Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:09:24.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

WTO Case Law 2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2018

CHAD P. BOWN*
Affiliation:
Peterson Institute for International Economics and CEPR
PETROS C. MAVROIDIS*
Affiliation:
Columbia Law School, New York

Extract

The WTO adjudicating bodies faced some very tough questions in 2016: the status of non-market economies, the consistency of policies aiming to address tax evasion with the WTO, and the clash between environment and trade policies were all on the menu. Old issues, like the consistency of zeroing, resurfaced as well, albeit with a twist this time, since the Appellate Body (AB) had to address the question whether zeroing is consistent with the WTO when practiced in the realm of a methodology that was so far untested.

Type
Introduction
Copyright
Copyright © Chad P. Bown and Petros C. Mavroidis 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)