Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:19:54.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lighting programmes and its implications for broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2016

R. GOMES DE OLIVEIRA  and
L. JOSÉ CAMARGOS LARA
R. GOMES DE OLIVEIRA*
Affiliation:
Dept. Zoothecny, Federal University of Minas Gerais, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
L. JOSÉ CAMARGOS LARA
Affiliation:
Dept. Zoothecny, Federal University of Minas Gerais, UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The manipulation of the photoperiod by the use of lighting programmes is a useful tool, inexpensive and can help to reduce the negative effect on feed intake due to the stress caused by hot environments. Lighting programmes for broiler chickens are used to regulate feed intake, providing access to food and water, especially during the cooler hours of the day. The change in the length of the photoperiod can be an alternative way to improve the welfare, immune response and, consequently, the performance of birds that are subject to heat stress. The purpose of this paper was to review relevant research on the use of lighting programmes for broilers.

Keywords

lightbroilerswelfareperformance
Type
Reviews
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 735 - 742
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABBAS, A.O., ALM EL-DEIN, A.K., DESOKY, A.A. and GALAL, M.A.A. (2008) The effects of photoperiod programs on broiler chicken performance and immune response. International Journal of Poultry Science 7 (7): 665-667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ABREU, V.M.N., ABREU, P.G., COLDEBELLA, A., JAENISCH, R.F., FILHO, J.I.S. and PAIVA, D.P. (2011) Curtain color and lighting program in broiler production: I – general performance. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia40 (9): 2026-2034.Google Scholar
AMARAL, A.G., YANAGINI, T. (Jr), LIMA, R.R., TEIXEIRA, V.H. and SCHIASSI, L. (2011) Efeito do ambiente de produção sobre frangos de corte sexados criados em galpão comercial. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 63 (3): 649-658.Google Scholar
APELDOORN, E.J., SCHRAMA, J.W., MASHALY, M.M. and PARMENTIER, H.K. (1999) Effect of Melatonin and Lighting Schedule on Energy Metabolism in Broiler Chickens . Poultry Science 78 (2): 223-229.Google Scholar
BAYRAM, A. and ÖZKAN, S. (2010) Effects of a 16-hour light, 8-hour dark lighting schedule on behavioural traits and performance in male broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 19 (3): 263-273.Google Scholar
BLATCHFORD, R.A., KLASING, K.C., SHIVAPRASAD, H.L., WAKENELL, P.S., ARCHER, G.S. and MENCH, J.A. (2009) The effect of light intensity on the behavior, eye and leg health, and immune function of broiler chickens . Poultry Science 88 (1): 20-28.Google Scholar
BRICKETT, K.E., DAHIYA, J.P., CLASSEN, H.L, ANNETT, C.B. and and GOMIS, S. (2007) The Impact of Nutrient Density, Feed Form, and Photoperiod on the Walking Ability and Skeletal Quality of Broiler Chickens. Poultry Science 86 (10): 2117-2125.Google Scholar
BUYSE, J., ADELSOHN, D.S. and DECUYPERE, E. (1997) Diurnal-nocturnal changes in food intake, gut storage of ingest, food transit time and metabolism in growing broiler chickens: a model for temporal control of energy balance. British Poultry Science 34 (4): 699-709.Google Scholar
CHARLES, R.G., ROBINSON, F.E., HARDIN, R.T. and YU, M.W. (1992) Growth, Body Composition, and Plasma Androgen Concentration of Male Broiler Chickens Subjected to Different Regimens of Photoperiod and Light Intensity. Poultry Science 71 (10): 1595-1605.Google Scholar
CLASSEN, H.L., RIDDELL, C. and ROBINSON, F.E. (1991) Effects of increasing photoperiod length on performance and health of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 32 (1): 21-29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
FARM ANIMAL WELFARE COUNCIL (FAWC) (1992) Report on the welfare of broiler chickens. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, pp. 9, paragraph 35-38.Google Scholar
FERREIRA, R.A. (2005) Maior produção com melhor ambiente para aves, suínos e bovinos. Viçosa/ MG: Aprenda Fácil, pp. 371.Google Scholar
INGRAM, D.R. and HATTEN, L.F. (2000) Effects of light restriction on broiler performance and specific body structure measurements. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 9 (4): 501-504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KAWAUCHI, I.M., SAKOMURA, N.K., BARBOSA, N.A.A., AGUILAR, C.A.L., MARCATO, S.M., BONATO, M.A. and FERNANDES, J.B.K. (2008) Efeito de programas de luz sobre o desempenho e rendimento de carcaça, cortes comerciais e vísceras comestíveis de frangos de corte. Revista de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 24 (1): 59-65.Google Scholar
LIBONI, B.S., YOSHIDA, S.H., PACHECO, A., MONTANHA, F.P., SOUZA, L.F.A., ASTOLPHI, J.L. and ASTOLPHI, M.Z. (2013) Diferentes programas de luz na criação de frangos de corte. Revista Científica Eletrônica de Medicina Veterinária, nr. 20.Google Scholar
LIEN, R.J., HOOIE, L.B. and HESS, J.B. (2009) Influence of long-bright and increasing-dim photoperiods on live and processing performance of two broiler strains. Poultry Science 88 (5): 896-903.Google Scholar
MENDES, A.S., PAIXÃO, S.J., RESTELATTO, R., MORELLO, G.M., MOURA, D.J. and POSSENTI, J.C. (2013) Performance and preference of broiler chickens exposed to different lighting sources. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 22 (1): 62-70.Google Scholar
MENDES, A.S., REFFATI, R., RESTELATTO, R. and PAIXÃO, S.J. (2010) Visão e iluminação na avicultura moderna. Revista Brasileira de Agrociência 16 (1-4): 05-13.Google Scholar
MORAES, D.T., LARA, L.J.C., BAIÃO, N.C., CANÇADO, S.V., GONZALES, M.L., AGUILAR, C.A.L. and LANA, A.M.Q. (2008) Efeitos dos programas de luz sobre desempenho, rendimento de carcaça e resposta imunológica em frangos de corte. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 60 (1): 201-208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OLANREWAJU, H.A., THAXTON, J.P., DOZIER, W.A., THAXTON, J.P. and BRANTON, S.L. (2006) A Review of Lighting Programs for Broiler Production. International Journal of Poultry Science 5 (4): 301-308.Google Scholar
RABELLO, C. BÔA-VIAGEM (2008) Produção de Aves em Clima Quente, in: Zootec. João Pessoa. Perfil Profissional e Demanda de Mercado.Google Scholar
RENDEN, J.A., BILGILI, S.F. and KINCAID, S.A. (1994) Live performance and carcass yield of broiler strain crosses provided either sixteen or twenty-three hours of light per day. Poultry Science 71 (9): 1427-1435.Google Scholar
RENDEN, J.A., MORAN, E.T. (Jr) and KINCAID, S.A. (1996) Lighting Programs for Broilers That Reduce Leg Problems Without Loss of Performance or Yield. Poultry Science 75 (11): 1345-1350.Google Scholar
RUTZ, F. and BERMUDEZ, V.L. (2004) Fundamentos de um programa de luz para frangos de corte, in: Produção de frangos de corte: FACTA, pp.157-168.Google Scholar
SORENSEN, P., SU, G. and KESTIN, S.C. (1999) The effect of photoperiod: Scotoperiod on leg weakness in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 78 (3): 336-342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ZHENG, L., MA, Y.E., GU, L.Y., YUAN, D., SHI, M.L., GUO, X.Y. and ZHAN, X.A. (2013) Growth performance, antioxidant status, and nonspecific immunity in broilers under different lighting regimens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 22 (4): 798-807.Google Scholar