Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:11:21.432Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent developments in DNA vaccination approaches against poultry coccidiosis and its future endeavours

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2014

M.A.A. SHAH ,
S. UMAR ,
M.F. IQBAL ,
F. REHMAN ,
I. QADRI  and
N. HE
M.A.A. SHAH
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China Department of Path biology, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
S. UMAR
Affiliation:
Department of Path biology, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
M.F. IQBAL
Affiliation:
Department of Path biology, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
F. REHMAN
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
I. QADRI
Affiliation:
King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
N. HE*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The world poultry industry is under great stress due to parasitic diseases; coccidiosis being one which is responsible for substantial economic losses worldwide. In 1948 the first research paper was published about the treatment of coccidiosis with sulphaquinoxaline. After six decades, researcher's attention has focused on DNA vaccination, especially as certain anticoccidials have failed due to drug resistance and residues. Thus far vaccination is partially successful but is accompanied by disadvantages: e.g. instability, inferiority control, cost-effectiveness, and inefficiency in opposition to a large number of coccidian strains which are prevalent in different geographical areas. Due to developments whereby genetically engineered DNA can be administered in vaccine form to provoke cellular and humoral immune responses; there has been huge development in the practical application of this field. In the last decade a number of DNA vaccines employing different strategies have been tested to produce appropriate immune responses against coccidiosis. The DNA fragments taken from all the four important species, E. tenella, E. necatrix, E. maxima and E. acervulina were able to provoke appropriate immune responses against challenging infections with homologous species; however, most of them were not able to provoke a response with heterologous infection. The shared DNA antigen in two different species of Eimeria; E. tenella and E. acervulina was able to produce sufficient immune responses, not only against these species but also against E. necatrix, but not against E. maxima. E. maximum is the biggest and most complex of all the seven species and it has come ahead as a challenge for DNA vaccine researchers.

Keywords

coccidiosisDNA vaccinationpoultry
Type
Review Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 315 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABBAS, R.Z., IQBAL, Z., BLAKE, D., KHAN, M.N. and SALEEMI, M.K. (2011) Anticoccidial drug resistance in fowl coccidia: the state of play revisited. World's Poultry Science Journal 67: 337-350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ALLEN, P.C. and FETTERER, R.H. (2002) Recent advances in biology and immunobiology of Eimeria species and in diagnosis and control of infection with these coccidian parasites of poultry. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 15: 58-65.Google Scholar
ALI, R., ALI, S., SAQIB, S.A., AZEEM, T., SHAH, M.A.A. and UMAR, S. (2014) Effects of chromium in meat and egg production in poultry-A review. Science Letters 2: 1-4.Google Scholar
ARNON, R., TARRAB-HAZDAI, R. and STEWARD, M. (2000) A mimotope peptide-based vaccine against Schistosoma mansoni: synthesis and characterisation. Immunology 101: 555-562.Google Scholar
BURGERS, W.A., VAN HARMELEN, J.H., SHEPHARD, E., ADAMS, C., MGWEBI, T., BOURN, W., HANKE, T., WILLIAMSON, A.L and WILLIAMSON, C. (2006) Design and preclinical evaluation of a multigene human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype C DNA vaccine for clinical trial. The Journal of General Virology 87: 399-410.Google Scholar
CONG, H., GU, Q.M., YIN, H.E., WANG, J.W., ZHAO, Q.L., ZHOU, H.Y., LI, Y. and ZHANG, J.Q. (2008) Multi-epitope DNA vaccine linked to the A2/B subunit of cholera toxin protect mice against Toxoplasma gondii. Vaccine 26: 3913-3921.Google Scholar
COOMBES, A.L. and CRAWFORD, G.R. (1996) Chicken anaemia virus: a short review. World's Poultry Science Journal 52: 267-277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DING, X., LILLEHOJ, H.S., DALLOUL, R.A., MIN, W., SATO, T., YASUDA, A. and LILLEHOJ, E.P. (2005) In ovo vaccination with the Eimeria tenella EtMIC2 gene induces protective immunity against coccidiosis. Vaccine 23: 3733-3740.Google Scholar
GURUNATHAN, S., KLINMAN, D.M. and SEDER, R.A. (2000) DNA vaccines: immunology, application, and optimisation. Annual Review of Immunology 18: 927-974.Google Scholar
HUYGEN, K., CONTENT, J., DENIS, O., MONTGOMERY, D.L., YAWMAN, A.M., DECK, R.R., DEWITT, C.M., ORME, I.M., BALDWIN, S., D'SOUZA, C., DROWART, A., LOZES, E., VANDENBUSSCHE, P., VAN VOOREN, J.P., LIU, M.A. and ULMER, J.B. (1996) Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a tuberculosis DNA vaccine. Nature Medicine 2: 893-898.Google Scholar
JENKINS, M.C. (1998) Progress on developing a recombinant coccidiosis vaccine. International Journal for Parasitology 28: 1111-1119.Google Scholar
JIE, H. and LIU, Y.P. (2011) Breeding for disease resistance in poultry: opportunities with challenges. World's Poultry Science Journal 67: 687-696.Google Scholar
KHAN, A.A., SABRI, A.N., MANSOOR, M.K. and HUSSAIN, I. (2005) Hydropericardium syndrome in Pakistan: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 647-654.Google Scholar
KHATRI, K., GOYAL, A.K. and VYAS, S.P. (2008) Potential of nanocarriers in genetic immunisation. Recent Patents On Drug Delivery & Formulation 2: 68-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLOTZ, C., GEHRE, F., LUCIUS, R. and POGONKA, T. (2007) Identification of Eimeria tenella genes encoding for secretory proteins and evaluation of candidates by DNA immunisation studies in chickens. Vaccine 25: 6625-6634.Google Scholar
LILLEHOJ, H.S., CHOI, K.D., JENKINS, M.C., VAKHARIA, V.N., SONG, K.D., HAN, J.Y. and LILLEHOJ, E.P. (2000) A recombinant Eimeria protein inducing interferon-gamma production: comparison of different gene expression systems and immunisation strategies for vaccination against coccidiosis. Avian Diseases 44: 379-389.Google Scholar
LILLEHOJ, H.S., DING, X., QUIROZ, M.A., BEVENSEE, E. and LILLEHOJ, E.P. (2005) Resistance to intestinal coccidiosis following DNA immunisation with the cloned 3-1E Eimeria gene plus IL-2, IL-15, and IFN-gamma. Avian Diseases 49: 112-117.Google Scholar
LOWENTHAL, J.W., JOHNSON, M.A., TYACK, S.G., HILTON, L.S. and BEAN, A.G.D. (2005) Oral delivery of novel therapeutics: development of a fowl adenovirus vector expressing chicken IL-2 and MGF. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 87-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCDONALD, V. and SHIRLEY, M.W. (2009) Past and future: vaccination against Eimeria. Parasitology 136: 1477-1489.Google Scholar
OSHOP, G.L., ELANKUMARAN, S. and HECKERT, R.A. (2002) DNA vaccination in the avian. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 89: 1-12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PEEK, H.W. and LANDMAN, W.J. (2011) Coccidiosis in poultry: anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies. The Veterinary Quarterly 31: 143-161.Google Scholar
REDDING, L. and WEINER, D.B. (2009) DNA vaccines in veterinary use. Expert Review of Vaccines 8: 1251-1276.Google Scholar
SCORZA, T., GRUBB, K., SMOOKER, P., RAINCZUK, A., PROLL, D. and SPITHILL, T.W. (2005) Induction of strain-transcending immunity against Plasmodium chabaudi adami malaria with a multiepitope DNA vaccine. Infection and Immunity 73: 2974-2985.Google Scholar
SHAH, M.A., SONG, X., XU, L., YAN, R. and LI, X. (2011) Construction of DNA vaccines encoding Eimeria acervulina cSZ-2 with chicken IL-2 and IFN-gamma and their efficacy against poultry coccidiosis. Research in Veterinary Science 90: 72-77.Google Scholar
SHAH, M.A.A. (2013) DNA vaccines as sustainable Coccidiosis control strategies in chickens. Science Letters 1: 1-4.Google Scholar
SHAH, M.A., SONG, X., XU, L., YAN, R., SONG, H., RUIRUI, Z., CHENGYU, L. and LI, X. (2010a) The DNA-induced protective immunity with chicken interferon gamma against poultry coccidiosis. Parasitology Research 107: 747-750.Google Scholar
SHAH, M.A., XU, L., YAN, R., SONG, X. and LI, X. (2010b) Cross immunity of DNA vaccine pVAX1-cSZ2-IL-2 to Eimeria tenella, E. necatrix and E. maxima. Experimental Parasitology 124: 330-333.Google Scholar
SHAH, M.A., YAN, R., XU, L., SONG, X. and LI, X. (2010c) A recombinant DNA vaccine encoding Eimeria acervulina cSZ-2 induces immunity against experimental E. tenella infection. Veterinary Parasitology 169: 185-189.Google Scholar
SHARMAN, P.A., SMITH, N.C., WALLACH, M.G. and KATRIB, M. (2010) Chasing the golden egg: vaccination against poultry coccidiosis. Parasite Immunology 32: 590-598.Google Scholar
SHINODA, K., XIN, K.Q., JOUNAI, N., KOJIMA, Y., TAMURA, Y., OKADA, E., KAWAMOTO, S., OKUDA, K., KLINMAN, D. and OKUDA, K. (2004) Polygene DNA vaccine induces a high level of protective effect against HIV-vaccinia virus challenge in mice. Vaccine 22: 3676-3690.Google Scholar
SHIRLEY, M.W. (1992) Research on avian coccidia: an update. The British Veterinary Journal 148: 479-499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SHIRLEY, M.W. and BEDRNIK, P. (1997) Live attenuated vaccines against avian coccidiosis: Success with precocious and egg-adapted lines of Eimeria. Parasitology Today 13: 481-484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SHIRLEY, M.W., SMITH, A.L. and BLAKE, D.P. (2007) Challenges in the successful control of the avian coccidia. Vaccine 25: 5540-5547.Google Scholar
SHIRLEY, M.W., SMITH, A.L. and TOMLEY, F.M. (2005) The biology of avian Eimeria with an emphasis on their control by vaccination. Advances in Parasitology 60: 285-330.Google Scholar
SONG, H., YAN, R., XU, L., SONG, X., SHAH, M.A., ZHU, H. and LI, X. (2010) Efficacy of DNA vaccines carrying Eimeria acervulina lactate dehydrogenase antigen gene against coccidiosis. Experimental Parasitology 126: 224-231.Google Scholar
SONG, K.D., LILLEHOJ, H.S., CHOI, K.D., YUN, C.H., PARCELLS, M.S., HUYNH, J.T. and HAN, J.Y. (2000) A DNA vaccine encoding a conserved Eimeria protein induces protective immunity against live Eimeria acervulina challenge. Vaccine 19: 243-252.Google Scholar
SONG, X., XU, L., YAN, R., HUANG, X., SHAH, M.A. and LI, X. (2009) The optimal immunisation procedure of DNA vaccine pcDNA-TA4-IL-2 of Eimeria tenella and its cross-immunity to Eimeria necatrix and Eimeria acervulina. Veterinary Parasitology 159: 30-36.Google Scholar
TALEBI, A. and MULCAHY, G. (2005) Partial protection against Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria tenella induced by synthetic peptide vaccine. Experimental Parasitology 110: 342-348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TIAN, L., WANG, H.N., LU, D., ZHANG, Y.F., WANG, T. and KANG, R.M. (2008) The immunoreactivity of a chimeric multi-epitope DNA vaccine against IBV in chickens. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 377: 221-225.Google Scholar
TOMLEY, F.M. (1994) Characterisation of rhoptry proteins of Eimeria tenella sporozoites: antigenic diversity of rhoptry epitopes within species of the genus Eimeria and among three asexual generations of a single species, E. tenella. Infection and Immunity 62: 4656-4658.Google Scholar
TOMLEY, F.M., BUMSTEAD, J.M., BILLINGTON, K.J. and DUNN, P.P. (1996) Molecular cloning and characterisation of a novel acidic microneme protein (Etmic-2) from the apicomplexan protozoan parasite, Eimeria tenella. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 79: 195-206.Google Scholar
UGEN, K.E., NYLAND, S.B., BOYER, J.D., VIDAL, C., LERA, L., RASHEID, S., CHATTERGOON, M., BAGARAZZI, M.L., CICCARELLI, R., HIGGINS, T., BAINE, Y., GINSBERG, R., MACGREGOR, R.R. and WEINER, D.B. (1998) DNA vaccination with HIV-1 expressing constructs elicits immune responses in humans. Vaccine 16: 1818-1821.Google Scholar
ULLAH, S., RIAZ, N., UMAR, S. and SHAH, M.A.A. (2013) DNA Vaccines against Avian Influenza: current research and future prospects. World's Poultry Science Journal 69: 125-134.Google Scholar
VERMEULEN, A.N. (1998) Progress in recombinant vaccine development against coccidiosis. A review and prospects into the next millennium. International Journal for Parasitology 28: 1121-1130.Google Scholar
VERMEULEN, A.N., KOK, J.J., VAN DEN BOOGAART, P., DIJKEMA, R. and CLAESSENS, J.A. (1993) Eimeria refractile body proteins contain two potentially functional characteristics: transhydrogenase and carbohydrate transport. FEMS Microbiology Letters 110: 223-229.Google Scholar
VERMEULEN, A.N., SCHAAP, D.C. and SCHETTERS, T.P. (2001) Control of coccidiosis in chickens by vaccination. Veterinary Parasitology 100: 13-20.Google Scholar
WATTS, A.M. and KENNEDY, R.C. (1999) DNA vaccination strategies against infectious diseases. International Journal for Parasitology 29: 1149-1163.Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, R.B. (2002) Anticoccidial vaccines for broiler chickens: pathways to success. Avian pathology : Journal of the W.V.P.A 31: 317-353.Google Scholar
WU, S.Q., WANG, M., LIU, Q., ZHU, Y.J., SUO, X. and JIANG, J.S. (2004) Construction of DNA vaccines and their induced protective immunity against experimental Eimeria tenella infection. Parasitology Research 94: 332-336.Google Scholar
XU, Q., SONG, X., XU, L., YAN, R., SHAH, M.A. and LI, X. (2008) Vaccination of chickens with a chimeric DNA vaccine encoding Eimeria tenella TA4 and chicken IL-2 induces protective immunity against coccidiosis. Veterinary Parasitology 156: 319-323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed