Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:10:32.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wheat value: improvements by feed technology, plant breeding and animal genetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2008

B. CARRÉ ,
S. MIGNON-GRASTEAU ,
A. PÉRON ,
H. JUIN  and
D. BASTIANELLI
B. CARRÉ*
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Avicoles, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly
S. MIGNON-GRASTEAU
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Avicoles, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly
A. PÉRON
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherches Avicoles, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly
H. JUIN
Affiliation:
UE EASM, INRA, Le Magneraud, 17700 Surgères
D. BASTIANELLI
Affiliation:
CIRAD-EMVT, Campus de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier, France
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Wheat is a common ingredient in poultry diets, especially in Europe. Due to its low protein and high starch levels, wheat is essentially used as an energy supplier. Nutritional values of wheat samples vary according to their nutrient content and digestibilities. Variations of nutrient contents may be associated with cultivars and environmental conditions. Digestibility variations in growing chicks may be associated with these factors, and also, with technological treatments of diets and genetic origin of birds.

Total nutrient content (starch, protein, lipids and sugars) is strongly related to fibre content through a negative relationship. A large part of fibre content variations of wheat samples depends on their cultivar origin. Wheat protein content depends both on cultivar and environmental conditions. High yield cultivars are often associated with low protein content.

Lipid and starch digestibilities of wheat diets given to growing birds may sometimes be rather low.

The main reason of the low lipid digestibility values observed with some wheat samples is the high viscosity of water-extract induced by their water-soluble arabinoxylans. This viscosity results from a combination of several variables including the potential applied viscosity value (PAV as mL/g) of the wheat cultivar, the endogenous and exogenous xylanases, and the endogenous anti-xylanase contents. Environmental conditions and technological treatments are major factors acting on xylanase and anti-xylanase contents.

A part of wheat starch digestibility variations may be related to accessibility problems in coarse particles due to hard wheat cultivars and coarse grinding. However, coarse particles may be positive for stimulating feed intake of mash diets, and protecting against intestinal transit disorders.

In growing chicks, genetic origin of birds may result in very large variations in the digestibility of wheat diets, as observed with the divergent D+ and D− “Digestion” lines selected on the digestion ability of a wheat diet. In 3 w old chickens selected over 4 generations, the AMEn value of a Rialto wheat diet was 13% lower in D− than in D+birds (P=0.0001). D− birds showed 10% variations in AMEn values between four cereal diets (P=0.0003), while D+ birds showed only 4% variations (P=0.0006). In D+ birds, AMEn values of wheat and maize diets were the same (14,488 vs. 14,538 J/g DM), while, in D− birds, AMEn values of wheat diets were 5% lower (P=0.015) than the maize diet value (13,106 vs. 13,809 J/g DM).

Keywords

wheatchickendigestiongenetics
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 585 - 596
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AACC (1995) Method 39–70 A. In: Approved Methods of the AACC, St. Paul, MN (USA): American Association of Cereal Chemists.Google Scholar
AMIOUR, N., MERLINO, M., LEROY, P. and BRANLARD, G. (2004) Chromosome mapping and identification of amphiphilic proteins of hexaploid wheat kernels. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108: 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BARLOW, K.K, BUTTROSE, M.S., SIMMONDS, D.H. and VESK, M. (1973). The nature of the starch-protein interface in wheat endosperm. Cereal Chemistry 50: 443–454.Google Scholar
BARRIER-GUILLOT, B., MÉTAYER, J.P., BOUVAREL, I., CASTAING, J., PICARD, M. and ZWICK, J.L. (1997) Energy value of wheat and maize presented in whole grains, mash and pellets in broiler feeds. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, pp. 237–239. Faaborg, (DK): WPSA.Google Scholar
BEDFORD, M.R. and CLASSEN, H.L. (1993) An in vitro assay for the prediction of broiler intestinal viscosity and growth when fed rye-based diets in the presence of exogenous enzymes. Poultry Science 72: 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BEDFORD, M.R., SCOTT, TA., SILVERSIDES, F.G., CLASSEN, H.L., SWIFT, M.L. and PACK, M. (1998) The effect of wheat cultivar, growing environment, and enzyme supplementation on digestibility of amino acids by broilers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 78: 335–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARRÉ, B. (1991) The chemical and biological bases of a calculation system developed for predicting dietary energy values: a poultry model. In: In vitro Digestion for Pigs and Poultry (Fuller, M.F. ed), pp. 67–85Wallingford (UK): CAB International Publishing.Google Scholar
CARRÉ, B. (2002) Carbohydrate chemistry of the feedstuffs used for poultry. In: Poultry Feedstuffs: Supply Composition and Nutritive Value (McNab, J. and Boorman, N. eds), pp. 39–56. Wallingford (UK): CAB International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARRÉ, B., GOMEZ, J., MELCION, J.P. and GIBOULOT, B. (1994) La viscosité des aliments destinés à l'aviculture. Utilisation pour prédire la consommation et l'excrétion d'eau. Productions Animales 7: 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARRÉ, B., IDI, A., MAISONNIER, S., MELCION, J.P., OURY, F.X., GOMEZ, J. and PLUCHARD, P. (2002) Relationships between digestibilities of food components and characteristics of wheats (Triticum aestivum) introduced as the only cereal source in a broiler chicken diet. British Poultry Science 43: 404–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARRÉ, B., MULEY, N, GOMEZ, J., OURY, F.-X., LAFFITTE, E., GUILLOU, D. and SIGNORET, C. (2005a) Soft wheat instead of hard wheat in pelleted diets results in high starch digestibility in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 46: 66–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CARRÉ, B., MIGNON-GRASTEAU, S., SVIHUS, B., PÉRON, A., BASTIANELLI, D., GOMEZ, J., BESNARD, J. and SELLIER, N. (2005b) Nutritional effects of feed form, and wheat compared to maize, in the D+ and D− chicken lines selected for divergent digestion capacity. In: Proceedings of the 15th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, pp. 42–44. Balatonfüred (H): WPSA.Google Scholar
CHANTRET, N, SALSE, J., SABOT, F., RAHMAN, S., BELLEC, A., LAUBIN, B., DUBOIS, I., DOSSAT, C., SOURDILLE, P., JOUDRIER, P., GAUTIER, M.F., CATTOLICO, L., BECKERT, M., AUBOURG, S., WEISSENBACH, J., CABOCHE, M., BERNARD, M., LEROY, P. and CHALHOUB, B. (2005) Molecular basis of evolutionary events that shaped the Hardness locus in diploid and polyploid wheat species (Triticum and Aegilops). Plant Cell 17: 1033–1045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHOCT, M. and ANNISON, G. (1992) The inhibition of nutrient digestion by wheat pentosans. British Journal of Nutrition 67: 123–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHOCT, M., HUGHES, R.J. and BEDFORD, M.R. (1999a) Effects of a xylanase on individual bird variation, starch digestion throughout the intestine, and ileal and caecal volatile fatty acid production in chickens fed wheat. British Poultry Science 40: 419–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHOCT, M., HUGHES, R.J. and ANNISON, G. (1999b) Apparent metabolisable energy and chemical composition of Australian wheat in relation to environmental factors. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50: 447–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLAYTON, T.A. and MORRISON, W.R. (1972) Changes in flour lipids during the storage of wheat flour. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 23: 721–736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FAIRFULL, R.W. and CHAMBERS, J.R. (1984) Breeding for feed efficiency: poultry. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 64: 513–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FARRELL, D.J., THOMSON, E., CHOICE, A., ASHES, J.R., PECK, N.J. and HOGAN, J.P. (1983) Effects of milling and pelleting of maize, barley and wheat on their metabolizable energy value for cockerels and chicks. Animal Feed Science and Technology 9: 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FRANCESH, M., PEREZ-VENDRELL, A.M., ESTEVE-GARCIA, E. and BRUFAU, J. (1994) Effects of cultivar, pelleting and enzyme addition on nutritive value of barley in poultry diets. British Poultry Science 35: 259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FURNISS, C.S.M., WILLIAMSON, G. and KROON, P.A. (2005) The substrate specificity and susceptibility to wheat inhibitor proteins of Penicillium funiculosum xylanases from a commercial enzyme preparation. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85: 574–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GALANDE, A.A., TIWARI, R., AMMIRAJU, J.S.S., SANTRA, D.K., LAGU, M.D., RAO, V.S., GUPTA, V.S., MISRA, B.K., NAGARAJAN, S. and RANJEKAR, P.K. (2001) Genetic analysis of kernel hardness in bread wheat using PCR-based markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 103: 601–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GARCÍA, V., GOMEZ, J., MIGNON-GRASTEAU, S., SELLIER, N. and CARRÉ, B. (2007) Effects of xylanase and antibiotic supplementations on the nutritional utilization of a wheat diet in growing chicks from genetic D+ and D− lines selected for divergent digestion efficiency. Animal 1: in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GIROUX, M.J. and MORRIS, C.F. (1998) Wheat grain hardness results from highly conserved mutations in the friabilin components puroindoline a and b. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95: 6262–6266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GRANUM, P.E. (1979) Studies on OC-amylase inhibitors in foods. Food Chemistry 4: 173–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HETLAND, H., CHOCT, M. and SVIHUS, B. (2004) Role of insoluble non-starch polysaccharides in poultry nutrition. World's Poultry Science Journal 60: 415–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUGHES, R.J. and CHOCT, M. (1997) Low-ME wheat or low-ME chickens? -highly variable responses by birds on the same low-ME wheat diet. Proceedings of the Australian Poultry Science Symposium 9: 138–141.Google Scholar
HUYGHEBAERT, G. (1997) The effect of a wheat-fat-interaction on the efficacy of a multi-enzyme preparation in broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 68: 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JONES, G.P.D. and TAYLOR, R.D. (2001) The incorporation of whole grain into pelleted broiler chicken diets: production and physiological responses. British Poultry Science 42: 477–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KIM, J.C., MULLAN, B.P., SIMMINS, P.H. and PLUSKE, J.R. (2003) Variation in the chemical composition of wheats grown in Western Australia as influenced by variety, growing region, season, and post-harvest storage. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54: 541–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LIVESEY, G., WILKINSON, J.A., ROE, M., FAULKS, R., CLARK, S., BROWN, J.C., KENNEDY, H. and ELIA, M. (1995). Influence of the physical form of barley grain on the digestion of its starch in the human small intestine and implications for health. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 61: 75–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MACRI, A., PARLAMENTI, R., SILANO, V. and VALFRE, F. (1977) Adaptation of the domestic chicken, Gallus Domesticus, to continuous feeding of albumin amylase inhibitors from wheat flour as gastro-resistant microgranules Poultry Science 56: 434–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MAISONNIER, S., GOMEZ, J. and CARRÉ, B. (2001a) Nutrient digestibility and intestinal viscosities in broiler chickens fed on wheat diets, as compared to maize diets with added guar gum. British Poultry Science 42: 102–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MAISONNIER, S., GOMEZ, J., CHAGNEAU, A.M. and CARRÉ, B. (2001b) Analysis of variability in nutrient digestibilities in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 42: 70–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MARRON, L., BEDFORD, M.R. and MCCRACKEN, K.J. (2001) The effects of adding xylanase, vitamin C and copper sulphate to wheat-based diets on broiler performance. British Poultry Science 42: 493–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MIGNON-GRASTEAU, S., MULEY, N., BASTIANELLI, D., GOMEZ, J., PÉRON, A., SELLIER, N., MILLET, N., BESNARD, J., HALLOUIS, J.M. and CARRÉ, B. (2004) Heritability of digestibilities and divergent selection for digestion ability in growing chicks fed a wheat diet. Poultry Science 83: 860–867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MOLLAH, Y., BRYDEN, W.L., WALLIS, I.R., BALNAVE, D. and ANNISON, E.F. (1983) Studies on low metabolisable energy wheats for poultry using conventional and rapid assay procedures and the effects of processing. British Poultry Science 24: 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NIU, Z.Y., CLASSEN, H.L. and SCOTT, T.A. (2003) Interaction of wheat micronization and cultivar on its feeding value for broilers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 83: 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OURY, F.X., CARRÉ, B., PLUCHARD, P., BÉRARD, P., NYS, Y. and LECLERCQ, B. (1998) Genetic variability and stability of poultry feeding related characters in wheat, in relation to environmental variation. Agronomie 18: 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PÉRON, A., BASTIANELLI, D., OURY, F.-X., GOMEZ, J. and CARRÉ, B. (2005) Effects of food deprivation and particle size of ground wheat on digestibility of food components in broilers fed a pelleted diet. British Poultry Science 46: 223–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PÉRON, A., GOMEZ, J., MIGNON-GRASTEAU, S., SELLIER, N., BESNARD, J., DEROUET, M., JUIN, H. and CARRÉ, B. (2006) Effects of wheat quality on digestion differ between the D+ and D− chicken lines selected for divergent digestion capacity. Poultry Science 85: 462–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PÉRON, A., SVIHUS, B., GABRIEL, I., BÉROT, S., TANGUY, D., BOUCHET, B., GOMEZ, J. and CARRÉ, B. (2007) Effects of two wheat cultivars on physico-chemical properties of wheat flours and digesta from two broiler chicken lines (D+ and D-) differing in digestion capacity. British Poultry Science: 48: 370–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PIRGOZLIEV, V.R., BIRCH, C.L., ROSE, S.P., KETTLEWELL, P.S. and BEDFORD, M.R. (2003) Chemical composition and the nutritive quality of different wheat cultivars for broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 44: 464–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
POMERANZ, Y. and SHELLENBERGER, J.A. (1961) Histochemical characterization of wheat and wheat products. IV. Mapping the free fatty acids in germinating wheat. Cereal Chemistry 38: 122–130.Google Scholar
PYM, R.A.E. (1984) Genetic and physiological aspects of feed efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 17th World Poultry Congress, pp. 60–64. Hämeenlinna (Finland): WPSA.Google Scholar
RAEDSCHELDERS, G., FIERENS, K., SANSEN, S., ROMBOUTS, S., GEBRUERS, K., ROBBEN, J., RABIJNS, A., COURTIN, C. M., DELCOUR, J. A., VAN CAMPENHOUT, S. and VOLCKAERT, G. (2005) Molecular identification of wheat endoxylanase inhibitor TAXI-II and the determinants of its inhibition specificity. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 335: 512–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ROGEL, A.M., ANNISON, E.F., BRYDEN, W.L. and BALNAVE, D. (1987). The digestion of wheat starch in broiler chickens. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38: 639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROSE, S.P., TUCKER, L.A., KETTLEWELL, P.S. and COLLIER, J.D.A. (2001) Rapid tests of wheat nutritive value for growing chickens Journal of Cereal Science 34: 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SALAH UDDIN, M., ROSE, S.P., HISCOCK, T.A., and BONNET, S. (1996) A comparison of the energy availability for chickens of ground and whole grain samples of two wheat varieties. British Poultry Science 37: 347–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
STEENFELDT, S. (2003) Wheat quality- a continuing important issue in poultry nutrition-results from broiler studies in Denmark, in: Proceedings of the 14th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, pp. 333–341. Lillehammer (Norway): WPSA.Google Scholar
STEENFELDT, S., HAMMERSHOJ, M., MÜLLERTZ, A., and FRIS JENSEN, J. (1998) Enzyme supplementation of wheat-based diets for broilers. 2. Effect on apparent metabolisable energy content and nutrient digestibility. Animal Feed Science and Technology 75: 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SVIHUS, B. (2001) A consistent low starch digestibility observed in pelleted broiler chicken diets containing high levels of different wheat varieties. Animal Feed Science and Technology 92: 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SVIHUS, B., EDVARDSEN, D.H., BEDFORD, M.R. and GULLORD, M. (2000) Effect of methods of analysis and heat treatment on viscosity of wheat, barley and oats. Animal Feed Science and Technology 88: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SYMES, K.J. (1965) The inheritance of grain hardness in wheat as measured by the particle size index. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 16: 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TURNBULL, K.M. and RAHMAN, S. (2002) Endosperm texture in wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 36: 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TURNER, A.S., BRADBURNE, R.P., FISH, L. and SNAPE, J.W. (2004) New quantitative trait loci influencing grain texture and protein content in bread wheat. Journal of Cereal Science 40: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VUKIC VRANJES, M., PFIRTER, HP. and WENK, C. (1994). Influence of processing treatment and type of cereal on the effect of dietary enzymes in broiler diets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 46: 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILLIAMS, P.C. (1979) Screening wheat for protein and hardness by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Cereal Chemistry 56: 169–172.Google Scholar
WISEMAN, J. (1990) Variability in the nutritive value of fats for non-ruminants. In: Feedstuff evaluation (Wiseman, J., and Cole, D.J.A. eds), pp. 215–234. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WU, Y.B., RAVINDRAN, V, THOMAS, D.G., BIRTLES, M.J. and HENDRIKS, W.H. (2004) Influence of method of whole wheat inclusion and xylanase supplementation on the performance, apparent metabolisable energy, digestive tract measurements and gut morphology of broilers. British Poultry Science 45: 385–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed