R, WT/DS59/R, WT/DS64/R and Corr.1, 2, 3 and 4, Panel Report, adopted 23 July 1998.Google Scholar
WTO (1999a), ‘Subsidies – Replies to Questions Posed by the European Communities Regarding the New and Full Notification of Panama – Revision’, G/SCM/Q2/PAN/6/Rev.1, Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (13 April 1999).Google Scholar
WTO (1999b), Minutes of the Special Meeting Held on 4 May 1999, G/SCM/M/21, Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (21 September 1999).Google Scholar
WTO (2000a), ‘Technical Note on the Accession Process, Note by the Secretariat, Revision’, WT/ACC/7/Rev.2 (1 November 2000).Google Scholar
WTO (2000b), Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry (Canada–Autos), WT/DS139/AB/R, WT/DS142/AB/R, Appellate Body Report, adopted 19 June 2000.Google Scholar
WTO (2000c), United States – Tax Treatment for ‘Foreign Sales Corporations’, WT/DS108/AB/R, Appellate Body Report, adopted 20 March 2000.Google Scholar
WTO (2001a), ‘Accession of the People's Republic of China, Decision of 10 November 2001’, WT/L/432 (23 November 2001).Google Scholar
WTO (2001b), ‘Report of the Working Party on the Accession of China’, WT/MIN(01)/3 (10 November 2001), Ministerial Conference, Fourth Session, Doha, 9–13 November 2001.Google Scholar
WTO (2001c), ‘Subsidies – Requests Pursuant to Article 27.4 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures – Requests Pursuant to the Procedure in Document G/SCM/39 – Costa Rica’, G/SCM/N/74/CRI, Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (20 December 2001).Google Scholar
WTO (2001d), ‘Procedures for Extensions under Article 27.4 for Certain Developing Country Members’, G/SCM/39, Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (20 November 2001).Google Scholar
WTO (2002a), United States – Tax Treatment for ‘Foreign Sales Corporations’ – Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by the European Communities, WT/DS108/RW, Panel Report, adopted 29 January 2002.Google Scholar
WTO (2002b), ‘Report of the Working Party on the Accession of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’, WT/ACC/807/27 (26 September 2002).Google Scholar
WTO (2002c), ‘Report of the Working Party on the Accession of the Republic of Armenia’, WT/ACC/ARM/23 (26 November 2002).Google Scholar
WTO (2006a), ‘Report of the Working Party on the Accession of Viet Nam’, WT/ACC/VNM/48 (27 October 2006).Google Scholar
WTO (2006b), Minutes of the Meeting of the Council for Trade in Goods, 9 May 2006, G/C/M/84 (29 June 2006).Google Scholar
WTO (2007a), ‘Trade Policy Review, Report by the Secretariat, Kyrgyz Republic, Revision’, WT/TPR/S/170/Rev.1 (12 January 2007).Google Scholar
WTO (2007b), ‘General Council, Article 27.4 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, Decision of 27 July 2007’, WT/L/691 (31 July 2007).Google Scholar
WTO (2007c), ‘Trade Policy Review, Report by the Secretariat, Panama, Revision’, WT/TPR/S/186/Rev.1 (3 December 2007).Google Scholar
WTO (2008a), ‘Report of the Working Party on the Accession of Ukraine to the World Trade Organization’, WT/ACC/UKR/152 (25 January 2008).Google Scholar
WTO (2008b), ‘Trade Policy Review, Report by the Secretariat, Republic of Korea, Revision’, WT/TPR/S/204/Rev.1 (4 December 2008).Google Scholar
WTO (2008c), China – Measures Affecting Imports of Automobile Parts (China–Auto Parts), WT/DS339/R/Add.2, WT/DS340/R/Add.2, WT/DS342/R/Add.2, Reports of the Panel, Annexes B, C, D, and E, Addendum (18 July 2008).Google Scholar
WTO (2009), Colombia – Indicative Prices and Restrictions on Ports of Entry (Colombia–Ports of Entry), WT/DS366/R, Panel Report, adopted 20 May 2009.Google Scholar
WTO (2010a), Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held on 20 October 2009, G/SCM/M/71, Committee on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (5 February 2010).Google Scholar
WTO (2010b), ‘Draft Consolidated Negotiating Text – Revision’, TN/TF/W/165.Rev.2, Negotiating Group on Trade Facilitation (4 May 2010).Google Scholar