Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:38:52.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional and health-promoting aspects of poultry meat and its processed products

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

J. STANGIERSKI  and
G. LESNIEROWSKI
J. STANGIERSKI*
Affiliation:
Department of Food Quality Management, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 31, 60-631 Poznań, Poland
G. LESNIEROWSKI
Affiliation:
Department of Food Quality Management, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 31, 60-631 Poznań, Poland
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In view of the increasing public awareness of the relationship between healthy diet and prevention of many diseases, particularly civilisation-related diseases, producers are trying to focus consumers’ attention on the health-promoting components found in poultry meat or introduced to final products. The health-promoting quality of poultry meat may be improved by undertaking certain animal management measures (genetic and nutritional factors), reducing undesirable components, adding individual biocomponents and applying appropriate technological measures. These include changing fatty acid profiles, increased content of bioactive protein and reduced content of sodium chloride, nitrates and nitrites. At present research is being conducted on methods to enrich the composition of meat and its processed products with bioactive substances such as vitamins, polyunsaturated fatty acids and other beneficial components, e.g. fibre.

Keywords

functional foodpoultrymodification
Type
Reviews
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 71 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ASKIN, O.O. and KILIC, B. (2009) Effect of microbial transglutaminase, sodium caseinate and non-fat dry milk on quality of salt-free, low fat turkey döner kebab. LWT-Food Science and Technology 42: 1590-1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BARROETA, A.C. (2006) Nutritive value of poultry meat: Relationship between vitamin E and PUFA. Worlds Poultry Science Journal 63: 277-284.Google Scholar
BETTI, M., SCHIEBER, A., CURTIS, J.M. and GODDARD, E. (2010) Protein Isolation from Mechanically Separated Turkey Meat (MSTM). University of Alberta, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, ©Yuliya Victorivna Hrynets, Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar
BIAZIK, E., KOPEĆ, W., PUDŁO, A. and SKIBA, T. (2011) Biologically active histidine dipeptides-functional components of poultry meat, in: TRZISZKA, T., BOBOK, Ł. & KAŹMIERSKA, M. (Eds) Selected problems of nutraceutical and functional food (Wyd. UP, Wrocław).Google Scholar
BOON, C.S., XU, Z., YUE, X., MCCLEMENTS, D.J., WEISS, J. and DECKER, E.A. (2008) Factors affecting lycopene oxidation in oil-in-water emulsions. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 56: 1408-1414.Google Scholar
BRAUER, H. (2005) Fettarm und dabei ballaststoffreich. Fleischwirtschaft 1: 39-40.Google Scholar
BREWER, M.S., MC KEITH, F., MARTIN, S.E., DALLMIER, A.W. and MEYER, J. (1991) Sodium lactate effects on shelf life, sensory and physical characteristics of fresh pork sausage . Journal of Food Science 56: 1176-1178.Google Scholar
COFRADES, S., LOPEZ-LOPEZ, I., RUIZ-CAPILLAS, C., TRIKI, M. and JIMENEZ-COLMENERO, F. (2011) Quality characteristics of low-salt restructured poultry with microbial transglutaminase and seaweed. Meat Science 87: 373-380.Google Scholar
COUSSEMENT, P.A.A. (1999) Inulin and oligofructose: safe intakes and legal status. Journal of Nutrition 129 (supplement): 14125-14175.Google Scholar
DASIEWICZ, K., SŁOWIŃSKI, M. and GAŁĘZIEWSKI, R. (2005) Próba zastosowania błonnika pszennego VITACEL® do produkcji drobno rozdrobnionych wyrobów garmażeryjnych z mięsa drobiowego. Mięso i Wędliny 2: 30-34 (in Polish).Google Scholar
DESMOND, E. (2006) Reducing salt: A challenge for the meat industry. Meat Science 74: 188-196.Google Scholar
DIMITRAKOPOULOU, M.A., AMBROSIADIS, J.A., ZETOU, F.K. and BLOUKAS, J.G. (2005) Effect of salt and transglutaminase (TG) level and processing conditions on quality characteristics of phosphate-free, cooek, restructured pork shoulder. Meat Science 70: 743-749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EDWARDS, R.A., DAINTY, R.H., HIBARD, C.M. and RAMANTANIS, S.V. (1987) Amines in fresh beef of normal pH and the role of bacteria in changes in concentration observed during storage in vacuum packs at chill temperatures. The Journal of Applied Bacteriology 63: 427-434.Google Scholar
EFSA JOURNAL (2012) Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of taurine as a feed additive for all animal species. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy.Google Scholar
FLOROWSKI, T., ADAMCZAK, L., HERNÁNDEZ, I.F., FRANCO, M.B.M. and TYBURCY, A. (2010) Ocena wpływu stopnia substytucji tłuszczu inuliną na wybrane wyróżniki jakości modelowych kiełbas. Nauka Przyroda Technologie 4: 1-9 (in Polish).Google Scholar
GAJOWIECKI, L., KOTOWICZ, M., LACHOWICZ, K., DĄBROWSKI, W., KORONKIEWICZ, A., ŻOCHOWSKA-KUJAWSKA, J., SOBCZAK, M. and ŻYCH, A. (2005) Zastosowanie mleczanów do produkcji wyrobów drobiowych niezawierających dodatku azotanu(III) sodu. Żywność Nauka Technologia Jakość 3 (44): 86-99 (in Polish).Google Scholar
GANESAN, K., ZOERB, H., MULLALLY, G., WEIGLE, D. and ADAMS, T. (2007) Ingredient systems comprising trehalose, food products containing trehalose, and methods of making same. Patent No. US, 2007-670920, 20071220-200712247.Google Scholar
GRANADO-LORENCIO, F., LÓPEZ-LÓPEZ, I., HERRERO-BARBUDO, C., BLANCO-NAVARRO, I., COFRADES, S., PÉREZ-SACRISTÁN, B., DELGADO-PANDO, G. and JIMÉNEZ-COLMENERO, F. (2010) Lutein-enriched frankfurter-type products: Physicochemical characteristics and lutein in vitro bioaccesibility. Food Chemistry 120: 741-748.Google Scholar
GRAY, J.L. (1981) Investigation into the formation of N-nitrosoamines in heat chicken frankfurters. Journal of Food Science 46: 1817-1819.Google Scholar
GIVENS, D.I. (2009) Animal nutrition and lipids in animal products and their contribution to human intake and health. Nutrients 1: 71-82.Google Scholar
HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, E., PONCE-ALQUICIRA, E., JARAMILO-FLORES, M.E. and COERRERO LEGARRETA, I. (2009) Antioxidant effect of rosemary (Rosemarinus officinalis L.) and oregano (Origanum vulgare L.) extracts on TBARS and colour of model raw pork batters. Meat Science 81: 410-417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOFFMANN, M., WASZKIEWICZ-ROBAK, B. and ŚWIDERSKI, F. (2010) Functional food of animals origin, meat and meat products. Nauka Przyroda Technologie 4 (5): #63 (online: http://www.npt.up-poznan.net/pub/art_4_63.pdf).Google Scholar
HU, X., HONGTRAKUL, K., JI, C., MA, Q., GUAN, S., SONG, C., ZHANG, Y. and ZHAO, L. (2009) Effect of carnosine on growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality and oxidative stability in broiler chickens. Journal of Poultry Science 46: 296-302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INSEL, P., TURNER, R.E. and ROSS, D. (2001) Nutrition. Jones & Bartlett Pub., Boston, Toronto.Google Scholar
INTRAOICHET, K.O. and MAIKHUNTAND, B. (2005) Genotype and gender differences in carnosine extracts and antioxidant activities of chicken breast and thigh meats. Meat Science 71: 634-642.Google Scholar
JAFARI, M. and EMAM-DJOMEH, Z. (2007) Reducing nitrite content in hot dogs by hurdle technology. Food Control 18: 1488-1493.Google Scholar
JANKIEWICZ, L. and SŁOWIŃSKI, M. (2007) Mięso drobiowe jako żywność funkcjonalna. W: Mięso i Wędliny. Cz. 5. Red. B. Wciślińska. Polskie Wydawnictwo Fachowe Sp. z o.o. Warszawa: pp. 14-15 (in Polish).Google Scholar
JÁNVÁRY, L. (2005) Ballaststoff als Fettersatz. Fleischwirtschaft 85: 22-23.Google Scholar
JIMÉNEZ-COLMENERO, F. and CARBALLO, J. (2005) Physicochemical properties of low sodium frankfurter with added walnut: effect of transglutaminase combined with caseinate, KCl and dietary fibre as salt replacers. Meat Science 69: 781-788.Google Scholar
JIMÉNEZ-COLMENERO, F. (2007) Functional foods based on meat products, in: HUI, Y.H. (Ed) Handbook of Food Products Manufacturing: Principles, Bakery, Beverages, Cereals, Cheese, Confectionary, Fats, Fruits and Functional Foods (John Woley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Google Scholar
KALAČ, P. (2006) Biologically active polyamines in beef, pork and meat products: A review. Meat Science 73: 1-11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KONJUFCA, V.H., PESTI, G.M. and BAKALLI, R.I. (1997) Modulation of cholesterol levels in broiler meat by dietary garlic and copper. Poultry Science 76: 1264-1271.Google Scholar
KUNACHOWICZ, H., NADOLNA, I., PRZYGODA, B. and IWANOW, K. (1998) Food Composition Tables. Instytut Żywności i Żywienia, Warszawa.Google Scholar
MACIOŁEK, H. and GIESZCZ, A. (2009) Stymulujące oddziaływanie biokomponentów w paszy treściwej na kształtowanie wartości odżywczej, prozdrowotnej i sensorycznej produktów pochodzenia drobiowego (mięsa i jaj). Polskie Drobiarstwo 5: 1-4 (in Polish).Google Scholar
MENDOZA, E., GARCIA, M., CASAS, C. and SELGAS, M. (2001) Inulin as fat substitute in low fat, dry fermented sausages. Meat Science 57: 387-393.Google Scholar
MEULEN, B. and VELDE, M. (2008) Functional foods, in: European Food Law Handbook (Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands).Google Scholar
MORRISSEY, P.A., SHEEHY, P.J.A., GALVIN, K., KERRY, J.P. and BUCKLEY, D.J. (1998) Lipid stability in meat and meat products. Meat Science 49: 73-86.Google Scholar
MUGURUMA, M., TSURUOKA, K., KATAYAMA, K., ERWANTO, Y., KAWAHARA, S., YAMAUCHI, K., SATHE, S.K. and SOEDA, T. (2003) Soybean and milk proteins modified by transglutaminase improves chicken sausage texture even at reduced levels of phosphate. Meat Science 63: 191-197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NISTOR, E., BAMPIDIS, V.A., PĂCALĂ, N., PENTEA, M., TOZER, J. and PRUNDEANU, H. (2013) Nutrient content of rabbit meat as compared to chicken, beef and pork meat. Journal of Animal Production Advances 3 (4): 172-176Google Scholar
PEIRETTI, P.G., MEDANA, C., VISENTIN, S., GIANCOTTI, V., ZUNINO, V. and MEINERI, G. (2011) Determination of carnosine, anserine, homocarnosine, pentosidine and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances contents in meat from different animal species. Food Chemistry 126: 1939-1947.Google Scholar
PISULEWSKI, P.M. (2005) Nutritional potential for improving meat quality in poultry. Animal Science Papers and Reports 23 (4): 303-315.Google Scholar
PONTE, P.I.P., MENDES, I., QUARESMA, M., AGUIAR, M.N.M., LEMOS, J.P.C., FERREIRA, L.M.A., SOARES, M.A.C., ALFAIA, C.M., PRATES, J.A.M. and FONTES, C.M.G.A. (2004) Cholesterol levels and sensory characteristics of meat from broilers consuming moderate to high levels of alfalfa. Poultry Science 83: 810-814.Google Scholar
RANDELL, A.W. (2010) The Codex Alimentarius and Food Labelling; delivering consumer protection. Innovations in food labelling. ALBERT, J. (Ed.) (Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC, UK).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REGULATION (EC) NO 1924/2006 of the European Parliament, of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods.Google Scholar
REGULATION (EC) NO 1169//2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers.Google Scholar
REGULATION (EC) NO 609/2013 of the European Parliament, of the Council of 12 June 2013 on food intended for infants, young children, food for special medical purposes and and total diet replacement for weight control.Google Scholar
ROMANS, J.R., COSTELLO, W.J., CARLSON, C.W., GREASER, M.L. and JONES, K.W. (1994) The meat we eat. (13th Ed.) Interstate Publisher, Inc., Danville, IL.Google Scholar
RUIZ-CAPILLAS, C. and JIMÉNEZ-COLMENERO, F. (2004a) Biogenic amines in meat and meat products. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 44: 489-599.Google Scholar
RUIZ-CAPILLAS, C. and JIMÉNEZ-COLMENERO, F. (2004b) Biogenic amine content in Spanish retail market meat products treated with protective atmosphere and high pressure. European Food Research and Technology 218: 237-241.Google Scholar
SANG, H. (2003) Genetically modified livestock and poultry and their potential effects on human health and nutrition. Trends in Food Science & Technology 14: 253-263.Google Scholar
SEBRANEK, J.C. and BACUS, J.N. (2007) Cured meat products without direct addition of nitrate and nitrite: What are the issues? Meat Science 77: 136-147.Google Scholar
SŁOWIŃSKI, M. and JANKIEWICZ, L. (2011a) Mięso i przetwory mięsne żywnością funkcjonalną. Gospodarka MięsnaCz. 1. 4: 10-1 (in Polish).Google Scholar
SŁOWIŃSKI, M. AND JANKIEWICZ and L. (2011b) Mięso i przetwory mięsne żywnością funkcjonalną. Gospodarka Mięsna,Cz. II 5: 18-22 (in Polish).Google Scholar
SMOLIŃSKA, T., KORZENIOWSKA, M. and ŻECHAŁKO-CZAJKOWSKA, A. (2009) Żywność funkcjonalna z mięsa drobiu. W: Przetwórstwo mięsa drobiu - podstawy biologiczne i technologiczne. Red. T. Smolińska. W. Kopeć. Wyd. UP, Wrocław (in Polish).Google Scholar
STANGIERSKI, J. (2009) Modification of functional quality of poultry myofibril preparatinon using transglutaminase. Rozprawy Naukowe 402, Poznan University of Life Sciences.Google Scholar
STANGIERSKI, J. and KACZMAREK, A. (2012) Effects of transglutaminase modification on the quality of poultry surimi. Investigations on poultry surimi obtained from mechanically recovered chicken meat. Fleischwirtschaft International 6: 69-73.Google Scholar
STANGIERSKI, J. and KIJOWSKI, J. (2007) The application of dried myofibril preparation from poultry meat in the production of corn puffs. XVIII European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat. Czech Republic, Prague 2-5 September, pp. 325-326.Google Scholar
SURAI, P.F. (2002) Natural antioxidants in avian nutrition and reproduction. Nottingham University Press. Nottingham.Google Scholar
TRESPALACIOS, P. and PLA, R. (2007) Simultaneous application of transglutaminase and high pressure to improve functional properties of chicken meat gels. Food Chemistry 100: 264-272.Google Scholar
VERMA, A.K., SHARMA, B.D. and BANERJEE, R. (2010) Effect of sodium chloride replacement and apple pulp inclusion on the physic-chemical, textural and sensory properties of low fat chicken nuggets. LWT-Food Science and Technology 43: 715-719.Google Scholar
VERMA, A.K. and BANERJEE, R. (2012) Low-sodium meat products: retaining salty taste for sweet health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 52: 72-84.Google Scholar
VINCI, G. and ANTONELLI, M. (2002) Biogenic amines: quality index of freshness in red and white meat. Food Control 13: 519-524.Google Scholar
WEBB, E.C., CASEY, N.H. and SIMELA, I. (2005) Goat meat quality. Small Ruminant Research 60: 153-166.Google Scholar
WEISS, J., GIBIS, M., SCHUH, V. and SALMINEN, H. (2010) Advances in ingredient and processing systems for meat and meat products. Meat Science 86: 196-213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WENK, C., LEONHARDT, M., MARTIN, R. and SCHEEDER, M.R.L. (2000) Monogastric nutrition and potential for improving muscle quality, in: DECKER, E., FAUSTMAN, C. & LOPEZ-BOTE, C.J. (Eds) Antioxidants in Muscle Foods (John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York).Google Scholar
WHO (2003) Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series 916:World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
WOOD, J.D., RICHARDSON, R.I., NUTE, G.R., FISHER, A.V., CAMPO, M.M., KASAPIDOU, E., SHEARD, P.R. and ESNER, M. (2003) Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: A review. Meat Science 66 (1): 21-32.Google Scholar