Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:03:59.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Random Sample Performance Testing of Poultry in the U.S.A.(1)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

Gordon E. Dickerson
Gordon E. Dickerson
Affiliation:
Geneticist, Kimber Farms, Inc., Fremont, California
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 1965 , pp. 345 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abplanalp, H., and Marrou, L. F., 1961. Genotype-environment interaction in field tests of poultry. Poultry Sci. 40: 1368–1369.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Service, U. S. D. A. 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965. Report of egg production tests Combined Summaries. A.R.S. 44-79-1, 2, 3,4,5. U.S. Derpt Agr., Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Council of American Official Poultry Tests, 1958. Report Number 20. Production records for the period 1957–58. D. R. Marble, Secy-Treas. Poultry Dept., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N.Y. Also Reports 1 through 19 for 1938–39 through 1956–57.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E., 1956. Sources of variation in performance of entries in the 4th, 5th and 6 th California random sample egg production tests. Proc. 9th Pacific Chicken and Turkey Breede rs Roundtable 9: 67–74.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E., 1961. Implications of genetic-environmental interaction in animal breeding. Animal Production 4: 47–63.Google Scholar
Dickerson, G. E., 1961. Implications of genetic-environmental interaction in animal breeding. Poultry Sci. 39: 1244 (1960).Google Scholar
Godfrey, G. F., Williams, C. and Marshall, C. E., 1953. Relative influence of egg size age at sexual matirity and mature body weight on growth to twelve weeks of age. Poultry Sci. 31: 496–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, K., 1961. Effect of hatching egg size and chick size upon subsequent growth rate in chickens. Poultry Sci. 40: 1408–1409.Google Scholar
Hill, J. F., and Nordskog, A. W., 1956. Efficiency of performance testing of poultry. Poultry Sci. 35: 256–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, S. C., and Bray, D. F., 1959. Competition between strains of chickens in separate versus intermingled flocks. Poultry Sci. 38: 86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, S. C., Carlson, J. R. and Doolittle, D. P.. 1959. The Connecticut and Cornell random-br ed populations of chickens. World's Poultry Sci. Jour. 15: 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosin, I. L., Abplanalp, H., Gutierrez, J. and Carver, J. S., 1952. The influence of egg size on subsequent early growth of the chick. Poultry Sci. 32: 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordskog, A. W., and Kempthorne, O., 1960. Importancc of genotype-environment interactions in random sample poultry tests. Biok Genetics 159–168. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, L. J., and Nordskog, A. W.. 1961. Influence of parent flock source on poultry performance. Poultry Sci. 41: 1578–1585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar