Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:39:57.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Flying High in a Plane’ Appellate Body Report, European Communities and Certain Member States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2020

Pramila Crivelli  and
Luca Rubini
Pramila Crivelli*
Affiliation:
Goethe University, Frankfurt
Luca Rubini
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham, UK
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reviews the Appellate Body decision in the implementation phase of the EC–Aircraft dispute. Focusing on some of the key findings, we assess whether they are legally and economically correct. We conclude that (a) though still unclear, the test for establishing de facto contingency on import substitution subsidies is probably too demanding; (b) though legitimate, the interpretation of the remedy of removal of the adverse effects for actionable subsidies is the weakest and most deferential possible; (c) the hesitation in confirming that quantitative methods are the key tool to define the relevant market is unwelcome; and (d) the Appellate Body correctly recognize the importance for Panels to consider, in the context of the serious prejudice analysis, whether the like product of the complainant has been subsidized. Most importantly, the analysis of this case, set within the broader jurisprudence and practice, has led us to conclude that WTO subsidy disciplines are not particularly strong. The review of the main economic theories justifying subsidy control (strategic trade policy, terms of trade, private information, commitment theory) has shown that no single theory is able to fully account for subsidies and the need to control them. The key question is the definition of what we want to achieve by controlling subsidies, which is the main message sent to the policy-makers and negotiators that are currently considering law reform.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 316 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacon, K (2017) European Union Law of State Aid. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, K and Staiger, RW (2006) Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System? American Economic Review 96(3), 877–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R and Krugman, P (1988) Industrial Policy and International Competition in Wide-Bodied Jet Aircraft, in Trade Policy Issues and Empirical Analysis. University of Chicago Press, pp. 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brander, JA and Spencer, BJ (1985) Export Subsidies and Internation Market Share Rivalry. Journal of International Economics 18(1–2), 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brou, D and Ruta, M (2013) A Commitment Theory of Subsidy Agreement. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 13(1), 239–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, ML (2001) Trade Warriors: States, Firms, and Strategic-Trade Policy in High-Technology Competition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buzard, K and Delimatsis, P (2018) Subsidies and Investment Promotion Reaching New Heights in the Aviation Sector: The US–Tax Incentives Dispute. World Trade Review 18(2), 327–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbaugh, R and Olienyk, J (2001) Boeing–Airbus Subsidy Dispute: An Economic and Trade Perspective. Global Economy Quarterly 2(4), 261–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppens, D (2014) WTO Disciplines on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures: Balancing Policy Space and Legal Constraints. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J and Grossman, GM (1986) Trade and Industrial Policy under Oligopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(2), 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairchild, RJ and McGuire, SM (2010) The Airbus–Boeing Dispute: A Strategic Trade Theory Approach. Available at SSRN 1640536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawande, K, Krishna, P, and Olarreaga, M (2015) A Political–Economic Account of Global Tariffs. Economics & Politics 27(2), 204–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, M and Mehta, K (2013) It's a Bird, It's a Plane: Some Remarks on the Airbus Appellate Body Report (EC and Certain Member States - Large Civil Aircraft, WT/DS316/AB/R). World Trade Review 12(2), 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, H and Mavroidis, PC (2004) Still Hazy after all These Years: The Interpretation of National Treatment in the GATT/WTO Case-Law on Tax Discrimination. European Journal of International Law 15(1), 39–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R and Teitel, R (2010) Beyond Compliance: Rethinking Why International Law Really Matters? Global Policy 1(2), 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hufbauer, GC, Rubini, L, and Wong, Y (2009) Swamped by Subsidies: Averting a US–EU Trade War after the Great Crisis. Policy Note 24 July.Google Scholar
Klepper, G (1990) Entry into the Market for Large Transport Aircraft. European Economic Review 34(4), 775–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, PR (1987) Is free trade passé?. Journal of economic Perspectives 1(2), 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr, A, Bellmann, J, and Schomaker, R (2012) Subsidies in Civil Aircraft Manufacturing: The World Trade Organization (WTO) and the Boeing–Airbus Dispute. European State Aid Law Quarterly 11(3), 585–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P, Obstfeld, M, and Melitz, M (2012) International Economics: Theory and Policy (9th edn). Addison-Wesley, World Student Series.Google Scholar
Jackson, JH (1997) The World Trading System. Ann Harbour: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, GM (2016a) Subsidies and Countervailing Duties. Handbook of Commercial Policy, Vol. 1. North-Holland, pp. 161–210.Google Scholar
Lee, GM (2016b) Optimal International Agreement and Restriction on Domestic Efficiency. Journal of international Economics 99, 138–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maggi, G (1996) Strategic Trade Policies with Endogenous Mode of Competition. The American Economic Review 86(1), 237–258.Google Scholar
Maggi, G and Rodriguez-Clare, A (1998) The Value of Trade Agreements in the Presence of Political Pressures. Journal of Political Economy 106(3), 574–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, PC (2016a) The Regulation of International Trade: Volume 2: The WTO Agreements on Trade in Goods. MIT Press, p. 273.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, PC (2016b) Dispute Settlement in the WTO: Mind Over Matter. Handbook of Commercial Policy Vol. 1. North-Holland, pp. 333–378.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, PC (2000) Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place. European Journal of International Law 11, 763–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavroidis, PC (2005) Come Together? Producer Welfare, Consumer Welfare, and WTO Rules. Reforming the World Trading System: Legitimacy, Efficiency and Democratic Governance.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neven, D and Seabright, P (1995) European Industrial Policy: The Airbus Case. Economic Policy 10(21), 313–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neven, D and Sykes, A (2014) United States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint): Some Comments. World Trade Review 13(2), 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavcnik, N (2002) Trade Disputes in the Commercial Aircraft Industry. The World Economy 25, 733–751,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, D and MacPherson, A (2004) Industrial Subsidies and the Politics of World Trade: The Case of the Boeing 7e7. Industrial Geographer 1(2).Google Scholar
Rubini, L and Hawkins, JK (2016) What Shapes the Law? Reflections on the History, Law, Politics and Economics of International and European Subsidy Disciplines. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute.Google Scholar
Rubini, L (2017) ASCM Disciplines and Recent WTO Case Law Developments: What Space for ‘Green’ Subsidies? in Cottier, T and Espa, I (eds.), Interantional Trade in Sustainable Electricity – Regulatory Challenges in International Economic Law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubini, L (2012) Ain't wastin'time no more: Subsidies for Renewable Energy, the SCM Agreement, Policy Space, and Law Reform. Journal of International Economic Law 15(2), 525–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, AO (2003) The Economics of WTO Rules on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. Chicago John M. Olin Law and Economics, Working Paper No. 186 (2nd Series) May 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, AO (2010) The Questionable Case for Subsidies Regulation: A Comparative Perspective. Journal of Legal Analysis 2(2), 473–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US, Japan, EU (2018) Joint Statement on Trilateral Meeting of the Trade Ministers of the United States, Japan, and the European Union. 31 May 2018.Google Scholar
Wolfe, R and Collins-Williams, T (2010) Transparency as a Trade Policy Tool: The WTO's Cloudy Windows. World Trade Review 9(4), 551–581.Google Scholar