Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:59:29.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Economy-Wide Impact of Subsidy Reform: A CGE Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2020

Elizabeth L. Roos*
Affiliation:
Centre of Policy Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
Philip D. Adams
Affiliation:
Centre of Policy Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
*
*Corresponding author email: [email protected]

Abstract

Oil prices fell from around $US110 per barrel in 2014 to less than $US50per barrel at the start of 2017. This put enormous pressure on government budgets within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. The focus of GCC economic policies quickly shifted to fiscal reform, including the removal of domestic subsidies on energy products. In this paper, we use a dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model to investigate the economic impact of the gradual removal of subsidies on refined petroleum and electricity, with specific reference to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA).

Our study shows that removing subsidies eliminates a large distortion in the economy. This improves the efficiency of resource use, so that even though employment and capital in most years fall relative to baseline levels, real GDP rises. In addition, we show that fully-funded compensation payments offset the increases in energy prices, leaving economic welfare of the Saudi-national population little affected. Removing the energy subsidies leads to an improvement in the net volume of trade, while leading to a mixed outcome for industries.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The work described in this paper was carried out at the Centre of Policy Studies. The views expressed are those of the authors.

References

Abouleinein, S, El-Laithy, H, and Kheir-El-Din, H (2009) The Impact of Phasing Out Subsidies of Petroleum Energy Products in Egypt. Working Paper No. 145. The Egyptian Centre for Economic Studies. www.eces.org.eg/MediaFiles/Uploaded_Files/%7B87C87F1A-6C8D-4A4D-BC46-18C15168AF13%7D_ECES%20WP145.pdf.Google Scholar
Adams, PD and Roos, EL (2014) Modelling the Effects of Removing Subsidies on the Jordan Economy: First Application of the JorGE Model. Report to the Ministry of Finance and Leading Point Management Services, Amman, Jordan.Google Scholar
Akkemik, KA and Li, J (2015) General Equilibrium Evaluation of Deregulation in Energy Sectors in China. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 13(3), 247268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Amin, , Chamhuri, S, and Hamid, A (2009) Computable General Equilibrium Techniques for Carbon Tax Modelling. American Journal of Environmental Sciences 5(3), 330340.Google Scholar
Al-Thumairi, IA (2012) Fixed or Flexible Exchange Rate for Saudi Arabia: Optimal Solution of CGE Model. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science 1(2), 6787.Google Scholar
AlShehabi, OH (2013) Modelling Energy and Labour Linkages: A CGE Approach with an Application to Iran. Economic Modelling 35(September), 8898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronsson, T, Backlund, K, and Sahlen, L (2010) Technology Transfers and the Clean Development Mechanism in a North–South General Equilibrium Model. Resource and Energy Economics 32: 292309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arze del Granado, FJA and Coady, D (2012) The Unequal Benefits of Fuel Subsidies: A Review of Evidence for Developing Countries. World Development 40(11): 22342248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, R, Bhattacharya, S, and Kojima, M (2010) Expenditure of Low-Income Households on Energy. Extractive Industries for Development Series, no 16. World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTOGMC/Resources/336929-1266963339030/eifd16_expenditure.pdf.Google Scholar
Bloomberg (2016) Saudi Arabia's Net Foreign Assets Fall to Four-Year Low. The National, 30 May 2016. www.thenational.ae/business/economy/saudi-arabias-net-foreign-assets-fall-to-four-year-low.Google Scholar
Breisinger, C, Engelke, W, and Ecker, O (2011) Petroleum Subsidies in Yemen: Leveraging Reform for Development. Policy Research Working Papers 5577. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, A, Choudhury, R, Johansen, PR, and Magnussen, K (1998) The Selection Model of Saudi Arabia. Revised Version 1998. Document 98/6. Statistics Norway Research Department. www.ssb.no/a/histstat/doc/doc_199806.pdf.Google Scholar
Chemingui, MA and Lofgren, H (2004) Tax Policy Reform in Saudi Arabia: A General Equilibrium Analysis. www.researchgate.net/publication/265323781_TAX_POLICY_REFORM_IN_SAUDI_ARABIA_A_GENERAL_EQUILIBRIUM_ANALYSIS.Google Scholar
Cockburn, J, El Lahga, A-R, Robichaud, V, Tiverti, L, and Zaki, C (2014) Enhancing Equity for Children in the Context of the Reform of Energy Subsidies in Egypt, A.R.E. Ministry of Finance and UNICEG, Cairo. www.unicef.org/evaldatabase/files/Enhancing_equity_for_children_in_the_context_of_the_reform_of_energy_subsidies_in_Egypt.pdf.Google Scholar
De Santis, RA (2003) Crude Oil Price Fluctuations and Saudi Arabia's Behaviour. Energy Economics 25, 155173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, PB and Rimmer, MT (2002) Dynamic General Equilibrium Modelling for Forecasting and Policy: A Practical Guide and Documentation of MONASH. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Ellis, J (2010) The Effects of Fossil-Fuel Subsidy Reform: A Review of Modelling and Empirical Studies. International Institute for Sustainable Development. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1572397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
General Authority for Statistics (2015) National Accounts 1436/1437H, 2015. www.stats.gov.sa/en#.Google Scholar
Gharibnavaz, MR and Waschik, R (2015) Food and Energy Subsidy Reforms in Iran: A General Equilibrium Analysis. Journal of Policy Modelling 37, 726741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Petrol Prices (2018) On-Line Data Facility for Gasoline and Diesel Prices. www.globalpetrolprices.com/.Google Scholar
Gohin, A and Chantret, F (2010) The Long-Run Impact of Energy Prices on World Agricultural Markets: The Role of Macro-Economic Linkages. Energy Policy 38(1), 333339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, WJ and Pearson, KR (1996) Computing Solutions for Large General Equilibrium Models Using GEMPACK. Computational Economics 9(2), 83127. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, YX, Zhang, SL, Yang, LY, Wang, YJ, and Wang, J (2010) Economic Analysis of Coal Price-Electricity Price Adjustment in China based on the CGE Model. Energy Policy 38(11), 66296637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horridge, JM, Jerie, M, Mustakinov, D, and Schiffmann, F (2018) GEMPACK Manual, GEMPACK Software, ISBN 978-1-921654-34-3. www.copsmodels.com/gpmanual.htm.Google Scholar
Hosseini-Yekani, SA (2011) Investigating the Effects of Targeting Subsidies on Macroeconomic Variables of Agricultural Sector in Iran. African Journal of Agricultural Research 6(2), 382391.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2013) Energy Subsidy Reform: Lessons and Implications. Benedict C, Coady D, Fabrizio S, Gupta S, Alleyne T, and Sdralevich C (eds.). Washington. DC. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.800.3440&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2015) Energy Price Reforms in the GCC – What Can Be Learned from International Experiences? Annual meeting of Ministers of Finance and Central Bank Governors, 10 November 2015. Doha, Qatar. www.imf.org/external/np/pp/eng/2015/111015b.pdf (accessed 15 July 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2018) World Economic Outlook Database April 2018. www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=28.Google Scholar
Jadwa Investment (2015) Saudi Arabia's 2016 Fiscal Budget. www.jadwa.com/en/download/2016-budget-2/gdp-report-15-6-2-1-2.Google Scholar
Jensen, J and Tarr, D (2003) Trade, Exchange Rate, and Energy Pricing Reform in Iran: Potentially Large Efficiency Effects and Gains to the Poor. Review of Development Economics 7(4), 543562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karami, A, Esmaeili, A, and Najafi, B (2012) Assessing Effects of Alternative Food Subsidy Reform in Iran. Journal of Policy Modeling 34: 788799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuster, R, Ellersdorfer, I, and Fahl, E (2007) A CGE-Analysis for Energy Policies Considering Labour Market Imperfections and Technology Specifications. FEEM working paper No. 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, B and Li, A (2012) Impacts of Removing Fossil Fuel Subsidies on China: How Large and How to Mitigate? Energy 44(1), 741749. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2012.05.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, B and Jiang, Z (2011) Estimates of energy subsidies in China and impact of energy subsidy reform. Energy Economics 33: 273283. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2010.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzoor, D, Shahmoradi, A, and Haqiqi, I (2012) An Analysis of Energy Price Reform: A CGE Approach. OPEC Energy Review 36(1), 3554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-0237.2011.00200.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maipita, I, Dan Jantan, M, Fitrawaty, , and Narimo, S (2012) The Impact of Diverting of Fuel Subsidy to Agricultural Sector on Poverty. Chiang Mai University Journal of Economic 161 :1 January–June. www.econ.cmu.ac.th/econmag/journals/issue16-1_4.pdfGoogle Scholar
Naranpanawa, A and Bandara, JS (2012) Poverty and Growth Impacts of High Oil Prices: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Energy Policy 45(June), 102111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nereim, V (2017) Saudi Arabia Slows Pace of Energy Subsidy Cuts to Boost Economy. Bloomberg, 20 December 2017. www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-12-19/saudi-arabia-slows-pace-of-energy-subsidy-cuts-to-boost-economy.Google Scholar
Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) Saudi Arabia facts and figures. www.opec.org/opec_web/en/about_us/169.htm.Google Scholar
Roos, EL, Adams, PD, and van Heerden, JH (2015) Construction a CGE Database Using GEMPACK for an African Country. Computational Economics 46(4), 495518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency (SAMA) Economic Reports and Statistics. www.sama.gov.sa/en-us/EconomicReports/Pages/default.aspx.Google Scholar
Solaymani, S, Kari, F, and Zakaria, RH (2014) Evaluating the Role of Subsidy Reform in Addressing Poverty Levels in Malaysia: A CGE Poverty Framework. The Journal of Development Studies 50(4), 556569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommer, M, Auclair, G, Fouejieu, A, Lukonga, I, Quayyum, S, Sadeghi, A, Shbaikat, G, Tiffing, A, Trevino, J, and Versailles, B (2016) Learning to Live with Cheaper Oil: Policy Adjustment in Oil-Exporting Countries of the Middle East and Central Asia. International Monetary Fund. Washington. www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/dp/2016/mcd1603.pdf.Google Scholar
Welsch, H (1996) Recycling of Carbon/Energy Taxes and the Labour Market: A General Equilibrium Analysis for the European Community. Environmental and Resource Economics 8, 141155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yusoff, NYBM and Bekhet, HA (2016) Impacts of Energy Subsidy Reforms on the Industrial Energy Structures in the Malaysian Economy: A Computable General Equilibrium Approach. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 6(1), 8897.Google Scholar