Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:54:17.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of nutrition on welfare aspects of broiler breeder flocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2014

M.M. VAN KRIMPEN  and
I.C. DE JONG
M.M. VAN KRIMPEN*
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
I.C. DE JONG
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR Livestock Research, PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

To ensure health and reproductive performance, broiler breeders are feed restricted during the rearing period and, to a lesser extent, during the production period. Although restricted feeding improves health and bird welfare, on the other hand the birds are chronically hungry and suffer from frustration of feeding motivation, which has a negative effect on bird welfare. The aim of the current paper is to give an overview of the role of feed (nutritional aspects as well as feeding management) as a possible tool to improve broiler breeder welfare. Possible strategies discussed are 1) dietary dilution, by reducing the energy content and/or increasing the NSP content, by adding soluble or insoluble fibres to the diet; 2) adding appetite suppressants (e.g. calcium propionate) to the diet; 3) changing feeding management (e.g., scattering feed in the litter). Some of these strategies, i.e. dietary dilution or adding appetite suppressants, positively affect behavioural patterns of the birds, by reducing stereotypic pecking and eating motivation, and increasing the time spent sitting. Appetite suppressants have however been criticised for causing birds to feel ill. These behavioural changes, however, can only be considered as indirect parameters of improved bird welfare and there is still a need for a reliable indicator of hunger. It is clear that nutritional strategies can be helpful in reducing hunger stress in broiler breeders. Nutrition, however, cannot fully solve the broiler breeder paradox. The main reason for this paradox is related to breeding goals that are focussed on improving feed conversion and increasing breast meat percentage. Future genetic selection should aim at uncoupling the link between (re)production and welfare or reducing the conflict between these outcomes.

Keywords

broiler breederfeed restrictiondietary dilutionsatietywelfare
Type
Review Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 139 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AERNI, V., EL-LETHEY, H. and WECHSLER, B. (2000) Effect of foraging material and food form on feather pecking in laying hens. British Poultry Science 41: 16-21.Google Scholar
BOKKERS, E.A.M. and KOENE, P. (2003) Eating behaviour, and preprandial and postprandial correlations in male broiler and layer chickens. British Poultry Science 44: 538-544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BOORMAN, K.N. and FREEMAN, B.M. (1979) Food intake regulation in poultry. Poultry Science Symposium No. 14, British Poultry Science Ltd, Edinburgh, UK, pp. 1-469.Google Scholar
BRUGGEMAN, V., ONAGBESAN, O., D'HONDT, E., BUYS, N., SAFI, M., VANMONTFORT, D., BERGHMAN, L., VANDESANDE, F. and DECUYPERE, E. (1999) Effects of timing and duration of feed restriction during rearing on reproductive characteristics in broiler breeder females. Poultry Science 78: 1424-1434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BRUGGEMAN, V., ONAGBESAN, O., VANMONTFORT, D., BERGHMAN, L., VERHOEVEN, G. and DECUYPERE, E. (1998) Effect of long-term food restriction on pituitary sensitivity to cLHRH-I in broiler breeder females. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 114: 267-276.Google Scholar
BUCKLEY, L.A., MCMILLAN, L.M., SANDILANDS, V., TOLKAMP, B.J., HOCKING, P.M. and D'EATH, R.B. (2011a) Too hungry to learn? Hungry broiler breeders fail to learn a Y-maze food quantity discrimination task. Animal Welfare 20: 469-481.Google Scholar
BUCKLEY, L.A., SANDILANDS, V., TOLKAMP, B.J. and D'EATH, R.B. (2011b) Quantifying hungry broiler breeder dietary preferences using a closed economy T-maze task. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 133: 216-227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURKHART, C.A., CHERRY, J.A., VANKREY, H.P. and SIEGEL, P.B. (1983) Genetic selection for growth-rate alters hypothalamic satiety mechanisms in chickens. Behavior Genetics 13: 295-300.Google Scholar
CUCHE, G., CUBER, J.C. and MALBERT, C.H. (2000) Ileal short-chain fatty acids inhibit gastric motility by a humoral pathway. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 279: G925-G930.Google Scholar
CUCHE, G. and MALBERT, C.H. (1999) Short-chain fatty acids present in the ileum inhibit fasting gastrointestinal motility in conscious pigs. Neurogastroenterology and Motility 11: 219-225.Google Scholar
D'EATH, R.B., TOLKAMP, B.J., KYRIAZAKIS, I. and LAWRENCE, A.B. (2009) 'Freedom from hunger' and preventing obesity: the animal welfare implications of reducing food quantity or quality. Animal Behaviour 77: 275-288.Google Scholar
DAWKINS, M.S. (1989) Time budgets in red junglefowl as a baseline for the assessment of welfare in domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 24: 77-80.Google Scholar
DAWKINS, M.S. and LAYTON, R. (2012) Breeding for better welfare: genetic goals for broiler chickens and their parents. Animal Welfare 21: 147-155.Google Scholar
DE JONG, I.C., ENTING, H., VAN VOORST, S., RUESINK, E.W. and BLOKHUIS, H.J. (2005a) Do Low Density Diets Improve Broiler Breeder Welfare During Rearing and Laying? Poultry Science 84: 194-203.Google Scholar
DE JONG, I.C., FILLERUP, M. and BLOKHUIS, H.J. (2005b) Effect of scattered feeding and feeding twice a day during rearing on parameters of hunger and frustration in broiler breeders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92: 61-76.Google Scholar
DE JONG, I.C. and GUEMENE, D. (2011) Major welfare issues in broiler breeders. World's Poultry Science Journal 67: 73-81.Google Scholar
DE JONG, I.C. and JONES, B. (2006) Feed restriction and welfare in domestic birds, in: BELS, V. (Ed.) Feeding in domestic vertebrates, pp. 120-135 (Wallingford, UK, CABI).Google Scholar
DE JONG, I.C., VAN VOORST, S. and BLOKHUIS, H.J. (2003) Parameters for quantification of hunger in broiler breeders. Physiology and Behavior 78: 773-783.Google Scholar
DE JONG, I.C., VAN VOORST, S., EHLHARDT, D.A. and BLOKHUIS, H.J. (2002) Effects of restricted feeding on physiological stress parameters in growing broiler breeders. British Poultry Science 43: 157-168.Google Scholar
DECUYPERE, E., ONAGBESAN, O., SWENNEN, Q., BUYSE, J. and BRUGGEMAN, V. (2007) The endocrine and metabolic interface of genotype-nutrition interactions in broilers and broiler breeders. World's Poultry Science Journal 63: 115-128.Google Scholar
DENBOW, D.M. (1999) Food intake regulation in birds. Journal of Experimental Zoology 283: 333-338.Google Scholar
EDWARDS, G.L., LADENHEIM, E.E. and RITTER, R.C. (1986) Dorsomedial Hindbrain Participation in Cholecystokinin-Induced Satiety. American Journal of Physiology 251: R971-R977.Google Scholar
EFSA (2010) Scientific opinion on the influence of genetic parameters on the welfare and the resistance to stress of commercial broilers. EFSA Journal 8: 1666.Google Scholar
ENTING, H., BOERSMA, W.J.A., CORNELISSEN, J., VAN WINDEN, S.C.L., VERSTEGEN, M.W.A. and VAN DER AAR, P.J. (2007a) The effect of low-density broiler breeder diets on performance and immune status of their offspring. Poultry Science 86: 282-290.Google Scholar
ENTING, H., KRUIP, T.A.M., VERSTEGEN, M.W.A. and VAN DER AAR, P.J. (2007b) The effect of low-density diets on broiler breeder performance during the laying period and on embryonic development of their offspring. Poultry Science 86: 850-856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ENTING, H., VELDMAN, A., VERSTEGEN, M.W.A. and VAN DER AAR, P.J. (2007c) The effect of low-density diets on broiler breeder development and nutrient digestibility during the rearing period. Poultry Science 86: 720-726.Google Scholar
FORBES, J.M. (1988) Metabolic aspects of the regulation of voluntary food intake and appetite. Nutrition Research Reviews 1: 145-168.Google Scholar
FORBES, J.M. (1995) Voluntary Food Intake and Diet Selection in Farm Animals. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.Google Scholar
FORBES, J.M. (1999) Natural feeding behaviour and feed selection. Proceedings of the 5th Zodiac Symposium, Wageningen, Netherlands, 22-24 April 1998, in Regulation of feed intake (p3-12), pp.Google Scholar
FORBES, J.M. and BARRIO, J.P. (1992) Abdominal Chemosensitivity and Mechanosensitivity in Ruminants and Its Role in the Control of Food-Intake. Experimental Physiology 77: 27-50.Google Scholar
GREENBERG, D., TORRES, N.I., SMITH, G.P. and GIBBS, J. (1989) The satiating effect of fats is attenuated by the cholecystokinin antagonist Lorglumide, in: SCHNEIDER, L.H. et al. (Eds.) Psychobiology of Human Eating Disorders - Preclinical and Clinical Perspectives, 575, pp. 517-520. (New York, New York Acad. Sciences).Google Scholar
GROFF, J.L. and GROPPER, S.S. (1999) Advanced nutrition and human metabolism. Wadsworth Pub Co, Stamford.Google Scholar
HAVENSTEIN, G.B., FERKET, P.R. and QURESHI, M.A. (2003a) Carcass composition and yield of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poultry Science 82: 1509-1518.Google Scholar
HAVENSTEIN, G.B., FERKET, P.R. and QURESHI, M.A. (2003b) Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poultry Science 82: 1500-1508.Google Scholar
HECK, A., ONAGBESAN, O., TONA, K., METAYER, S., PUTTERFLAM, J., JEGO, Y., TREVIDY, J. J., DECUYPERE, E., WILLIAMS, J., PICARD, M. and BRUGGEMAN, V. (2004) Effects of ad libitum feeding on performance of different strains of broiler breeders. British Poultry Science 45: 695-703.Google Scholar
HETLAND, H. and CHOCT, M. (2003) Role of insoluble non-starch polysaccharides in poultry nutrition. Proceedings of the 14th European Symposium of Poultry Nutrition, Lillehammer, Norway, pp. 64-69Google Scholar
HETLAND, H., CHOCT, M. and SVIHUS, B. (2004) Role of insoluble non-starch polysaccharides in poultry nutrition. World's Poultry Science Journal 60: 415-422.Google Scholar
HOCKING, P.M. (1993) Effects of body weight at sexual maturity and the degree and age of restriction during rearing on the ovarian follicular hierarchy of broiler breeder females. British Poultry Science 34: 793-801.Google Scholar
HOCKING, P.M. (2006) High-fibre pelleted rations decrease water intake but do not improve physiological indexes of welfare in food-restricted female broiler breeders. British Poultry Science 47: 19-23.Google Scholar
HOCKING, P.M. (2009) Feed Restriction, in: HOCKING, P.M. (Ed.) Biology of Breeding Poultry 29, pp. 307-330 (Wallingford, Cabi Publishing-CAB Int).Google Scholar
HOCKING, P.M. and BERNARD, R. (1993) Evaluation of putative appetite suppressants in the domestic fowl. British Poultry Science 34: 393-404.Google Scholar
HOCKING, P.M. and JONES, E.K.M. (2006) On-farm assessment of environmental enrichment for broiler breeders. British Poultry Science 47: 418-425.Google Scholar
HOCKING, P.M., MAXWELL, M.H. and MITCHELL, M.A. (1993) Welfare assessment of broiler breeder and layer females subjected to food restriction and limited access to water during rearing. British Poultry Science 34: 443-458.Google Scholar
HOCKING, P.M., MAXWELL, M.H. and MITCHELL, M.A. (1996) Relationships between the degree of food restriction and welfare indices in broiler breeder females. British Poultry Science 37: 263-278.Google Scholar
HOCKING, P.M., MAXWELL, M.H. and MITCHELL, M.A. (1999) Welfare of food restricted male and female turkeys. British Poultry Science 40: 19-29.Google Scholar
HOCKING, P.M., MAXWELL, M.H., ROBERTSON, G.W. and MITCHELL, M.A. (2002) Welfare assessment of broiler breeders that are food restricted after peak of lay. British Poultry Science 43: 5-15.Google Scholar
HOCKING, P.M., WADDINGTON, D., WALKER, M.A. and GILBERT, A.B. (1989) Control of the development of the ovarian follicular hierarchy in broiler breeder pullets by food restriction during rearing. British Poultry Science 30: 161-174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HOCKING, P.M., ZACZEK, V., JONES, E.K.M. and MACLEOD, M.G. (2004) Different concentrations and sources of dietary fibre may improve the welfare of female broiler breeders. British Poultry Science 45: 9-19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
JONES, E.K.M., ZACZEK, V., MCLEOD, M. and HOCKING, P.M. (2004) Genotype, dietary manipulation and food allocation affect indices of welfare in broiler breeders. British Poultry Science 45: 725-737.Google Scholar
KATANBAF, M.N., DUNNINGTON, E.A. and SIEGEL, P.B. (1989) Restricted feeding in early and late-feathering chickens. I. Growth and physiological responses. Poultry Science 68: 344-351.Google Scholar
KOSTAL, L., SAVORY, C.J. and HUGHES, B.O. (1992) Diurnal and individual variation in behaviour of restricted-fed broiler breeders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 361-374.Google Scholar
KUENZEL, W.J. (1994) Central neuroanatomical systems involved in the regulation of food-intake in birds and mammals. Journal of Nutrition 124: S1355-S1370.Google Scholar
MATEOS, G.G., JIMÉNEZ-MORENO, E., SERRANO, M.P. and LÁZARO, R.P. (2012) Poultry response to high levels of dietary fiber sources varying in physical and chemical characteristics. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 21: 156-174.Google Scholar
MAXWELL, M.H. (1993) Avian blood leucocyte responses to stress. World's Poultry Science Journal 49: 34-43.Google Scholar
MEI, N. (1985) Intestinal Chemosensitivity. Physiological Reviews 65: 211-237.Google Scholar
MENCH, J.A. (2002) Broiler breeders: feed restriction and welfare. World's Poultry Science Journal 58: 23-30.Google Scholar
MORLEY, J.E. and BLUNDELL, J.E. (1988) The neurobiological basis of eating disorders: Some formulations. Biological Psychiatry 23: 53-78.Google Scholar
NIELSEN, B.L., THODBERG, K., MALMKVIST, J. and STEENFELDT, S. (2011) Proportion of insoluble fibre in the diet affects behaviour and hunger in broiler breeders growing at similar rates. Animal 5: 1247-1258.Google Scholar
RENEMA, R.A., RUSTAD, M.E. and ROBINSON, F.E. (2007) Implications of changes to commercial broiler and broiler breeder body weight targets over the past 30 years. World's Poultry Science Journal 63: 457-472.Google Scholar
RICHARDS, M.P. (2003) Genetic regulation of feed intake and energy balance in poultry. Poultry Science 82: 907-916.Google Scholar
ROBINSON, F.E., ROBINSON, N.A. and SCOTT, T.A. (1991) Reproductive performance, growth rate and body composition of full fed versus feed restricted broiler breeder hens. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 71: 549-556.Google Scholar
SANDILANDS, V., TOLKAMP, B.J. and KYRIAZAKIS, I. (2005) Behaviour of food restricted broilers during rearing and lay - effects of an alternative feeding method. Physiology & Behavior 85: 115-123.Google Scholar
SANDILANDS, V., TOLKAMP, B.J., SAVORY, C.J. and KYRIAZAKIS, I. (2006) Behaviour and welfare of broiler breeders fed qualitatively restricted diets during rearing: are there viable alternatives to quantitative restriction? Applied Animal Behaviour Science 96: 53-67.Google Scholar
SAVORY, C.J., DUKE, G.E. and BERTOY, R.W. (1981) Influence of intravenous injections of cholecystokinin on gastrointestinal motility in turkeys and domestic-fowls. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology a-Physiology 70: 179-189.Google Scholar
SAVORY, C.J., HOCKING, P.M., MANN, J.S. and MAXWELL, M.H. (1996) Is broiler breeder welfare improved by using qualitative rather than quantitative food restriction to limit growth rate? Animal Welfare 5: 105-127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAVORY, C.J. and KOSTAL, L. (1996) Temporal patterning of oral stereotypies in restricted-fed fowls: 1. investigations with a single daily meal. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 9: 117-139.Google Scholar
SAVORY, C.J. and LARIVIERE, J.-M. (2000) Effects of qualitative and quantitative food restriction treatments on feeding motivational state and general activity level of growing broiler breeders. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69: 135-147.Google Scholar
SAVORY, C.J. and MANN, J.S. (1997) Is there a role for corticosterone in expression of abnormal behaviour in restricted-fed fowls? Physiology & Behavior 62: 7-13.Google Scholar
SAVORY, C.J. and MAROS, K. (1993) Influence of degree of food restriction, age and time of day on behaviour of broiler breeder chickens. Behavioural Processes 29: 179-190.Google Scholar
SAVORY, C.J., MAROS, K. and RUTTER, S.M. (1993) Assessment of hunger in growing broiler breeders in relation to a commercial restricted feeding programme. Animal Welfare 2: 131-152.Google Scholar
SIEGEL, P.B. and DUNNINGTON, E.A. (1985) Reproductive complications associated with selection for broiler growth, in: HILL, W.G., MANSON, J.M. & HEWITT, D. (Eds) Poultry Genetics and Breeding, pp. 59-72 (British Poultry Science, Harlow, UK).Google Scholar
SKINNER-NOBLE, D.O. and R.G.T. (2009) Feed restriction for broiler breeder pullets, Comparison of well being consequences of three feed restriction programs for broiler breeder pullets. Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA, 27 pp.Google Scholar
SMITS, C.H.M., VELDMAN, A., VERSTEGEN, M.W.A. and BEYNEN, A.C. (1997) Dietary carboxymethylcellulose with high instead of low viscosity reduces macronutrient digestion in broiler chickens. Journal of Nutrition 127: 483-487.Google Scholar
TOLKAMP, B.J., SANDILANDS, V. and KYRIAZAKIS, I. (2005) Effects of qualitative feed restriction during rearing on the performance of broiler breeders during rearing and lay. Poultry Science 84: 1286-1293.Google Scholar
VAN DER KLIS, J.D., VAN VOORST, A. and VAN CRUYNINGEN, C. (1993) Effect of a soluble polysaccharide (Carboxy Methyl Cellulose) on the physicochemical conditions in the gastrointestinal-tract of broilers. British Poultry Science 34: 971-983.Google Scholar
VAN HIERDEN, Y.M., KOOLHAAS, J.M., DE BOER, S.F. and KORTE, S.M. (2004a) The control of feather pecking by serotonin. Behavioral Neuroscience 118: 575-583.Google Scholar
VAN HIERDEN, Y.M., KOOLHAAS, J.M., KOŠT’ÁL, P., VÝBOH, P., SEDLACKOVÁ, M., RAJMAN, M., JURÁNI, M. and KORTE, S.M. (2005) Chicks from a high and low feather pecking line of laying hens differ in apomorphine sensitivity. Physiology and Behavior 84: 471-477.Google Scholar
VAN HIERDEN, Y.M., KORTE, S.M. and KOOLHAAS, J.M. (2004b) Chronic increase of dietary L-Tryptophan decreases gentle feather pecking behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 89: 74-84.Google Scholar
VAN HIERDEN, Y.M., KORTE, S.M., RUESINK, E.W., VAN REENEN, C.G., ENGEL, B., KORTE-BOUWS, G.A.H., KOOLHAAS, J.M. and BLOKHUIS, H.J. (2002) Adrenocortical reactivity and central serotonin and dopamine turnover in young chicks from a high and low feather pecking line of laying hens. Physiology and Behavior 75: 653-659.Google Scholar
VAN KRIMPEN, M.M. (2008) Impact of nutritional factors on eating behaviour and feather damage of laying hens. Thesis Department Animal Nutrition, Wageningen University Wageningen.Google Scholar
VAN KRIMPEN, M.M., KWAKKEL, R.P., VAN DER PEET-SCHWERING, C.M.C., DEN HARTOG, L.A. and VERSTEGEN, M.W.A. (2011) Effects of dietary energy concentration, nonstarch polysaccharide concentration and particle sizes of nonstarch polysaccharides on digesta mean retention time and gut development in laying hens. British Poultry Science 52: 730-741.Google Scholar
WILSON, H.R. and HARMS, R.H. (1986) Performance of broiler breeders as affected by body weight during the breeding season. Poultry Science 65: 1052-1057.Google Scholar
YU, M.W., ROBINSON, F.E. and ROBBLEE, A.R. (1992) Effect of feed allowance during rearing and breeding on female broiler breeders 1. Growth and carcass characteristics. Poultry Science 71: 1739-1749.Google Scholar
ZUIDHOF, M.J., ROBINSON, F.E., FEDDES, J.J.R., HARDIN, R.T., WILSON, J.L., MCKAY, R.I. and NEWCOMBE, M. (1995) The effects of nutrient dilution on the well-being and performance of female broiler breeders. Poultry Science 74: 441-456.Google Scholar