Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:58:25.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Standard European footpad dermatitis scoring system for use in turkey processing plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2008

P.M. HOCKING*
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK
R.K. MAYNE
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, UK
R.W. ELSE
Affiliation:
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Midlothian, Scotland EH25 9RG, UK
N.A. FRENCH
Affiliation:
British United Turkeys Ltd, Chowley Five, Chowley Oak Business Park, Tattenhall, Chester CH3 9GA, UK
J. GATCLIFFE
Affiliation:
British United Turkeys Ltd, Chowley Five, Chowley Oak Business Park, Tattenhall, Chester CH3 9GA, UK
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A standard scoring system for turkeys at slaughter that consists of 5 categories based on the size of the lesion was adopted as the recommended classification scheme for FPD in slaughter plants at a meeting of the WPSA European Poultry Federation Working Party Number 10: Turkeys. Each score of the classification scheme is defined and photographs of a minimal lesion in each category are presented. The numbers of turkeys required for scoring to determine the prevalence of FPD, if the target or expected frequency is 10, 20 or 40% respectively are 150, 250 and 400 birds. Assessment of the consecutive right foot for the required number of birds from the middle load of a specific flock with a minimum of 3 flocks from a given site is recommended. The classification scheme will facilitate comparisons across countries and systems of production and allow rational decisions to be made regarding management changes to decrease the prevalence of FPD in Europe.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

CLARK, S. (2002) Scoring systems in the USA and the UK, pp. 36-41. Roche Vitamins Inc, USA.Google Scholar
CLARK, S., HANSEN, G., MCLEAN, P., BOND, P., WAKEMAN, W., MEADOWS, R. and BUDA, S. (2002) Pododermatitis in turkeys. Avian Diseases 46: 1038-1044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MARTLAND, M.F. (1984) Wet litter as a cause of plantar pododermatitis leading to foot ulceration and lameness in fattening turkeys. Avian Pathology 13: 241-252.Google Scholar
MAYNE, R.K., ELSE, R.W. and HOCKING, P.M. (2007a) Foot pad dermatitis in growing turkeys is associated with cytokine and cellular changes indicative of an inflammatory immune response Avian Pathology 36: 453-459.Google Scholar
MAYNE, R.K., ELSE, R.W. and HOCKING, P.M. (2007b) High litter moisture alone is sufficient to cause foot pad dermatitis in growing turkeys British Poultry Science 48: 538-545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAYNE, R.K., HOCKING, P.M. and ELSE, R.W. (2006) Foot pad dermatitis develops at an early age in commercial turkeys. British Poultry Science 47: 36-42.Google Scholar
THRUSFIELD, M., ORTEGA, C., BLAS, I.D., NOORDHUIZEN, J.P. and FRANKENA, K. (2001) WIN EPISCOPE 2.0: improved epidemiological software for veterinary medicine. Veterinary Record 148: 567-572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed