Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:33:50.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intermittent lighting regimes and mortality rates in laying hens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

P.D. Lewis ,
G.C. Perry ,
T.R. Morris  and
M.M. Midgley
P.D. Lewis
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Science, Bristol BS18 7DU, UK
G.C. Perry
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, University of Bristol, School of Veterinary Science, Bristol BS18 7DU, UK
T.R. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading RG6 2AT, UK
M.M. Midgley
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Agricultural Development and Advisory Service, Northampton NN5 7QG, UK
Get access

Abstract

A literature search was carried out for papers which described the intermittent lighting of laying hens and included information on mortality and behavioural responses. A review of 36 sets of mortality data indicated that intermittent lighting generally improved bird liveability, compared with that under conventional lighting. Biomittent lighting, which involved low total daily amounts of illumination, gave the greatest improvement. This brings into question welfare recommendations for a minimum of 8 h illumination per 24-h cycle. Asymmetrical and Biomittent intermittent lighting generally reduced vices, obesity and heat stress. Hens submitted to asymmetrical and Biomittent intermittent lighting had similar endocrine periodicities and patterns of activity to conventionally illuminated birds.

Keywords

Intermittent lightlaying henslightmortalitywelfare
Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , July 1992 , pp. 113 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belyavin, C. (1986) Changing the light pattern can increase margins. Poultry (Missett) February: 20–23Google Scholar
Binkley, S., Macbride, S.E., Klein, D.C. and Ralph, C.L. (1975) Regulation of pineal enzymes in chickens: refractory period and nonvisual light perception. Endocrinology 96: 846–853CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blokhuis, H.J. (1983) The relevance of sleep in poultry. World Poultry Science Journal 39: 33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bougan, M., L'Hospitalier, R. and Protais, J. (1978) Effet de l'éclairement discontinu de courte durée sur les performances des pondeuses. Bulletin d'Information 18: No. 3, Station Experimentale d'Aviculture, Ploufragan, FranceGoogle Scholar
Bougan, M., Protais, J. and L'Hospitalier, R. (1982) Étude des performances et de la qualité des oeufs chez des pondeuses soumises à un éclairement discontinu par périodes de trois heures (2e essai). Bulletin d'Information 22: No. 4, Station Experimentale d'Aviculture, Ploufragan, FranceGoogle Scholar
Coenen, A.M.L., Wolters, E.M.T.J., Van Luijtelaar, E.L.J.M. and Blokhuis, H. (1988) Effects of intermittent lighting on sleep and activity in the domestic hen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 20: 309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, C.A., Macleod, M.G. and Anderson, J.E.M. (1991) Alleviation of acute heat stress by food withdrawal or darkness. British Poultry Science 32: 219–225CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutschemaekers, L.W.H. and Workamp, J.A. (1986) Layers perform better with intermittent lighting. Poultry (Misset) April: 20–21Google Scholar
Kuit, A.R. (1985) Intermittent lighting improves performance. Poultry International April: 24Google Scholar
Lewis, P.D. (1987) Responses of laying hens to interrupted lighting regimes. PhD Thesis, University of BristolGoogle Scholar
Lewis, P.D. and Perry, G.C. (1986) Effects of interrupted lighting regimens on the feeding activity of the laying hen. British Poultry Science 27: 661–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, P.D. and Perry, G.C. (1989) Effect of asymmetrical lighting on the body weight and carcase composition of laying hens, and their influence on feed utilization efficiency. British Poultry Science 30: 223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, P.D. and Perry, G.C. (1990a) Response of laying hens to asymmetrical interrupted lighting regimens: physiological aspects. British Poultry Science 31: 45–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, P.D. and Perry, G.C. (1990b) Response of laying hens to asymmetrical interrupted lighting regimens: reproductive performance, body weight and carcase composition. British Poultry Science 31: 33–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, P.D., Perry, G.C. and Tuddenham, A. (1987) Noise output of hens subjected to interrupted lighting regimens. British Poultry Science 28: 535–540CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, P.D., Perry, G.C. and Cockrem, J.F. (1989) Plasma concentrations of melatonin in layers under interrupted lighting. British Poultry Science 30: 968–969Google Scholar
Maff, (1987) Codes of Recommendations for the Welfare of Livestock: Domestic Fowls, Leaflet 703, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Publications), Alnwick, Northumberland, UKGoogle Scholar
March, T.I., Thomson, L.J., Lewis, P.D. and Perry, G.C. (1990) Sleep and activity behaviour of layers subjected to an interrupted lighting schedule. British Poultry Science 31: 895–896Google Scholar
Midgley, M.M. (1984) Interrupted lighting programmes for commercial layers: report on a visit to USA, 8-18 August 1984. Project No.4 in the Agricultural service overseas study tour programme 1984/85. Agricultural Development and Advisory ServiceGoogle Scholar
Midgley, M., Morris, T.R. and Butler, E.A. (1988) Experiments with the Biomittent lighting system for laying hens. British Poultry Science 29: 333–342Google Scholar
Mongin, P., Jastrzebski, M. and van Tienhoven, A. (1978) Temporal patterns of ovulation, oviposition and feeding of laying hens under skeleton photoperiods. British Poultry Science 19: 747–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, T.R. (1988) Use of intermittent lighting to save feed and improve egg quality in laying flocks. Proceedings 18th World Poultry Congress pp. 161–164Google Scholar
Morris, T.R., Midgley, M. and Butler, E.A. (1988) Experiments with Cornell intermittent lighting systems for laying hens. British Poultry Science 29: 325–332CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, T.R., Midgley, M. and Butler, E.A. (1990) Effect of age at starting Biomittent lighting on performance of laying hens. British Poultry Science 31: 447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nys, Y. and Mongin, P. (1981) the effects of 6 and 8 hour light–dark cycles on egg production and pattern of ovipositions. British Poultry Science 22: 391–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North of Scotland Agricultural College (1985) Development Trials on Lighting Regimes for Layers. Technical Note 87Google Scholar
Oishi, T. (1980) Light and dark induced lesions in birds. In: Biological Rhythms in Birds: Neural and Endocrine Aspects (Eds Tanabe, Y. et al. ), Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo and Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Sauveur, B. and Mongin, P. (1983) Performance of layers reared and/or kept under different 6-hour light–dark cycles. British Poultry Science 24: 405–416CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savory, C.J. and Duncan, I.J.H. (1982) Voluntary regulation of lighting by domestic fowls in skinner boxes. Applied Animal Ethology 9: 73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, P.C.M. and Zegwaard, A. (1983) Verlichting in verband met produktiviteit en energiebesparing van leghennen. Bedrijfsontwikkeling 14: 785–789Google Scholar
Skoglund, W.C. and Whittaker, D. (1980) Interrupted lighting programs for brown egg breeds. Poultry Science 59: 2397–2399Google Scholar
Torges, von H.G., Rauch, H.W. and Wegner, R.M. (1981) Intermittierende beleuchtung von legehennen und ihr einfluss auflegeleistung, eiqualitat, eiablage und futteraufnahmerhythmik. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 45: 76–82Google Scholar
van Tienhoven, A., Ostrander, C.E. and Gehle, M. (1984) Response of different commercial strains of laying hens to short total photoperiods in interrupted night experiments during days of 24 and 28 hours. Poultry Science 63: 2318–2330CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitley, R.D., Albert, R.A., Brewer, R.N., McDaniel, G.R., Pidgeon, G.L. and Mora, E.C. (1985) Photoinduced buphthalmic avian eyes: II. Continuous darkness. Poultry Science 64: 1869–1874Google Scholar
Wilson, W.O. and Abplanalp, H. (1956) Intermittent light stimuli in egg production of chickens. Poultry Science 36: 532–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar