Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:09:11.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developments in turkey meat harvesting technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2015

S. BARBUT*
Affiliation:
Food Science, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road, Guelph, Ontario N1G2W1, Canada
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Over the past half century the turkey industry has seen significant changes in the methods used to harvest meat. Some of the major changes include an increase of over three fold in line speed (new plants are designed to process up to 3,600 bph) and processing larger birds; both resulted in a six fold rise in kg processed per hour. The industry has also seen a large increase in the proportion of cut up and deboned meat (i.e. helped year round sales), as well as substantial improvements in sanitation. These advancements have been possible due to knowledge gained in areas such as genetics, muscle biology (post mortem processes), live bird handling (transportation, unloading, stunning), heat and mass transfer (scalding, chilling) and computer science (e.g. image analysis, in-line weighing and tracking). This review includes a general summary of the steps involved in primary turkey processing and focuses on several principles that have been used to achieve greater efficiencies in mechanising the process. The main focus areas include automating unloading, stunning, chilling and mechanical filleting. These topics are also used to demonstrate the importance of moving from a batch operation to a continuous line where speed, efficiency and traceability could be improved by mechanisation. Overall, integrating and automating the whole process is a challenge that must be met by both the processing plant personnel and equipment manufacturer who should understand the whole farm to fork approach.

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © World's Poultry Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABEYESINGHE, S.M., BEMMEL, H., KRANEN, R.W., WATHES, C.M., LANKHAAR, J.A.C., WHITE, R.P., MCLEMAN, M.A., MCKEEGAN, D.E.F., DEMMERS, T.G.M. and LOWE, J.C. (2007) Controlled atmosphere stunning of broiler chickens. I. Effects on behavior, physiology and meat quality in a pilot scale system at a processing plant. British Poultry Science 48: 406-423.Google Scholar
ALLEN, V.M., CORRY, J.E.L., BURTON, C.H., WHYTE, R.T. and MEAD, G.C. (2000) Hygienic aspects of modern poultry chilling. International Journal of Food Microbiology 58: 39-48.Google Scholar
ANONYMOUS (2011) Executive guide to poultry meat trends. http://www.wattagnet.com/2011. Accessed March 2012.Google Scholar
BARBUT, S. (2002) Post Mortem Changes. In: Poultry Products Processing – An Industry Guide, pp. 55-60 (CRC Press, New York, NY).Google Scholar
BARBUT, S. (2010) Past and future of poultry meat harvesting. World's Poultry Science Journal 66: 399-410.Google Scholar
BARBUT, S., SOSNICKI, A.A., LONERGAN, S.M., KNAPP, T., CIOBANU, D.C., GATCLIFFE, L.J., HUFF-LONERGAN, E. and WILSON, E.W. (2008) Progress in reducing the pale, soft and exudative (PSE) problem in pork and poultry meat. Meat Science 79: 46-63.Google Scholar
CASE, L.A., MILLER, S.P. and WOOD, B.J. (2010) Factors affecting breast meat yield in turkeys. World's Poultry Science Journal 66: 189-201.Google Scholar
COENEN, A.M.L., LANKHAAR, J., LOWE, J.C. and MCKEEGAN, D.E.F. (2009) . Remote monitoring of electroencephalogram, electrocardiogram, and behavior during controlled atmosphere stunning in broilers: Implications for welfare. Poultry Science 88: 10-19.Google Scholar
DEFRA (2012) Turkey leads increase in UK poultry meat output. http://www.thepoultrysite.com/poultrynews/25112/turkey-leads-increase-in-uk-poultry-meat-output. Accessed March 2012.Google Scholar
EU (2009) European Union: Council regulation No 1099/2009 Protection of animals at the time of killing. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:303:0001:0030:EN:PDF. Accessed April 2012.Google Scholar
HUEZO, R., NORTHCUTT, J.K., SMITH, D.P., FLETCHER, D.L. and INGRAM, K.D. (2007) Effect of dry air or immersion chilling on recovery of bacteria from broiler carcasses. Journal of Food Protection 70: 1829-1834.Google Scholar
WILKINS, L.J. and WOTTON, S.B. (2002) Effect of frequency of the stunning current waveform on carcass and meat quality of turkeys processed in a commercial plant in the UK. British Poultry Science 43: 231-237.Google Scholar