Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:52:25.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduction of nitrogen excretion and emissions from poultry: a review for conventional poultry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2016

V.I. CHALOVA ,
J.H. KIM ,
P.H. PATTERSON ,
S.C. RICKE  and
W.K. KIM
V.I. CHALOVA
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Food Technologies, Plovdiv 4000, Bulgaria
J.H. KIM
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University, Yesan, Chungnam 32439, Republic of Korea
P.H. PATTERSON
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
S.C. RICKE
Affiliation:
Center for Food Safety and Department of Food Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA
W.K. KIM*
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Reduction of potential environmental pollutants is a major issue for the sustainable development of the poultry industry. Accumulation of excessive manure and nitrogen poses a risk to animal and human health and ground and surface water cleanliness. In conventional poultry, synthetic amino acids and enzyme supplementations are commonly used to balance the diet and improve digestibility of nutritive compounds. However, diet preparation with sufficient nutrients and minimum amount of excessive nitrogen which still provides optimal growth and health performance continues to be a challenge. This review focuses on various approaches leading to improvement of feed formulation in conventional poultry production systems. The use of crystalline amino acids and genetically engineered plant protein sources in the conventional poultry industry with regard to optimisation of nitrogen level in poultry diets are discussed, and the application of the ideal protein ratio concept in poultry feed preparation as a tool for nitrogen level optimisation is outlined.

Keywords

nitrogen excretionsynthetic amino acidideal amino acid formulationgenetically improved plants
Type
Reviews
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 509 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ALTENBACH, S.B., KUO, C., STARACI, L.C., PEARSON, K.W., WAINWRIGHT, C., GEORGESCU, A. and TOWNSEND, J. (1992) Accumulation of a Brazil nut albumin in seeds of transgenic canola results in enhanced levels of seed protein methionine . Plant Molecular Biology 18: 235-245.Google Scholar
AMDUR, M.O., DULL, J. and KLASSEN, E.D. (1991) Casarett and Doul's Toxicology. 4th ed. (New York, NY, Pergamon Press).Google Scholar
AMIR, R. and TABE, L. (2006) Molecular approaches to improving plant methionine content, in: JAIWAL, P.K. & SINGH, R.P. (Eds) Plant Genetic Engineering: Vol 8 Metabolic Engineering and Molecular Farming - II, pp. 1-26 (Huston, Texas, Studium Press LLC).Google Scholar
AVRAHAM, T., BADANI, H., GALILI, S. and AMIR, R. (2005) Enhanced levels of methionine and cysteine in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plants over-expressing the Arabidopsis cystathionine γ-synthase gene . Plant Biotechnology Journal 3: 71-79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AZEVEDO, R.A., LANCIEN, M. and LEA, P.J. (2006) The aspartic acid metabolic pathway, an exciting and essential pathway in plants . Amino Acids 30: 143-162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BAKER, D.H. (1994) Utilisation of precursors for L-amino acids, in: D'MELLO, J.P.F. (Ed) Amino Acids in Farm Animal Nutrition, pp. 37-61 (Wallingford, UK, CAB International).Google Scholar
BAKER, D.H. and HAN, Y. (1994) Ideal amino acid profile for chicks during the first three weeks posthatching . Poultry Science 73: 1441-1447.Google Scholar
BATTYE, R., BATTYE, W., OVERCASH, C. and FUDGE, S. (1994) Development and selection of ammonia emission factors, final report.Google Scholar
BEAGLE, J.M., APGAR, G.A., JONES, K.L., GRISWOLD, K.E., RADCLIFFE, J.S., QIU, X., LIGHTFOOT, D.A. and IQBAL, M.J. (2006) The digestive fate of Escherichia coli glutamate dehydrogenase deoxyribonucleic acid from transgenic corn in diets fed to weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 84: 597-607.Google Scholar
BEDFORD, M.R. and MORGAN, A.J. (1996) The use of enzymes in poultry diets . World's Poultry Science Journal 52: 61-68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BLAIR, R., JACOB, J.P., IBRAHIM, S. and WANG, P. (1999) A quantitative assessment of reduced protein diets and supplements to improve nitrogen utilisation . The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 8: 25-47.Google Scholar
BRINCH-PEDERSEN, H., GALILI, G., KNUDSEN, S. and HOLM, P.B. (1996) Engineering of the aspartate family biosynthetic pathway in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) by transformation with heterologous genes encoding feed-back-insensitive aspartate kinase and dihydrodipicolinate synthase . Plant Molecular Biology 32: 611-620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CHUNG, T.K. and BAKER, D.H. (1992) Ideal amino acid pattern for 10-kilogram pigs. Journal of Animal Science 70: 3102-3111.Google Scholar
DE LANGE, C.F.M., NYACHOTI, C.M. and VERSTEGEN, M.W.A. (2000) The significance of antinutritional factors in feedstuffs for monogastric animals, in: MOUGHAN, P.J., VERSTEGEN, M.W.A. & VISSER-REYNEVELD, M.I. (Eds) Feed evaluation: principles and practice, pp. 169-188 (Wageningen, Wageningen Press).Google Scholar
EDWARDS, H.M., DOUGLAS, M.W., PARSONS, C.M. and BAKER, D.H. (2000) Protein and energy evaluation of soybean meals processed from genetically modified high-protein soybeans . Poultry Science 79: 525-527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EINSPANIER, R., KLOTZ, A., KRAFT, J., AULRICH, K., POSER, R., SCHWÄGELE, F., JAHREIS, G. and FLACHOWSKY, G. (2001) The fate of forage plant DNA in farm animals: a collaborative case-study investigating cattle and chicken fed recombinant plant material . European Food Research and Technology 212: 129-134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EMMERT, J.L. and BAKER, D.H. (1997) Use of the ideal protein concept for precision formulation of amino acid levels in broiler diets. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 6: 462-470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FERKET, P.R., VAN HEUGTEN, E., VAN KEMPEN, T.A.T.G. and ANGEL, R. (2002) Nutritional strategies to reduce environmental emissions from nonruminants . Journal of Animal science 80: E168-E182.Google Scholar
FERNANDEZ, S.R., AOYAGI, S., HAN, Y., PARSONS, C.M. and BAKER, D.H. (1994) Limiting order of amino acids in corn and soybean meal for growth of the chick . Poultry Science 73: 1887-1896.Google Scholar
FIRMAN, J.D. and BOLING, S.D. (1998) Ideal protein in turkeys. Poultry Science 77:105-110.Google Scholar
FLACHOWSKY, G. (2011) Poultry feed from genetically modified plants . Lohmann Information 46: 43-60.Google Scholar
FLACHOWSKY, G., CHESSON, A. and AULRICH, K. (2005) Animal nutrition with feeds from genetically modified plants . Archives of Animal Nutrition 59: 1-40.Google Scholar
FLACHOWSKY, G. (2013) Influence of feeds from GM plants on composition/quality of food of animal origine, in: FLACHOWSKY, G. (Ed) Animal Nutrition with Transgenic Plants, Ch. 10, pp. 140-155 (Boston, MA, CABI).Google Scholar
FRIZZI, A., HUANG, S., GILBERTSON, L.A., ARMSTRONG, T.A., LUETHY, M.H. and MALVAR, T.M. (2008) Modifying lysine biosynthesis and catabolism in corn with a single bifunctional expression/silencing transgene cassette . Plant Biotechnology Journal 6: 13-21.Google Scholar
FRIZZI, A., CALDO, R.A., MORRELL, J.A., WANG, M., LUTFIYYA, L.L., BROWN, W.E., MALVAR, T.M. and HUANG, S. (2010) Compositional and transcriptional analyses of reduced zein kernels derived from the opaque2 mutation and RNAi suppression . Plant Molecular Biology 73: 569-585.Google Scholar
GALILI, G. and AMIR, R. (2013) Fortifying plants with the essential amino acids lysine and methionine to improve nutritional quality . Plant Biotechnology Journal 11: 211-222.Google Scholar
HAGAN, N.D., UPADHYAYA, N., TABE, L.M. and HIGGINS, T.J.V. (2003) The redistribution of protein sulphur in transgenic rice expressing a gene for a foreign, sulphur-rich protein . The Plant Journal 34: 1-11.Google Scholar
KESHAVARZ, K. and AUSTIC, R.E. (2004) The use of low-protein, low-phosphorus, amino acid- and phytase-supplemented diets on laying hen performance and nitrogen and phosphorus excretion. Poultry Science 83: 75-83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KIM, J.H., PATTERSON, P.H. and KIM, W.K. (2014) Impact of dietary crude protein, synthetic amino acid and keto acid formulation on nitrogen excretion. International Journal of Poultry Science 13: 429-436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KRISTENSEN, H.H. and WATHES, C.M. (2000) Ammonia and poultry welfare: a review . World's Poultry Science Journal 56: 235-245.Google Scholar
LATSHAW, J.D. and ZHAO, L. (2011) Dietary protein effects on hen performance and nitrogen excretion . Poultry Science 90: 99-106.Google Scholar
LEE, T.T.T., WANG, M.M.C., HOU, R.C.W., CHEN, L., SU, R., WANG, C. and TZEN, J.T.C. (2003) Enhanced methionine and cysteine levels in transgenic rice seeds by the accumulation of sesame 2S albumin . Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 67: 1699-1705.Google Scholar
LUCAS, D.M., TAYLOR, M.L., HARTNELL, G.F., NEMETH, M.A., GLENN, K.C. and DAVIS, S.W. (2007) Broiler performance and carcass characteristics when fed diets containing lysine maize (LY038 or LY038 × MON 810), control, or conventional reference maize . Poultry Science 86: 2152-2161.Google Scholar
MALOMO, G.A., BOLU, S.A. and OLUTADE, S.G. (2013) Effects of dietary crude protein on performance and nitrogen economy of broilers. Sustainable Agriculture Research 2: 52-57.Google Scholar
MELUZZI, A., SIRRI, F., TALLARICO, N. and FARACHINI, A. (2010) Nitrogen retention and performance of brown laying hens on diets with different protein content and constant concentration of amino acids and energy. British Poultry Science 42: 213-217.Google Scholar
MOLVIG, L., TABE, L.M., EGGUM, B.O., MOORE, A.E., CRAIG, S., SPENCER, D. and HIGGINS, T.J.V. (1997) Enhanced methionine levels and increased nutritive value of seeds of transgenic lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L.) expressing a sunflower seed albumingene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94: 8393-8398.Google Scholar
MOORE, P.A. (1998) Best management practices for poultry manure utilisation that enhance agricultural productivity and reduce pollution. In Animal Waste Utilisation: Effective Use of Manure as a Soil Resource. Chelsea, Mich., Ann Arbor Press.Google Scholar
NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (1994) Nutrient requirements of poultry (Washington, D.C., National Academy Press).Google Scholar
OVIEDO-RONDÓN, E.O. and WALDROUP, P.W. (2002) Models to estimate amino acid requirements for broiler chickens: A review . International Journal of Poultry Science 1: 106-113.Google Scholar
PATTERSON, P.H. (2002) Using dietary and management strategies to reduce the nutrient excretion of poultry, in: Livestock and Poultry Environmental Stewardship (LPES) Curriculum, pp. 7-19 (Ames, IA, Midwest Plant Service (MWPS Publisher)).Google Scholar
PATTERSON, P.H. (2005) Air emissions and poultry production symposium: Introduction . The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 14: 612-612.Google Scholar
RAVINDRAN, V. (2013) Feed enzymes: The science, practice, and metabolic realities . The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 22: 628-636.Google Scholar
RAVINDRAN, V., TABE, L.M., MOLVIG, L., HIGGINS, T.J.V. and BRYDEN, W.L. (2002) Nutritional evaluation of transgenic high-methionine lupins (Lupinus angustifolius L) with broiler chickens . Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 82: 280-285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REYES, A.R., BONIN, C.P., HOUMARD, N.M., HUANG, S. and MALVAR, T.M. (2009) Genetic manipulation of lysine catabolism in maize kernels . Plant Molecular Biology 69: 81-89.Google Scholar
RICKE, S.C. and SAENGKERDSUB, S. (2015) Bacillus probiotics and biologicals for improving animal and human health: Current applications and future prospects, in: RAVISHANKAR RAI, V. & JAMUNA BAI, A. (Eds) Beneficial Microbes in Fermented and Functional Foods, Ch.19, pp. 341-360 (Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group).Google Scholar
ROBEL, E. and MENGE, H. (1973) Performance of chicks fed an amino acid profile diet based on carcass composition . Poultry Science 52: 1219-1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SANDSTEDT, C.A. (1990) Nitrates: Sources and their effects upon humans and livestock. (Washington, D.C., The American University Press).Google Scholar
SLOAN, D.R., HARMS, R.H., BARNARD, D. and NORDSTEDT, R. (1995) Effect of diet on feces composition and the implications on environmental quality . The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 4: 379-383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOMMER, S.G. and HUTCHINGS, N.J. (2001) Ammonia emission from field applied manure and its reduction - invited paper . European Journal of Agronomy 15: 1-15.Google Scholar
STEPANSKY, A., LESS, H., ANGELOVICI, R., AHARON, R., ZHU, X. and GALILI, G. (2006) Lysine catabolism, an effective versatile regulator of lysine level in plants. Amino Acids. 30: 121-125.Google Scholar
SUMMERS, J.D. (1993) Reducing nitrogen excretion of the laying hen by feeding lower crude protein diets . Poultry Science 72: 1473-1478.Google Scholar
SWIATKIEWICZ, S. and ARCZEWSKA-WŁOSEK, A. (2011) Prospects for the use of genetically modified crops with improved nutritional properties as feed materials in poultry nutrition. World's Poultry Science Journal 67: 631-642.Google Scholar
TONY, M.A., BUTSCHKE, A., BROLL, H., GROHMANN, L., ZAGON, J., HALLE, I., DÄNICKE, S., SCHAUZU, M., HAFEZ, H.M. and FLACHOWSKY, G. (2003) Safety assessment of BT 176 Maise in broiler nutrition: Degradation of maise-DNA and its metabolic fate . Archives of Animal Nutrition 57: 235-252.Google Scholar
TUFARELLI, V., SELVAGGI, M., DARIO, C. and LAUDADIO, V. (2015) Genetically modified feeds in poultry diet: Safety, performance, and product quality . Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 55: 562-569.Google Scholar
UFAZ, S. and GALILI, G. (2008) Improving the content of essential amino acids in crop plants: Goals and opportunities. Plant Physiology 147: 954-961.Google Scholar
WALDROUP, P.W. (2000) Feeding programs for broilers: The challenge of low protein diets. Proceedings of 47th Maryland Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers., University of Maryland, College Park, MD., pp. 119-134.Google Scholar
WENEFRIDA, I., UTOMO, H.S., BLANCHE, S.B. and LINSCOMBE, S.D. (2009) Enhancing essential amino acids and health benefit components in grain crops for improved nutritional values. Recent Patents on DNA & Gene Sequences 3: 219-225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
YU, J., PENG, P., ZHANG, X., ZHAO, Q., ZHU, D., SUN, X., LIU, J. and AO, G. (2005) Seed-specific expression of the lysine-rich protein gene sb401 significantly increases both lysine and total protein content in maize seeds. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 26: 427-431.Google Scholar
YUE, J., LI, C., ZHAO, Q., ZHU, D. and YU, J. (2014) Seed-specific expression of a lysine-rich protein gene, GhLRP, from cotton significantly increases the lysine content in maize seeds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15: 5350-5365.Google Scholar