Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:39:53.217Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Injurious pecking in domestic turkeys: development, causes, and potential solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2013

H.A. DALTON ,
B.J. WOOD  and
S. TORREY
H.A. DALTON*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada
B.J. WOOD
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada Hybrid Turkeys, Suite C, 650 Riverbend Drive, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
S. TORREY
Affiliation:
Dept. of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Injurious pecking is a serious concern for commercial turkey production and welfare. The behaviour is thought to represent re-directed ground foraging, but the development and causes are poorly understood with little supporting literature. In the initial development of the behaviour, early lighting regimes and social facilitation may play contributing roles. Other factors such as the availability of foraging material, diet composition, stocking densities, and group dynamics may also affect levels of injurious pecking. Given that commercial turkeys are group-housed, alternative breeding techniques, like group selection based on social effects, might successfully reduce moralities from pecking without detracting selection pressure from economic traits. However, to better suit their behavioural needs, any genetic attempts to adapt turkeys to perform less injurious pecking should be done in combination with environmental and dietary improvements.

Keywords

injurious peckingturkeygenetic selectionenvironmentnutritionfeather peckingcannibalismhead pecking
Type
Review Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 69 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 865 - 876
Copyright
Copyright © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ALLAIN, V., HUONNIC, D., ROUNIA, M. and MICHEL, V. (2013) Prevalence of skin lesions in turkeys at slaughter. British Poultry Science 54: 33-41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BERGER, L. (2006) Salt and Ttrace Minerals for Livestock, Poultry and Other Animals, 8th Edition. pp: 8 (Salt Institute, Virginia).Google Scholar
BUCHHOLZ, R. (1997) Male dominance and variation in fleshy head ornamentation in wild turkeys. Journal of Avian Biology 28: 223-230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUCHWALDER, T. and HUBER-EICHER, B. (2003) A brief report on aggressive interactions within and between groups of domestic turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 84: 75-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUCHWALDER, T. and HUBER-EICHER, B. (2004) Effect of increased floor space on aggressive behaviour in male turkeys. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 89: 207-214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUSAYI, R.M., CHANNING, C.E. and HOCKING, P.M. (2006) Comparisons of damaging feather pecking and time budgets in male and female turkeys of a traditional breed and a genetically selected male line. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 96: 281-292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHENG, H.W. and MUIR, W.M. (2005) The effects of genetic selection for survivability and productivity on chicken physiological homeostasis. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 383-397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLASSEN, H., RIDDEL, C., ROBINSON, F., SHAND, P. and MCCURDY, A. (1994) Effect of lighting treatment on the productivity, health, behaviour and sexual maturity of heavy male turkeys. British Poultry Science 35: 215-225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CRAIG, J.V. and MUIR, W.M. (1996) Group selection for adaption to multiple-hen cages: beak-related mortality, feathering, and body weight responses. Poultry Science 75: 294-302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CUNNINGHAM, D.L., BUHR, R.J. and MAMPUTU, M. (1992) Beak trimming and sex effects on behaviour and performance traits of large white turkeys. Poultry Science 71: 1606-1614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DENBOW, D.M., LEIGHTON, A.T. Jr and HUBET, R.M. (1984) Behaviour and growth parameters of large white turkeys as affected by floor space and beak trimming. 1. Males. Poultry Science 63: 31-37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DENNIS, R.L., FAHEY, A.G. and CHENG, H.W. (2009) Infrared beak treatment method compared to conventional hot-blade trimming in laying hens. Poultry Science 88: 38-42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DIXON, L.M., DUNCAN, I.J.H. and MASON, G.J. (2008) What's in a peck? Using fixed action pattern morphology to identify the motivational basis of abnormal feather pecking behaviour. Animal Behaviour 76: 1035-1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DUGGAN, G., WEBER, L., WIDOWSKI, T. and TORREY, S. (2011) Environment and the development of feather pecking in a commercial turkey facility. 43rd Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology. Indianapolis, USA.Google Scholar
ELLEN, E., MUIR, W.M., TEUSCHER, F. and BIJMA, P. (2007) Genetic improvement of traits affected by interactions among individuals: sib selection schemes. Genetics 176: 489-499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ENSMINGER, M.E. (1992) Cannibalism, in: Poultry Science, 3rd Ed, pp.195-321 (Danville, IL, Interstate Publishers).Google Scholar
FLOCK, D.K., LAUGHLIN, K.F. and BENTLEY, J. (2006) Minimising losses in poultry breeding and production: how breeding companies contribute to poultry welfare. Lohmann Information 41: 20-28.Google Scholar
FREEMAN, B.M. (1987) The stress syndrome. World`s Poultry Science Journal 43: 15-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENTLE, M.J., HUGHES, B.O. and HUBRECHT, R.C. (1982) The effect of beak trimming on food intake, feed behaviour and body weight in adult hens. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 147-159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GILL, D.J. and LEIGHTON, A.T. Jr (1984) Effects of light environment and population density on growth of male turkeys. Poultry Science 63: 1314-1321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GRIGOR, P.N., HUGHES, B.O. and GENTLE, M.J. (1995) An experimental investigation of the costs and benefits of beak trimming in turkeys. Veterinary Record 136: 257-265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HALE, E.B. and SCHEIN, M.W. (1962) The behaviour of turkeys, in: HAFEZ, E.S.E. (Ed.) The Behaviour of Domestic Animals, pp. 531-564 (London, UK; Balliere, Tindall and Cox).Google Scholar
HAMILTON, R.M.G. and KENNIE, J. (1997) The effects of lighting program, ingredient particle size and feed form on the performance of broiler turkeys. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77: 503-508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAVENSTEIN, G.B., FERKET, P.R., GRIMES, J.L., QURESHI, M.A. and NESTOR, K.E. (2007) Comparison of the performance of 1966- versus 2003-type turkeys when fed representative 1966 and 2003 turkey diets: growth rate, livability, and feed conversion. Poultry Science 86: 232-240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HAWKINS, P., MORTON, D.B., CAMERON, D., CUTHILL, I., FRANCIS, R., FREIRE, R., GOSLER, A., HEALY, S., HUDSON, A., INGLIS, I., JONES, A., KIRKWOOD, J., LAWTON, M., MONAGHAN, P., SHERWIN, C. and TOWNSEND, P. (2001) Refinements in husbandry and procedures for laboratory birds. Laboratory Animals 35: 1-163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOCKING, P. (1993) Welfare of turkeys, in: SAVORY, C.J., and HUGHES, B.O. (Eds) Proceedings of the Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, pp. 125-138 (UK, Universities Federation for Animal Welfare).Google Scholar
HUGHES, B.O. and DUNCAN, I.J.H. (1972) The influence of strain and environmental factors upon feather pecking and cannibalism in fowls. British Poultry Science 13: 525-547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HUGHES, B.O. and GRIGOR, P.N. (1996) Behavioural time budgets and beak-related behaviour in floor-housed turkey. Animal Welfare 5: 189-198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUGHES, B.O. and WOOD-GUSH, D.G.M. (1977) Agonistic behaviour in domestic hens: the influence of housing method and group size. Animal Behaviour 25: 1056-1062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HUGHES, B.O., CARMICHAEL, N.L., WALKER, A.W. and GRIGOR, P.N. (1997) Low incidence of aggression in large flocks of laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54: 215-234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JENDRAL, M.J. and ROBINSON, F.E. (2004) Beak trimming in chickens: historical, economical, physiological and welfare implications, and alternatives for preventing cannibalistic activity. Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews 15: 9-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KRAUTWALD-JUNGHANNS, M.E., ELLERICH, R., MITTERER-ISTYAGIN, H., LUDEWIG, M., FEHLHABER, K., SCHUSTER, E., BERK, J., DRESSEL, A., PETERMANN, S., KRUSE, W., NOACK, U., ALBRECHT, K. and BARTELS, T. (2011) Examination of the prevalence of skin injuries in debeaked fattened turkeys. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 124: 8-16. [Abstr.; Article in German].Google ScholarPubMed
LEIGHTON, A.T. Jr, DENBOW, D.M. and HULET, R.M. (1985) Behaviour and growth parameters of large white turkeys as affected by floor space and beak trimming. II. Females. Poultry Science 64: 440-446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LEWIS, P.D. and MORRIS, T.R. (2000) Poultry and coloured light. World's Poultry Science Journal 58: 189-207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEWIS, P.D., PERRY, G.C. and SHERWIN, C.M. (1998a) Effect of photoperiod and light intensity on the performance of intact male turkeys. Animal Science 66: 759-767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEWIS, P.D., PERRY, G.C. and SHERWIN, C.M. (1998b) Effect of intermittent light regimens on the performance of intact male turkeys. Animal Science 67: 627-636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARTRENCHAR, A. (1999) Animal welfare and intensive production of turkey broilers. World's Poultry Science Journal 55: 143-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MARTRENCHAR, A., HUONNIC, D., COTTE, J.P., BOILLETOT, E. and MORISSE, J.P. (1999) Influence of stocking density on behavioural, health and productivity traits of turkeys in large flocks. British Poultry Science 40: 323-331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MARTRENCHAR, A., HUONNIC, D. and COTTE, J.P. (2001) Influence of environmental enrichment on injurious pecking and perching behaviour in young turkeys. British Poultry Science 42: 161-170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MIRABITO, L., ANDRE, L. and BOUVAREL, L. (2003) Effect of providing ‘whole wheat’ in the diet on pecking behaviour in turkeys. British Poultry Science 44: 776-778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MOINARD, C. and SHERWIN, C.M. (1999) Turkeys prefer fluorescent light with supplementary ultraviolet radiation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 64: 261-267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOINARD, C., LEWIS, P., PERRY, G. and SHERWIN, C. (2001) The effects of light intensity and light source on injuries due to pecking of male domestic turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Animal Welfare 10: 131-139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOORE, A.J., BRODIE III, E.D. and WOLF, J.B. (1997) Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51: 1352-1362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MUIR, W.M. (1996) Group selection for adaptation to multiple hen cages: selection program and direct responses. Poultry Science 75: 447-458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
QUINTON, C.D., WOOD, B.J. and MILLER, S.P. (2011) Genetic analysis of survival and fitness in turkeys with multiple-trait animal models. Poultry Science 90: 2479-2486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RODENBURG, T.B. and TURNER, S.P. (2012) The role of breeding and genetics in the welfare of farm animals. Animal Frontiers 2: 16-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RODENBURG, T.B., UITEDHAAG, E.D., ELLEN, E.D. and KOMEN, J. (2009) The effects of selection on low mortality and brooding by a mother hen on open-field response, feather pecking and cannibalism in laying hens. Animal Welfare 18: 427-432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RODENBURG, T.B., VAN HIERDEN, Y.M., BUITENHUIS, A.J., RIEDSTRA, B., KOENE, P., KORTE, S.M., VAN DER POEL, J.J., GROOTHUIS, T.G.G. and BLOKHUIS, H. (2004) Feather pecking in laying hens: new insights and directions for research? Applied Animal Behavioural Science 86: 291-298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAVORY, C.J. (1995) Feather pecking and cannibalism. World's Poultry Science Journal 51: 215-219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHERWIN, C.M. (1999) Domestic turkeys are not averse to compact fluorescent lighting. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 64: 47-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHERWIN, C.M. and DEVEREUX, C.L. (1999) Preliminary investigation of ultraviolet induced markings on domestic turkey chicks and a possible role in injurious pecking. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 64: 47-55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHERWIN, C.M. and KELLAND, A. (1998) Time-budgets, comfort behaviour and injurious pecking of turkeys housed in pairs. British Poultry Science 39: 325-332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SHERWIN, C.M., LEWIS, P.D. and PERRY, G.C. (1999) Effects of environmental enrichment fluorescent and intermittent lighting on injurious pecking amongst male turkey poults. British Poultry Science 40: 592-598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SIOPES, T.D., TIMMONS, M.B., BAUGHMAN, G.R. and PARKHURST, C.R. (1984) The effects of light intensity on turkey poult performance, eye morphology and adrenal weight. Poultry Science 63: 904-909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VESTERGAARD, K.S., KRUIJT, J.P. and HOGAN, J.A. (1993) Feather pecking and chronic fear in groups of red junglefowl: their relations to dustbathing, rearing environment, and social status. Animal Behaviour 45: 1127-1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WATTS, C. and STOCKES, A. (1971) The social order of turkeys. Scientific American 224: 112-118.Google Scholar
WOOD, B.J. (2009) Profitable turkey production and animal welfare are not mutually exclusive and can be selected for simultaneously. Poultry Science 88 (Suppl 1): 2 (Abstr.).Google Scholar