Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T01:53:58.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship between egg shell quality and shell breakage and factors that affect shell breakage in the field–A review1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2007

R. M. J. Hamilton ,
K. G. Hollands ,
P. W. Voisey  and
A. A. Grunder
R. M. J. Hamilton
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Research Branch, Agriculure Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, CanadaK1A OC6
K. G. Hollands
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Research Branch, Agriculure Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, CanadaK1A OC6
P. W. Voisey
Affiliation:
Engineering and Statistical Research Institute, Research Branch, Agriculure Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, CanadaK1A OC6
A. A. Grunder
Affiliation:
Animal Research Institute, Research Branch, Agriculure Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, CanadaK1A OC6
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , August 1979 , pp. 177 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, C. B.Carter, T. C. (1972). The hen's egg: Shell cracking in eggs dropped on cage floors coated with zinc or plastic. Poult. Sci. 13: 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. B.Carter, T. C. (1976). The hen's egg: Shell crackage at impact on a heavy, stiff body and factors that affect it. Br. Poult. Sci. 17: 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, G. B.Carter, T. C.Jones, R. M. (1974). Some factors affecting dynamic fracture of egg shells in battery cages. Br. Poult. Sci. 15: 53.Google Scholar
Anon 1972 How producers rank eggshell factors. Poultry Digest 31 (368): 496Google Scholar
Anon 1974 Overnight holding to detect checked eggs. Poultry Digest 33 (386): 169Google Scholar
Ball, R. G.Hill, J. F.Logan, V.Lyman, J. (1976). The effect of washing, oiling, holding and temperature of eggs on shell strength. Poult. Sci. 55: 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramhall, E. L.Swanson, M. H.Johnston, G. W. (1973). Eggshell damage during handling. Poultry Digest 32 (371): 12.Google Scholar
Berry, J. G. (1976). Extending egg shell damage survey results into the field. Poult. Sci. 55: 758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezpa, J.Johndrew, O. F. Jr. Thacker, G. H.Grover, R. M.Muir, F. V.Dupras, C. A. (1972). Field studies on eggshell damage and bloodspot detection. Ext. Bull. 403New Brusnwick, NJRutgers University.Google Scholar
Brooks, R. C. (1971). Egg breakage is costing you money. Poultry Tribune 77 (3): 22.Google Scholar
Bunk, M. J.Balloun, S. L. (1978). Ultrastructure of the mammillary region of low puncture strength avian eggshells. Poult. Sci. 57: 639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, T. C. (1970) Why do egg shells crack? Wld's Poult. Sci. J. 26: 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, T. C. (1971). The hen's egg: Shell cracking at oviposition in battery cages and its inheritance. Br. Poult. Sci. 12: 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipera, J. D. (1976). Effect of oviposition time and storage conditions on the specific gravities of eggs. Poult. Sci. 55: 1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, R. L.Acree, R. L. (1974). Eggshell shear strength evaluation with micro-punches. Trans. Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng. 17: 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, J. W. (1967). The effect of mechanical disturbance of the egg cuticle on shell mottling. Poult. Sci. 46: 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggleton, L. Z.Ross, W. J. (1971). Observed egg shell damage in a mechanical gathering system. Poult. Sci. 50: 1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Boushy, A. R.Simons, P. C. M.Wiertz, G. (1968). Structure and ultra-structure of the hen's egg shell as influenced by environmental temperature, humidity and vitamin C additions. Poult. Sci. 47: 456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ernst, R. A. and Johnston, G. W. (1977). Shell damage in mechanical egg gathering systems. A California study. Prog. Poult. Coop. Extension, Univ. California, Riverside, CA., February.Google Scholar
Folkerts, J. (1976). Influence of feeding and husbandry on egg shell quality. In 5th Europ. Poult. Conf. Vol. 1: 580.Google Scholar
Froning, G. W. (1973). Effect of temperature and moisture on breaking strength of the egg shell. Poult. Sci. 52: 2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, J. L.Harms, R. H.Angalet, S. A., Roland, D. A. Sr.1975 Factors affecting the incidence of naturally occurring “windows” in egg shells. Poult. Sci. 54: 1199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlich, J. D.Parkhurst, C. R.Ball, H. R. (1975). The comparison of rough, normal and translucent egg shells with respect to shell strength and calcification. Poult. Sci. 54: 1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, R. M. G. (1978). Observations on the changes in physical characteristics that influence egg shell quality in ten strains of White Leghorns. Poultry Sci. 57: 1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammerle, J. R. (1969). An engineering appraisal of egg shell strength evaluation techniques. Poult. Sci. 48: 1708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. R.Voisey, P. W.Thompson, B. K. (1977). Physical properties of eggshells: A comparison of the puncture and comparision tests for estimating shell strength. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 57: 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, G. W. (1975). Potential eggshell damage locations. Poultry Digest 34 (396): 60.Google Scholar
Johnston, G. W.Ernest, R. A. (1975). Shell damage in mechanical egg gathering. Poultry Digest 34 (396): 57.Google Scholar
King, N. R.Robinson, D. S. (1972). The use of the scanning electron microscope for comparing the structure of weak and strong egg shells. J. Microscop. 95: 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, F. B.Thornton, P. A.Epling, E. P. (1961). The effects of heat stress on the microscopic structure of the egg shell matrix. Poult. Sci. 40: 1428.Google Scholar
Mather, F. B.Epling, J. P.Thornton, P. A. (1962). The microscopic structure of the egg shell matrix as influenced by egg shell thickness and environmental temperature. Poult. Sci. 41: 963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNally, E. H. (1965). The rglationship of egg snell weight to cracked eggs. Pult. Sci. 44: 1513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, R.Baker, R. C.Scott, M. L. (1973). Effects of hen egg shell and other calcium source upon egg shell strength and ultrastructure. Poult. Sci. 52: 949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, W. J. (1959). The effect of environmental temperature and humidity on the calcium balance and serum calcium of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 38: 1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, L. H.Henderson, J. M. (1974). Techniques for measuring eggshell strength. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 19: 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nethercote, C. H.Boisvenu, C. N.Gosselin, R. and Fletcher, D. A. (1972). Egg Packing Tests. Rep. OP-X-46, Environment Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Nethercote, C. H.Boisvenu, C. N.Fletcher, D. A. (1974). Egg carton tests. Poult. Sci. 53: 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordstrom, J. O. (1973). Duration of egg formation in chickens during heat stress. Poult. Sci. 52: 1687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orr, H. L.Friars, G. W.Reinhart, B. S.Pevzner, I. Y. (1977). Classification of shell damage resulting from egg handling practices. Poult. Sci. 56: 611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overfield, N. D. (1976). General aspects of egg quality.. 5th Europ. Poult. Conf. Vol. 1: 569.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. F. (1965). Factors influencing egg shell quality. Wld's Poult. Sci. J. 21: 110 A review.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Place, T. A.Eroschenko, V. P. (1976). Strain rate and temperature sensitivity of the crack initiation force in intact Japanese quail eggs. Poult. Sci. 55: 1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, P. L.Washburn, K. W. (1974). Shell evaluation of white and brown egg strains by deformation, breaking strength, shell thickness and specific gravity. 1. Relationship to egg characteristics. Poult. Sci. 53: 1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reece, F. N.Lott, B. (1976). The effect of loading rate on the breaking force, deformation and stiffness modulus of eggs. Poult. Sci. 55: 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, D. A. Sr. 1976 Recent developments in eggshell quality. Feedstuffs 48 (29): 31.Google Scholar
Roland, D. A. Sr. 1977 The extent of uncollected eggs due to inadequate shell. Poult. Sci. 56: 1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, D. A. Sr., Sloan, D. R.Harms, R. H. (1973). Calcium metabolism in the laying hen. 6. Shell quality in relation to time of oviposition. Poult. Sci. 52: 506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoorl, P. and Boersma, H. Y. (1963). Research on the quality of the egg shell (a new method of determination). In XIIth Wld's. Poult. Conf. Section Papers. p. 432.Google Scholar
Shrimpton, D. H.Hann, C. M. (1967). Shell deformation in predicting breakage due to transport and handling. Br. Poult. Sci. 8: 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrimpton, D. H.Hann, C. M. (1968). An investigation into the value of measurements of egg shell deformation in predicting breakage due to transport and handling Expl. Husb 17: 29.Google Scholar
Simons, P. C. M. (1971). Ultrastructure of the hen egg shell and its physiological interpretation. Commun. No. 175 Cent. Inst. Poultry Res. Het Spelderhold Beekbergen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Smith, A. J. (1974). Changes in the average weight and shell thickness of eggs produced by hens exposed to high environmental temperatures. A review. Trop. Anim. Hlth. Prod. 6: 237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. J.Oliver, J. (1972). Some nutritional problems associated with egg production at high environmental temperatures. 4. The effect of prolonged exposure to high environmental temperatures on the productivity of pullets fed on high-energy diets. Rhod. J. Agr. Res. 10: 43.Google Scholar
Talbot, C. J.Tyler, C. (1974) aA study of the fundamental cause of natural translucent areas in egg shells. Br. Poult. Sci. 15: 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, C. J.Tyler, C. (1974) bA study of the fundamental cause of artificial translucent areas in egg shells. Br. Poult. Sci. 15: 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toleman, W. J. (1977). How to minimize egg damage in mechanised collection systems. Shaver Focus 6 (4): 1.Google Scholar
Toleman, W. J. (1978). Control egg shell processing damage. Poultry Tribune 84 (1): 27.Google Scholar
Tyler, C. (1961). Shell strength: Its measurements and its relationship to other factors. Br. Poult Sci. 2: 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, C.Geake, F. H. (1953). Studies on egg shells. III. Some physical and chemical characteristics of the egg shells of domestic hens. J. Sci. Food Agr. 4: 587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, C.Geake, F. H. (1958). Studies on egg shells. IX. The influence of individuality, breed and season on certain characteristics of egg shells from pullets. J. Sci. Food Agr. 9: 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, C.Geake, F. H. (1960). Studies on egg shells. XIII. Influence of individuality, breed, season and age on certain characteristics of egg shells. J. Sci. Food Agr. 11: 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, C.Geake, F. H. (1964). The effect of water on egg shell strength including a study of the translucent areas of the shell. Br. Poult. Sci. 5: 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voisey, P. W. (1975). Selecting deformation rates in texture studies. J. Texture Studies 6: 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voisey, P. W.Hamilton, R. M. G. (1976). Factors affecting the non-destructive and destructive methods of measuring egg shell strength by the quasi-static compression test. Br. Poult. Sci. 17: 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voisey, P. W.Hamilton, R. M. G. (1977) aSources of error in egg specific gravity measurements by the flotation method. Poult. Sci. 56: 1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voisey, P. W.Hamilton, R. M. G. (1977) bObservations on the relationship between nondestructive egg shell deformation and resistance to fracture by quasi-static compression for measurement of egg shell strength. Poult. Sci. 56: 1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voisey, P. W.Hamilton, R. M. G. 1977c The effect of deformation rate and other factors on the force required to fracture egg shells in measuring shell strength. Poult. Sci. 56: 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voisey, P. W.Hamilton, R. M. G.Thompson, B. K. (1979). The effect of temperature on the resistance of the hen's egg shell to fracture under impact and compression and deformation under a non-destructive force. Poult. Sci. 58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voisey, P. W.Hunt, J. R. (1968). Behaviour of eggshells under impact. Apparatus design considerations. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 13: 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voisey, P. W.Hunt, J. R. (1969). Effect of compression speed on the behaviour of eggshells. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 14: 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voisey, P. W. and Hunt, J. R. (1973). Apparatus and techniques for measuring eggshell strength and other quality factors. Eng. Specif. 6176. Eng. Res. Service, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Voisey, P. W.Hunt, J. R. (1974). Measurement of eggshell strength. J. Texture Studies 5: 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washburn, K. W.Potts, P. L. (1975). Effect of strain and age on the relationship of oviposition time to shell strength. Br. Poult. Sci. 16: 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasylyshen, T. F. (1976). Egg quality. Canada Poultryman 63 (6): 14.Google Scholar
Wells, R. G. (1967) aEgg shell strength. 1. The relationship between egg breakage in the field and certain laboratory assessments of shell strenth. Br. Poult. Sci. 8: 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, R. G. (1967) bEgg shell strength. 2. The relationship between egg specific gravity and egg shell formation and their reliability as indicators of shell strength. Br. Poult. Sci. 8: 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, R. G. (1968). The measurement of certain egg quality characteristics: A review. In Egg Quality: A Study of the Hen's Egg. 214Carter, T. C.EdinburghOliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Wolford, J. H.Tanaka, K. (1970). Factors influencing egg shell quality. Wld's Poult. Sci. J. 26: 763A review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar