Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:41:06.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Naked neck and frizzle genes for improving chickens raised under high ambient temperature: II. Blood parameters and immunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2014

M.M. FATHI ,
A. GALAL ,
S. EL-SAFTY  and
M. MAHROUS
M.M. FATHI*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal Production and Breeding, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
A. GALAL
Affiliation:
Dept. of Poultry Production, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
S. EL-SAFTY
Affiliation:
Dept. of Poultry Production, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
M. MAHROUS
Affiliation:
Dept. of Poultry Production, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Major marker genes are believed to confer not only adaptability to the tropical climate, but also resistance to diseases. During the last two decades, many investigations have observed that naked neck and frizzle genes have favourable effects on immunocompetence in chickens raised under high ambient temperatures. As a result, several tropical countries have introduced these genes in breeding programs to improve both the productive performance and survival rate of chickens.

Keywords

naked neckfrizzleheat stressimmunityblood parameters
Type
Small-scale Family Poultry Production
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 165 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AL-MURRANI, W.K., KASSAB, A., AL-SAM, H.Z. and AL-ATHARI, A.M. (1997) Heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a selection criterion for heat resistance in domestic fowls. British Poultry Science 38: 159-163.Google Scholar
ALVAREZ, M.T., CARRASCO, E., TATO, P. and TÉLLEZ, G. (2002) Comparison of production parameters and egg quality between laying hens indigenous naked neck (Na) and commercial Babcock B-380. Proceedings of 91st Poultry Science annual meeting, Newark, University of Delaware, USA, 11-14 Aug.Google Scholar
ALVAREZ, M.T., LEDESMA, N., TELLEZ, G., MOLINARI, J.L. and TATO, P. (2003) Comparison of the immune response against Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum infection between naked neck chickens and a commercial chicken line. Avian Pathology 32: 193-203.Google Scholar
BACON, L.D., FADLY, A.M. and CRITENDEN, L.B. (1986) Absence of influence on immune competence by the sex-linked gene (M) determining slow-feathering in white Leghorn chickens. Avian Diseases 30: 751-760.Google Scholar
CAHANER, A., DEEB, N. and GUTMAN, M. (1993) Effects of the plumage-reducing naked neck (Na) geneon the performance of fast-growing broilers at normal and high ambient temperatures. Poultry Science 72: 767-775.Google Scholar
CHENG, S. and LAMONT, S.J. (1988) Genetic analysis of immune competence measures in a White Leghorn chicken line. Poultry Science 67: 989-.Google Scholar
DORNY, P., BAELMANS, R., PARMENTIER, H.K., NIEUWLAND, M.G.B., DEMEY, F. and BERKVENS, D. (2005) Serum haemolytic complement levels in German Dahlem Red chickens are affect by three major genes (Naked neck, Dwarf, Frizzled) of tropical interest. Tropical Animal Health and Production 37: 1-9.Google Scholar
EEROLA, E., VEROMAA, T. and TOIVANEN, P. (1987) Special feature in the structural organisation of the avian lymphoid system, in: TOIVANEN, A. & TOIVANEN, P. (Ed.) Avian Immunology: Basis and Practice, pp. 9-22 (CRC Press. Inc. Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
EL-SAFTY, S.A., ALI, U.M. and FATHI, M.M. (2006) Immunological parameters and laying performance of naked neck and normally feathered genotypes of chickens under winter conditions of Egypt. International Journal of Poultry Science 5: 780-785.Google Scholar
FATHI, M.M., EL-ATTAR, A.H., ALI, U.M. and NAZMI, A. (2008) Effect of naked neck gene on carcase composition and immunocompetence in chicken. British Poultry Science 49 (2): 103-110.Google Scholar
FATHI, M.M., GALAL, A., EL-SAFTY, S.A. and ABDEL-FATTAH, S.A. (2005) Impact of naked neck and frizzle genes on cell-mediated immunity of chickens. Egyptian Poultry Science 25: 1055-1067.Google Scholar
GALAL, A. (2008) Immunocompetance and some heamatological parameters of Naked neck and normally feathered chicken. Journal of Poultry Science 45: 89-95.Google Scholar
GALAL, A. and MAHROUS, M. (2011) Productive performance and immunocompetence parameters of naked necks and normally feathered chicken genotypes issued from different maternal lines. Proceedings of 100th Poultry Science Annual Meeting, America's Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA , Poultry Science 90 (Suppl. 1): 8.Google Scholar
GROSS, W.B. and SIEGEL, H.S. (1983) Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Diseases 27: 972-979.Google Scholar
HAUNSHI, S. (1999) Studies on general immune competence in specialised chicken populations. M.V. Sc. Thesis submitted in Poultry Science, IVRI, Izatnagar, UP, India.Google Scholar
HAUNSHI, S., SHARMA, D., NAYAL, L.M.S., SINGH, D.P. and SINGH, R.V. (2002) Effect of naked neck (Na) and frizzle gene (F) on immune competence in chickens. British Poultry Science 43: 28-32.Google Scholar
KAUFMAN, J. (2008) The avian MHC, in: DAVISON, F., KASPERS, B. & SCHAT, K.A. (Eds) Avian immunology, pp. 159-181 (London, Academic Press).Google Scholar
KLINGENSMITH, P.H., DONAHOE, J.P. and STREPHENS, J.F. (1983) The effect of sex linked dwarfing gene, dw, on the immune response of broiler breeder chickens. Poultry Science 62: 733-740.Google Scholar
KOGUT, M.H., MCGRUDE, E.D., HARGIS, B.M., CORRIER, D.E. and DELOACH, J.R. (1994) Characterisation of the pattern of inflammatory cell influx in chicks following the intraperitoneal administration of line Salmonella enteritidies-immune lymphokines. Poultry Science 74: 8-17.Google Scholar
KOGUT, M.H., MCGRUDE, E.D., HARGIS, B.M., CORRIER, D.E. and DELOACH, J.R. (1995) In vivo activation of heterophil functions in chickens following injection with Salmonella enteritidies immune lymphokines. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 57: 56-62.Google Scholar
KUNDU, A., SINGH, D.P., MOHAPATRA, S.C., DASH, B.B., MOUDGAL, R.P. and BISHT, G.S. (1999) Antibody response to sheep erythrocytes in Indian native vis-à-vis imported breeds of chickens. British Poultry Science 40: 40-43.Google Scholar
MAHROUS, M.Y. and EL-DLEBSHANY, A.M. (2011) Reduction of the cholesterol content of eggs by introducing naked neck (Na) and frizzle genes in laying hens. Egyptian Poultry Science 31: 817-824.Google Scholar
MAHROUS, M.Y., GALAL, A., FATHI, M.M. and ZEIN EL-DEIN, A. (2008) Impact of naked neck (Na) and frizzle (F) genes on growth performance and immunocompetence in chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 7: 45-54.Google Scholar
MARTIN, A., GROSS, W.B. and SIEGEL, P.B. (1989) IgG and IgM responses in high and low antibody selected lines of chickens. Journal of Heredity 80: 249-252.Google Scholar
MÉRAT, P. (1986) Potential usefulness of the Na (naked neck) gene in poultry production. World's Poultry Science Journal 42: 124-142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MÉRAT, P. (1990) Pleiotropic and Associated Effects of Major Genes, in: CRAWFORD, R.D. (Ed.) Poultry Breeding and Genetics, pp. 429-467 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).Google Scholar
NAZMI, A. (2006) Study on immunogenetic differences in naked neck and normally feathered chickens. M. Sc. Thesis, Ain Shams University, Egypt.Google Scholar
PARMENTIER, H.K., YOUSIF-ABUZEID, S.D.E., VRIES-REILINGH, G., NIEUWLAND, M.G.B. and GRAAT, E.A.M. (2001) Immune responses and resistance to Eimeria acervulina of chickens divergently selected for antibody responses to sheep red blood cells . Poultry Science 80: 894-900Google Scholar
PATRA, B.N., BAIS, R.K.S., PRASAD, R.B. and SINGH, B.P. (2002) Performance of naked neck versus normally feathered coloured broilers for growth, carcass traits and blood biochemical parameters in tropical climate. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 15: 1776-1783.Google Scholar
PATRA, B.N., BAIS, R.K.S., SHARMA, D., SINGH, B.P., PRASAD, R.B. and BHUSHAN, R. (2004) Immunocompetence status of white plumage naked neck versus normally feathered broilers in tropical climate. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 17: 560-563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PETERS, S.O., GUNN, H.H., IMUMORIN, I.G., AGAVIEZOR, B.O. and IKEOBI, C.O.N. (2011) Haematological studies on frizzled and naked neck genotypes of Nigerian native chickens. Tropical Animal Health and Production 3: 631-638.Google Scholar
QURESHI, M.A., YU, M. and SAIF, Y.M. (2000) A novel "small round virus" inducing poult enteritis and mortality syndrome and associated immune alterations. Avian Diseases 44: 275-283.Google Scholar
RAJKUMAR, U., REDDY, B.L.N., RAJARAVINDRA, K.S., NIRANJAN, M., BHATTACHARYA, T.K., CHATTERJEE, R.N., PANDA, A.K., REDDY, M.R. and SHARMA, R.P. (2010) Effect of naked neck gene on immune competence, serum biochemical and carcass traits in chicken under tropical climate. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 23: 867-872.Google Scholar
RAJKUMAR, U., REDDY, M.R., RAMA RAO, S.V., RADHIKA, K. and SHANMUGAM, M. (2011) Evaluation of growth, carcass, immune response and stress parameters in naked neck chicken and their normal siblings under tropical winter and summer temperatures. Australasian Journal of Animal Science 24: 509-516.Google Scholar
SIEGEL, H.S. (1995) Stress, strains and resistance. British Poultry Science 36: 3-22.Google Scholar
THIRUVENKADAN, A.K., PANNEERSELVAM, S. and PRABAKARAN, R. (2010) Layer breeding strategies: an overview. World's Poultry Science Journal 66: 477-501.Google Scholar
TOIVANEN, P., NAUKKARINEN, A. and VAINIO, O. (1987) What is the function of bursa of Fabricius?, in: TOIVANEN, A. & TOIVANEN, P. (Eds) Avian Immunology: Basis and Practice, pp. 79-100 (CRC. Press. Inc. Boca Raton, FL).Google Scholar
YAHAV, S., LUGER, D., CAHANER, A., DOTAN, M., RUSAL, M. and HURWITZ, S. (1998) Thermoregulation in naked neck chickens subjected to different ambient temperatures. British Poultry Science 39:133-138.Google Scholar