Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:39:04.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indigenous breeds, crossbreds and synthetic hybrids with modified genetic and economic profiles for rural family and small scale poultry farming in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2008

A.G. KHAN*
Affiliation:
Department of Poultry Science, Jawaharlal Nehru Agricultural University, Narmada Nagar, Shastri Ward, Jabalpur, India 482 004
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Approximately 110 million birds from nineteen documented indigenous, heavier and lighter bodied chicken breeds and numerous non-descript types are bought and sold at unorganized meat markets in India. Improving the economic production profile for poultry farmers had been a focus since independence. Genetic improvements by selection over seven generations in non-descript chicken breeds has resulted in 19 more eggs and 4 g higher egg weight. Indigenous exotic crossbreds have shown an increase of 24-45 eggs, which has been associated with increased body weight and earlier age of sexual maturity. Heterosis for egg number ranged from 15-23 percent. Hybrids of the Aseel and Delhem Red breeds produced more eggs than either of the parents. Exotic crossbreds, including the Vanraja, Giriraja, Nadanum, Kuroiler (semi-broiler types) and Krishna-J, Grampriya, Krishipriya, Hit-CARI, Up-CARI (lighter weight) were introduced to scavenging in small scale poultry operations by both public and private sector organisations. The production of the Kalyani-DK and Satpura-Desi synthetic hybrid prototypes, which resemble indigenous fowl in body conformation, multi coloured plumage, dull shanks, pink skin and single comb have generated new opportunities for poultry production in rural areas. The Satpura-Desi attained 1.0 kg bodyweight in 8-9 weeks with 2.45 kg feed. In the ‘quick return’ scheme for free range flocks the 200-300 g birds grew to marketable weight in another 50-60 days and were worth 150% in market price compared to the broiler chicken. Whereas, in a gradual income scheme, the egg produced, surplus cockerels and culled hens resulted in a net gain of US$64-70 annually; the quick return scheme for meat chicken produced a net income of US$96 for village women which exceeded the gradual financial returns generated from egg production. Small scale poultry farmers, raising 100-2000 Satpura-Desi chickens, have been able to capitalize on its acceptance as an indigenous breed in the local meat markets, which has been apparent from the sale of 0.67 million chicks in last 12 months.

Type
Small-Scale Family Poultry Production
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACHARYA, R.M. and BHATT, P.N. (1984) Live stock and poultry Genetics resources in India. Publication of Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, India; pp. 71-76.Google Scholar
AGRAWAL, C.K. and SAPRA, K.L. (1972) Collection and evaluation of native germ plasma, efficiency of feed conversion, egg production and egg size in Desi, Black Bengal, Naked Neck and Aseel. Indian Veterinary Journal 49:187-190.Google Scholar
ANONYMOUS, (1974) PL 480 Scheme: Effectiveness of different methods of utilizing available germ plasma in improving production performance of poultry. Final report PL-480, Udaipur, India.Google Scholar
ANONYMOUS, (2005) Pamphlet on Satpura-Desi. Yashwant Agritech Pvt. Ltd. Jalgaon, M.S. India.Google Scholar
AYYAGARI, V. (2001) Genesis, development and propagation of Vanraja and Grampriya germ plasm for rural poultry production. Proceedings of the seminar on appropriate poultry for adverse environment. Hyderabad, India; pp. 7-14.Google Scholar
COPLAND, J.W. and ALDERS, R.G. (2005) The Australian poultry development programme in Asia and Africa, World's Poultry Science Journal 61:31-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FARREL, J.D. (2002) Overseas assistance to village poultry: The Australian experience. Proceedings of the 7th Worlds Poultry Science, Asia Pacific Federation Congress, Gold Coast, Australia; Association Federation Asia Pacific Federation, pp. 404-407.Google Scholar
GUEYE, E.F. (2005) Gender aspects in family poultry management systems in developing countries. World's Poultry Sciences Journal 61:39-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HENNING, J., PYME, R. HLA, T., , KYAW, N. and MEER, J. (2007) Village chicken production in Myanmar purpose, magnitude and major constraints. World's Poultry Science Journal 63:308-322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IYER, S.G. (1949) Improvement of indigenous hen evolved by selection. Indian Veterinary Journal 26: 2-6.Google Scholar
JENSEN, H.A. (1996) Semi scavenging model for rural poultry holding. Proceedings of the XXth Worlds Poultry Congress, New Delhi, Vol. 1, pp. 61-70.Google Scholar
JENSEN, H.A. and DOLBERG, F. (2001) A conceptual frame using poultry as a tool in poverty alleviation. INFPD News letter 12: 8-19.Google Scholar
KATARIA, M.C. and JOHRI, D.C. (2001) CARI Gold brown layer rearing in rural and tribal areas. Proceedings of a Seminar on Appropriate Poultry for Adverse Environments. Hyderabad, India; pp. 15-23.Google Scholar
KHAN, A.G. (1984) Replica of Desi fowl Krishna-J (Part III). Poultry Guide 11(6): 45-55.Google Scholar
KHAN, A.G. (1994) Development of Small bodied coloured birds for tribal & rural area. Final report to Indian Council of Agriculture Research, New Delhi, Adhoc project - Jawaharlal Nehru Agricultural University, Jabalpur M.P. India.Google Scholar
KHAN, A.G. (1998a) Utilization of native breeds in poultry production system in high temperature regime. Proceeding of the 6th Worlds Poultry Science Asian Pacific Poultry Conference, Nagoya, Japan; pp. 30-35.Google Scholar
KHAN, A.G. (1998b) Women as a source target for rural poultry production in India. Proceedings of 10th European Poultry Conference Jerusalem, Israel Vol. 2; pp. 604-606.Google Scholar
KHAN, A.G. (2001) Krishna-J coloured bird concept under scavenging system of management. Proceedings of National Seminar for Appropriate Poultry for Adverse Environments. 11-12 Jan; Hyderabad, India: pp. 506-510.Google Scholar
KHAN, A.G. (2002) Approach to breed replica of indigenous fowl for commercial meat market and egg production under family poultry raising. Proceeding of 7th Worlds Poultry Science Association Conference Gold Coast; Australia; pp. 413-17.Google Scholar
KHAN, A.G. (2003) Personnel communication from Kalyani-Farm, White house Goregaon, Mumbai.Google Scholar
KHAN, A.G. (2004) Attempts to breed chicken for Indian indigenous meat market. Proceedings of XXII Worlds Poultry Congress, Istanbul, June, 8-13; Turkey; pp.102.Google Scholar
KITAYLI, A.J. (1966) Socio economic aspects of village chicken production in Africa – The role of women, children and non-government organization. Proceeding of the XX World Poultry Congress New Delhi India. Vol. 1: pp. 35-45.Google Scholar
MACK, S., HOFFMAN, D. and OTTE, J. (2005) The contribution of poultry to rural development. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 7-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAPHOSA, T., KUSINA, J., KUSINA N.T., , MAKUZA, S.M. and SIBANA, S. (2002) Effect of housing on chick mortality in small holders area in Narira Lancashire Zimbabwe. Proceedings of the 7th Worlds Poultry Science Association Asian Pacific Federation Conference, Gold Coast, Australia; pp. 500-510.Google Scholar
MOHAPATRA, S.C. and PANDA, B. (1981) Poultry genetic resources in India, Indian Poultry Industry Year Book: pp. 50-58.Google Scholar
PANDA, B.K. (2001) The viable technology for sustainable village chicken production. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Appropriate Poultry for Adverse Environments, June, 11 : Hyderabad, India, pp. 80-83.Google Scholar
RIISE, J.C., PERMIN, A. and RYGER, K.N. (2005) Strategies for developing family poultry production at village level Experiences from West Africa and Asia. World's Poultry Science, Journal 61: 15-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROBERT, J.A. and GUNARATNE, S.P. (1992) The scavenging feed resource base for the village chicken in a developing country. Proceedings of XIX Worlds Poultry Congress, Amsterdam, Vol.1, pp. 822-825.Google Scholar
RAO, G.V. (1977) Documentation on maintenance and improvement of indigenous germ plasm. Published by Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, India.Google Scholar
SHELDON, B.L. (1998) Poultry and poultry products as resources for human health and food in 21st Century. Proceedings of the Worlds Poultry Science 6th Asian Pacific Poultry Congress, Nagoya, Japan, pp. 1-8.Google Scholar
SINGH, D.P. (2001) Aseel in India. Proceedings of a Seminar on Appropriate Poultry for Adverse Environments, Hyderabad; India: pp. 96-100.Google Scholar
SINGH, D.P. (2002) Utilization of Indian native chicken for development of egg type scavenger chicken. Proceedings of 2nd National Seminar on Rural Poultry Production, Bangalore, India; pp. 39-41.Google Scholar
SINGH, A.B., KHAN, A.G. and GEHALUT, B.S. (1980) The effect of reciprocal crosses between dwarf and normal parents upon the blood constituents of their progeny. British Poultry Science 21: 77-79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SONAIYA, E.B. (1996) Employment income generation & skill development through rural poultry development. Proceedings of the XX World Poultry Science Association Congress, New Delhi, India; Vol. 1: pp. 17-22.Google Scholar
SONAIYA, E.B. (2005) Direct assessment of nutrient resources in free range and scavenging system. World's Poultry Science Journal 60: 523-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPRADBROW, P.B. (2005) Appropriate vaccination and therapies for rural poultry flock in developing countries and their relevance to developed countries. World's Poultry Science Journal 61: 47-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar