Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:59:29.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meat production efficiencies of turkey, chicken and duck broilers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

B.A. Shalev  and
H. Pasternak
B.A. Shalev
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Extension Service, Poultry Division, PO Box 7054, Hakirya, Tel Aviv 61070, Israel
H. Pasternak
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Extension Service, Poultry Division, PO Box 7054, Hakirya, Tel Aviv 61070, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Comparison of the efficiencies of meat production between chickens, turkeys and ducks at 7 weeks of age indicates that although the turkey broiler is most efficient in feed utilization, the high cost of poult production neutralizes this advantage. Thus, chicken broiler edible meat is cheaper to produce by =16 and 25% than meat from turkeys and ducks, respectively. The favourable feed utilization of the turkey broiler is partly due to the concave growth curve (with reduced feed consumption for maintenance) and primarily due to the markedly lower body fat concentration, which in turkeys is about six to ten times lower than in chickens and ducks, respectively. The low body fat level of turkey, together with the lowest cost of edible meat protein, may appeal to consumers who wish to reduce the amount of animal fat in their diets. This advantage of low fat concentration in the turkey broiler is sharply reduced at 16–24 weeks of age. There is therefore justification to examine the possibility of marketing oven-ready turkey broilers, or at least female turkey broilers, at 7–10 weeks of age.

Keywords

Broilercomparisonduckefficiencymeatproductionturkey
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , July 1989 , pp. 109 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abplanalp, H., Ogasawara, F.X. and Asmundson, V.S. (1963) Influences of selection for body weight at different ages in growth of turkeys. British Poultry Science 4: 71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aharoni, J., Shafir, Z. and Katz, Z. (1987, 1988) Production levels and costs of chicken, turkey and duck broilers. Israeli Extension Service. Ministry of Agriculture (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
Benoff, F.H. (1986) Smaller bird for boning? Let's push the pencil! Broiler Industry pp. 30–34Google Scholar
Dickerson, G.E. (1978) Animal size and efficiency: basic concepts. Animal production 27: 367–379Google Scholar
Holton, J. (1988) The National Farmers' Union, Springfield Spalding, Lincolnshire, UKGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, S., Weiselberg, M., Eisner, U., Bartov, I., Riesenfeld, G., Sharvit, M., et al. (1980) The energy requirements and performance of growing chickens and turkeys as affected by environmental temperature. Poultry Science 59: 2290–2299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, S., Frisch, Y., Bar, A., Eisner, U., Bengal, I. and Pines, M. (1983) The amino acid requirements of growing turkeys. 1. Model construction and parameter estimation. Poultry Science 62: 2208–2217Google Scholar
Leclercq, B. (1987) Selection broilers for low or high abdominal fat. 29th British Poultry Breeders Roundtable ConferenceEdinburgh, UK16–18 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
Leenstra, F.R. and Pit, R. (1987) Fat deposition in a broiler sire strain. 2. Comparisons among lines selected for less abdominal fat, lower feed conversion ratio, and higher body weight after restricted and ad libitum feeding. Poultry Science 66: 193–202Google Scholar
Leeson, S. and Summers, J.D. (1980a) Production and carcass characteristics of broiler chicken. Poultry Science 59: 786–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, S. and Summers, J.D. (1980b) Production and carcass characteristics of the large white turkey. Poultry Science 59: 1237–1245Google Scholar
Leeson, S., Summers, J.D. and Proulx, J. (1982) Production and carcass characteristics of the duck. Poultry Science 61: 2456–2464Google Scholar
Nativ, A., Aharoni, J. and Shalev, B.A. (1986) Breeders performance. Israeli Extension Service. Ministry of Agriculture, Poultry Division (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
Nixey, C. (1986) A comparison of growth and fat deposition of commercial avian species. 7th European Poultry Conference,Paris24–28 August pp. 671–680Google Scholar
Olver, M.D., Du Preez, J.J., Kuyper, M.A. and Mould, D.J. (1977) The carcass composition and growth of the ‘mule’ ducklings compared to the purebred ducklings. Agroanimalia 9: 7–12Google Scholar
Pasternak, H. and Shalev, B.A. (1983) Genetic-economic evaluation of traits in a broiler enterprise: reduction of food intake due to increased growth rate. British Poultry Science 24: 531–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternak, H., Shalev, B. and Hava, Engei (1986) Genetic-economic evaluation of traits in a turkey enterprise: the relative genetic-economic values. World's Poultry Science Journal 42: 5–11Google Scholar
Shafir, Z. (1986, 1987) Turkey breeders and broilers performance. Israeli Extension Service. Ministry of Agriculture. Poultry Division (in Hebrew)Google Scholar
Shalev, B.A. and Pasternak, H. (1983) Genetic-economic evaluation of traits in a broiler-enter-prise: the relative genetic-economic values. British Poultry Science 24: 521–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar