Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:48:25.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concurrent trade defense investigations in the EU, the EU's new anti-subsidy practice against China, and the future of both

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2012

EDWIN VERMULST  and
BRIAN GATTA
EDWIN VERMULST*
Affiliation:
Partner, VVGB Advocaten, Brussels, Belgium
BRIAN GATTA*
Affiliation:
Senior associate, VVGB Advocaten, Brussels, Belgium
*
*Email: [email protected]
**Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The EU's decision to follow in the footsteps of the United States by breaking with its past practice of not applying countervailing duties against Chinese subsidies has left many wondering whether its first imposition of such duties on Coated Fine Paper from China was a watershed moment in EU trade defense history or merely an aberration, and if the former, just how profound of an impact these cases might have in the future. The article examines the key considerations which can aid one in determining the probability of the EU making an anti-subsidy practice against China routine, as well as the extent to which that practice could have a substantial practical impact on duty rates. This examination entails a look at the EU's historical use of the anti-subsidy instrument as a subordinate complement to the anti-dumping instrument, the impact of the EU's adoption of the ‘lesser duty rule’ on concurrent investigations, the way in which the expiration of a key provision in China's Protocol of Accession to the WTO will increase the desirability of the anti-subsidy instrument, as well as a look at how the European Commission might have fallen foul of the SCM Agreement with regard to a few key points.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 11 , Issue 3: Symposium Issue: Standards and Non-Tariff Barriers in Trade , July 2012 , pp. 527 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © Edwin Vermulst and Brian Gatta 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, Dukgeun (2011), ‘United States – Definitive Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China’, American Journal of International Law, 105(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, Dukgeun and Lee, Jieun (2011), ‘Countervailing Duty against China: Opening a Pandora's Box in the WTO System?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 14(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P. (2002), ‘Why are Safeguards under WTO so Unpopular?’, World Trade Review, 1(1): 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P. (2010), ‘Global Antidumping Database’, available at http://econ.worldbank.org/ttbd/gad/.Google Scholar
Hansen, Jørgen Drud and Jørgen, Ulff-Møller Nielsen (2011), ‘The Puzzle of Simultaneous Anti-dumping and Anti-subsidy Measures’, draft, at 4, http://www.hha.dk/nat/philipp/iei/2011/Nielsen.pdf.Google Scholar
Jakob, Thinam (2001), ‘Lesser Duty Rule and Community Interest in Anti-dumping Proceedings – The Community System in Perspective’, Internomics, 36(4): 192.Google Scholar
Makiyama, Hosuk Lee (2011), ‘Chasing Paper Tigers, Need for Caution and Priorities in EU Countervailing Duties (CVDs)’, ECIPE Policy Briefs, 01.Google Scholar
Qin, Julia Ya (2004), ‘WTO Regulation of Subsidies to State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) – A Critical Appraisal of the China Accession Protocol’, Journal of International Economic Law, 7(4): 863–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietje, Christian, Kluttig, Bernhard, and Franke, Martina (2011), ‘Cost of Production Adjustments in Anti-dumping Proceedings: Challenging Raw Material Inputs Dual Pricing Systems in EU Anti-dumping Law and Practice’, Journal of World Trade, 45(5): 1071–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermulst, Edwin (2010), EU Anti-Dumping Law and Practice, Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Vermulst, Edwin and Graafsma, Folkert (2010), ‘Investigating Wireless Modems from China: Triple Jeopardy in the Making’, Who's Who Legal (December).Google Scholar
Woo, Wing Thye and Xiao, Geng (2007), ‘Facing Protectionism Generated by Trade Disputes: China's Post-WTO Blues’, Brookings Institute, http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/faculty/woo/Woo-Xiao.ANU.29June2007.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Wentong (2010), ‘The Pitfalls of the (Perfect) Market Benchmark: The Case of Countervailing Duty Law’, Minnesota Journal of International Law, 19(1), at 31.Google Scholar