Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:06:37.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trade Reform and Institution Building: Peru and Argentina under the WTO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2015

ELÍAS A. BARACAT ,
J. MICHAEL FINGER ,
RAÚL LEÓN THORNE  and
JULIO J. NOGUÉS
ELÍAS A. BARACAT
Affiliation:
Comisión Nacional de Comercio Exterior, Argentina, Former President
J. MICHAEL FINGER*
Affiliation:
World Bank, retired
RAÚL LEÓN THORNE
Affiliation:
Comisión de Fiscalición de Dumping y Subsidios, Peru, Former Member
JULIO J. NOGUÉS
Affiliation:
Academia Nacional de Ciencias Economicas, Argentina
*
Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Beyond removing restrictions, trade reform in Latin American in the 1980s and 1990s was in significant part an attempt to change the domestic politics of trade and to reformulate the culture of policy management by introducing procedural characteristics that WTO trade remedy rules advance. This paper examines how trade reform in Peru and Argentina has gone since the reforms of the 1990s. Peru provides a valuable example of sustaining reforms. Leaders have used negotiations and other international instruments to disseminate among Peruvians a positive vision of Peru in the international economy, and to extend the application of WTO-based governance principles. Peru has introduced few new restrictions and all of them have been through WTO-sanctioned policy instruments. Argentina, on the other hand, has introduced multiple restrictions, through procedures that eschew WTO governance principles. Moreover, leaders there have returned trade politics to the dependencia philosophy that sees the international economy as an exploitive environment.The paper brings out the weakness of international obligations to limit Argentina's return to import substitution and the pains at which Peru has gone to maintain the management of its economy within the same rules that Argentina has so easily violated. To have commercial value, the GATT/WTO principle that members apply only approved methods of trade control must have operational expression in national institutions.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , October 2015 , pp. 579 - 615
Copyright
Copyright © Elías A. Baracat et al. 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaronson, S. A. and Abouhard, M. R. (2014), ‘Does the WTO Help Member States Improve Governance?’, World Trade Review, 13(3): 547–582.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2012), Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
ADN Mundo (2007), ‘China responde a las restricciones argentinas con una amenaza’, 27 August, http://www.adnmundo.com/contenidos/economia/argentina_china_conflictos_comerciales_ce_270807.html.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. W. (2010), ‘The World Trade Organization: Theory and Practice’, Annual Reviews of Economics, 2: 223–256.Google Scholar
Baracat, E. A., Finger, J. M., Thorne, R. L., and Nogués, J. J. (2013), Sustaining Trade Reform: Institutional Lessons from Argentina and Peru, Directions in Development, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. A., de Sola Pool, I., and Dexter, L. A. (1972), American Business and Public Policy: The Politrics of Foreign Trade, Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Boeninger, I. (2010), ‘Industria alimentaria: Oportunidades en mercados latinoamericanos – Argentina’, Embajada de Chile, Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Dantas, A. (2012), ‘Trade Policy and Development in Brazil’, presented at the VIII Annual ABCI International Trade Symposium, Washington School of Law, Washington, DC, 17 October 2012.Google Scholar
Delletore, R. (2011), ‘Trabajo argentino hasta en el último clavo’, Página 12, 30 November, http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/economia/2-182361-2011-11-30.html.Google Scholar
Finger, J. M. (2012), ‘Flexibilities, rules, and trade remedies in the GATT/WTO system’, in Narlikar, A., Daunton, M., and Stern, R. M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, chapter 19.Google Scholar
Finger, J. M. and Nogués, J. (2006), Safeguards and Antidumping in Latin America Trade Liberalization, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. L. (1934), ‘American Legal Realism’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 82(5): 429–462.Google Scholar
GarcíaPérez, A. Pérez, A. (2011), Contra el temor económico: Creer en el Perú, Lima: Planeta.Google Scholar
Global Trade Alert (2010a), ‘Argentina: Legislation for Locally Produced Motorcycles and Motorcycles-Parts Subsidies Program’, Global Trade Alert, London, http://www.globaltradealert.org/measure/argentina-legislation-locally-produced-motorcycles-and-motorcycles-parts-subsidies-program.Google Scholar
Global Trade Alert (2010b), ‘Argentina Limits Entry Points for Certain Goods’, Global Trade Alert, London, http://www.globaltradealert.org/measure/argentina-limits-entry-points-certain-goods.Google Scholar
Global Trade Alert (2011a), ‘Argentina Announces Import-Export-Balance Policy in the Automotive Industry’, Global Trade Alert, London, http://www.globaltradealert.org/measure/argentina-announces-import-export-balance-policy-automotive-industry.Google Scholar
Global Trade Alert (2011b), ‘Argentina Extents Its Import-Export-Balance Policy to the Pharmaceutical Industry’, Global Trade Alert, London, http://www.globaltradealert.org/measure/argentina-extends-its-import-export-balance-policy-pharmaceutical-industry.Google Scholar
Global Trade Alert (2011c. ‘Argentina: Import-Export “1 to 1” Policy Extended to Refrigerators, Washing Machines, Cookers, and Toys’, Global Trade Alert, London, http://www.globaltradealert.org/measure/argentina-import-export-%E2%80%9C1-1%E2%80%9D-policy-extended-refrigerators-washing-machines-cookers-and-toy.Google Scholar
Harberger, A. C. (1993), ‘Secrets of Success: A Handful of Heroes’, American Economic Review, 83(2): 343–350.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (1998), ‘The Approach of Institutional Economics’, Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1): 166–192.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (ed.) (2003), Recent Developments in Institutional Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hudec, R. E. (2011), Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hufbauer, G. C. and Lowry, S. (2012), US Tire Tariffs: Saving Few Jobs at High Cost, Policy Brief Number PB12-9 April, Peterson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Infocampo (2012), ‘Pidien a la industria de la maquinaria que reduzca el déficit commercial’, 22 March, http://infocampo.com.ar/nota/campo/30852/pidien-a-la-industria-de-la-maquinaria-que-reduzca-el-déficit-comercial.Google Scholar
Inside US Trade's World Trade Online (2013), ‘Argentina Scraps Import Licenses but US Advances WTO Complaint’, 14 August 2013, http://insidetrade.com/Inside-Trade-General/Public-Content-World-Trade-Online/argentina-scraps-import-licenses-but-us-advances-wto-complaint/menu-id-896.html (accessed 20 August 2013).Google Scholar
iProfessional.com (2007), ‘Nueva batería de medidas para contener el avance chino’, 17 August, http://www.iprofesional.com/notas/51699-Nueva-batera-de-medidas-para-contener-el-avance-chino.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H., Louis, J.-V., and Matsushita, M. (1984), Implementing the Tokyo Round: National Constitutions and International Economic Rules, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. L. M. and Southwick, J. D. (2002), The Political Economy of International Trade LaGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1996), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edn, University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George (2006), ‘Simple Framing: An Introduction to Framing and Its Uses in Politics’, Rockridge Institute, available at http://integral-options.blogspot.com/2009/04/simple-framing-by-george-lakoff.html (accessed 30 April 2012).Google Scholar
Longoni, M. (2010), ‘China levanta la prohibición y vuelve a comprar aceite de soja’, Clarín, 12 October, http://www.clarin.com/politica/China-levanta-prohibicioncomprar-aceite_0_352164842.html.Google Scholar
Losauro, H. (2011), ‘Cristina Fernández de Kirchner: “Debemos profundizar la sustitución de importaciones”’, Ahora Cuyo, 5 August.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, A. F. (2011), ‘Disaggregating Latin America: Diverse Trajectories, Emerging Clusters and Their Implications’, Brookings Research and Commentary, 1 November 2011, The Brookings Institution, http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2011/1101_latin_america_lowenthal.aspx (accessed 20 August 2013).Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (2007), Contours of the World Economy 1-2030 AD, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, N. (2000), ‘Alf Rattigan and the journalists: advocacy journalism and agenda setting in the Australian tariff debate 1963–1971’, Australian Journalism Review, 22(2): 88–102.Google Scholar
Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) (2005), Tariff Policy Guidelines. Ministry Resolution 005-2006-EF/15, Lima: MEF.Google Scholar
Ministry of Industry (2011a), ‘Garbarino presentó un proyecto de inversión para fabricar tabletas en Tierra del Fuego’, press release, 20 January, http://www.industria.gob.ar/garbarino-presento-un-proyecto-de-inversion-para-fabricar-tablets-en-tierra-delfuego/.Google Scholar
Ministry of Industry (2011b), ‘Giorgi: Este gobierno cree y aplica administración del comercio’, press release, 25 February, http://www.industria.gob.ar/giorgi-este-gobierno-cree-y-aplica-administración-del-comercio/.Google Scholar
Ministry of Industry (2011c), ‘La defensa del mercado interno es un pilar fundamental para el crecimiento de la economía’, press release, 22 February, http://www.sub-industria.gob.ar/blog/2011/02/22/%e2%80%9cla-defensa-del-mercado-interno-es-un-pilar-fundamental-para-el-crecimiento-de-la-economia%e2%80%9d/.Google Scholar
Ministry of Industry (2012), ‘Giorgi: ‘el que más rápido integre piezas nacionales es el que más va a ganar’, press release, 22 March, http://www.industria.gob.ar/giorgi-el-que-mas-rapido-integre-piezas-nacionales-es-el-que-mas-va-a-ganar/.Google Scholar
Nogués, J. J. 1991. ‘An Historical Perspective of Peru's Trade Liberalization Policies of the 1980s’, in Michaely, M., Papageorgiou, D., and Choksi, A. (eds.), Liberalizing Foreign Trade: Lessons of Experience in the Developing World, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, Chapter 4, pp. 135–167, available as World Bank Discussion Paper No. DRD168, http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2013/06/10/000442464_20130610112856/Rendered/PDF/DRD1680WP00An00s0Public00Box374348B.pdf.Google Scholar
Nogués, J. J. (2011), Agro e Industria: del centenario al bicentenario, Cuidad Argentina y Hispania Libros.Google Scholar
Nogués, J. J. ——– (2014), ‘Agricultural Export Barriers and Domestic Prices: Argentina during the Last Decade’: Argentina’, in Krivonos, E. and Dawe, D. (eds.), ‘Policy responses to high food prices in Latin America and the Caribbean, Rome: FAO, Chapter 2, http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3909e.pdf.Google Scholar
Nogués, J. J. and Baracat, E. A. (2006), ‘Political economy of anti-dumping and safeguards in Argentina’, in Finger, J. M. and Nogués, J. (eds.), Safeguards and Antidumping in Latin America Trade Liberalization, Palgrave Macmillan. chapter 3, pp. 45–78.Google Scholar
Nogués, J. J. and Porto, A. (2007), ‘Evaluación de impactos económicos y sociales de políticas públicas en la cadena agroindustrial’, Foro de la Cadena Agroindustrial, http://www.foroagroindustrial.org.ar/pdf/final_home_old.pdf.Google Scholar
North, D. C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nourse, V. and Shaffer, G. (2009), ‘Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory?’, Cornell Law Review, 95(1): 61–137, http://cornell.lawreviewnetwork.com/files/2013/02/VictoriaNourseGregoryShafferVarietiesofNewLegalRealism.pdfGoogle Scholar
Palmeter, D. (2003), ‘Robert E. Hudec – A Practitioner's Appreciation’, Journal of World Trade Law, 37(4): 703–717.Google Scholar
Secretariat of Public Communication (2011), ‘Giorgi confirmo respaldo al sector textil y pidió más inversiones’, Press Release, 22 June, http://www.prensa.argentina.ar/2011/06/22/20917-giorgi-confirmo-respaldo-al-sector-textil-ypidio-mas-inversiones.php.Google Scholar
Shaffer, G. C. and Meléndez-Ortiz, R. (eds.) (2010), Dispute Settlement at the WTO: The Developing Country Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trade Risk Group (2012), ‘New Import Regulations in Argentina’ (posted December 4, 2012 by Gene Ferraiolo), http://traderiskgroup.com/new-import-regulations-in-argentina/ (accessed 4 September 2013).Google Scholar
Webb, R., Beuermann, D., and Revilla, C. (2011), La construcción del derecho de propiedad: El caso de los asentamientos humanos en el Perú, Lima: Colegio de Notarios de Lima.Google Scholar
Webb, R., Camminati, J., and Thorne, R. L. (2006), ‘Antidumping Mechanisms and Safeguards in Peru’, in Finger, J. M. and Nogués, J. J., Safeguards and Antidumping in Latin American Trade Liberalization: Fighting Fire with Fire, Chapter 8, pp. 247–277Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (2000), ‘The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock’, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3): 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2009), Country Partnership Strategy for the Argentine Republic for the Period 2010–2012, May 6, at http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2009/06/02/000350881_20090602151341/Rendered/PDF/484760CAS0Addendum0Box.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (2013a), Report by Argentina, Trade Policy Review Argentina, WT/TPR/G/277, 13 February 2013.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (2013b), Report by the Secretariat, Trade Policy Review Argentina, WT/TPR/S/277/Rev.1, 14 June 2013.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (2013c), Minutes of Meeting, Trade Policy Review Argentina, WT/TPR/M/277, 18 July 2013.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (2013d), Record of the Meeting Addendum, Trade Policy Review Argentina, WT/TPR/M/277/Add.1 19 July 2013 (this document contains the advance written questions, and replies provided by Argentina).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (2014), Argentina – Measures Affecting the Importation of Goods, WT/DS438/R, WT/DS444/R, WT/DS445/R, WTO document number 14-4794, 22 August 2014.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (2015), Argentina – Measures Affecting the Importation of Goods, AB-2014-9, Reports of the Appellate Body, WT/DS438/AB/R, WT/DS444/AB/R WT/DS445/AB/R). WTO document number 15-0276, 15 January 2015.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, M. (2013), Domestic Review of Trade Remedies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar