Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:16:19.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Do Egg Shells Crack?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

T. C. Carter
T. C. Carter
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JS, Scotland.
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , April 1970 , pp. 549 - 561
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, G. B., Carter, T. C. and Jones R., Morley (1969). Some factors affecting downgrading in eggs, especially damage in transit. Br. Poult. Sci. 10, 45–52.Google Scholar
Anderson, G. B., Carter, T. C. and Morley, Jones R. (1970 a). Some factors affecting the incidence of cracks in hens egg shells. Br. Poult. Sci. 11, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. G., Carter, T. C. and Jones R., Morley (1970 b). Some factors affecting dynamic fracture of egg shells in battery cages. In British Egg Marketing Board Symposium No. 6. Edit. Gordon, R. F. and Freeman, B. M.Edinburgh, Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Baskett, R. G., Dryden, W. H. and Hale, R. W. (1937). Investigations on the shell strength of hens' eggs. J. Minist. Agric. N. Ire. 5, 132–142.Google Scholar
Bowman, J. C. and Challender, N. I. (1963). Egg shell strength: a comparison of two laboratory tests and field results. Br. Poult. Sci. 4, 103–116.Google Scholar
Brooks, J. (1960). Strength in the egg. Soc. Chem. Ind. Monogr. 7, 149–178.Google Scholar
Carter, T. C. (1968 a). The hen's egg: a mathematical model with three parameters. Br. Poult. Sci. 9, 165–171.Google Scholar
Carter, T. C. (1968 b). The hen's egg: density of egg shell and egg contents. Br. Poult. Sci. 9, 265–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, T. C. (1968 c). The hen's egg: estimation of egg mean and flock mean shell thickness. Br. Poult. Sci. 9, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, T. C. (1969 a). The hen's egg: relationship between shell thickness and the amount of organic matter in the shell. Br. Poult. Sci. 10, 165–174.Google Scholar
Carter, T. C. (1969 b). The hen's egg: variation in shell deformation under static load with relative humidity and age of egg. Br. Poult. Sci. 10, 311–319.Google Scholar
Carter, T. C. (1970). The hen's egg: some factors affecting deformation in statically loaded shells. Br. Poult. Sci. 11, 15–38.Google Scholar
Carter, T. C. and Jones R., Morley (1970). The hen's egg: size and shape parameters and their interrelations. Br. Poult. Sci. (in the press).Google Scholar
Elson, H. A. (1969). The relationship between cage floor design and shell quality. Wld's Poult. Sci. J. 25, 145.Google Scholar
Leonard, E. M. (1970). The molar ratio of calcium to magnesium in the shell of the hen's egg during formation. Proc. Physiol. Soc. 1970, 24P-25P.Google Scholar
Mitchell, K. W. (1966). Criteria for designing in brittle materials. London, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Sluka, S. J., Besch, E. L. and Smith, E. H. (1965). A hydrostatic tester for egg shell strength. Poult. Sci. 44, 1494–1500.Google Scholar
Wood-Gush, D. G. M. and Gilbert, A. B. (1969). Observations on the laying behaviour of hens in battery cages. Br. Poult. Sci. 10, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed