Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:10:07.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

United States-Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2005

HENRIK HORN  and
PETROS C. MAVROIDIS
HENRIK HORN
Affiliation:
Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University, Research Institute for Industrial Economics, Stockholm Centre for Economic Policy Research, London
PETROS C. MAVROIDIS
Affiliation:
University of Neuchâtel, Columbia University, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 16 January 2003, the WTO Appellate Body (AB) issues its report on the appeal of the Panel decision in United States-Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000). The report concerns the consistency of the US Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (the ‘CDSOA’, or the so-called Byrd Amendment) with several WTO provisions. A host of complainants (Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, the European Community, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Thailand) as well as four third parties evidence the interest in the dispute among WTO Members. The appeal was directed against the Panel's finding that the legislation was inconsistent with the US obligations under the WTO Agreements on Antidumping (AD) and Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM).

Type
Dispute settlement corner
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , November 2005 , pp. 525 - 550
Copyright
© 2005 Henrik Horn and Petros C. Mavroidis

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)